UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Medline ® Abstract for Reference 51

of 'Prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in adults'

51
TI
Combination antiemetic therapy with aprepitant/fosaprepitant in patients with colorectal cancer receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (SENRI trial): a multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial.
AU
Nishimura J, Satoh T, Fukunaga M, Takemoto H, Nakata K, Ide Y, Fukuzaki T, Kudo T, Miyake Y, Yasui M, Morita S, Sakai D, Uemura M, Hata T, Takemasa I, Mizushima T, Ohno Y, Yamamoto H, Sekimoto M, Nezu R, Doki Y, Mori M, Multi-center Clinical Study Group of Osaka, Colorectal Cancer Treatment Group (MCSGO)
SO
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jul;51(10):1274-82. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
 
INTRODUCTION: The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant is recommended in several guidelines for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea&vomiting (CINV) due to highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. Little is known about the feasibility and safety of aprepitant in patients treated with oxaliplatin.
METHODS: In this multicentre, open label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients with colorectal cancer who underwent an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients were centrally randomised in a 1:1 ratio to the control group (5-HT3-receptor antagonist+dexamethasone) or aprepitant group (5-HT3-receptor antagonist+dexamethasone+aprepitant or fosaprepitant) in the first course. All patients were treated with aprepitant/fosaprepitant therapy in the second course. The primary end-point was theproportion of patients with no emesis.
RESULTS: A total of 413 patients entered this clinical trial from 25 centres in Japan. Significantly more patients in the aprepitant group achieved no vomiting overall and delayed phase than those in the control group (95.7% versus 83.6%, and 95.7% versus 84.7%, respectively). The aprepitant group also had statistically significantly higher percentages of no significant nausea, complete response and complete protection than the control group overall. In the control group, the percentages of no vomiting were higher in the second cycle than in the first cycle. The incidence of vomiting occurred day 7 or later was significantly higher in the control group compared with the aprepitant group. Other adverse events were not significant between the groups.
CONCLUSION: The aprepitant therapy was more effective than the control therapy for prevention of CINV in colorectal cancer patients receiving an oxaliplatin-based regimen.
AD
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita, Osaka, Japan. Electronic address: jnishimura@gesurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
PMID