Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


Parastomal hernia

INTRODUCTION

A parastomal hernia (PSH) is a type of incisional hernia that occurs at the site of the stoma or immediately adjacent to the stoma (image 1). It forms when the abdominal wall defect, the trephine, is continually stretched by the tangential forces applied along the circumference of the abdominal wall opening [1].

The construction of an ostomy and the management of patients with an ileostomy or colostomy are reviewed separately. (See "Surgical principles of ostomy construction" and "Management of patients with a colostomy or ileostomy".)

INCIDENCE

A parastomal hernia (PSH) is the most frequent complication following the construction of a colostomy or an ileostomy. It has even been suggested that a certain degree of PSH is almost inevitable [2].

The reported incidence varies widely and is related to a number of factors including: the lack of a standard definition, type of ostomy constructed, and variability in the duration of follow-up after ostomy construction [3-13]. A minor degree of parastomal weakness is present in many patients and does not represent a true hernia [14].

A review found that PSH occurs in 1.8 to 28.3 percent of patients with end-ileostomy, 0 to 6.2 percent with loop ileostomy, 4.0 to 48.1 percent with end-colostomy, and 0 to 30.8 percent with loop colostomies [15]. The lower rate for loop ostomy is related to the temporary nature of most of these stomas and the short duration of follow-up. Most parastomal hernias occur within the first two years of construction, and studies with longer follow-up report higher PSH rates [16].  

                

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Jun 2014. | This topic last updated: Jan 13, 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. de Ruiter P, Bijnen AB. Successful local repair of paracolostomy hernia with a newly developed prosthetic device. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992; 7:132.
  2. Goligher, J. Surgery of the Anus, Colon and Rectum, 5th ed, Balleire Tindall, London 1984.
  3. Whittaker M, Goligher JC. A comparison of the results of extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal techniques for construction of terminal iliac colostomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1976; 19:342.
  4. Cheung MT. Complications of an abdominal stoma: an analysis of 322 stomas. Aust N Z J Surg 1995; 65:808.
  5. Mäkelä JT, Turku PH, Laitinen ST. Analysis of late stomal complications following ostomy surgery. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1997; 86:305.
  6. Leenen LP, Kuypers JH. Some factors influencing the outcome of stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32:500.
  7. Arumugam PJ, Bevan L, Macdonald L, et al. A prospective audit of stomas--analysis of risk factors and complications and their management. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5:49.
  8. Leong AP, Londono-Schimmer EE, Phillips RK. Life-table analysis of stomal complications following ileostomy. Br J Surg 1994; 81:727.
  9. Porter JA, Salvati EP, Rubin RJ, Eisenstat TE. Complications of colostomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32:299.
  10. Harshaw DH Jr, Gardner B, Vives A, Sundaram KN. The effect of technical factors upon complications from abdominal perineal resections. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974; 139:756.
  11. Marks CG, Ritchie JK. The complications of synchronous combined excision for adenocarcinoma of the rectum at St Mark's Hospital. Br J Surg 1975; 62:901.
  12. von Smitten K, Husa A, Kyllönen L. Long-term results of sigmoidostomy in patients with anorectal malignancy. Acta Chir Scand 1986; 152:211.
  13. Kronborg O, Kramhöft J, Backer O, Sprechler M. Late complications following operations for cancer of the rectum and anus. Dis Colon Rectum 1974; 17:750.
  14. Martin L, Foster G. Parastomal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996; 78:81.
  15. Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 2003; 90:784.
  16. Hotouras A, Murphy J, Power N, et al. Radiological incidence of parastomal herniation in cancer patients with permanent colostomy: what is the ideal size of the surgical aperture? Int J Surg 2013; 11:425.
  17. Devlin HB. Peristomal hernia. In: Operative Surgery Volume 1: Alimentary Tract and Abdominal Wall, 4th ed, Dudley H (Ed), Butterworths, London 1983. p.441.
  18. Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin A, et al. The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11:173.
  19. Pearl RK. Parastomal hernias. World J Surg 1989; 13:569.
  20. Leslie D. The parastomal hernia. Surg Clin North Am 1984; 64:407.
  21. Rosin JD, Bonardi RA. Paracolostomy hernia repair with Marlex mesh: a new technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1977; 20:299.
  22. Bass EM, Del Pino A, Tan A, et al. Does preoperative stoma marking and education by the enterostomal therapist affect outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40:440.
  23. De Raet J, Delvaux G, Haentjens P, Van Nieuwenhove Y. Waist circumference is an independent risk factor for the development of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51:1806.
  24. Colwell JC. Stomal and peristomal complications. In: Fecal & Urinary Diversions: Management Principles, Goldberg MT, Colwell JC, Carmel JE (Eds), Mosby, St. Louis 2004. p.308.
  25. Trunbull GB. Parastomal hernias. Ostomy Wound Manage 2003; 49:15.
  26. Hansson BM, de Hingh IH, Bleichrodt RP. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair is feasible and safe: early results of a prospective clinical study including 55 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 2007; 21:989.
  27. Junge K, Klinge U, Rosch R, et al. Decreased collagen type I/III ratio in patients with recurring hernia after implantation of alloplastic prostheses. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2004; 389:17.
  28. Rosch R, Junge K, Knops M, et al. Analysis of collagen-interacting proteins in patients with incisional hernias. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2003; 387:427.
  29. Serra-Aracil X, Bombardo-Junca J, Moreno-Matias J, et al. Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Ann Surg 2009; 249:583.
  30. Helgstrand F, Gögenur I, Rosenberg J. Prevention of parastomal hernia by the placement of a mesh at the primary operation. Hernia 2008; 12:577.
  31. Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study. World J Surg 2009; 33:118.
  32. Vijayasekar C, Marimuthu K, Jadhav V, Mathew G. Parastomal hernia: Is prevention better than cure? Use of preperitoneal polypropylene mesh at the time of stoma formation. Tech Coloproctol 2008; 12:309.
  33. Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 2004; 91:280.
  34. Israelsson LA. Preventing and treating parastomal hernia. World J Surg 2005; 29:1086.
  35. Marimuthu K, Vijayasekar C, Ghosh D, Mathew G. Prevention of parastomal hernia using preperitoneal mesh: a prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8:672.
  36. Gögenur I, Mortensen J, Harvald T, et al. Prevention of parastomal hernia by placement of a polypropylene mesh at the primary operation. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49:1131.
  37. Geisler DJ, Reilly JC, Vaughan SG, et al. Safety and outcome of use of nonabsorbable mesh for repair of fascial defects in the presence of open bowel. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46:1118.
  38. Hauters P, Cardin JL, Lepere M, et al. Prevention of parastomal hernia by intraperitoneal onlay mesh reinforcement at the time of stoma formation. Hernia 2012; 16:655.
  39. López-Cano M, Lozoya-Trujillo R, Quiroga S, et al. Use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Hernia 2012; 16:661.
  40. Ventham NT, Brady RR, Stewart RG, et al. Prophylactic mesh placement of permanent stomas at index operation for colorectal cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2012; 94:569.
  41. Wijeyekoon SP, Gurusamy K, El-Gendy K, Chan CL. Prevention of parastomal herniation with biologic/composite prosthetic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 211:637.
  42. Lee L, Saleem A, Landry T, et al. Cost effectiveness of mesh prophylaxis to prevent parastomal hernia in patients undergoing permanent colostomy for rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 218:82.
  43. Sjödahl R, Anderberg B, Bolin T. Parastomal hernia in relation to site of the abdominal stoma. Br J Surg 1988; 75:339.
  44. Harold, KL. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. In: Challenging Hernias PostGraduate Course. SAGES Annual Meeting. Philadelphia, PA, April 2008. p. 43.
  45. Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ Jr, Matthews JB. Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg 1994; 129:413.
  46. Franks ME, Hrebinko RL Jr. Technique of parastomal hernia repair using synthetic mesh. Urology 2001; 57:551.
  47. Byers JM, Steinberg JB, Postier RG. Repair of parastomal hernias using polypropylene mesh. Arch Surg 1992; 127:1246.
  48. Morris-Stiff G, Hughes LE. The continuing challenge of parastomal hernia: failure of a novel polypropylene mesh repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998; 80:184.
  49. Aldridge AJ, Simson JN. Erosion and perforation of colon by synthetic mesh in a recurrent paracolostomy hernia. Hernia 2001; 5:110.
  50. Kasperk R, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. The repair of large parastomal hernias using a midline approach and a prosthetic mesh in the sublay position. Am J Surg 2000; 179:186.
  51. Schumpelick V, Klinge U, Welty G, Klosterhalfen B. [Meshes within the abdominal wall]. Chirurg 1999; 70:876.
  52. Steele SR, Lee P, Martin MJ, et al. Is parastomal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh safe? Am J Surg 2003; 185:436.
  53. Tekkis PP, Kocher HM, Payne JG. Parastomal hernia repair: modified thorlakson technique, reinforced by polypropylene mesh. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:1505.
  54. Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Ludwig K. Repair of paracolostomy hernias with a prosthetic mesh in the intraperitoneal onlay position: modified Sugarbaker technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:185.
  55. Sugarbaker PH. Peritoneal approach to prosthetic mesh repair of paraostomy hernias. Ann Surg 1985; 201:344.
  56. van Sprundel TC, Gerritsen van der Hoop A. Modified technique for parastomal hernia repair in patients with intractable stoma-care problems. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7:445.
  57. Guzmán-Valdivia G, Guerrero TS, Laurrabaquio HV. Parastomal hernia-repair using mesh and an open technique. World J Surg 2008; 32:465.
  58. Baig MK, Larach JA, Chang S, et al. Outcome of parastomal hernia repair with and without midline laparotomy. Tech Coloproctol 2006; 10:282.
  59. LeBlanc KA, Bellanger DE. Laparoscopic repair of paraostomy hernias: early results. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 194:232.
  60. Virzí G, Scaravilli F, Ragazzi S, Piazza D. Laparoscopic paracolostomy hernia mesh repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2007; 17:548.
  61. Berger D, Bientzle M. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a single surgeon's experience in 66 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50:1668.
  62. Jani K, Palanivelu C, Parthasarathi R, Madhankumar MV. Laparoscopic repair of a paracolostomy hernia: secure reinforced closure of the defect prevents recurrence. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007; 17:216.
  63. Mancini GJ, McClusky DA 3rd, Khaitan L, et al. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a nonslit mesh technique. Surg Endosc 2007; 21:1487.
  64. Voitk A. Simple technique for laparoscopic paracolostomy hernia repair. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:1451.
  65. Muysoms EE, Hauters PJ, Van Nieuwenhove Y, et al. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a multi-centre retrospective review and shift in technique. Acta Chir Belg 2008; 108:400.
  66. Cassar K, Munro A. Surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Br J Surg 2002; 89:534.
  67. Berger D, Bientzle M. Polyvinylidene fluoride: a suitable mesh material for laparoscopic incisional and parastomal hernia repair! A prospective, observational study with 344 patients. Hernia 2009; 13:167.
  68. Rosen MJ, Fatima J, Sarr MG. Repair of abdominal wall hernias with restoration of abdominal wall function. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14:175.
  69. Kish KJ, Buinewicz BR, Morris JB. Acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm): new material in the repair of stoma site hernias. Am Surg 2005; 71:1047.
  70. Greenstein AJ, Aldoroty RA. Parastomal hernia repair using cross-linked porcine dermis: report of a case. Surg Today 2008; 38:1048.
  71. Lo Menzo E, Martinez JM, Spector SA, et al. Use of biologic mesh for a complicated paracolostomy hernia. Am J Surg 2008; 196:715.
  72. Taner T, Cima RR, Larson DW, et al. The use of human acellular dermal matrix for parastomal hernia repair in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a novel technique to repair fascial defects. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52:349.
  73. Slater NJ, Hansson BM, Buyne OR, et al. Repair of parastomal hernias with biologic grafts: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 15:1252.
  74. Cheung MT, Chia NH, Chiu WY. Surgical treatment of parastomal hernia complicating sigmoid colostomies. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44:266.
  75. Horgan K, Hughes LE. Para-ileostomy hernia: failure of a local repair technique. Br J Surg 1986; 73:439.