UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Prenatal screening and diagnosis for fragile X syndrome

Author
Louise Wilkins-Haug, MD, PhD
Section Editor
Helen V Firth, DM, FRCP, DCH
Deputy Editor
Vanessa A Barss, MD, FACOG

INTRODUCTION

Fragile X syndrome is an X-linked disorder and the most common inherited cause of intellectual disability [1]. Both males and females can be affected. This topic will discuss preconception/prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis for fragile X syndrome. The epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, and postnatal diagnosis of the disorder are reviewed separately. (See "Fragile X syndrome: Clinical features and diagnosis in children and adolescents".)

FRAGILE X MUTATION

Gene — The fragile X mental retardation 1 gene (FMR1) is located on the X chromosome at Xq27.3 and most commonly has about 30 cytosine-guanine-guanine (CGG) trinucleotide repeats; the normal range is about 5 to 44 CGG repeats. In the general population, this region is stable and passes from generation to generation without significant alteration.

Pathogenesis — Fragile X syndrome is primarily caused by expansion in the number of CGG repeats within the FMR1 gene; deletions or point mutations within FMR1 account for only 1 percent of cases [2]. Expansion of CGG repeats allows hypermethylation of FMR1, resulting in impaired transcription and reduced production of the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), which adversely impacts prenatal and postnatal brain development.

As repeat size increases, stability decreases, and further increases in the number of repeats in the FMR1 region become likely. The lower and upper boundaries of repeat length are variably defined, but generally described as:

Normal -- 5 to 44 CGG repeats

            

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2016. | This topic last updated: Tue Jan 26 00:00:00 GMT+00:00 2016.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Crawford DC, Acuña JM, Sherman SL. FMR1 and the fragile X syndrome: human genome epidemiology review. Genet Med 2001; 3:359.
  2. McConkie-Rosell A, Finucane B, Cronister A, et al. Genetic counseling for fragile x syndrome: updated recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors. J Genet Couns 2005; 14:249.
  3. Ennis S, Murray A, Youings S, et al. An investigation of FRAXA intermediate allele phenotype in a longitudinal sample. Ann Hum Genet 2006; 70:170.
  4. Cronister A, Teicher J, Rohlfs EM, et al. Prevalence and instability of fragile X alleles: implications for offering fragile X prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111:596.
  5. Nolin SL, Brown WT, Glicksman A, et al. Expansion of the fragile X CGG repeat in females with premutation or intermediate alleles. Am J Hum Genet 2003; 72:454.
  6. Nolin SL, Glicksman A, Ding X, et al. Fragile X analysis of 1112 prenatal samples from 1991 to 2010. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31:925.
  7. Zhong N, Ju W, Pietrofesa J, et al. Fragile X "gray zone" alleles: AGG patterns, expansion risks, and associated haplotypes. Am J Med Genet 1996; 64:261.
  8. Nolin SL, Glicksman A, Ersalesi N, et al. Fragile X full mutation expansions are inhibited by one or more AGG interruptions in premutation carriers. Genet Med 2015; 17:358.
  9. Nolin SL, Sah S, Glicksman A, et al. Fragile X AGG analysis provides new risk predictions for 45-69 repeat alleles. Am J Med Genet A 2013; 161A:771.
  10. Yrigollen CM, Durbin-Johnson B, Gane L, et al. AGG interruptions within the maternal FMR1 gene reduce the risk of offspring with fragile X syndrome. Genet Med 2012; 14:729.
  11. Tiberio G. MZ female twins discordant for X-linked diseases: a review. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1994; 43:207.
  12. Zeesman S, Zwaigenbaum L, Whelan DT, et al. Paternal transmission of fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 2004; 129A:184.
  13. Nolin SL, Lewis FA 3rd, Ye LL, et al. Familial transmission of the FMR1 CGG repeat. Am J Hum Genet 1996; 59:1252.
  14. Fisch GS, Snow K, Thibodeau SN, et al. The fragile X premutation in carriers and its effect on mutation size in offspring. Am J Hum Genet 1995; 56:1147.
  15. Sherman S, Pletcher BA, Driscoll DA. Fragile X syndrome: diagnostic and carrier testing. Genet Med 2005; 7:584.
  16. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 469: Carrier screening for fragile X syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:1008.
  17. Berkenstadt M, Ries-Levavi L, Cuckle H, et al. Preconceptional and prenatal screening for fragile X syndrome: experience with 40,000 tests. Prenat Diagn 2007; 27:991.
  18. Musci TJ, Caughey AB. Cost-effectiveness analysis of prenatal population-based fragile X carrier screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192:1905.
  19. Fernandez-Carvajal I, Lopez Posadas B, Pan R, et al. Expansion of an FMR1 grey-zone allele to a full mutation in two generations. J Mol Diagn 2009; 11:306.
  20. Kieffer E, Nicod JC, Gardes N, et al. Improving preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Fragile X syndrome: two new powerful single-round multiplex indirect and direct tests. Eur J Hum Genet 2016; 24:221.
  21. Platteau P, Sermon K, Seneca S, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for fragile Xa syndrome: difficult but not impossible. Hum Reprod 2002; 17:2807.
  22. Tsafrir A, Altarescu G, Margalioth E, et al. PGD for fragile X syndrome: ovarian function is the main determinant of success. Hum Reprod 2010; 25:2629.