Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Overview of breast reduction

Juliana Hansen, MD
Shiliang Chang, MD
Section Editors
Anees B Chagpar, MD, MSc, MA, MPH, MBA, FACS, FRCS(C)
Charles E Butler, MD, FACS
Deputy Editor
Kathryn A Collins, MD, PhD, FACS


The extent to which extremely large breasts can negatively impact a woman’s life is often underappreciated. For those who live with unwanted macromastia and its associated symptoms, the relief from pain and tension that breast reduction can produce is immediately noticeable after surgery. Recovery from surgery leads to additional benefits and the majority of women enjoy an improved quality of life.

An overview of breast reduction, including patient selection, techniques, and complications, is presented here. An overview of the flap and graft techniques used for breast reduction is reviewed separately. (See "Principles of grafts and flaps for reconstructive surgery".)


Women with excessively large breasts (macromastia) who seek breast reduction often experience chronic pain and tension in their neck, shoulders, and upper back, and a feeling of heaviness of the breasts. Symptoms are generally worse at the end of a day of upright posture. The sturdy support bra worn by many women with macromastia can cause visible, as well as palpable, tender grooves, overlying the trapezius near its insertion site on the acromion (picture 1). Over the years, these can become permanent troughs that do not resolve even after the bra is removed.

A typical woman seeking breast reduction (reduction mammoplasty) will have two to five pounds (900 to 2200 grams) of excess breast tissue weight that pulls the shoulders forward (picture 2). The trapezius muscles may hypertrophy to compensate. Women with macromastia complain of chronic pain in the breasts, shoulders, neck, or back as a result of the weight of their breasts. (See 'Indications' below.)

Women who choose to undergo breast reduction surgery desire more attractive appearing breasts which usually means breasts with nipples that point outward (not downward), and that are rounded and full on top and in proportion to the rest of their body.


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Sep 2016. | This topic last updated: Jun 21, 2016.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Committee Opinion No. 662: Breast and Labial Surgery in Adolescents. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127:e138.
  2. Ansell JR, Buchholz MC. Chronic bilateral T1 denervation in women with macromastia. Muscle Nerve 2013; 47:183.
  3. Gonzalez F, Brown FE, Gold ME, et al. Preoperative and postoperative nipple-areola sensibility in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92:809.
  4. Hamdi M, Greuse M, Nemec E, et al. Breast sensation after superior pedicle versus inferior pedicle mammaplasty: anatomical and histological evaluation. Br J Plast Surg 2001; 54:43.
  5. Davis GM, Ringler SL, Short K, et al. Reduction mammaplasty: long-term efficacy, morbidity, and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96:1106.
  6. Brzozowski D, Niessen M, Evans HB, Hurst LN. Breast-feeding after inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105:530.
  7. Harris L, Morris SF, Freiberg A. Is breast feeding possible after reduction mammaplasty? Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89:836.
  8. de Castro CC, Coelho RS, Cupello AM. Analysis of late results in postpregnancy mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 1991; 26:111.
  9. Sandsmark M, Amland PF, Abyholm F, Traaholt L. Reduction mammaplasty. A comparative study of the Orlando and Robbins methods in 292 patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1992; 26:203.
  10. Souto GC, Giugliani ER, Giugliani C, Schneider MA. The impact of breast reduction surgery on breastfeeding performance. J Hum Lact 2003; 19:43.
  11. Colwell AS, Kukreja J, Breuing KH, et al. Occult breast carcinoma in reduction mammaplasty specimens: 14-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113:1984.
  12. Clark CJ, Whang S, Paige KT. Incidence of precancerous lesions in breast reduction tissue: a pathologic review of 562 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124:1033.
  13. Descamps MJ, Landau AG, Lazarus D, Hudson DA. A formula determining resection weights for reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121:397.
  14. Schnur Sliding Scale. http://www.bcbst.com/mpmanual/The_Schnur_Sliding_Scale_chart.htm (Accessed on October 15, 2015).
  15. Jackson IT, Bayramicli M, Gupta M, Yavuzer R. Importance of the pedicle length measurement in reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104:398.
  16. Climo MS, Alexander JE. Intercostothelial circulation: nipple survival in reduction mammaplasty in the absence of a dermal pedicle. Ann Plast Surg 1980; 4:128.
  17. Iwuagwu OC, Drew PJ. Deskinning versus deepithelialization for inferior pedicle reduction mammoplasty: a prospective comparative analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005; 29:202.
  18. Hall-Findlay EJ. A simplified vertical reduction mammaplasty: shortening the learning curve. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104:748.
  20. Nicolle F. Improved standards in reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69:453.
  21. Lassus C. A 30-year experience with vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97:373.
  22. Lejour M. Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 94:100.
  23. Hester TR Jr, Bostwick J 3rd, Miller L, Cunningham SJ. Breast reduction utilizing the maximally vascularized central breast pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76:890.
  24. Regnault P. Reduction mammaplasty by the "B" technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974; 53:19.
  25. Benelli L. A new periareolar mammaplasty: the "round block" technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1990; 14:93.
  26. Hammond DC. Short scar periareolar inferior pedicle reduction (SPAIR) mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103:890.
  27. Góes JC. Periareolar mammaplasty: double skin technique with application of polyglactine or mixed mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97:959.
  28. Passot R. La correction esthetique du prolapsus mammaire par le procede de la transposition du mamelon. Presse Med 1925; 33:317.
  29. Yousif NJ, Larson DL, Sanger JR, Matloub HS. Elimination of the vertical scar in reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89:459.
  30. Savaci N. Reduction mammoplasty by the central pedicle, avoiding a vertical scar. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1996; 20:171.
  31. Grazer FM. Suction-assisted lipectomy: Its indications, contraindications and complications. In: Advances in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Year Book, Chicago 1984. Vol 51.
  32. Teimourian B, Massac E Jr, Wiegering CE. Reduction suction mammoplasty and suction lipectomy as an adjunct to breast surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1985; 9:97.
  33. Courtiss EH. Reduction mammaplasty by suction alone. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92:1276.
  34. Matarasso A, Courtiss EH. Suction mammaplasty: the use of suction lipectomy to reduce large breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87:709.
  35. Cruz-Korchin N, Korchin L. Vertical versus Wise pattern breast reduction: patient satisfaction, revision rates, and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112:1573.
  36. Dabbah A, Lehman JA Jr, Parker MG, et al. Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome analysis. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35:337.
  37. Mandrekas AD, Zambacos GJ, Anastasopoulos A, Hapsas DA. Reduction mammaplasty with the inferior pedicle technique: early and late complications in 371 patients. Br J Plast Surg 1996; 49:442.
  38. Erdogan B, Ayhan M, Deren O, Tuncel A. Importance of pedicle length in inferior pedicle technique and long-term outcome of areola-to-fold distance. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002; 26:436.
  39. Lejour M. Vertical mammaplasty: early complications after 250 personal consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104:764.
  40. Collis N, McGuiness CM, Batchelor AG. Drainage in breast reduction surgery: a prospective randomised intra-patient trail. Br J Plast Surg 2005; 58:286.
  41. Corion LU, Smeulders MJ, van Zuijlen PP, van der Horst CM. Draining after breast reduction: a randomised controlled inter-patient study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62:865.
  42. Wrye SW, Banducci DR, Mackay D, et al. Routine drainage is not required in reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111:113.
  43. Khan SM, Smeulders MJ, Van der Horst CM. Wound drainage after plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; :CD007258.