Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.
INTRODUCTION — The pigmented purpuric dermatoses (PPDs), also known as capillaritis, purpura simplex, and inflammatory purpura without vasculitis, are a group of chronic, benign, cutaneous eruptions characterized by the presence of petechiae, purpura, and increased skin pigmentation. PPDs most commonly occur on the lower extremities and may be asymptomatic or pruritic.
Familiarity with the clinical and pathologic findings of PPDs is useful for distinguishing them from cutaneous vasculitis and other disorders that may present with similar clinical features. The classic pathologic findings of PPDs include a perivascular mononuclear cell inflammatory infiltrate, erythrocyte extravasation, and hemosiderin deposition.
The diagnosis and treatment of PPDs will be reviewed here. Cutaneous vasculitis is discussed separately. (See "Evaluation of adults with cutaneous lesions of vasculitis" and "Management of adults with idiopathic cutaneous small vessel vasculitis".)
EPIDEMIOLOGY — Data are limited on the epidemiology of pigmented purpuric dermatoses (PPDs). Overall, these disorders are considered to be uncommon . The major subtypes of PPD include:
●Schamberg's disease (the most common form of PPD [2,3]; also known as progressive pigmentary purpura)
●Purpura annularis telangiectodes (also known as Majocchi's disease)
●Pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot and Blum
●Eczematid-like purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis
Rare, additional subtypes of PPD include itching purpura, unilateral linear capillaritis, and granulomatous pigmented purpura. Some authors have considered eczematid-like purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis and itching purpura as a single entity [4,5].
Although PPD can develop at any age, age predilections have been observed in some subtypes [2,4,6-8]:
●Schamberg's disease – middle-aged adults
●Purpura annularis telangiectodes – adolescents and young adults
●Pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot and Blum – adults
●Lichen aureus – young adults
●Eczematid-like purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis – middle-aged adults
●Itching purpura – middle-aged adults
●Unilateral linear capillaritis – young adults
●Granulomatous pigmented purpura – adults
Children are not excluded from the development of PPDs [2,9]. Schamberg's disease is the most common cause of petechiae in children [2,3,9], and has been documented in a child as young as one year . In addition, there are multiple published reports of lichen aureus in children [11-19].
Data are insufficient to confirm whether gender predilections exist among PPDs, and two of the largest series have found conflicting results regarding whether Schamberg's disease is more common in males or females [5,7]. Although there are also insufficient data for conclusions on racial or ethnic predilections for the PPDs, it has been noted that patients of East Asian descent constitute the majority of reported cases of granulomatous pigmented purpura [20-25].
ETIOLOGY AND PATHOGENESIS — Multiple factors have been proposed as potential contributors to the development of pigmented purpuric dermatoses (PPDs), though none have been definitively proven. These include [2,4,21]:
●Localized infection 
In PPDs linked to drug exposure, times of onset ranging from one week to years after the start of drug treatment have been reported [38-48].
Associations between PPD and multiple systemic diseases have been proposed . Examples of the most commonly cited associations include hyperlipidemia (granulomatous PPD) [21,25,50,51] and viral hepatitis [52-55]. However, the relationship between PPD and these disorders is uncertain. A case-control study of 60 patients with PPD and 230 controls did not find significant differences in the prevalence of hepatitis B or C among the patients with PPD . PPDs are not manifestations of platelet abnormalities or bleeding disorders.
Some authors have considered PPD a form of a cutaneous T cell lymphoid dyscrasia based upon infrequent reports of PPD progressing to mycosis fungoides, similarities in the clinical and histologic features of PPD and mycosis fungoides, and the frequent detection of T cell monoclonality in lesions of PPD . Further study is necessary to clarify the relationship between mycosis fungoides and PPD. (See 'Relationship to mycosis fungoides' below.)
There is a paucity of data on the pathogenic mechanisms that lead to the clinical findings of PPD, and thus, the mechanisms through which PPD develops are poorly understood. Three theories that have arisen based upon interpretation of the histologic and immunohistochemical findings in PPD are reviewed below:
●Vascular abnormalities – Extravasation of erythrocytes in the dermis is a characteristic pathologic feature of PPD. A state of capillary fragility has been postulated to contribute to capillary rupture and erythrocyte extravasation consistent with that observed in PPD . Increased pressure in the cutaneous microvasculature secondary to venous stasis has also been proposed as a contributing factor .
●Cell-mediated immunity – A mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltrate of varying extent is typically found in pathology specimens of PPD, and it is conceivable that a perivascular cell-mediated immune response could contribute to capillary damage and erythrocyte leakage . The nature of the inflammatory infiltrate in Schamberg's disease was investigated in a study of tissue specimens from five adults with the condition . The infiltrate was primarily composed of CD4+ lymphocytes and CD1a+ dendritic cells. In addition, upregulation of adhesion molecules that could facilitate inflammatory cell trafficking was detected on infiltrating lymphocytes (LFA-1 and ICAM-1) and endothelial cells (ICAM-1 and ELAM-1).
●Humoral immunity – A potential role for immune complex disease in PPD has been suggested based upon reports documenting direct immunofluorescence findings of vascular deposits of C3, C1q, IgM, or IgA within lesional skin [5,61,62].
As a consequence of limited research, the role of each of these factors in the development of PPD remains uncertain. Additional studies are necessary to elucidate the pathophysiology of this disorder.
CLINICAL FEATURES — The key clinical features of all pigmented purpuric dermatoses (PPDs) are petechiae or purpura, which reflect erythrocyte extravasation, and yellow to brown pigmented patches, which result from hemosiderin deposition within the dermis. The most common sites for PPDs are the lower extremities, although lesions also may develop in other areas. Infrequently, PPDs present as generalized eruptions. The palms, soles, genitalia, and mucosa are typically spared.
The clinical findings that distinguish the PPD subtypes are reviewed below.
Schamberg's disease (progressive pigmentary purpura) — First described by Jay Frank Schamberg in 1901 , Schamberg's disease presents with discrete, nonblanchable, red-brown purpuric patches that are usually a few millimeters to several millimeters in diameter, although some patches may reach several centimeters in breadth (picture 1A-C). Close inspection of the patches reveals nonpalpable pinpoint petechiae that were described by Schamberg as "pinpoint to pinhead sized reddish puncta, closely resembling grains of cayenne pepper" . The most common site for involvement is the bilateral lower extremities (below the knees). The thighs and buttocks are also frequently involved. Less commonly, Schamberg's disease presents with upper extremity or generalized involvement. Although Schamberg's disease is usually asymptomatic, occasional patients experience mild pruritus.
The course of the condition is typically chronic, with numerous exacerbations and remissions. Spontaneous resolution also may occur [5,9,64-68]. In a retrospective series that included at least three years of follow-up data on each of the 45 patients with Schamberg's disease, 62 percent cleared or improved and 38 percent remained stable or experienced worsening of symptoms .
Purpura annularis telangiectodes (Majocchi's disease) — Initially described by Domenico Majocchi in 1896 , purpura annularis telangiectodes presents with nonblanchable, annular, 2 to 20 cm, symmetrical, purpuric, telangiectatic patches (picture 2A-B). Unilateral disease is reported in one patient . Linear or arciform patches may also be present. Occasionally, atrophy is evident in the center of lesions .
As with Schamberg's disease, the most common site for involvement is the lower extremities . Extension to the upper extremities and trunk may occur.
The cutaneous lesions of purpura annularis telangiectodes usually are asymptomatic. Occasionally, mild pruritus is present [71,73]. The course is chronic and characterized by relapses and remissions . Individual lesions typically last several months.
Pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot and Blum — Patients with pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot and Blum develop small polygonal or round lichenoid purpuric papules that coalesce to form red-brown to violaceous plaques that are one to several centimeters in diameter (picture 3) . The appearance of the plaques may resemble Kaposi's sarcoma . Like other subtypes of PPD, this eruption usually is found on the lower extremities. Rarely, there is involvement of the upper extremities or trunk. The course of pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot and Blum tends to be chronic, although spontaneous remission may occur .
Lichen aureus — Lichen aureus (originally termed "lichen purpuricus") presents with the acute onset of distinctive, rust-yellow or gold colored lichenoid papules or circumscribed patches and plaques (picture 4) . The term "lichen aureus" emphasizes the classic gold-brown color of the eruption . Of note, lichen aureus also may present with copper-orange or violaceous lesions.
Lichen aureus most frequently occurs unilaterally on the lower extremities; bilateral involvement is less common [11,15,78]. Other reported distributions include upper extremity and trunk involvement; segmental, dermatomal, and Blaschkoid arrangements; and involvement that follows the course of superficial or deep veins [78-83]. Aberrant locations and distributions may occur more commonly in children .
Lichen aureus typically is asymptomatic. Occasionally, patients experience intense pruritus.
Lichen aureus tends to persist for multiple years, and, in some cases, is slowly progressive [78,84]. In a retrospective study of 42 patients with lichen aureus (age of onset 3 to 70 years), lesions tended to persist during the follow-up period of 3 months to 19 years . Complete resolution was reported for only two patients. In contrast, spontaneous resolution was observed more frequently in a series of eight children with lichen aureus; five experienced resolution within two to six years (mean 3.4 years), two had reduced but continued lesions beyond four to five years, and one had persistent lesions at three years .
Eczematid-like purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis — Eczematid-like purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis is distinguished from other forms of PPD by the concomitant presence of eczematous features. The eruption usually begins with the insidious onset of groups of nonblanchable pinpoint red macules that evolve to a darker red or yellow-brown color over a few weeks . The eruption typically begins on the lower extremities and may spread to the upper extremities or trunk. The face, neck, palms, and soles typically are spared.
Erythema and mild scale develop within the involved areas, resulting in an appearance that mimics eczema (picture 5A-B). Pruritus is common. Mild lichenification secondary to rubbing and scratching may be present.
Eczematid-like purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis follows a fluctuating course. The eruption usually spontaneously resolves within several months to two years .
Rare variants — Rarely reported variants of PPD include itching purpura, unilateral linear capillaritis, and granulomatous pigmented purpura.
●Itching purpura – Itching purpura (also known as disseminated pruriginous angiodermatitis) is characterized by the acute onset of orange-brown to purpuric macules on the lower extremities. The lesions often subsequently become generalized. Unlike most other types of PPD, the condition is associated with severe pruritus [85,86]. Itching purpura has a chronic course, though spontaneous remissions occur.
●Unilateral linear capillaritis – Unilateral linear capillaritis (also known as segmental pigmented purpura and quadrantic capillaropathy) describes the development of pigmented purpura in a linear, dermatomal, or segmental distribution (picture 6) [87-91]. The condition primarily has been reported in young adults and children on the lower extremity or upper extremity [87,88]. The prognosis appears to be good; in a series of four males with lower extremity lesions, significant regression of skin lesions occurred within three years in all patients .
●Granulomatous pigmented purpura – Approximately 20 cases of granulomatous pigmented purpura have been reported in the literature [20-25,50,51,92-94]. The condition usually presents with multiple erythematous to brown purpuric macules or papules and is distinguished from other types of PPD by the detection of a granulomatous infiltrate on histopathology (picture 7A-B). The most common sites of involvement are the dorsum of the feet and the legs. Less frequently, wrists and hands have been affected. Many of the reported cases have occurred in patients who also had hyperlipidemia, prompting some authors to question whether a relationship between these disorders exists [25,50,51,92,93]. The cutaneous lesions may persist for years .
HISTOPATHOLOGY — The pigmented purpuric dermatoses (PPDs) subtypes share several histopathologic features, including [5,57,95]:
●A superficial perivascular inflammatory infiltrate (primarily CD4+ lymphocytes with occasional dendritic cells and macrophages)
●Endothelial cell proliferation and edema; narrowing of vessel lumens
●Extravasation of erythrocytes in the papillary dermis
●Variable degree of hemosiderin deposition in macrophages in the dermis (particularly in mature lesions)
●Variable mild vacuolar degeneration at the basal layer
Histochemical stains that stain iron, such as the Perls or Fontana Masson stain, are useful for highlighting hemosiderin deposition in the superficial dermis. Of note, features of leukocytoclastic vasculitis (eg, leukocytoclasia and fibrinoid necrosis of vessel walls) are absent. (See "Evaluation of adults with cutaneous lesions of vasculitis", section on 'Diagnostic criteria'.)
Depending on the clinical subtype of PPD, additional histopathologic features may be present:
●Schamberg's disease: Variable degree of epidermal spongiosis 
●Pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot and Blum: Band-like (lichenoid) lymphocytic infiltrate in the upper dermis ± epidermal spongiosis 
●Lichen aureus: Dense lichenoid lymphocytic infiltrate in the upper dermis and at the dermal-epidermal junction, variable degree of lymphocyte exocytosis, ± Grenz zone (an area of uninvolved connective tissue that separates the dermal infiltrate from the epidermis) 
●Eczematoid purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis: Epidermal spongiosis 
●Itching purpura: Epidermal spongiosis, marked inflammatory response that includes neutrophils 
●Granulomatous pigmented purpura: Mononuclear cell infiltrate accompanied by a granulomatous infiltrate in the papillary dermis 
LABORATORY FINDINGS — No laboratory abnormalities are associated with pigmented purpuric dermatoses (PPDs). Laboratory tests that assess for platelet abnormalities, coagulopathies, or acute phase reactants are expected to be normal.
DIAGNOSIS — The presence of discrete or circumscribed purpuric macules, papules, patches, or plaques (particularly on the lower extremity) with petechiae and yellow-brown pigmentation suggests the possibility of pigmented purpuric dermatoses (PPDs). The diagnosis is usually made through clinical inspection and the recognition of classic clinical features.
A skin biopsy is useful when the diagnosis remains uncertain following clinical examination. Biopsies may help to distinguish PPD from disorders in the differential diagnosis, such as cutaneous vasculitis. (See 'Differential diagnosis' below.)
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS — The differential diagnosis of pigmented purpuric dermatoses (PPDs) consists of other cutaneous lesions that may present with petechiae, purpura, eczematous features, or localized hyperpigmentation related to hemosiderin deposition. A careful clinical assessment and biopsy (when needed) can aid in distinguishing PPD from other disorders. Stasis dermatitis, cutaneous vasculitis, traumatic purpura, and mycosis fungoides are among the disorders most likely to be confused with PPD.
●Stasis dermatitis – Stasis dermatitis shares both clinical and pathologic features with PPD. Stasis dermatitis usually presents on the lower extremities with insidious onset of eczematous patches that progress to red-brown or brawny colored irregular patches (picture 8A-B). Associated varicosities and leg edema are often present. The medial ankle is the most common site of initial involvement. Like PPD, the pathology findings of stasis dermatitis include epidermal spongiosis, a perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate, dilated dermal capillaries with intimal thickening, and hemosiderin within dermal macrophages. Clinicians should be aware that stasis dermatitis and PPD may coexist. (See "Stasis dermatitis".)
●Cutaneous vasculitis – Cutaneous leukocytoclastic vasculitis presents with the acute onset of palpable purpura, often primarily involving the lower extremities and other dependent areas of the body. Hemorrhagic bullae and brown pigmentation consistent with hemosiderin deposition in the skin also may be present (picture 9A-D). The palpable nature of this disorder is useful for distinguishing it from Schamberg's disease and purpura annularis telangiectodes, which present with nonpalpable petechiae and/or purpura. A skin biopsy can distinguish vasculitis from PPD; the vessel destruction, leukocytoclasia, and fibrinoid necrosis characteristic of vasculitis are not found in PPD. (See "Evaluation of adults with cutaneous lesions of vasculitis".)
●Traumatic purpura – Injury to the skin may result in the development of purpuric patches. Traumatic purpura are much less persistent than PPDs, typically evolving and resolving over the course of a few weeks.
●Mycosis fungoides – PPD is sometimes difficult to distinguish from mycosis fungoides. Infrequently, purpura is an initial manifestation of mycosis fungoides, and the two disorders can have overlapping histologic features (eg, lichenoid infiltrate, lymphocytes invading the epidermis). In cases in which the clinical features suggest PPD, but pathologic examination raises the question of mycosis fungoides, distinguishing between the conditions can be challenging. The detection of large intraepidermal groups of lymphocytes or many lymphocytes in the spinous layer of the epidermis favor a diagnosis of mycosis fungoides . (See 'Relationship to mycosis fungoides' below and "Clinical manifestations, pathologic features, and diagnosis of mycosis fungoides".)
Additional disorders that may enter the differential diagnosis of a patient with specific forms of PPD include scurvy, dermatitis, and Kaposi's sarcoma.
●Scurvy – The purpuric lesions of scurvy may be confused with the scattered petechiae and purpura of Schamberg's disease (picture 10A-B). The detection of perifollicular purpura, corkscrew-shaped hairs, bleeding gums, and a dietary history of reduced vitamin C intake support a diagnosis of scurvy. (See "Overview of water-soluble vitamins", section on 'Deficiency'.)
●Eczematous dermatitis – Additional disorders that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of eczematid-like purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis include atopic dermatitis, nummular eczema, and allergic contact dermatitis (picture 11A-D). These disorders can be clinically distinguished from this subtype of PPD by the absence of petechiae, purpura, and the yellow-brown pigmentation characteristic of PPDs. In addition, the pathologic findings of atopic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis do not include erythrocyte extravasation and hemosiderin deposition. (See "Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (eczema)", section on 'Clinical manifestations'.)
●Kaposi's sarcoma – Kaposi sarcoma may mimic the presentation of pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot and Blum. Cutaneous lesions of Kaposi's sarcoma appear as violaceous macules, papules, plaques, or nodules, most commonly on the lower extremities, head, neck, and oral mucosa (picture 12). The last three sites are typically spared in PPD. Kaposi's sarcoma is easily distinguished from PPD through pathology findings of vascular proliferation, dermal spindle cells, and vascular slits. (See "Classic Kaposi sarcoma: Clinical features, staging, diagnosis, and treatment" and "AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis".)
TREATMENT — Pigmented purpuric dermatoses (PPDs) are benign conditions that are often asymptomatic. Thus, treatment is not always necessary and reassurance is an acceptable course of management for most patients. Treatment is generally considered for patients with associated symptoms and for patients who are distressed by the cosmetic appearance of the skin lesions.
Because most data on the efficacy of treatments are derived from case reports and small case series and spontaneous resolution of PPD is possible, the best approach to treatment remains uncertain. In our experience, the response to treatment is unpredictable and often poor. Given the benign nature of PPDs, the risk-benefit ratio of treatment always should be considered.
When patients desire treatment, we typically begin with measures to reduce exacerbating factors or topical corticosteroids due to the relative safety of these interventions. We reserve other interventions for patients with extensive involvement or topical corticosteroid-refractory lesions who also have a strong desire for additional treatment.
First-line interventions — Our first-line therapies for PPDs are nonpharmacologic interventions and topical corticosteroids.
Nonpharmacologic interventions — Non-drug interventions for PPD are aimed at eliminating or reducing potential contributing factors. In patients in whom the development of a PPD appears to correlate with exposure to a medication or contact allergen, discontinuation of exposure to the potential inciting agent should be implemented whenever feasible. (See 'Etiology and pathogenesis' above.)
Due to the theory that increased vascular pressure may contribute to capillary leakage in PPDs, many clinicians, including ourselves, often have patients with PPDs on the lower extremities wear supportive stockings, particularly if concomitant signs of venous stasis are present. However, the efficacy of this measure for accelerating resolution of the PPD is unproven.
Topical corticosteroids — Topical corticosteroids have been used for PPD based upon the histologic evidence that PPD is an inflammatory process. Although some case reports and case series have documented improvement in PPD during topical corticosteroid therapy, the response to treatment is inconsistent [4,5,9,13,25,98,99]. Randomized controlled trials of topical corticosteroid therapy for PPD have not been performed.
When treating with topical corticosteroids, we typically prescribe application of a medium potency or high potency topical corticosteroid once to twice daily to affected areas for four to six weeks (table 3) . If no improvement is detected within this period, we discontinue topical corticosteroid treatment.
Cutaneous atrophy is a potential adverse effect of topical corticosteroid treatment. The adverse effects of this treatment are reviewed in greater detail separately. (See "General principles of dermatologic therapy and topical corticosteroid use", section on 'Side effects'.)
Second-line intervention — Phototherapy is a well-tolerated skin-directed treatment that appears to be of value for some patients with PPD. We consider phototherapy for patients who fail topical corticosteroid therapy or for patients for whom topical therapy is impractical due to extensive involvement. Data on the long-term benefit of phototherapy after treatment cessation are limited.
Phototherapy — Case reports and small case series have documented improvement in PPDs with ultraviolet B (UVB) or psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) phototherapy. Multiple treatment sessions are required. The repeated visits required for phototherapy are a deterrent to treatment for some patients. (See "UVB therapy (broadband and narrowband)" and "Psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) photochemotherapy".)
●Narrowband UVB – In a prospective uncontrolled study of five patients with Schamberg's disease and one patient with purpura annularis telangiectodes, treatment with narrowband UVB three times per week led to a good response (more than 75 percent reduction in petechiae and pigmentation) in all patients within 24 to 28 treatment sessions . Subsequently, maintenance treatments were given twice per week for three weeks followed by once per week for three weeks. The two patients who relapsed during the one-year follow-up period improved with additional sessions of narrowband UVB treatment.
Case reports and case series describe other patients with PPD [101-104] (including children [9,105]) who seemed to respond well to narrowband UVB phototherapy. For example, patients with pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot and Blum have achieved improvement or lesion clearance during narrowband UVB phototherapy [9,106].
●PUVA – PUVA phototherapy involves the administration of a psoralen prior to irradiation with UVA light. In a series of 11 adults treated with PUVA for PPD (five with Schamberg's disease, five with pigmented lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot and Blum, and one with eczematid-like purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis), all patients achieved lesion clearance . Moreover, dramatic reductions in CD4+ and CD1a cells and adhesion molecule expression were detected following PUVA therapy. A separate series of seven adults with pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot and Blum also seemed to demonstrate benefit of PUVA; all patients achieved clearance of skin lesions within 7 to 20 PUVA treatments . Two patients who relapsed one month after treatment cessation responded to a second course of treatment.
Improvement in PPD during PUVA also has been reported in case reports of patients with Schamberg's disease , lichen aureus , and unilateral linear capillaritis .
Potential adverse effects of phototherapy include sunburns, blistering, pruritus, and skin aging. Increased risk for skin cancer has been reported in psoriasis patients who have received high numbers of PUVA treatments. The side effects of phototherapy are reviewed in greater detail separately. (See "UVB therapy (broadband and narrowband)", section on 'Short- and long-term adverse effects' and "Psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) photochemotherapy", section on 'Adverse effects'.)
Other interventions — Multiple other therapies have been utilized for PPD. Only pentoxifylline has been evaluated in a randomized trial.
Pentoxifylline — Pentoxifylline may have beneficial effects on Schamberg's disease. Pentoxifylline is a drug that inhibits adhesion of leukocytes to endothelial cells and can stimulate vascular endothelium to release PGI2, which inhibits platelet adhesion and aggregation . Pentoxifylline is also used for the management of lower extremity chronic venous disease. (See "Medical management of lower extremity chronic venous disease", section on 'Pentoxifylline'.)
A single-blind randomized trial of 112 adults with moderate to severe Schamberg's disease compared eight weeks of treatment with pentoxifylline (400 mg three times per day) to topical betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% cream (applied twice daily for eight weeks) . Whereas 34 patients in the pentoxifylline group (61 percent) had a statistically significant reduction in a disease severity score after two months, this occurred in only 12 of 56 patients in the corticosteroid group (21 percent). By four months after treatment cessation, statistically significant reductions in the severity score remained in 14 patients in the pentoxifylline group and 8 patients in the corticosteroid group. Whether cosmetically significant responses were obtained is unclear.
Case reports and small case series of pentoxifylline for Schamberg's disease have documented both marked clinical improvement in patients with 300 mg per day or 400 mg three times daily [111,112] and treatment failure in patients treated with 300 to 600 mg per day [113,114]. Further studies are necessary to confirm the clinical value of the drug for PPD. Partial improvement following combination therapy with pentoxifylline and prostacyclin (PGI2) was reported in a patient with segmental lichen aureus .
Treatment with pentoxifylline is generally well tolerated. Gastrointestinal symptoms (eg, nausea, vomiting) are the most common adverse effects.
Other — Other therapies that have been reported to be beneficial for PPD in small numbers of patients include griseofulvin , calcium dobesilate (500 mg twice daily) , colchicine (0.5 mg twice daily) , tacrolimus ointment , pimecrolimus cream , photodynamic therapy , and pulse dye laser . Immunosuppressants such as systemic glucocorticoids , cyclosporine , and methotrexate  have been used successfully, but generally are not indicated given the potential adverse effects of these agents and the minimal data to support their efficacy.
An oral bioflavonoid (rutoside) 50 mg twice daily and ascorbic acid (500 mg twice daily) has been reported to improve PPD [6,122,123]. In a two center retrospective case series of 35 patients with Schamberg disease receiving rutoside 50 mg twice daily and 1000 mg ascorbic acid once daily with a mean treatment duration of 8.2 months, 71 percent experienced complete clearance and 20 percent experienced improvement of greater than 50 percent. Nine participants (25 percent) relapsed after discontinuation. Seven of these patients responded to reinitiation of rutoside and ascorbic acid. Those with shorter disease duration had better responses, shorter time to response, and lower risk of recurrence .
PROGNOSIS AND FOLLOW-UP — In general, pigmented purpuric dermatoses (PPDs) are benign, chronic conditions. Eruptions persist, wax and wane, or slowly progress, and may clear spontaneously over a period of months to years. The clinical courses of specific forms of PPD are reviewed above. (See 'Clinical features' above.)
Relationship to mycosis fungoides — Infrequent reports of patients in whom a diagnosis of PPD preceded a diagnosis of mycosis fungoides or in whom mycosis fungoides presented with clinical features of PPD, as well as studies that have found shared clinical and histologic features between the two disorders, have led to uncertainty about the relationship between mycosis fungoides and PPD [57,97,124-131]. As an example, in a study of 56 biopsy specimens from patients with PPD, 29 (52 percent) exhibited pathologic patterns that have been associated with mycosis fungoides .
Similar to mycosis fungoides, monoclonal expansion of T cells is frequently detected in patients with PPD [15,57,97,132]. The authors of one study found that patients diagnosed with PPD who had monoclonal expansion were more likely to exhibit clinical and pathologic features similar to those of mycosis fungoides and proposed that PPD may represent a form of cutaneous T cell lymphoid dyscrasia . In another study, 8 of 12 PPD biopsy specimens that had lichenoid histologic patterns exhibited monoclonality .
The clinical significance of monoclonal expansion in PPD is uncertain; clinical experience suggests that the development of mycosis fungoides after an initial diagnosis of PPD is rare. A review of 23 patients with lichen aureus found that although 8 of 16 patients who had T cell receptor-γ gene rearrangement performed had a monoclonal T cell population, after a mean follow-up of 102 months (range 11 to 382 months), none of the patients in the study developed mycosis fungoides .
Follow-up — Because of the potential association between PPD and mycosis fungoides, patients with atypical presentations and patients who demonstrate clinical or histologic features that suggest a possibility of mycosis fungoides require close clinical follow-up. In particular, the possibility of mycosis fungoides should be considered when patients present with large confluent patches or plaques with reticular arrangements, violaceous hue, or pruritus that have persisted or relapsed over the course of several years [40,124]. Case reports suggest that males may be more likely to have overlapping mycosis fungoides and PPD . (See 'Relationship to mycosis fungoides' above.)
Due to the lack of data on the risk for mycosis fungoides in patients with classic presentations of PPD, the need for follow-up of patients with classic presentations of PPD is unclear. It is generally thought that the risk for mycosis fungoides in this population is low. As a precaution, we perform skin examinations on patients with PPD once yearly.
PREVENTION — No preventive measures have been established for pigmented purpuric dermatoses (PPDs).
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
●Pigmented purpuric dermatoses (PPDs) are uncommon benign cutaneous disorders that are clinically characterized by petechiae or purpura (secondary to erythrocyte extravasation) and localized hyperpigmentation (secondary to hemosiderin deposition in the skin). (See 'Introduction' above.)
●The five major types of PPD are Schamberg's disease, purpura annularis telangiectodes, pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot and Blum, lichen aureus, and eczematid-like purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis. Schamberg's disease is the most common type of PPD. PPDs may affect both adults and children. (See 'Epidemiology' above.)
●The pathogenesis of PPDs are poorly understood. Factors such as venous hypertension, systemic diseases, drugs, and contact allergens may contribute to the development of PPDs. Vascular abnormalities, cell-mediated immunity, and humoral immunity have been proposed as pathogenic mechanisms. (See 'Etiology and pathogenesis' above.)
●The diagnosis of PPDs usually can be made through clinical examination. No laboratory abnormalities are associated with PPDs. Skin biopsies are useful for confirming a PPD when the diagnosis is uncertain. (See 'Histopathology' above and 'Laboratory findings' above and 'Diagnosis' above.)
●The response of PPDs to treatment is unpredictable. Most patients with PPD do not require treatment. Treatment is considered for patients who desire treatment due to associated symptoms or patients who are bothered by the cosmetic appearance of lesions. (See 'Treatment' above.)
●Data on the efficacy of treatments for PPD are limited. Our initial approach involves the elimination of drugs or contact allergens that appear to have induced PPD and the use of supportive stockings for patients with concomitant signs of venous stasis. For patients who desire further treatment, we suggest a four to six week course of a medium or high potency topical corticosteroid applied to affected areas (Grade 2C). (See 'First-line interventions' above.)
●For patients who desire treatment, but fail to respond to topical corticosteroid therapy, or for whom topical therapy is impractical due to extensive involvement, we suggest treatment with phototherapy (Grade 2C). Options for treatment include narrowband UVB and PUVA phototherapy. (See 'Second-line intervention' above.)
●There are no definitive guidelines for the follow-up of patients with PPD. We typically follow patients with atypical clinical features or with histologic features that are suspicious for mycosis fungoides closely due to a possible relationship between mycosis fungoides and PPD. We perform skin examinations on other patients with PPD once yearly. (See 'Prognosis and follow-up' above.)
- Sardana K, Sarkar R, Sehgal VN. Pigmented purpuric dermatoses: an overview. Int J Dermatol 2004; 43:482.
- Tristani-Firouzi P, Meadows KP, Vanderhooft S. Pigmented purpuric eruptions of childhood: a series of cases and review of literature. Pediatr Dermatol 2001; 18:299.
- Torrelo A, Requena C, Mediero IG, Zambrano A. Schamberg's purpura in children: a review of 13 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48:31.
- Newton RC, Raimer SS. Pigmented purpuric eruptions. Dermatol Clin 1985; 3:165.
- Ratnam KV, Su WP, Peters MS. Purpura simplex (inflammatory purpura without vasculitis): a clinicopathologic study of 174 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991; 25:642.
- DOUCAS C, KAPETANAKIS J. Eczematid-like purpura. Dermatologica 1953; 106:86.
- RANDALL SJ, KIERLAND RR, MONTGOMERY H. Pigmented purpuric eruptions. AMA Arch Derm Syphilol 1951; 64:177.
- Sherertz EF. Pigmented purpuric eruptions. Semin Thromb Hemost 1984; 10:190.
- Coulombe J, Jean SE, Hatami A, et al. Pigmented purpuric dermatosis: clinicopathologic characterization in a pediatric series. Pediatr Dermatol 2015; 32:358.
- Zvulunov A, Avinoach I, Hatskelzon L, Halevy S. Pigmented purpuric dermatosis (Schamberg's purpura) in an infant. Dermatol Online J 1999; 5:2.
- Gelmetti C, Cerri D, Grimalt R. Lichen aureus in childhood. Pediatr Dermatol 1991; 8:280.
- Kahana M, Levy A, Schewach-Millet M, et al. Lichen aureus occurring in childhood. Int J Dermatol 1985; 24:666.
- Moche J, Glassman S, Modi D, Grayson W. Segmental lichen aureus: a report of two cases treated with methylprednisolone aceponate. Australas J Dermatol 2011; 52:e15.
- Böhm M, Bonsmann G, Luger TA. Resolution of lichen aureus in a 10-year-old child after topical pimecrolimus. Br J Dermatol 2004; 151:519.
- Fink-Puches R, Wolf P, Kerl H, Cerroni L. Lichen aureus: clinicopathologic features, natural history, and relationship to mycosis fungoides. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144:1169.
- Kim MJ, Kim BY, Park KC, Youn SW. A case of childhood lichen aureus. Ann Dermatol 2009; 21:393.
- Yazdi AS, Mayser P, Sander CA. Lichen aureus with clonal T cells in a child possibly induced by regular consumption of an energy drink. J Cutan Pathol 2008; 35:960.
- Fujita H, Iguchi M, Ikari Y, Asahina A. Lichen aureus on the back in a 6-year-old girl. J Dermatol 2007; 34:148.
- Rubio FA, Robayna G, Herranz P, et al. Abdominal Lichen aureus in a child. Pediatr Dermatol 1997; 14:411.
- Saito R, Matsuoka Y. Granulomatous pigmented purpuric dermatosis. J Dermatol 1996; 23:551.
- Wong WR, Kuo TT, Chen MJ, Chan HL. Granulomatous variant of chronic pigmented purpuric dermatosis: report of two cases. Br J Dermatol 2001; 145:162.
- Lin WL, Kuo TT, Shih PY, et al. Granulomatous variant of chronic pigmented purpuric dermatoses: report of four new cases and an association with hyperlipidaemia. Clin Exp Dermatol 2007; 32:513.
- Kerns MJ, Mallatt BD, Shamma HN. Granulomatous pigmented purpura: an unusual histological variant. Am J Dermatopathol 2009; 31:77.
- Lee SH, Kwon JE, Lee KG, Roh MR. Granulomatous variant of chronic pigmented purpuric dermatosis associated with hyperlipidaemia. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010; 24:1243.
- Kaplan J, Burgin S, Sepehr A. Granulomatous pigmented purpura: report of a case and review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol 2011; 38:984.
- Satoh T, Yokozeki H, Nishioka K. Chronic pigmented purpura associated with odontogenic infection. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 46:942.
- Pratt M, Taraska V. Disperse blue dyes 106 and 124 are common causes of textile dermatitis and should serve as screening allergens for this condition. Am J Contact Dermat 2000; 11:30.
- van der Veen JP, Neering H, de Haan P, Bruynzeel DP. Pigmented purpuric clothing dermatitis due to Disperse Blue 85. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 19:222.
- Foti C, Elia G, Filotico R, Angelini G. Purpuric clothing dermatitis due to Disperse Yellow 27. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 39:273.
- Lazarov A, Cordoba M. The purpuric patch test in patients with allergic contact dermatitis from azo dyes. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 42:23.
- Shimunes E. Purpuric allergic contact dermatitis to paraphenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4:225.
- Roed-Petersen J, Clemmensen OJ, Menné T, Larsen E. Purpuric contact dermatitis from black rubber chemicals. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 18:166.
- Schmidt H, Larsen FS, Larsen PO, Søgaard H. Petechial reaction following patch testing with cobalt. Contact Dermatitis 1980; 6:91.
- Laurberg G, Christiansen JV. Purpuric allergic contact dermatitis to epoxy resin. Contact Dermatitis 1984; 11:186.
- Koch P, Baum HP, John S. Purpuric patch test reaction and venulitis due to methyl methacrylate in a dental prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34:213.
- de Waard-van der Spek FB, Oranje AP. Purpura caused by Emla is of toxic origin. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 36:11.
- van Joost T, van Ulsen J, Vuzevski VD, et al. Purpuric contact dermatitis to benzoyl peroxide. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 22:359.
- Abeck D, Gross GE, Kuwert C, et al. Acetaminophen-induced progressive pigmentary purpura (Schamberg's disease). J Am Acad Dermatol 1992; 27:123.
- Kwon SJ, Lee CW. Figurate purpuric eruptions on the trunk: acetaminophen-induced rashes. J Dermatol 1998; 25:756.
- Lipsker D, Cribier B, Heid E, Grosshans E. [Cutaneous lymphoma manifesting as pigmented, purpuric capillaries]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1999; 126:321.
- Peterson WC Jr, Manick KP. Purpuric eruptions associated with use of carbromal and meprobamate. Arch Dermatol 1967; 95:40.
- Nishioka K, Katayama I, Masuzawa M, et al. Drug-induced chronic pigmented purpura. J Dermatol 1989; 16:220.
- Voelter WW. Pigmented purpuric dermatosis-like reaction to topical fluorouracil. Arch Dermatol 1983; 119:875.
- Adams BB, Gadenne AS. Glipizide-induced pigmented purpuric dermatosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41:827.
- Tsao H, Lerner LH. Pigmented purpuric eruption associated with injection medroxyprogesterone acetate. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 43:308.
- Koçak AY, Akay BN, Heper AO. Sildenafil-induced pigmented purpuric dermatosis. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2013; 32:91.
- Nishioka K, Sarashi C, Katayama I. Chronic pigmented purpura induced by chemical substances. Clin Exp Dermatol 1980; 5:213.
- Kaplan R, Meehan SA, Leger M. A case of isotretinoin-induced purpura annularis telangiectodes of Majocchi and review of substance-induced pigmented purpuric dermatosis. JAMA Dermatol 2014; 150:182.
- Schetz D, Kocić I. A new adverse drug reaction--Schamberg's disease caused by amlodipine administration--a case report. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 80:1477.
- Macquarrie EK, Pasternak S, Torok M, et al. Persistent pigmented purpuric dermatitis: granulomatous variant. J Cutan Pathol 2011; 38:979.
- Tato BP, Marinero Escobedo S, Pérez González YC, et al. Granulomatous variant of pigmented purpuric dermatosis. Am J Dermatopathol 2012; 34:746.
- Gupta G, Holmes SC, Spence E, Mills PR. Capillaritis associated with interferon-alfa treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 43:937.
- Dessoukey MW, Abdel-Dayem H, Omar MF, Al-Suweidi NE. Pigmented purpuric dermatosis and hepatitis profile: a report on 10 patients. Int J Dermatol 2005; 44:486.
- Sawamura D, Ohata Y, Shibaki A, Shimizu H. Pigmented purpuric dermatosis in mixed cryoglobulinaemia associated with rheumatoid arthritis and hepatitis C infection. Acta Derm Venereol 2005; 85:460.
- Raslan HM, Ezzat WM, Abd El Hamid MF, et al. Skin manifestations of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in Cairo, Egypt. East Mediterr Health J 2009; 15:692.
- Ehsani AH, Ghodsi SZ, Nourmohammad-Pour P, et al. Pigmented purpura dermatosis and viral hepatitis: a case-control study. Australas J Dermatol 2013; 54:225.
- Magro CM, Schaefer JT, Crowson AN, et al. Pigmented purpuric dermatosis: classification by phenotypic and molecular profiles. Am J Clin Pathol 2007; 128:218.
- Shelley WB, Swaminathan R, Shelley ED. Lichen aureus: a hemosiderin tattoo associated with perforator vein incompetence. J Am Acad Dermatol 1984; 11:260.
- Aiba S, Tagami H. Immunohistologic studies in Schamberg's disease. Evidence for cellular immune reaction in lesional skin. Arch Dermatol 1988; 124:1058.
- Ghersetich I, Lotti T, Bacci S, et al. Cell infiltrate in progressive pigmented purpura (Schamberg's disease): immunophenotype, adhesion receptors, and intercellular relationships. Int J Dermatol 1995; 34:846.
- Krizsa J, Hunyadi J, Dobozy A. PUVA treatment of pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis (Gougerot-Blum). J Am Acad Dermatol 1992; 27:778.
- Iwatsuki K, Aoshima T, Tagami H, et al. Immunofluorescence study in purpura pigmentosa chronica. Acta Derm Venereol 1980; 60:341.
- Schamberg JF. A peculiar progressive pigmentary disease of the skin. Br J Dermatol 1901; 13:1.
- Roehm HR. Progressive pigmentary dermatosis (Schamberg). Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1968; 7:307.
- Hersh CS, Shwayder TA. Unilateral progressive pigmentary purpura (Schamberg's disease) in a 15-year-old boy. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991; 24:651.
- Draelos ZK, Hansen RC. Schamberg's purpura in children: case study and literature review. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1987; 26:659.
- Kerem E, Branski D, Gross-Kieselstein E, et al. Chronic pigmented purpura: a case report of Schamberg's disease. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1987; 26:657.
- Nichamin SJ, Brough AJ. Chronic progressive pigmentary purpura. Purpura annulares telangiectodes of Majocchi-Schamberg. Am J Dis Child 1968; 116:429.
- Majocchi D. Sopra una dermatosi telangiectode non ancora descritta: purpura annularis. G Ital Mal Ven 1896; 31:263.
- Wang A, Shuja F, Chan A, Wasko C. Unilateral purpura annularis telangiectodes of majocchi in an elderly male: an atypical presentation. Dermatol Online J 2013; 19:19263.
- Hoesly FJ, Huerter CJ, Shehan JM. Purpura annularis telangiectodes of Majocchi: case report and review of the literature. Int J Dermatol 2009; 48:1129.
- Kim HJ, Skidmore RA, Woosley JT. Pigmented purpura over the lower extremities. Purpura annularis telangiectodes of Majocchi. Arch Dermatol 1998; 134:1477, 1480.
- Hale EK. Purpura annularis telangiectodes of Majocchi. Dermatol Online J 2003; 9:17.
- Gougerot H, Blum P. Purpura angioscleux prurigeneux avec elements lichenoides. Bull Soc Franc Derm Syph 1925; 32:161.
- Wong RC, Solomon AR, Field SI, Anderson TF. Pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot-Blum mimicking Kaposi's sarcoma. Cutis 1983; 31:406.
- Marten RH. Case for diagnosis. Trans St. John's Hosp Dermatol Soc 1958; 30:98.
- Calnan CD. Lichen aureus. Br J Dermatol 1960; 72:373.
- Price ML, Jones EW, Calnan CD, MacDonald DM. Lichen aureus: a localized persistent form of pigmented purpuric dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1985; 112:307.
- Mishra D, Maheshwari V. Segmental lichen aureus in a child. Int J Dermatol 1991; 30:654.
- Leal-Khouri S, Sherman LD, Mallory SB. Segmental eruption in an 8-year-old girl. Pediatr Dermatol 1992; 9:154.
- Abramovits W, Landau JW, Lowe NJ. A report of two patients with lichen aureus. Arch Dermatol 1980; 116:1183.
- Ruiz-Esmenjaud J, Dahl MV. Segmental lichen aureus: onset associated with trauma and puberty. Arch Dermatol 1988; 124:1572.
- Lee HW, Lee DK, Chang SE, et al. Segmental lichen aureus: combination therapy with pentoxifylline and prostacyclin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006; 20:1378.
- Graham RM, English JS, Emmerson RW. Lichen aureus--a study of twelve cases. Clin Exp Dermatol 1984; 9:393.
- MOSTO SJ, CASALA AM. DISSEMINATED PRURIGINOUS ANGIODERMATITIS: ITCHING PURPURA. Arch Dermatol 1965; 91:351.
- Pravda DJ, Moynihan GD. Itching purpura. Cutis 1980; 25:147.
- Riordan CA, Darley C, Markey AC, et al. Unilateral linear capillaritis. Clin Exp Dermatol 1992; 17:182.
- Ma HJ, Zhao G, Liu W, et al. Unilateral linear capillaritis: two unusual Chinese cases. Eur J Dermatol 2007; 17:160.
- Mar A, Fergin P, Hogan P. Unilateral pigmented purpuric eruption. Australas J Dermatol 1999; 40:211.
- Taketuchi Y, Chinen T, Ichikawa Y, Ito M. Two cases of unilateral pigmented purpuric dermatosis. J Dermatol 2001; 28:493.
- Abdullah L, Abbas O. Dermacase. Can you identify this condition? Unilateral linear capillaritis. Can Fam Physician 2011; 57:563.
- Battle LR, Shalin SC, Gao L. Granulomatous pigmented purpuric dermatosis. Clin Exp Dermatol 2015; 40:387.
- Hanson C, Fischer R, Fraga G, Rajpara A. Granulomatous pigmented purpuric dermatosis: an unusual variant associated with hyperlipidemia. Dermatol Online J 2014; 21.
- MacKenzie AI, Biswas A. Granulomatous pigmented purpuric dermatosis: report of a case with atypical clinical presentation including dermoscopic findings. Am J Dermatopathol 2015; 37:311.
- Weedon D. The vasculopathic reaction pattern. In: Weedon's Skin Pathology, 3rd ed, Elsevier Limited, 2010. p.195.
- Fishman HC. Pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis of Gougerot-Blum. Cutis 1982; 29:260.
- Toro JR, Sander CA, LeBoit PE. Persistent pigmented purpuric dermatitis and mycosis fungoides: simulant, precursor, or both? A study by light microscopy and molecular methods. Am J Dermatopathol 1997; 19:108.
- Lor P, Krueger U, Kempf W, et al. Monoclonal rearrangement of the T cell receptor gamma-chain in lichenoid pigmented purpuric dermatitis of gougerot-blum responding to topical corticosteroid therapy. Dermatology 2002; 205:191.
- Rudolph RI. Lichen aureus. J Am Acad Dermatol 1983; 8:722.
- Fathy H, Abdelgaber S. Treatment of pigmented purpuric dermatoses with narrow-band UVB: a report of six cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2011; 25:603.
- Lasocki AL, Kelly RI. Narrowband UVB therapy as an effective treatment for Schamberg's disease. Australas J Dermatol 2008; 49:16.
- Gudi VS, White MI. Progressive pigmented purpura (Schamberg's disease) responding to TL01 ultraviolet B therapy. Clin Exp Dermatol 2004; 29:683.
- Karadag AS, Bilgili SG, Onder S, Calka O. Two cases of eczematid-like purpura of Doucas and Kapetanakis responsive to narrow band ultraviolet B treatment. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2013; 29:97.
- Dhali TK, Chahar M, Haroon MA. Phototherapy as an effective treatment for Majocchi's disease--case report. An Bras Dermatol 2015; 90:96.
- Can B, Turkoglu Z, Kavala M, et al. Successful treatment of generalized childhood Schamberg's disease with narrowband ultraviolet B therapy. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2011; 27:216.
- Kocaturk E, Kavala M, Zindanci I, et al. Narrowband UVB treatment of pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis (Gougerot-Blum). Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2009; 25:55.
- Lotti T, Ghersetich I, Panconesi E. Why should we use PUVA treatment in pigmented purpuric lichenoid dermatitis? J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 30:145.
- Seckin D, Yazici Z, Senol A, Demircay Z. A case of Schamberg's disease responding dramatically to PUVA treatment. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2008; 24:95.
- Ling TC, Goulden V, Goodfield MJ. PUVA therapy in lichen aureus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 45:145.
- Panda S, Malakar S, Lahiri K. Oral pentoxifylline vs topical betamethasone in Schamberg disease: a comparative randomized investigator-blinded parallel-group trial. Arch Dermatol 2004; 140:491.
- Kano Y, Hirayama K, Orihara M, Shiohara T. Successful treatment of Schamberg's disease with pentoxifylline. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 36:827.
- Wahba-Yahav AV. Schamberg's purpura: association with persistent hepatitis B surface antigenemia and treatment with pentoxifylline. Cutis 1994; 54:205.
- Basak PY, Ergin S. Should pentoxifylline be regarded as an effective treatment for Schamberg's disease? J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 44:548.
- Burkhart CG, Burkhart KM. Pentoxifylline for Schamberg's disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 39:298.
- Tamaki K, Yasaka N, Osada A, et al. Successful treatment of pigmented purpuric dermatosis with griseofulvin. Br J Dermatol 1995; 132:159.
- Agrawal SK, Gandhi V, Bhattacharya SN. Calcium dobesilate (Cd) in pigmented purpuric dermatosis (PPD): a pilot evaluation. J Dermatol 2004; 31:98.
- Geller M. Benefit of colchicine in the treatment of Schamberg's disease. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2000; 85:246.
- Murota H, Katayama I. Lichen aureus responding to topical tacrolimus treatment. J Dermatol 2011; 38:823.
- Kim SK, Kim EH, Kim YC. Treatment of pigmented purpuric dermatosis with topical photodynamic therapy. Dermatology 2009; 219:184.
- Hong DK, Chang IK, Lee Y, et al. Treatment of segmental lichen aureus with a pulsed-dye laser: new treatment options for lichen aureus. Eur J Dermatol 2013; 23:891.
- Okada K, Ishikawa O, Miyachi Y. Purpura pigmentosa chronica successfully treated with oral cyclosporin A. Br J Dermatol 1996; 134:180.
- Reinhold U, Seiter S, Ugurel S, Tilgen W. Treatment of progressive pigmented purpura with oral bioflavonoids and ascorbic acid: an open pilot study in 3 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41:207.
- Schober SM, Peitsch WK, Bonsmann G, et al. Early treatment with rutoside and ascorbic acid is highly effective for progressive pigmented purpuric dermatosis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2014; 12:1112.
- Barnhill RL, Braverman IM. Progression of pigmented purpura-like eruptions to mycosis fungoides: report of three cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988; 19:25.
- Martínez W, del Pozo J, Vázquez J, et al. Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma presenting as disseminated, pigmented, purpura-like eruption. Int J Dermatol 2001; 40:140.
- Ugajin T, Satoh T, Yokozeki H, Nishioka K. Mycosis fungoides presenting as pigmented purpuric eruption. Eur J Dermatol 2005; 15:489.
- Kazakov DV, Burg G, Kempf W. Clinicopathological spectrum of mycosis fungoides. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2004; 18:397.
- Georgala S, Katoulis AC, Symeonidou S, et al. Persistent pigmented purpuric eruption associated with mycosis fungoides: a case report and review of the literature. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2001; 15:62.
- Puddu P, Ferranti G, Frezzolini A, et al. Pigmented purpura-like eruption as cutaneous sign of mycosis fungoides with autoimmune purpura. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 40:298.
- Cather JC, Farmer A, Jackow C, et al. Unusual presentation of mycosis fungoides as pigmented purpura with malignant thymoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 39:858.
- Crowson AN, Magro CM, Zahorchak R. Atypical pigmentary purpura: a clinical, histopathologic, and genotypic study. Hum Pathol 1999; 30:1004.
- Ladrigan MK, Poligone B. The spectrum of pigmented purpuric dermatosis and mycosis fungoides: atypical T-cell dyscrasia. Cutis 2014; 94:297.