Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


Pulsus paradoxus in pericardial disease

INTRODUCTION

Systemic arterial pressure normally falls by less than 10 mmHg during inspiration, but this decline is not palpable at the peripheral pulse. Moderate to severe cardiac tamponade, and occasionally constrictive pericarditis, induce hemodynamic changes that enhance the inspiratory fall in systolic blood pressure. This exaggerated drop in systemic blood pressure during inspiration is termed pulsus paradoxus (waveform 1 and waveform 2).

Although Kussmaul named this phenomenon pulsus paradoxus, the paradox to which he referred was that the pulse palpated on examination is of variable strength, while precordial activity is regular [1]. The name is somewhat misleading, since the direction of change is the same as in normal subjects and is therefore not paradoxical.

Pulsus paradoxus will be discussed here, including its proper measurement, pathophysiology, and clinical conditions in which it may be present. Specific clinical conditions in which pulsus paradoxus may be present are discussed in greater detail separately. (See "Cardiac tamponade".)

MEASUREMENT OF PULSUS PARADOXUS

Severe pulsus paradoxus can be palpated in the radial, brachial, or femoral pulses as a weakening or disappearance of the pulse during inspiration (which is best observed by watching or palpating the rise and fall of the chest). However, in most patients pulsus paradoxus is most readily identified while measuring the blood pressure. It may be necessary to have the patient breathe slowly and deeply to elucidate this finding when pulsus paradoxus is not severe.

To measure pulsus paradoxus, a manually-operated sphygmomanometer is employed for blood pressure measurement in the standard fashion except that the cuff is deflated more slowly than usual. During deflation, the first Korotkoff sounds are audible only during expiration, but with further deflation, Korotkoff sounds are heard throughout the respiratory cycle. The difference between the systolic pressure at which the first Korotkoff sounds are heard during expiration and the pressure at which they are heard throughout the respiratory cycle quantifies pulsus paradoxus. Pulsus paradoxus can be more sensitively quantified by an invasive arterial measurement, and may also be observed by respirophasic variation of the pulse oximetry waveform (waveform 2).

      

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Oct 2014. | This topic last updated: Jul 14, 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Kussmaul A. Über schwielige Mediastino-Pericarditis und den paradoxen Puls. Berliner Klinische Wochenschrift 1878; 10:461.
  2. Spodick DH. Acute pericarditis: current concepts and practice. JAMA 2003; 289:1150.
  3. Roy CL, Minor MA, Brookhart MA, Choudhry NK. Does this patient with a pericardial effusion have cardiac tamponade? JAMA 2007; 297:1810.
  4. Curtiss EI, Reddy PS, Uretsky BF, Cecchetti AA. Pulsus paradoxus: definition and relation to the severity of cardiac tamponade. Am Heart J 1988; 115:391.
  5. Klopfenstein HS, Schuchard GH, Wann LS, et al. The relative merits of pulsus paradoxus and right ventricular diastolic collapse in the early detection of cardiac tamponade: an experimental echocardiographic study. Circulation 1985; 71:829.
  6. Shabetai R, Fowler NO, Fenton JC, Masangkay M. Pulsus paradoxus. J Clin Invest 1965; 44:1882.
  7. Reddy PS, Curtiss EI, O'Toole JD, Shaver JA. Cardiac tamponade: hemodynamic observations in man. Circulation 1978; 58:265.
  8. Santamore WP, Heckman JL, Bove AA. Right and left ventricular pressure-volume response to elevated pericardial pressure. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986; 134:101.
  9. Reddy PS, Curtiss EI, Uretsky BF. Spectrum of hemodynamic changes in cardiac tamponade. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66:1487.
  10. GOLINKO RJ, RUDOLPH AM. The mechanism of pulsus paradoxus during acute pericardial tamponade. J Clin Invest 1963; 42:249.
  11. McGregor M. Current concepts: pulsus paradoxus. N Engl J Med 1979; 301:480.
  12. Gollapudi RR, Yeager M, Johnson AD. Left ventricular cardiac tamponade in the setting of cor pulmonale and circumferential pericardial effusion. Case report and review of the literature. Cardiol Rev 2005; 13:214.
  13. Antman EM, Cargill V, Grossman W. Low-pressure cardiac tamponade. Ann Intern Med 1979; 91:403.
  14. Winer HE, Kronzon I. Absence of paradoxical pulse in patients with cardiac tamponade and atrial septal defects. Am J Cardiol 1979; 44:378.
  15. Settle HP Jr, Engel PJ, Fowler NO, et al. Echocardiographic study of the paradoxical arterial pulse in chronic obstructive lung disease. Circulation 1980; 62:1297.
  16. Shiomi T, Guilleminault C, Stoohs R, Schnittger I. Leftward shift of the interventricular septum and pulsus paradoxus in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Chest 1991; 100:894.
  17. Lee JC, Atwood JE, Lee HJ, et al. Association of pulsus paradoxus with obesity in normal volunteers. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:1907.
  18. Santamore WP, Bartlett R, Van Buren SJ, et al. Ventricular coupling in constrictive pericarditis. Circulation 1986; 74:597.
  19. Cohen SI, Kupersmith J, Aroesty J, Rowe JW. Pulsus paradoxus and Kussmaul's sign in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 1973; 32:271.
  20. Cohn JN, Pinkerson AL, Tristani FE. Mechanism of pulsus paradoxus in clinical shock. J Clin Invest 1967; 46:1744.
  21. Yalamanchili K, Summer W, Valentine V. Pectus excavatum with inspiratory inferior vena cava compression: a new presentation of pulsus paradoxus. Am J Med Sci 2005; 329:45.
  22. Swami A, Spodick DH. Pulsus paradoxus in cardiac tamponade: a pathophysiologic continuum. Clin Cardiol 2003; 26:215.
  23. Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Popp RL. Cardiac tamponade and pericardial effusion: respiratory variation in transvalvular flow velocities studied by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11:1020.