Open surgical repair of inguinal and femoral hernia in adults

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal hernia repair is among the most common procedures performed by general surgeons. Many techniques have been used for hernia repair and these can be categorized as tension-free repairs, which typically use mesh, and primary tissue approximation repairs that do not use mesh. The most commonly used open approaches include the Lichtenstein repair, plug and patch repair, and the open, preperitoneal approach. When performed by surgeons with experience with the technique, each of these techniques is associated with low recurrence rates.

Open techniques for the repair of inguinal and femoral hernia are reviewed here. The classification and diagnosis of inguinal and femoral hernias, management of inguinal and femoral hernia, and laparoscopic techniques for inguinal and femoral hernia repair are discussed elsewhere. (See "Classification, clinical features and diagnosis of inguinal and femoral hernias in adults" and "Overview of treatment for inguinal and femoral hernia in adults" and "Laparoscopic inguinal and femoral hernia repair in adults".)

ANATOMIC CONSIDERATIONS

Inguinal anatomy is illustrated in the figure (figure 1A). The inguinal canal is formed by the aponeurosis of the external oblique muscle anteriorly, and the transversalis fascia and the transversus abdominus muscles posteriorly. The external inguinal ring is formed by the external oblique muscle. The internal inguinal ring is located in the transversalis fascia and composed of the transversus abdominus and internal oblique muscles. The iliac vessels exit the abdomen posterior to the inguinal canal. The anatomy of the abdominal wall is discussed in detail elsewhere. (See "Anatomy of the abdominal wall".)

Hernia location — Indirect inguinal hernias develop at the internal ring, the site at which the spermatic cord in males and the round ligament in females enter the inguinal canal. Indirect inguinal hernias originate lateral to the inferior epigastric artery (figure 1A-B), in contrast to direct hernias (figure 2), which protrude through Hesselbach's triangle medial to the inferior epigastric vessels. Hesselbach's triangle is bounded by the rectus abdominis muscle medially, the inguinal ligament inferiorly, and the inferior epigastric vessels laterally.

Femoral hernias (figure 3) protrude through the femoral ring, which is bounded by the inguinal ligament anteriorly, Cooper’s Ligament posteriorly, the lacunar ligament medially, and the sheath of the femoral vein laterally.

                                      

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Aug 2014. | This topic last updated: May 16, 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Weber A, Valencia S, Garteiz D, Burgues A. Epidemiology of hernia in the female. In: Abdominal wall hernias, Springer, New York 2001. p.613.
  2. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 2009; 13:343.
  3. . SSAT patient care guidelines. Surgical repair of groin hernias. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11:1228.
  4. Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, et al. Danish Hernia Database recommendations for the management of inguinal and femoral hernia in adults. Dan Med Bull 2011; 58:C4243.
  5. Smink DS, Paquette IM, Finlayson SR. Utilization of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: a population-based analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009; 19:745.
  6. Patel M, Garcea G, Fairhurst K, Dennison AR. Patient perception of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of inguinal hernia, the hard sell. Hernia 2012; 16:411.
  7. Amid PK. Groin hernia repair: open techniques. World J Surg 2005; 29:1046.
  8. Sanjay P, Watt DG, Ogston SA, et al. Meta-analysis of Prolene Hernia System mesh versus Lichtenstein mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Surgeon 2012; 10:283.
  9. Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, et al. Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; :CD002197.
  10. Willaert W, De Bacquer D, Rogiers X, et al. Open Preperitoneal Techniques versus Lichtenstein Repair for elective Inguinal Hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 7:CD008034.
  11. Li J, Ji Z, Cheng T. Comparison of open preperitoneal and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Surg 2012; 204:769.
  12. Nienhuijs SW, van Oort I, Keemers-Gels ME, et al. Randomized trial comparing the Prolene Hernia System, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2005; 92:33.
  13. Vironen J, Nieminen J, Eklund A, Paavolainen P. Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein patch or Prolene Hernia System for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2006; 93:33.
  14. Zhao G, Gao P, Ma B, et al. Open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2009; 250:35.
  15. Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L, et al. Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study. Lancet 2001; 358:1124.
  16. McGillicuddy JE. Prospective randomized comparison of the Shouldice and Lichtenstein hernia repair procedures. Arch Surg 1998; 133:974.
  17. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2002; 235:322.
  18. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 2000; 87:854.
  19. Abrahamson J. Etiology and pathophysiology of primary and recurrent groin hernia formation. Surg Clin North Am 1998; 78:953.
  20. Nordin P, Zetterström H, Gunnarsson U, Nilsson E. Local, regional, or general anaesthesia in groin hernia repair: multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2003; 362:853.
  21. Magnusson N, Nordin P, Hedberg M, et al. The time profile of groin hernia recurrences. Hernia 2010; 14:341.
  22. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1819.
  23. Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R. Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 2005; 19:188.
  24. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias under local anesthesia. Ann Surg 1996; 223:249.
  25. Matthews RD, Anthony T, Kim LT, et al. Factors associated with postoperative complications and hernia recurrence for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair: a report from the VA Cooperative Hernia Study Group. Am J Surg 2007; 194:611.
  26. Wara P, Bay-Nielsen M, Juul P, et al. Prospective nationwide analysis of laparoscopic versus Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 2005; 92:1277.
  27. Dahlstrand U, Wollert S, Nordin P, et al. Emergency femoral hernia repair: a study based on a national register. Ann Surg 2009; 249:672.
  28. Elsebae MM, Nasr M, Said M. Tension-free repair versus Bassini technique for strangulated inguinal hernia: A controlled randomized study. Int J Surg 2008; 6:302.
  29. Bisgaard T, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H. Re-recurrence after operation for recurrent inguinal hernia. A nationwide 8-year follow-up study on the role of type of repair. Ann Surg 2008; 247:707.
  30. Dedemadi G, Sgourakis G, Radtke A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of outcomes. Am J Surg 2010; 200:291.
  31. Sevonius D, Gunnarsson U, Nordin P, et al. Recurrent groin hernia surgery. Br J Surg 2011; 98:1489.
  32. Koch A, Edwards A, Haapaniemi S, et al. Prospective evaluation of 6895 groin hernia repairs in women. Br J Surg 2005; 92:1553.
  33. Hernández-Irizarry R, Zendejas B, Ramirez T, et al. Trends in emergent inguinal hernia surgery in Olmsted County, MN: a population-based study. Hernia 2012; 16:397.
  34. McIntosh A, Hutchinson A, Roberts A, Withers H. Evidence-based management of groin hernia in primary care--a systematic review. Fam Pract 2000; 17:442.
  35. Družijanić N, Sršen D, Pogorelić Z, et al. Preperitoneal approach for femoral hernia repair. Hepatogastroenterology 2011; 58:1450.
  36. Hachisuka T. Femoral hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83:1189.
  37. Glassow F. Femoral hernia. Review of 2,105 repairs in a 17 year period. Am J Surg 1985; 150:353.
  38. Cervantes-Castro J, Rojas-Reyna G, Cicero-Lebrija A, Menéndez-Skertchly AL. Experience with the "Cheatle-Henry" operation for femoral hernia repair. Cir Cir 2011; 79:220.
  39. Sachs M, Damm M, Encke A. Historical evolution of inguinal hernia repair. World J Surg 1997; 21:218.
  40. USHER FC. Hernia repair with Marlex mesh. An analysis of 541 cases. Arch Surg 1962; 84:325.
  41. Zhong C, Wu B, Yang Z, et al. A meta-analysis comparing lightweight meshes with heavyweight meshes in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Innov 2013; 20:24.
  42. Uzzaman MM, Ratnasingham K, Ashraf N. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing lightweight and heavyweight mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 2012; 16:505.
  43. Sajid MS, Leaver C, Baig MK, Sains P. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2012; 99:29.
  44. Li J, Ji Z, Li Y. The comparison of self-gripping mesh and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: the results of meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2014; 259:1080.
  45. Schopf S, von Ahnen T, von Ahnen M, Schardey H. Chronic pain after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair: a randomized comparison of light and extralight titanized polypropylene mesh. World J Surg 2011; 35:302.
  46. Campanelli G, Champault G, Pascual MH, et al. Randomized, controlled, blinded trial of Tissucol/Tisseel for mesh fixation in patients undergoing Lichtenstein technique for primary inguinal hernia repair: rationale and study design of the TIMELI trial. Hernia 2008; 12:159.
  47. Nowobilski W, Dobosz M, Wojciechowicz T, Mionskowska L. Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty using butyl-2-cyanoacrylate versus sutures. Preliminary experience of a prospective randomized trial. Eur Surg Res 2004; 36:367.
  48. Kapischke M, Schulze H, Caliebe A. Self-fixating mesh for the Lichtenstein procedure--a prestudy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010; 395:317.
  49. Campanelli G, Pascual MH, Hoeferlin A, et al. Randomized, controlled, blinded trial of Tisseel/Tissucol for mesh fixation in patients undergoing Lichtenstein technique for primary inguinal hernia repair: results of the TIMELI trial. Ann Surg 2012; 255:650.
  50. Shen YM, Sun WB, Chen J, et al. NBCA medical adhesive (n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate) versus suture for patch fixation in Lichtenstein inguinal herniorrhaphy: a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 2012; 151:550.
  51. Jorgensen LN, Sommer T, Assaadzadeh S, et al. Randomized clinical trial of self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh for Lichtenstein hernia repair. Br J Surg 2013; 100:474.
  52. Canonico S, Benevento R, Perna G, et al. Sutureless fixation with fibrin glue of lightweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: effect on postoperative pain: a double-blind, randomized trial versus standard heavyweight mesh. Surgery 2013; 153:126.
  53. Paajanen H, Kössi J, Silvasti S, et al. Randomized clinical trial of tissue glue versus absorbable sutures for mesh fixation in local anaesthetic Lichtenstein hernia repair. Br J Surg 2011; 98:1245.
  54. Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H, Danish Hernia Database. Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg 2001; 233:1.
  55. Tverskoy M, Cozacov C, Ayache M, et al. Postoperative pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy with different types of anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1990; 70:29.
  56. Jeroukhimov I, Wiser I, Karasic E, et al. Reduced postoperative chronic pain after tension-free inguinal hernia repair using absorbable sutures: a single-blind randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 218:102.
  57. Wijsmuller AR, van Veen RN, Bosch JL, et al. Nerve management during open hernia repair. Br J Surg 2007; 94:17.
  58. Reinpold WM, Nehls J, Eggert A. Nerve management and chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective two phase study. Ann Surg 2011; 254:163.
  59. Amid PK. Causes, prevention, and surgical treatment of postherniorrhaphy neuropathic inguinodynia: triple neurectomy with proximal end implantation. Hernia 2004; 8:343.
  60. Amid PK, Hiatt JR. New understanding of the causes and surgical treatment of postherniorrhaphy inguinodynia and orchalgia. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 205:381.
  61. Johner A, Faulds J, Wiseman SM. Planned ilioinguinal nerve excision for prevention of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis. Surgery 2011; 150:534.
  62. Gravante G, Filingeri V, Venditti D. A meta-analytic approach to ilioinguinal nerve excision or preservation during open inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 2008; 247:1078; discussion 1078.
  63. Alfieri S, Rotondi F, Di Giorgio A, et al. Influence of preservation versus division of ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genital nerves during open mesh herniorrhaphy: prospective multicentric study of chronic pain. Ann Surg 2006; 243:553.
  64. Malekpour F, Mirhashemi SH, Hajinasrolah E, et al. Ilioinguinal nerve excision in open mesh repair of inguinal hernia--results of a randomized clinical trial: simple solution for a difficult problem? Am J Surg 2008; 195:735.
  65. Picchio M, Palimento D, Attanasio U, et al. Randomized controlled trial of preservation or elective division of ilioinguinal nerve on open inguinal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh. Arch Surg 2004; 139:755.
  66. Ravichandran D, Kalambe BG, Pain JA. Pilot randomized controlled study of preservation or division of ilioinguinal nerve in open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 2000; 87:1166.
  67. Alfieri S, Amid PK, Campanelli G, et al. International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery. Hernia 2011; 15:239.
  68. Dittrick GW, Ridl K, Kuhn JA, McCarty TM. Routine ilioinguinal nerve excision in inguinal hernia repairs. Am J Surg 2004; 188:736.
  69. Mui WL, Ng CS, Fung TM, et al. Prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy in open inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006; 244:27.
  70. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK. The cause, prevention, and treatment of recurrent groin hernia. Surg Clin North Am 1993; 73:529.
  71. Gilbert AI. An anatomic and functional classification for the diagnosis and treatment of inguinal hernia. Am J Surg 1989; 157:331.
  72. Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. "Tension-free" inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the "mesh plug" technique. Surgery 1993; 114:3.
  73. Kugel RD. Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 1999; 178:298.
  74. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 1989; 157:188.
  75. Feliu X, Torres G, Viñas X, et al. Preperitoneal repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: laparoscopic and open approach. Hernia 2004; 8:113.
  76. Alani A, Duffy F, O'Dwyer PJ. Laparoscopic or open preperitoneal repair in the management of recurrent groin hernias. Hernia 2006; 10:156.
  77. Gilbert, AI, Graham, MF, Voigt, WJ. A bilayer patch device for inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 1999; 3:161.
  78. Simons MP, Kleijnen J, van Geldere D, et al. Role of the Shouldice technique in inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review of controlled trials and a meta-analysis. Br J Surg 1996; 83:734.
  79. Amato B, Moja L, Panico S, et al. Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 4:CD001543.
  80. Glassow F. The Shouldice Hospital technique. Int Surg 1986; 71:148.
  81. Kingsnorth AN, Britton BJ, Morris PJ. Recurrent inguinal hernia after local anaesthetic repair. Br J Surg 1981; 68:273.
  82. Shouldice, EE. The treatment of hernia. Ontario Med Rev 1953; 20:670.
  83. McVAY CB, CHAPP JD. Inguinal and femoral hernioplasty; the evaluation of a basic concept. Ann Surg 1958; 148:499.
  84. LaRoque, GP. The intra-abdominal method of removing inguinal and femoral hernia. Arch Surg 1932; 24:189.
  85. Williams C. Repair of Sliding Inguinal Hernia Through the Abdominal (Laroque) Approach. Ann Surg 1947; 126:612.
  86. Shulman AG, Amid PK, Lichtenstein IL. Returning to work after herniorrhaphy. BMJ 1994; 309:216.
  87. Salcedo-Wasicek MC, Thirlby RC. Postoperative course after inguinal herniorrhaphy. A case-controlled comparison of patients receiving workers' compensation vs patients with commercial insurance. Arch Surg 1995; 130:29.
  88. Barkun JS, Keyser EJ, Wexler MJ, et al. Short-term outcomes in open vs. laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: confounding impact of worker's compensation on convalescence. J Gastrointest Surg 1999; 3:575.
  89. Welsh CL, Hopton D. Advice about driving after herniorrhaphy. Br Med J 1980; 280:1134.
  90. Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs JO, et al. Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 295:285.