Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Orthopedic issues in myelomeningocele (spina bifida)

Vineeta T Swaroop, MD
Luciano Dias, MD
Section Editors
Marc C Patterson, MD, FRACP
William Phillips, MD
Deputy Editor
Carrie Armsby, MD, MPH


Myelomeningocele, also known as spina bifida, leads to bowel, bladder, motor, and sensory paralysis below the level of the spinal lesion. Patients with myelomeningocele can have other lesions of the spinal cord (eg, diastematomyelia or hydromyelia) or structural abnormalities of the brain (eg, hydrocephalus), which can also compromise neurologic function. (See "Pathophysiology and clinical manifestations of myelomeningocele (spina bifida)".)

Orthopedic abnormalities in patients with myelomeningocele are caused by unbalanced muscle action around joints, paralysis, and decreased sensation in the lower extremities [1]. Some of these problems are chronic or slowly progressive, and others may arise acutely because of progressive neurologic dysfunction, which might be caused by tethered cord or shunt malfunction.

The main goal of orthopedic care of a patient with myelomeningocele is to correct deformities that may interfere with function. For some patients, functional goals may include ambulation using orthoses [2]. In addition, the orthopedic surgeon must monitor spinal balance and deformity. Because acute changes in orthopedic problems can be caused by acute neurologic events, the orthopedic examination also helps to monitor the neurologic status of the patient.

Orthopedic care of the child with myelomeningocele is made challenging by the presence of multiple medical comorbidities that must be taken into account in any treatment plan. These comorbidities include central nervous system involvement (eg, hydrocephalus), spinal cord complications (eg, syringomyelia and tethering), urinary tract complications (eg, bladder incontinence and renal dysfunction), bowel incontinence, insensate skin, and latex allergy [3]. For this reason, whenever possible, orthopedic care should be rendered as part of a multi-disciplinary team, working together with neurosurgery, urology, and physiatry.

The evaluation and treatment of the common orthopedic problems that affect patients with myelomeningocele are discussed here. The management of their neurologic and urinary tract problems is discussed in a separate topic reviews. (See "Overview of the management of myelomeningocele (spina bifida)" and "Urinary tract complications of myelomeningocele (spina bifida)".)


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Sep 2016. | This topic last updated: Jun 16, 2015.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Westcott MA, Dynes MC, Remer EM, et al. Congenital and acquired orthopedic abnormalities in patients with myelomeningocele. Radiographics 1992; 12:1155.
  2. Neuromuscular disorders. In: Tachdjian's Pediatric orthopedics, Herring J (Ed), Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia 2008. p.1405.
  3. Guille JT, Sarwark JF, Sherk HH, Kumar SJ. Congenital and developmental deformities of the spine in children with myelomeningocele. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006; 14:294.
  4. Asher M, Olson J. Factors affecting the ambulatory status of patients with spina bifida cystica. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65:350.
  5. Seitzberg A, Lind M, Biering-Sørensen F. Ambulation in adults with myelomeningocele. Is it possible to predict the level of ambulation in early life? Childs Nerv Syst 2008; 24:231.
  6. Swank M, Dias LS. Walking ability in spina bifida patients: a model for predicting future ambulatory status based on sitting balance and motor level. J Pediatr Orthop 1994; 14:715.
  7. Graham HK, Harvey A, Rodda J, et al. The Functional Mobility Scale (FMS). J Pediatr Orthop 2004; 24:514.
  8. Battibugli S, Gryfakis N, Dias L, et al. Functional gait comparison between children with myelomeningocele: shunt versus no shunt. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007; 49:764.
  9. Dunteman RC, Vankoski SJ, Dias LS. Internal derotation osteotomy of the tibia: pre- and postoperative gait analysis in persons with high sacral myelomeningocele. J Pediatr Orthop 2000; 20:623.
  10. Gabrieli AP, Vankoski SJ, Dias LS, et al. Gait analysis in low lumbar myelomeningocele patients with unilateral hip dislocation or subluxation. J Pediatr Orthop 2003; 23:330.
  11. Moen T, Gryfakis N, Dias L, Lemke L. Crouched gait in myelomeningocele: a comparison between the degree of knee flexion contracture in the clinical examination and during gait. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25:657.
  12. Vankoski S, Moore C, Statler KD, et al. The influence of forearm crutches on pelvic and hip kinematics in children with myelomeningocele: don't throw away the crutches. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997; 39:614.
  13. Berven S, Bradford DS. Neuromuscular scoliosis: causes of deformity and principles for evaluation and management. Semin Neurol 2002; 22:167.
  14. Müller EB, Nordwall A, von Wendt L. Influence of surgical treatment of scoliosis in children with spina bifida on ambulation and motoric skills. Acta Paediatr 1992; 81:173.
  15. Schoenmakers MA, Gulmans VA, Gooskens RH, et al. Spinal fusion in children with spina bifida: influence on ambulation level and functional abilities. Eur Spine J 2005; 14:415.
  16. Wai EK, Young NL, Feldman BM, et al. The relationship between function, self-perception, and spinal deformity: Implications for treatment of scoliosis in children with spina bifida. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25:64.
  17. Mazur J, Menelaus MB, Dickens DR, Doig WG. Efficacy of surgical management for scoliosis in myelomeningocele: correction of deformity and alteration of functional status. J Pediatr Orthop 1986; 6:568.
  18. McCarthy RE. Management of neuromuscular scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1999; 30:435.
  19. Geiger F, Parsch D, Carstens C. Complications of scoliosis surgery in children with myelomeningocele. Eur Spine J 1999; 8:22.
  20. Sherk HH, Ames MD. Functional results of iliopsoas transfer in myelomeningocele hip dislocations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978; :181.
  21. Feiwell E, Sakai D, Blatt T. The effect of hip reduction on function in patients with myelomeningocele. Potential gains and hazards of surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978; 60:169.
  22. Sherk HH, Uppal GS, Lane G, Melchionni J. Treatment versus non-treatment of hip dislocations in ambulatory patients with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol 1991; 33:491.
  23. Feiwell E. Surgery of the hip in myelomeningocele as related to adult goals. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; :87.
  24. Dias LS, Jasty MJ, Collins P. Rotational deformities of the lower limb in myelomeningocele. Evaluation and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984; 66:215.
  25. Fraser RK, Menelaus MB. The management of tibial torsion in patients with spina bifida. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75:495.
  26. Mednick RE, Eller EB, Swaroop VT, Dias L. Outcomes of Tibial Derotational Osteotomies Performed in Patients With Myelodysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop 2015; 35:721.
  27. Frawley PA, Broughton NS, Menelaus MB. Incidence and type of hindfoot deformities in patients with low-level spina bifida. J Pediatr Orthop 1998; 18:312.
  28. Gerlach DJ, Gurnett CA, Limpaphayom N, et al. Early results of the Ponseti method for the treatment of clubfoot associated with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91:1350.
  29. de Carvalho Neto J, Dias LS, Gabrieli AP. Congenital talipes equinovarus in spina bifida: treatment and results. J Pediatr Orthop 1996; 16:782.
  30. Rodrigues RC, Dias LS. Calcaneus deformity in spina bifida: results of anterolateral release. J Pediatr Orthop 1992; 12:461.
  31. Chalayon O, Adams A, Dobbs MB. Minimally invasive approach for the treatment of non-isolated congenital vertical talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94:e73.
  32. Kodros SA, Dias LS. Single-stage surgical correction of congenital vertical talus. J Pediatr Orthop 1999; 19:42.
  33. Mubarak SJ, Van Valin SE. Osteotomies of the foot for cavus deformities in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2009; 29:294.