Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


Postoperative ileus

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative paralytic ileus refers to obstipation and intolerance of oral intake due to nonmechanical factors that disrupt the normal coordinated propulsive motor activity of the gastrointestinal tract following abdominal or nonabdominal surgery [1-3]. There is general consensus that some degree of postoperative ileus is a normal obligatory and physiologic response to abdominal surgery [4,5]. Physiologic postoperative ileus is generally a benign condition that resolves without serious sequelae. However, when ileus is prolonged, it leads to patient discomfort, dissatisfaction, and prolonged hospitalization, and must be differentiated from mechanical bowel obstruction or other postoperative complications.

The epidemiology, clinical features, and diagnosis of postoperative ileus are reviewed here.   (See "Measures to prevent prolonged postoperative ileus".)

PHYSIOLOGIC VERSUS PATHOLOGIC POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS

Postoperative ileus refers to obstipation and intolerance of oral intake due to factors that disrupt the normal coordinated propulsive motor activity of the gastrointestinal tract [1,2,4]. The nature of the surgery, intraoperative complications, and medical comorbidities need to be taken into consideration when distinguishing physiologic from pathologic causes of postoperative ileus. Some degree of postoperative ileus is a normal obligatory and physiologic response to abdominal surgery. The physiologic postoperative ileus that typically follows surgery has a benign and self-limited course. However, when ileus is prolonged, it leads to patient discomfort and dissatisfaction, and must be differentiated from other potential complications. However, a lack of consensus on what constitutes a normal physiologic response has hindered the development of a meaningful clinical definition of prolonged (or pathologic) postoperative ileus.  

"Normal" physiologic postoperative ileus due to postoperative gut dysmotility is widely reported as lasting 0 to 24 hours in the small intestine, 24 to 48 hours in the stomach, and 48 to 72 hours in the colon [2,6-9]. However, this belief has been challenged; the duration of postoperative gastrointestinal dysmotility appears to be shorter than previously thought. Generally, gastric and small intestinal activity appear to return within hours of surgery, and colonic activity returns by postoperative day two or three [5,10-16]. When the expected period of time extends beyond what is acceptable, the patient is diagnosed as having postoperative ileus, provided there are no signs of mechanical intestinal obstruction (see 'Diagnosis' below).  

A wide variety of endpoints have been used to measure gut recovery with no consensus as to which one is most clinically meaningful. In randomized trials of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, time to recovery of gastrointestinal function has been assessed as time to first solid food, and time to either bowel movement or flatus, whichever occurs later [17-19]. Systematic reviews note that when a definition of postoperative ileus is stated, the timeframe is not given or is inconsistent between studies [18,19]. Definitions have included:

                       

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Jul 2014. | This topic last updated: Apr 23, 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL. Textbook of Surgery. The biological basis of modern surgical practice, 17th ed, Elsevier Saunders, 2004.
  2. Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 8th ed, Brunicardi FC (Ed), McGraw Hill, 2005.
  3. Bederman SS, Betsy M, Winiarsky R, et al. Postoperative ileus in the lower extremity arthroplasty patient. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16:1066.
  4. Miedema BW, Johnson JO. Methods for decreasing postoperative gut dysmotility. Lancet Oncol 2003; 4:365.
  5. Wilson JP. Postoperative motility of the large intestine in man. Gut 1975; 16:689.
  6. Resnick J, Greenwald DA, Brandt LJ. Delayed gastric emptying and postoperative ileus after nongastric abdominal surgery: part I. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92:751.
  7. Resnick J, Greenwald DA, Brandt LJ. Delayed gastric emptying and postoperative ileus after nongastric abdominal surgery: part II.AmJ Gastroenterol 1997;92:934
  8. Holte K, Kehlet H. Postoperative ileus: a preventable event. Br J Surg 2000; 87:1480.
  9. Livingston EH, Passaro EP Jr. Postoperative ileus. Dig Dis Sci 1990; 35:121.
  10. Waldhausen JH, Schirmer BD. The effect of ambulation on recovery from postoperative ileus. Ann Surg 1990; 212:671.
  11. Clevers GJ, Smout AJ, van der Schee EJ, Akkermans LM. Myo-electrical and motor activity of the stomach in the first days after abdominal surgery: evaluation by electrogastrography and impedance gastrography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1991; 6:253.
  12. Böhm B, Milsom JW, Fazio VW. Postoperative intestinal motility following conventional and laparoscopic intestinal surgery. Arch Surg 1995; 130:415.
  13. Waldhausen JH, Shaffrey ME, Skenderis BS 2nd, et al. Gastrointestinal myoelectric and clinical patterns of recovery after laparotomy. Ann Surg 1990; 211:777.
  14. Condon RE, Frantzides CT, Cowles VE, et al. Resolution of postoperative ileus in humans. Ann Surg 1986; 203:574.
  15. Graber JN, Schulte WJ, Condon RE, Cowles VE. Relationship of duration of postoperative ileus to extent and site of operative dissection. Surgery 1982; 92:87.
  16. Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Viscusi ER, et al. Postoperative upper and lower gastrointestinal recovery and gastrointestinal morbidity in patients undergoing bowel resection: pooled analysis of placebo data from 3 randomized controlled trials. Am J Surg 2006; 191:315.
  17. Wolff BG, Michelassi F, Gerkin TM, et al. Alvimopan, a novel, peripherally acting mu opioid antagonist: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of major abdominal surgery and postoperative ileus. Ann Surg 2004; 240:728.
  18. Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, Sawyers JL. A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg 1995; 221:469.
  19. Ramirez JA, McIntosh AG, Strehlow R, et al. Definition, incidence, risk factors, and prevention of paralytic ileus following radical cystectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2013; 64:588.
  20. Wolff BG, Viscusi ER, Delaney CP, et al. Patterns of gastrointestinal recovery after bowel resection and total abdominal hysterectomy: pooled results from the placebo arms of alvimopan phase III North American clinical trials. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 205:43.
  21. Boeckxstaens GE, de Jonge WJ. Neuroimmune mechanisms in postoperative ileus. Gut 2009; 58:1300.
  22. Andrews JM, Dent J. Small intestinal motor physiology. In: Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. Pathophysiology/Diagnosis/Management, Saunders, Philadelphia 2002. Vol 2.
  23. Heuman DM, Mills AS, McGuire HH. Saunders text and review series: Gastroenterology, WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia 1997.
  24. Waxman SG. Clinical Neuroanatomy, 25th ed, McGraw-Hill, 2003.
  25. Kalff JC, Schraut WH, Simmons RL, Bauer AJ. Surgical manipulation of the gut elicits an intestinal muscularis inflammatory response resulting in postsurgical ileus. Ann Surg 1998; 228:652.
  26. Türler A, Moore BA, Pezzone MA, et al. Colonic postoperative inflammatory ileus in the rat. Ann Surg 2002; 236:56.
  27. Schwarz NT, Kalff JC, Türler A, et al. Selective jejunal manipulation causes postoperative pan-enteric inflammation and dysmotility. Gastroenterology 2004; 126:159.
  28. de Jonge WJ, van den Wijngaard RM, The FO, et al. Postoperative ileus is maintained by intestinal immune infiltrates that activate inhibitory neural pathways in mice. Gastroenterology 2003; 125:1137.
  29. Wehner S, Behrendt FF, Lyutenski BN, et al. Inhibition of macrophage function prevents intestinal inflammation and postoperative ileus in rodents. Gut 2007; 56:176.
  30. Wehner S, Vilz TO, Sommer N, et al. The novel orally active guanylhydrazone CPSI-2364 prevents postoperative ileus in mice independently of anti-inflammatory vagus nerve signaling. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2012; 397:1139.
  31. Wehner S, Straesser S, Vilz TO, et al. Inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway as prophylaxis of postoperative ileus in mice. Gastroenterology 2009; 136:619.
  32. Schwarz NT, Kalff JC, Türler A, et al. Prostanoid production via COX-2 as a causative mechanism of rodent postoperative ileus. Gastroenterology 2001; 121:1354.
  33. de Jonge WJ, The FO, van der Coelen D, et al. Mast cell degranulation during abdominal surgery initiates postoperative ileus in mice. Gastroenterology 2004; 127:535.
  34. Gomez-Pinilla PJ, Farro G, Di Giovangiulio M, et al. Mast cells play no role in the pathogenesis of postoperative ileus induced by intestinal manipulation. PLoS One 2014; 9:e85304.
  35. Barquist E, Bonaz B, Martinez V, et al. Neuronal pathways involved in abdominal surgery-induced gastric ileus in rats. Am J Physiol 1996; 270:R888.
  36. Zittel TT, Lloyd KC, Rothenhöfer I, et al. Calcitonin gene-related peptide and spinal afferents partly mediate postoperative colonic ileus in the rat. Surgery 1998; 123:518.
  37. Jørgensen H, Wetterslev J, Møiniche S, Dahl JB. Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; :CD001893.
  38. Kalff JC, Schraut WH, Billiar TR, et al. Role of inducible nitric oxide synthase in postoperative intestinal smooth muscle dysfunction in rodents. Gastroenterology 2000; 118:316.
  39. Espat NJ, Cheng G, Kelley MC, et al. Vasoactive intestinal peptide and substance P receptor antagonists improve postoperative ileus. J Surg Res 1995; 58:719.
  40. Luckey A, Livingston E, Taché Y. Mechanisms and treatment of postoperative ileus. Arch Surg 2003; 138:206.
  41. Cullen JJ, Eagon JC, Kelly KA. Gastrointestinal peptide hormones during postoperative ileus. Effect of octreotide. Dig Dis Sci 1994; 39:1179.
  42. Martínez V, Rivier J, Wang L, Taché Y. Central injection of a new corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) antagonist, astressin, blocks CRF- and stress-related alterations of gastric and colonic motor function. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997; 280:754.
  43. Katzung BG. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, McGraw-Hill, 2004.
  44. Thörn SE, Wattwil M, Lindberg G, Säwe J. Systemic and central effects of morphine on gastroduodenal motility. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996; 40:177.
  45. Lyer S, Saunders WB, Stemkowski S. Economic burden of postoperative ileus associated with colectomy in the United States. J Manage Care Pharm. 2009;15:485
  46. Twine CP, Humphreys AK, Williams IM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the retroperitoneal versus the transperitoneal approach to the abdominal aorta. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 46:36.
  47. Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Taub D, et al. Identifying risk factors for potentially avoidable complications following radical cystectomy. J Urol 2005; 174:1231.
  48. Condon RE, Cowles V, Ekbom GA, et al. Effects of halothane, enflurane, and nitrous oxide on colon motility. Surgery 1987; 101:81.
  49. Huge A, Kreis ME, Jehle EC, et al. A model to investigate postoperative ileus with strain gauge transducers in awake rats. J Surg Res 1998; 74:112.
  50. Artinyan A, Nunoo-Mensah JW, Balasubramaniam S, et al. Prolonged postoperative ileus-definition, risk factors, and predictors after surgery. World J Surg 2008; 32:1495.
  51. Kronberg U, Kiran RP, Soliman MS, et al. A characterization of factors determining postoperative ileus after laparoscopic colectomy enables the generation of a novel predictive score. Ann Surg 2011; 253:78.
  52. Chang SS, Cookson MS, Baumgartner RG, et al. Analysis of early complications after radical cystectomy: results of a collaborative care pathway. J Urol 2002; 167:2012.
  53. Svatek RS, Fisher MB, Williams MB, et al. Age and body mass index are independent risk factors for the development of postoperative paralytic ileus after radical cystectomy. Urology 2010; 76:1419.
  54. Chapuis PH, Bokey L, Keshava A, et al. Risk factors for prolonged ileus after resection of colorectal cancer: an observational study of 2400 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2013; 257:909.
  55. Park HK, Kwak C, Byun SS, et al. Early removal of nasogastric tube after cystectomy with urinary diversion: does postoperative ileus risk increase? Urology 2005; 65:905.
  56. Inman BA, Harel F, Tiguert R, et al. Routine nasogastric tubes are not required following cystectomy with urinary diversion: a comparative analysis of 430 patients. J Urol 2003; 170:1888.
  57. Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B. Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; :CD004929.
  58. Donat SM, Slaton JW, Pisters LL, Swanson DA. Early nasogastric tube removal combined with metoclopramide after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. J Urol 1999; 162:1599.
  59. Ng CK, Kauffman EC, Lee MM, et al. A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy. Eur Urol 2010; 57:274.
  60. Lowrance WT, Rumohr JA, Chang SS, et al. Contemporary open radical cystectomy: analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol 2008; 179:1313.
  61. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2004; 91:1111.
  62. Schwenk W, Böhm B, Haase O, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomised study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1998; 383:49.
  63. Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Piqué JM, et al. Short-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 1995; 9:1101.
  64. Cagnacci A, Pirillo D, Malmusi S, et al. Early outcome of myomectomy by laparotomy, minilaparotomy and laparoscopically assisted minilaparotomy. A randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod 2003; 18:2590.
  65. Svatek RS, Fisher MB, Matin SF, et al. Risk factor analysis in a contemporary cystectomy cohort using standardized reporting methodology and adverse event criteria. J Urol 2010; 183:929.
  66. Guillotreau J, Gamé X, Mouzin M, et al. Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: morbidity of laparoscopic versus open surgery. J Urol 2009; 181:554.
  67. Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol 2010; 57:196.
  68. Porpiglia F, Renard J, Billia M, et al. Open versus laparoscopy-assisted radical cystectomy: results of a prospective study. J Endourol 2007; 21:325.
  69. Basillote JB, Abdelshehid C, Ahlering TE, Shanberg AM. Laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy with ileal neobladder: a comparison with the open approach. J Urol 2004; 172:489.
  70. Huang J, Lin T, Xu K, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder: a report of 85 cases. J Endourol 2008; 22:939–46
  71. Wang SZ, Chen LW, Chen W, Chen JX, Lin HY. Hand-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical cystectomy: a clinical outcome comparison Int J Urol 2009;16:360–3
  72. Lee CT, Dunn RL, Chen BT, et al. Impact of body mass index on radical cystectomy. J Urol 2004; 172:1281.
  73. Makino T, Shukla PJ, Rubino F, Milsom JW. The impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Ann Surg 2012; 255:228.
  74. Mangesi L, Hofmeyr GJ. Early compared with delayed oral fluids and food after caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; :CD003516.
  75. Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA, Thomas S. Early enteral feeding versus "nil by mouth" after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ 2001; 323:773.
  76. Pikarsky AJ, Saida Y, Yamaguchi T, et al. Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 2002; 16:855.
  77. Singh A, Muthukumarasamy G, Pawa N, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in obese patients. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13:878.
  78. Eom BW, Joo J, Yoon HM, et al. A body shape index has a good correlation with postoperative complications in gastric cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21:1115.
  79. Mattei A, Birkhaeuser FD, Baermann C, et al. To stent or not to stent perioperatively the ureteroileal anastomosis of ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes and ileal conduits? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 2008; 179:582.
  80. Yamanaka K, Miyake H, Hara I, et al. Significance of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in patients over 80 years old. Int Urol Nephrol 2007; 39:209.
  81. Antosh DD, Grimes CL, Smith AL, et al. A case-control study of risk factors for ileus and bowel obstruction following benign gynecologic surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013; 122:108.
  82. Bakkum-Gamez JN, Langstraat CL, Martin JR, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for postoperative ileus in women undergoing primary staging and debulking for epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 125:614.
  83. Frager D, Medwid SW, Baer JW, et al. CT of small-bowel obstruction: value in establishing the diagnosis and determining the degree and cause. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:37.
  84. Frager DH, Baer JW, Rothpearl A, Bossart PA. Distinction between postoperative ileus and mechanical small-bowel obstruction: value of CT compared with clinical and other radiographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:891.
  85. Suri S, Gupta S, Sudhakar PJ, et al. Comparative evaluation of plain films, ultrasound and CT in the diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. Acta Radiol 1999; 40:422.
  86. Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ, Cho KC, et al. Bowel obstruction: evaluation with CT. Radiology 1991; 180:313.
  87. Peck JJ, Milleson T, Phelan J. The role of computed tomography with contrast and small bowel follow-through in management of small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 1999; 177:375.
  88. Taourel PG, Fabre JM, Pradel JA, et al. Value of CT in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected acute small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165:1187.