UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Medline ® Abstract for Reference 13

of 'Prevention and management of side effects in patients receiving opioids for chronic pain'

13
TI
Laxatives or methylnaltrexone for the management of constipation in palliative care patients.
AU
Candy B, Jones L, Goodman ML, Drake R, Tookman A
SO
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;
 
BACKGROUND: Constipation is common in palliative care; it can generate considerable suffering due to the unpleasant physical symptoms. In the first Cochrane Review on effectiveness of laxatives for the management of constipation in palliative care patients, published in 2006, no conclusions could be drawn because of the limited number of evaluations. This article describes the first update of this review.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of laxatives or methylnaltrexone for the management of constipation in palliative care patients.
SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched databases including MEDLINE and CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library) in 2005 and in the update to August 2010.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating laxatives for constipation in palliative care patients. In the update we also included RCTs on subcutaneous methylnaltrexone; an opioid-receptor antagonist that is nowlicensed for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in palliative care when response to usual laxative therapy is insufficient.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors assessed trial quality and extracted data. The appropriateness of combining data from the studies depended upon clinical and outcome measure homogeneity.
MAIN RESULTS: We included seven studies involving 616 participants; all under-reported methodological features. In four studies the laxatives lactulose, senna, co-danthramer, misrakasneham, and magnesium hydroxide with liquid paraffin were evaluated. In three methylnaltrexone.In studies comparing the different laxatives evidence was inconclusive. Evidence on subcutaneous methylnaltrexone was clearer; in combined analysis (287 participants) methylnaltrexone, in comparison with a placebo, significantly induced laxation at 4 hours (odds ratio 6.95; 95% confidence interval 3.83 to 12.61). In combined analyses there was no difference in the proportion experiencing side effects, although participants on methylnaltrexone suffered more flatulence and dizziness. No evidence of opioid withdrawal was found. In one study severe adverse events, commonly abdominal pain, were reported that were possibly related to methylnaltrexone. A serious adverse event considered to be related to the methylnaltrexone also occurred; this involved a participant having severe diarrhoea, subsequent dehydration and cardiovascular collapse.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The 2010 update found evidence on laxatives for management of constipation remains limited due to insufficient RCTs. However, the conclusions of this update have changed since the original review publication in that it now includes evidence on methylnaltrexone. Here it found that subcutaneous methylnaltrexone is effective in inducing laxation in palliative care patients with opioid-induced constipation and where conventional laxatives have failed. However, the safety of this product is not fully evaluated. Large, rigorous, independent trials are needed.
AD
Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Mental Health Sciences, Royal Free&University College Medical School, Hampstead Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, UK, NW3 2PF.
PMID