Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:

Subscribers log in here

Placement of vena cava filters and their complications


The only widely accepted and validated indications for vena cava filter placement in patients with thromboembolism are an absolute contraindication to therapeutic anticoagulation, and failure of anticoagulation when there is acute proximal venous thrombosis. These are discussed in more detail elsewhere. (See "Treatment of acute pulmonary embolism", section on 'IVC filters' and "Treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis".)

Other possible treatment indications, and prophylactic filter placement, are more controversial [1-8]. As result, the use of caval filters varies widely [9-12]. Although vena cava filters can be placed into the superior vena cava (SVC) in select situations, the inferior vena cava (IVC) is the standard location for filter placement. The placement and complications associated with predominantly IVC filters are reviewed here. Other treatments for deep venous thrombosis and acute pulmonary embolism are discussed separately. (See "Low molecular weight heparin for venous thromboembolic disease" and "Treatment of acute pulmonary embolism" and "Fibrinolytic (thrombolytic) therapy in acute pulmonary embolism and lower extremity deep vein thrombosis".)


Knowledge of the normal and variant anatomy of the vena cava is important for successful placement of vena cava filters and prevention of complications.

The major veins of the upper and lower extremity drain into the central veins. In the upper extremity, the subclavian veins arch cephalad behind the medial clavicle and then slope caudally to join the internal jugular veins and form the brachiocephalic (innominate) veins (figure 1). The thyroid veins contribute to the left brachiocephalic vein, and together with the right brachiocephalic vein and azygos vein, these join to form the superior vena cava, which drains into the right atrium.

In the lower extremity, the common femoral veins become the external iliac veins after passing below the inguinal ligament (figure 2). They are joined by the internal iliac veins to form the common iliac veins. The common iliac veins merge at the level of the umbilicus to form the inferior vena cava (IVC) at the L5 level. It continues superiorly to the right of the aorta and receives multiple lumbar tributaries. At the L1 to L2 level, the right and left renal veins join the IVC and this junction divides the vein into the infrarenal and suprarenal portions. Because the inferior vena cava is usually located to the right of the spine, the left common iliac vein is longer with a less vertical path to the IVC.


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Aug 2014. | This topic last updated: Sep 8, 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Stein PD, Matta F. Vena cava filters in unstable elderly patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2014; 127:222.
  2. Ozturk C, Ganiyusufoglu K, Alanay A, et al. Efficacy of prophylactic placement of inferior vena cava filter in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35:1893.
  3. Knudson MM, Ikossi DG, Khaw L, et al. Thromboembolism after trauma: an analysis of 1602 episodes from the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank. Ann Surg 2004; 240:490.
  4. Spencer FA, Bates SM, Goldberg RJ, et al. A population-based study of inferior vena cava filters in patients with acute venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170:1456.
  5. Moore PS, Andrews JS, Craven TE, et al. Trends in vena caval interruption. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52:118.
  6. Duszak R Jr, Parker L, Levin DC, Rao VM. Placement and removal of inferior vena cava filters: national trends in the medicare population. J Am Coll Radiol 2011; 8:483.
  7. Stein PD, Matta F, Hull RD. Increasing use of vena cava filters for prevention of pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2011; 124:655.
  8. Haut ER, Garcia LJ, Shihab HM, et al. The effectiveness of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 2014; 149:194.
  9. Meisner RJ, Labropoulos N, Gasparis AP, et al. Review of indications and practices of vena caval filters at a large university hospital. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2012; 46:21.
  10. Baadh AS, Zikria JF, Rivoli S, et al. Indications for inferior vena cava filter placement: do physicians comply with guidelines? J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23:989.
  11. White RH, Geraghty EM, Brunson A, et al. High variation between hospitals in vena cava filter use for venous thromboembolism. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173:506.
  12. Meltzer AJ, Graham A, Kim JH, et al. Clinical, demographic, and medicolegal factors associated with geographic variation in inferior vena cava filter utilization: an interstate analysis. Surgery 2013; 153:683.
  13. Matthews BD, Joels CS, LeQuire MH. Inferior vena cava filter placement: preinsertion inferior vena cava imaging. Am Surg 2003; 69:649.
  14. Martin MJ, Blair KS, Curry TK, Singh N. Vena cava filters: current concepts and controversies for the surgeon. Curr Probl Surg 2010; 47:524.
  15. Bass JE, Redwine MD, Kramer LA, et al. Spectrum of congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava: cross-sectional imaging findings. Radiographics 2000; 20:639.
  16. Nam JK, Park SW, Lee SD, Chung MK. The clinical significance of a retroaortic left renal vein. Korean J Urol 2010; 51:276.
  17. Pais SO, Tobin KD, Austin CB, Queral L. Percutaneous insertion of the Greenfield inferior vena cava filter: experience with ninety-six patients. J Vasc Surg 1988; 8:460.
  18. Eifler AC, Lewandowski RJ, Gupta R, et al. Optional or permanent: clinical factors that optimize inferior vena cava filter utilization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24:35.
  19. Van Ha TG, Dillon P, Funaki B, et al. Use of retrievable filters in alternative common iliac vein location in high-risk surgical patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22:325.
  20. Knudson MM. Hospital-specific risk factors for filter fever. JAMA Surg 2013; 148:687.
  21. Pickham DM, Callcut RA, Maggio PM, et al. Payer status is associated with the use of prophylactic inferior vena cava filter in high-risk trauma patients. Surgery 2012; 152:232.
  22. Spangler EL, Dillavou ED, Smith KJ. Cost-effectiveness of guidelines for insertion of inferior vena cava filters in high-risk trauma patients. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52:1537.
  23. Hislop S, Fanciullo D, Doyle A, et al. Correlation of intravascular ultrasound and computed tomography scan measurements for placement of intravascular ultrasound-guided inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59:1066.
  24. Hodgkiss-Harlow K, Back MR, Brumberg R, et al. Technical factors affecting the accuracy of bedside IVC filter placement using intravascular ultrasound. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2012; 46:293.
  25. Haley M, Christmas B, Sing RF. Bedside insertion of inferior vena cava filters by a medical intensivist: preliminary results. J Intensive Care Med 2009; 24:144.
  26. Kardys CM, Stoner MC, Manwaring ML, et al. The use of intravascular ultrasound imaging to improve use of inferior vena cava filters in a high-risk bariatric population. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46:1248.
  27. Chiou AC. Intravascular ultrasound-guided bedside placement of inferior vena cava filters. Semin Vasc Surg 2006; 19:150.
  28. Uppal B, Flinn WR, Benjamin ME. The bedside insertion of inferior vena cava filters using ultrasound guidance. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2007; 19:78.
  29. Killingsworth CD, Taylor SM, Patterson MA, et al. Prospective implementation of an algorithm for bedside intravascular ultrasound-guided filter placement in critically ill patients. J Vasc Surg 2010; 51:1215.
  30. Kassavin DS, Constantinopoulos G. The transition to IVUS-guided IVC filter deployment in the nontrauma patient. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2011; 45:142.
  31. Gill G, Morita S, Kitanosono T, et al. Incidence and complications of accidental cannulation of retroperitoneal veins during venography for inferior vena cava filter placement. Ann Vasc Surg 2013; 27:767.
  32. Abdel-Aal AK, Saddekni S, Hamed MF. Guide wire entrapment in a vena cava filter: techniques for dislodgement. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2013; 47:115.
  33. Fang AS, Morita S, Gill GS, et al. Clinical outcomes of inferior vena cava filter placement in patients with renal vein anomalies. Ann Vasc Surg 2014; 28:318.
  34. Ascer E, Gennaro M, Lorensen E, Pollina RM. Superior vena caval Greenfield filters: indications, techniques, and results. J Vasc Surg 1996; 23:498.
  35. Ascher E, Hingorani A, Tsemekhin B, et al. Lessons learned from a 6-year clinical experience with superior vena cava Greenfield filters. J Vasc Surg 2000; 32:881.
  36. Watanabe S, Shimokawa S, Shibuya H, et al. Superior vena caval placement of a temporary filter: a case report. Vasc Surg 2001; 35:59.
  37. Usoh F, Hingorani A, Ascher E, et al. Long-term follow-up for superior vena cava filter placement. Ann Vasc Surg 2009; 23:350.
  38. Mismetti P, Rivron-Guillot K, Quenet S, et al. A prospective long-term study of 220 patients with a retrievable vena cava filter for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest 2007; 131:223.
  39. Stein PD, Alnas M, Skaf E, et al. Outcome and complications of retrievable inferior vena cava filters. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94:1090.
  40. Lynch FC. Removal of a Günther Tulip filter after 3,006 days. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22:337.
  41. Garcia-Godoy F, Collins T, Sacks D, et al. Retrieval of inferior vena cava filters after prolonged indwelling time. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171:1953.
  42. Naidu SG, Stone WM, Sweeney JP, Money SR. Endovascular retrieval of a TrapEase permanent inferior vena cava filter from the aorta. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55:237.
  43. Angel LF, Tapson V, Galgon RE, et al. Systematic review of the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22:1522.
  44. Helling TS, Kaswan S, Miller SL, Tretter JF. Practice patterns in the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in a trauma population: a single-center experience. J Trauma 2009; 67:1293.
  45. Sarosiek S, Crowther M, Sloan JM. Indications, complications, and management of inferior vena cava filters: the experience in 952 patients at an academic hospital with a level I trauma center. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173:513.
  46. Gyang E, Zayed M, Harris EJ, et al. Factors impacting follow-up care after placement of temporary inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Surg 2013; 58:440.
  47. Lynch FC. A method for following patients with retrievable inferior vena cava filters: results and lessons learned from the first 1,100 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22:1507.
  48. (Accessed on March 09, 2012).
  49. Albrecht RM, Garwe T, Carter SM, Maurer AJ. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters in trauma patients: factors that influence removal rate and an argument for institutional protocols. Am J Surg 2012; 203:297.
  50. Irwin E, Byrnes M, Schultz S, et al. A systematic method for follow-up improves removal rates for retrievable inferior vena cava filters in a trauma patient population. J Trauma 2010; 69:866.
  51. Minocha J, Idakoji I, Riaz A, et al. Improving inferior vena cava filter retrieval rates: impact of a dedicated inferior vena cava filter clinic. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21:1847.
  52. Rogers FB, Shackford SR, Miller JA, et al. Improved recovery of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters in trauma patients: the results of a dedicated filter registry and critical pathway for filter removal. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 72:381.
  53. Given MF, McDonald BC, Brookfield P, et al. Retrievable Gunther Tulip inferior vena cava filter: experience in 317 patients. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2008; 52:452.
  54. Cantwell CP, Pennypacker J, Singh H, et al. Comparison of the recovery and G2 filter as retrievable inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20:1193.
  55. Johnson MS, Nemcek AA Jr, Benenati JF, et al. The safety and effectiveness of the retrievable option inferior vena cava filter: a United States prospective multicenter clinical study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21:1173.
  56. Lyon SM, Riojas GE, Uberoi R, et al. Short- and long-term retrievability of the Celect vena cava filter: results from a multi-institutional registry. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20:1441.
  57. Hiromatsu S, Nata S, Ohno T, et al. Non-permanent inferior vena cava filters for prophylaxis and treatment of lower limb venous thromboembolism. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2010; 44:668.
  58. Zhu X, Tam MD, Bartholomew J, et al. Retrievability and device-related complications of the G2 filter: a retrospective study of 139 filter retrievals. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22:806.
  59. Janne d'Othée B. Predicting the removal of optionally retrievable caval filters: are we there yet? J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24:40.
  60. Avgerinos ED, Bath J, Stevens J, et al. Technical and patient-related characteristics associated with challenging retrieval of inferior vena cava filters. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 46:353.
  61. Millward SF, Oliva VL, Bell SD, et al. Günther Tulip Retrievable Vena Cava Filter: results from the Registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12:1053.
  62. Lorch H, Welger D, Wagner V, et al. Current practice of temporary vena cava filter insertion: a multicenter registry. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11:83.
  63. Imberti D, Bianchi M, Farina A, et al. Clinical experience with retrievable vena cava filters: results of a prospective observational multicenter study. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3:1370.
  64. Foley PJ, Nathan DP, Wang GJ, et al. A "fall-back" technique for difficult inferior vena cava filter retrieval. J Vasc Surg 2012; 56:1629.
  65. Dinglasan LA, Oh JC, Schmitt JE, et al. Complicated inferior vena cava filter retrievals: associated factors identified at preretrieval CT. Radiology 2013; 266:347.
  66. Zhou D, Spain J, Moon E, et al. Retrospective review of 120 celect inferior vena cava filter retrievals: experience at a single institution. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23:1557.
  67. Kuo WT, Odegaard JI, Rosenberg JK, Hofmann LV. Excimer laser-assisted removal of embedded inferior vena cava filters: a single-center prospective study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6:560.
  68. Teo TK, Angle JF, Shipp JI, et al. Incidence and management of inferior vena cava filter thrombus detected at time of filter retrieval. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22:1514.
  69. Joels CS, Sing RF, Heniford BT. Complications of inferior vena cava filters. Am Surg 2003; 69:654.
  70. Nazzal M, Chan E, Nazzal M, et al. Complications related to inferior vena cava filters: a single-center experience. Ann Vasc Surg 2010; 24:480.
  71. Lambe BD, Bedway JJ, Friedell ML. Percutaneous femoral vein access for inferior vena cava filter placement does not cause insertion-site thrombosis. Ann Vasc Surg 2013; 27:1169.
  72. Gorman PH, Qadri SF, Rao-Patel A. Prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement may increase the relative risk of deep venous thrombosis after acute spinal cord injury. J Trauma 2009; 66:707.
  73. Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F, et al. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prévention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:409.
  74. PREPIC Study Group. Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation 2005; 112:416.
  75. Blebea J, Wilson R, Waybill P, et al. Deep venous thrombosis after percutaneous insertion of vena caval filters. J Vasc Surg 1999; 30:821.
  76. Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Selby JB. Inferior vena cava filters. Indications, safety, effectiveness. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152:1985.
  77. Usoh F, Hingorani A, Ascher E, et al. Prospective randomized study comparing the clinical outcomes between inferior vena cava Greenfield and TrapEase filters. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52:394.
  78. Hajduk B, Tomkowski WZ, Malek G, Davidson BL. Vena cava filter occlusion and venous thromboembolism risk in persistently anticoagulated patients: a prospective, observational cohort study. Chest 2010; 137:877.
  79. McAree BJ, O'Donnell ME, Fitzmaurice GJ, et al. Inferior vena cava thrombosis: a review of current practice. Vasc Med 2013; 18:32.
  80. Raju S, Hollis K, Neglen P. Obstructive lesions of the inferior vena cava: clinical features and endovenous treatment. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44:820.
  81. Stein PD, Matta F, Keyes DC, Willyerd GL. Impact of vena cava filters on in-hospital case fatality rate from pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2012; 125:478.
  82. Ku GH, Billett HH. Long lives, short indications. The case for removable inferior cava filters. Thromb Haemost 2005; 93:17.
  83. Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141:e419S.
  84. Vena Caval Filter Consensus Conference. Recommended reporting standards for vena caval filter placement and patient follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:S427.
  85. Ferris EJ, McCowan TC, Carver DK, McFarland DR. Percutaneous inferior vena caval filters: follow-up of seven designs in 320 patients. Radiology 1993; 188:851.
  86. Almestady R, Spain J, Bayona-Molano Mdel P, Wang W. Iatrogenic migration of VenaTech LP IVC filter to superior vena cava secondary to guidewire entrapment: case report and review of literature. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2013; 47:48.
  87. Porcellini M, Stassano P, Musumeci A, Bracale G. Intracardiac migration of nitinol TrapEase vena cava filter and paradoxical embolism. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 22:460.
  88. Arjomand H, Surabhi S, Wolf NM. Right ventricular foreign body: percutaneous transvenous retrieval of a Greenfield filter from the right ventricle--a case report. Angiology 2003; 54:109.
  89. Bochenek KM, Aruny JE, Tal MG. Right atrial migration and percutaneous retrieval of a Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:1207.
  90. Yegul TN, Bonilla SM, Goodwin SC, et al. Retrieval of a Greenfield IVC filter displaced to the right brachiocephalic vein. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2000; 23:403.
  91. Caldwell EH, Fridley TL, Erb EL, Fleischer SR. Endovascular retrieval of an inferior vena cava filter with simultaneous caval, aortic, and duodenal perforations. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2012; 46:671.
  92. Zhou D, Moon E, Bullen J, et al. Penetration of Celect inferior vena cava filters: retrospective review of CT scans in 265 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202:643.
  93. Malek JY, Kwolek CJ, Conrad MF, et al. Presentation and treatment outcomes of patients with symptomatic inferior vena cava filters. Ann Vasc Surg 2013; 27:84.
  94. Yoshida Rde A, Yoshida WB, Kolvenbach R, Vieira PR. Endovascular treatment of late aortic perforation due to vena cava filter. Ann Vasc Surg 2012; 26:859.e9.
  95. Malgor RD, Hines GL, Terrana L, Labropoulos N. Persistent abdominal pain caused by an inferior vena cava filter protruding into the duodenum and the aortic wall. Ann Vasc Surg 2012; 26:858.e3.
  96. Skeik N, McEachen JC, Stockland AH, et al. Lumbar artery pseudoaneurysm caused by a Gunther Tulip inferior vena cava filter. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2011; 45:756.
  97. Connolly PH, Balachandran VP, Trost D, Bush HL Jr. Open surgical inferior vena cava filter retrieval for caval perforation and a novel technique for minimal cavotomy filter extraction. J Vasc Surg 2012; 56:256.
  98. Rasuli P. Inferior vena cava penetration by günther tulip filter? J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24:752.
  99. McLoney ED, Krishnasamy VP, Castle JC, et al. Complications of Celect, Günther tulip, and Greenfield inferior vena cava filters on CT follow-up: a single-institution experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24:1723.
  100. Yeung LY, Hastings GS, Alexander JQ. Endovascular retrieval of inferior vena cava filter penetrating into aorta: an unusual presentation of abdominal pain. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2010; 44:683.
  101. Becher RD, Corriere MA, Edwards MS, Godshall CJ. Late erosion of a prophylactic Celect IVC filter into the aorta, right renal artery, and duodenal wall. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52:1041.
  102. Sparrow P. Double whammy: inferior vena cava filter-related perforation and thrombosis of the inferior vena cava and aorta. Circulation 2011; 123:e245.
  103. Olorunsola OG, Kohi MP, Fidelman N, et al. Caval penetration by retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a retrospective comparison of Option and Günther Tulip filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24:566.
  104. Pontone G, Andreini D, Bertella E, et al. Asymptomatic struts fracture and multiple embolization as a late complication of ALN removable vena cava filter implantation. Eur Heart J 2013; 34:2353.
  105. Rogers NA, Nguyen L, Minniefield NE, et al. Fracture and embolization of an inferior vena cava filter strut leading to cardiac tamponade. Circulation 2009; 119:2535.
  106. Nicholson W, Nicholson WJ, Tolerico P, et al. Prevalence of fracture and fragment embolization of Bard retrievable vena cava filters and clinical implications including cardiac perforation and tamponade. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170:1827.
  107. Tam MD, Spain J, Lieber M, et al. Fracture and distant migration of the Bard Recovery filter: a retrospective review of 363 implantations for potentially life-threatening complications. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23:199.
  108. Johnson MS. Vena cava filter fracture: unplanned obsolescence. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23:196.
  109. Dinglasan LA, Trerotola SO, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, et al. Removal of fractured inferior vena cava filters: feasibility and outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23:181.
  110. Vijay K, Hughes JA, Burdette AS, et al. Fractured Bard Recovery, G2, and G2 express inferior vena cava filters: incidence, clinical consequences, and outcomes of removal attempts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23:188.
  111. Wu A, Helo N, Moon E, et al. Strategies for prevention of iatrogenic inferior vena cava filter entrapment and dislodgement during central venous catheter placement. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59:255.
  112. Duong MH, Jensen WA, Kirsch CM, et al. An unusual complication during central venous catheter placement. J Clin Anesth 2001; 13:131.
  113. Vinces FY, Robb TV, Alapati K, et al. J-tip spring guidewire entrapment by an inferior vena cava filter. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2004; 104:87.
  114. Wholey M, Toursarkissian B, Velez G, et al. Technique for retrieval of a guidewire lodged in a vena cava filter. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2002; 36:385.
  115. Stavropoulos SW, Itkin M, Trerotola SO. In vitro study of guide wire entrapment in currently available inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:905.
  116. Athanasoulis CA, Kaufman JA, Halpern EF, et al. Inferior vena caval filters: review of a 26-year single-center clinical experience. Radiology 2000; 216:54.