Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Overview of the management of patients with prosthetic heart valves

William H Gaasch, MD
William A Zoghbi, MD, FASE, FAHA, MACC
Section Editor
Catherine M Otto, MD
Deputy Editor
Susan B Yeon, MD, JD, FACC


Surgical replacement of a diseased heart valve with a prosthetic valve or transcatheter implantation of a prosthetic valve exchanges the native disease for prosthesis-related complications [1-3]. The frequency of various complications depends upon the valve type and position, and other clinical risk factors. Complications include embolic events, bleeding, valve obstruction (due to thrombosis or pannus), infective endocarditis, structural deterioration (particularly for bioprosthetic valves), paravalvular regurgitation, hemolytic anemia, and prosthesis-patient mismatch.(See "Complications of prosthetic heart valves".)

Management of patients with prosthetic valves, including monitoring for complications, is reviewed here. Issues related to antithrombotic therapy in patients (including pregnant women) with prosthetic valves, management of complications, choice of prosthetic valve, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and prosthesis-patient mismatch are discussed separately. (See "Antithrombotic therapy for prosthetic heart valves: Indications" and "Antithrombotic therapy for prosthetic heart valves: Management of bleeding and invasive procedures" and "Complications of prosthetic heart valves" and "Management of pregnant women with prosthetic heart valves" and "Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Indications and outcomes" and "Surgical procedures for severe chronic mitral regurgitation" and "Choice of prosthetic heart valve for surgical replacement", section on 'Prosthetic valve-patient mismatch'.)


Goals — The goals of serial follow-up of patients with prosthetic valves include identification of changes in clinical status, management of antithrombotic therapy, monitoring for complications, identification of changes in valve function, and provision of patient education.

Change in clinical status — Patients should be educated about prosthetic valve outcomes and should be instructed to seek prompt medical attention for any new sign or symptom that might be related to a valve complication such as a significant change in the audible click of a mechanical prosthesis, persistent or recurrent fever, decrease in exercise tolerance, ischemic cerebral events, or palpitations. Repeat evaluation with echocardiography should be performed any time there is a change in clinical status or examination findings.

Schedule of follow-up — The main components of follow-up are history, physical examination, and echocardiography. We suggest the following approach to evaluation after prosthetic valve implantation, largely based on the 2014 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease [3]:


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Sep 2016. | This topic last updated: Apr 15, 2016.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), Vahanian A, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J 2012; 33:2451.
  2. Whitlock RP, Sun JC, Fremes SE, et al. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for valvular disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141:e576S.
  3. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63:e57.
  4. Vongpatanasin W, Hillis LD, Lange RA. Prosthetic heart valves. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:407.
  5. Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, et al. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22:975.
  6. Olmos L, Salazar G, Barbetseas J, et al. Usefulness of transthoracic echocardiography in detecting significant prosthetic mitral valve regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83:199.
  7. Shiran A, Weissman NJ, Merdler A, et al. Transesophageal echocardiographic findings in patients with nonobstructed prosthetic valves and suspected cardiac source of embolism. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88:1441.
  8. Saad RM, Barbetseas J, Olmos L, et al. Application of the continuity equation and valve resistance to the evaluation of St. Jude Medical prosthetic aortic valve dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80:1239.
  9. Horstkotte D, Friedrichs W, Pippert H, et al. [Benefits of endocarditis prevention in patients with prosthetic heart valves]. Z Kardiol 1986; 75:8.
  10. Bonow RO, Nishimura RA, Thompson PD, Udelson JE. Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 5: Valvular Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66:2385.
  11. Bonow RO, Cheitlin MD, Crawford MH, Douglas PS. Task Force 3: valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45:1334.