UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Patient safety in the operating room

Authors
Bradford D Winters, MD, PhD
Peter J Pronovost, MD, PhD
Ayse P Gurses, PhD
Section Editor
Hilary Sanfey, MD
Deputy Editor
Nancy A Nussmeier, MD, FAHA

INTRODUCTION

Surgical and anesthetic safety has improved significantly in the last few decades. Examples of important safety advances include improved surgical techniques, technology for patient monitoring such as pulse oximetry to prevent hypoxemia, and fail-safe systems such as pin-indexing systems for gas cylinders and lines to prevent delivery of hypoxic gas mixtures. Teamwork between anesthesiologists, surgeons, and nurses also improves operating room safety. However, the operating room (OR) environment continues to have significant safety risks for patients as well as the health care providers who work there.

This topic focuses on the science of safety principles and efforts to improve safety in the OR. Related quality and safety topics that address the details of informed consent, perioperative medication management, and hospital discharge are discussed separately. (See "Informed procedural consent" and "Perioperative medication management" and "Hospital discharge and readmission".)

SCIENCE OF SAFETY TOOLS

The goal of applying scientific principles to health care practice is to reduce adverse events and improve patient safety.

Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) — One model of work system design for patient safety is the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) [1,2]. This model is anchored in the discipline of human factors engineering and describes the five major components of a health care system:

Tasks

                              

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2016. | This topic last updated: Wed Apr 20 00:00:00 GMT 2016.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Carayon P, Schoofs Hundt A, Karsh BT, et al. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15 Suppl 1:i50.
  2. Carayon P, Hundt AS, Alvarado CJ, et al. Implementing a Systems Engineering Intervention for Improving Safety in Outpatient Surgeries. In: Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation, Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI. (Eds), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville, MD 2005. Vol 3.
  3. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist-based surgical safety intervention. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20:102.
  4. Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Dziekan G, et al. Effect of a 19-item surgical safety checklist during urgent operations in a global patient population. Ann Surg 2010; 251:976.
  5. Pronovost PJ, Holzmueller CG, Martinez E, et al. A practical tool to learn from defects in patient care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2006; 32:102.
  6. Surowiecki, J. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economics, Societies and Nations, 1st edition, Random House, New York 2004.
  7. Timmel J, Kent PS, Holzmueller CG, et al. Impact of the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) on safety culture in a surgical inpatient unit. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010; 36:252.
  8. Pronovost, P, Weast, et al. Implementing and validating a comprehensive unit-based safety program. J Pat Saf 2005; 1:33.
  9. Holzmueller CG, Timmel J, Kent PS, et al. Implementing a team-based daily goals sheet in a non-ICU setting. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2009; 35:384.
  10. Makary MA, Holzmueller CG, Thompson D, et al. Operating room briefings: working on the same page. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2006; 32:351.
  11. Makary MA, Holzmueller CG, Sexton JB, et al. Operating room debriefings. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2006; 32:407.
  12. Thompson DA, Holzmueller CG, Lubomski L, Pronovost PJ. View the world through a different lens: shadowing another provider. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2008; 34:614.
  13. Alonso, A, Baker, DP, Holtzman, A, et al. Reducing medical error in the Military Health System: How can team training help?. Human Resource Management Review 2006; 16:396.
  14. Weaver SJ, Rosen MA, DiazGranados D, et al. Does teamwork improve performance in the operating room? A multilevel evaluation. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010; 36:133.
  15. Stead K, Kumar S, Schultz TJ, et al. Teams communicating through STEPPS. Med J Aust 2009; 190:S128.
  16. Capella J, Smith S, Philp A, et al. Teamwork training improves the clinical care of trauma patients. J Surg Educ 2010; 67:439.
  17. Bergs J, Hellings J, Cleemput I, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist on postoperative complications. Br J Surg 2014; 101:150.
  18. Urbach DR, Govindarajan A, Saskin R, et al. Introduction of surgical safety checklists in Ontario, Canada. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1029.
  19. Bosk CL, Dixon-Woods M, Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ. Reality check for checklists. Lancet 2009; 374:444.
  20. Leape LL. The checklist conundrum. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1063.
  21. Smith HM, Jacob AK, Segura LG, et al. Simulation education in anesthesia training: a case report of successful resuscitation of bupivacaine-induced cardiac arrest linked to recent simulation training. Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1581.
  22. Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y, et al. Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA 2010; 304:1693.
  23. Paull DE, Mazzia LM, Wood SD, et al. Briefing guide study: preoperative briefing and postoperative debriefing checklists in the Veterans Health Administration medical team training program. Am J Surg 2010; 200:620.
  24. Lingard L, Regehr G, Cartmill C, et al. Evaluation of a preoperative team briefing: a new communication routine results in improved clinical practice. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20:475.
  25. Guglielmi C, Canacari E, Moorman D, et al. Strategies for preventing wrong site, wrong procedure, wrong patient surgery. AORN J 2010; 92:22.
  26. Devine J, Chutkan N, Norvell DC, Dettori JR. Avoiding wrong site surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35:S28.
  27. Neily J, Mills PD, Eldridge N, et al. Incorrect surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room. Arch Surg 2009; 144:1028.
  28. http://www.jointcommission.org/sentinel_event_statistics_quarterly/ (Accessed on March 21, 2011).
  29. Broex EC, van Asselt AD, Bruggeman CA, van Tiel FH. Surgical site infections: how high are the costs? J Hosp Infect 2009; 72:193.
  30. Gagliardi AR, Eskicioglu C, McKenzie M, et al. Identifying opportunities for quality improvement in surgical site infection prevention. Am J Infect Control 2009; 37:398.
  31. Casey AL, Elliott TS. Progress in the prevention of surgical site infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2009; 22:370.
  32. Sessler DI. New surgical thermal management guidelines. Lancet 2009; 374:1049.
  33. Mauermann WJ, Nemergut EC. The anesthesiologist's role in the prevention of surgical site infections. Anesthesiology 2006; 105:413.
  34. SCIP-Inf-7 www.qualitynet.org (Accessed on March 02, 2010).
  35. Galvão CM, Liang Y, Clark AM. Effectiveness of cutaneous warming systems on temperature control: meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs 2010; 66:1196.
  36. Pronovost PJ, Goeschel CA, Colantuoni E, et al. Sustaining reductions in catheter related bloodstream infections in Michigan intensive care units: observational study. BMJ 2010; 340:c309.
  37. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2725.
  38. Berenholtz SM, Pronovost PJ, Lipsett PA, et al. Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:2014.
  39. Merry AF, Cooper JB, Soyannwo O, et al. An iterative process of global quality improvement: the International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia 2010. Can J Anaesth 2010; 57:1021.
  40. Merry AF, Cooper JB, Soyannwo O, et al. International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia 2010. Can J Anaesth 2010; 57:1027.
  41. Nishiyama K, Komori M, Kodaka M, Tomizawa Y. Crisis in the operating room: fires, explosions and electrical accidents. J Artif Organs 2010; 13:129.
  42. Adedeji R, Oragui E, Khan W, Maruthainar N. The importance of correct patient positioning in theatres and implications of mal-positioning. J Perioper Pract 2010; 20:143.
  43. Barker SJ, Doyle DJ. Electrical safety in the operating room: dry versus wet. Anesth Analg 2010; 110:1517.
  44. Le Heron J, Padovani R, Smith I, Czarwinski R. Radiation protection of medical staff. Eur J Radiol 2010; 76:20.
  45. Chaffins JA. Radiation protection and procedures in the OR. Radiol Technol 2008; 79:415.
  46. Sheyn DD, Racadio JM, Ying J, et al. Efficacy of a radiation safety education initiative in reducing radiation exposure in the pediatric IR suite. Pediatr Radiol 2008; 38:669.
  47. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, USA. Tubing misconnections-a persistent and potentially deadly occurrence. Sentinel Event Alert, Issue 36, April 3, 2006. www.jointcommission.org/sentinel_event_alert_issue_36_tubing_misconnections—a_persistent_and_potentially_deadly_occurrence/ (Accessed on August 11, 2010).
  48. McAfee N, Seidel K, Watkins S, Flynn JT. A continuous quality improvement project to decrease hemodialysis catheter infections in pediatric patients: use of a closed luer-lock access cap. Nephrol Nurs J 2010; 37:541.
  49. Simmons D, Phillips MS, Grissinger M, et al. Error-avoidance recommendations for tubing misconnections when using Luer-tip connectors: a statement by the USP Safe Medication Use Expert Committee. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2008; 34:293.
  50. Fraind DB, Slagle JM, Tubbesing VA, et al. Reengineering intravenous drug and fluid administration processes in the operating room: step one: task analysis of existing processes. Anesthesiology 2002; 97:139.
  51. Arora S, Hull L, Sevdalis N, et al. Factors compromising safety in surgery: stressful events in the operating room. Am J Surg 2010; 199:60.
  52. http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/SEA_36.PDF.
  53. Papaspyros SC, Javangula KC, Adluri RK, O'Regan DJ. Briefing and debriefing in the cardiac operating room. Analysis of impact on theatre team attitude and patient safety. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 10:43.
  54. Starmer AJ, Spector ND, Srivastava R, et al. Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:1803.
  55. Hudson CC, McDonald B, Hudson JK, et al. Impact of anesthetic handover on mortality and morbidity in cardiac surgery: a cohort study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2015; 29:11.
  56. Caruso TJ, Marquez JL, Wu DS, et al. Implementation of a standardized postanesthesia care handoff increases information transfer without increasing handoff duration. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2015; 41:35.
  57. Dixon JL, Stagg HW, Wehbe-Janek H, et al. A standard handoff improves cardiac surgical patient transfer: operating room to intensive care unit. J Healthc Qual 2015; 37:22.