UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Off-pump and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Outcomes

Author
David M Holzhey, MD, PhD
Section Editors
Edward Verrier, MD
Gabriel S Aldea, MD
Deputy Editor
Gordon M Saperia, MD, FACC

INTRODUCTION

Standard coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) employs a midline incision through the sternum, placement of the patient on cardiopulmonary bypass, and arrest of the heart with cardioplegia. This approach allows for optimal exposure of the coronary arteries and a motionless (non-beating) heart, both of which optimize the suturing of the distal anastomoses of the bypass.

This approach may contribute risk during certain clinical scenarios. For example, patients requiring a repeat CABG are at risk of damage to a previously placed left internal mammary bypass graft during a repeat sternotomy and patients with calcified aortas may be at increased risk of cerebral embolization with cross-clamping of the aorta during cardiopulmonary bypass.

This topic will discuss clinical outcomes after off-pump and minimally invasive direct CABG, two approaches that have been be evaluated as potential approaches to decrease some of the risks of standard CABG. Complications of CABG using any technique, technical issues related to minimally invasive CABG, and minimally invasive approaches to valvular surgery are discussed separately. (See "Early noncardiac complications of coronary artery bypass graft surgery", section on 'Prevention of complications' and "Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Definitions and technical issues" and "Minimally invasive aortic and mitral valve surgery".)

OFF-PUMP CABG

Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCAB) refers to CABG without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. The major rationale for this procedure, which is also called “beating heart surgery,” is to avoid the morbidity associated with cardiopulmonary bypass (induction of a systemic inflammatory response, activation of platelets) and of cross-clamping the aorta (risk of stroke or systemic embolization).(See "Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Definitions and technical issues", section on 'General principles' and "Embolism from aortic plaque: Thromboembolism".)

All surgeons performing OPCAB must be competent with the on-pump technique. The off-pump technique is technically more challenging and requires additional training. It has been chosen by some practitioners for high-risk patients with contraindications to conventional CABG, such as those with extensive ascending aortic atheromatous or calcific changes that might preclude safe aortic instrumentation. A potential disadvantage of off-pump surgery is the difficulty of performing distal anastomoses on a beating heart; this might lead to incomplete revascularization if exposure of the back of the heart is challenging or decreased graft patency because of suboptimal conditions during the construction of the distal anastomosis.

          

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2016. | This topic last updated: Mon Apr 11 00:00:00 GMT+00:00 2016.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Cleveland JC Jr, Shroyer AL, Chen AY, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72:1282.
  2. Mack MJ, Duhaylongsod FG. Through the open door! Where has the ride taken us? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124:655.
  3. www.sts.org/sections/stsnationaldatabase/ (Accessed on May 11, 2007).
  4. Aldea GS, Mokadam NA, Melford R Jr, et al. Changing volumes, risk profiles, and outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary interventions. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87:1828.
  5. Cartier R, Brann S, Dagenais F, et al. Systematic off-pump coronary artery revascularization in multivessel disease: experience of three hundred cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119:221.
  6. Kshettry VR, Flavin TF, Emery RW, et al. Does multivessel, off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce postoperative morbidity? Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69:1725.
  7. Dewey TM, Magee MJ, Edgerton JR, et al. Off-pump bypass grafting is safe in patients with left main coronary disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72:788.
  8. Arom KV, Flavin TF, Emery RW, et al. Safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69:704.
  9. Aldea GS, Goss JR, Boyle EM Jr, et al. Use of off-pump and on-pump CABG strategies in current clinical practice: the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program of the state of Washington. J Card Surg 2003; 18:206.
  10. Magee MJ, Jablonski KA, Stamou SC, et al. Elimination of cardiopulmonary bypass improves early survival for multivessel coronary artery bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73:1196.
  11. Mack MJ, Pfister A, Bachand D, et al. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127:167.
  12. Al-Ruzzeh S, Ambler G, Asimakopoulos G, et al. Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) surgery reduces risk-stratified morbidity and mortality: a United Kingdom Multi-Center Comparative Analysis of Early Clinical Outcome. Circulation 2003; 108 Suppl 1:II1.
  13. Hannan EL, Wu C, Smith CR, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revascularization. Circulation 2007; 116:1145.
  14. Hu S, Zheng Z, Yuan X, et al. Increasing long-term major vascular events and resource consumption in patients receiving off-pump coronary artery bypass: a single-center prospective observational study. Circulation 2010; 121:1800.
  15. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:1827.
  16. van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EW, et al. Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study. Circulation 2001; 104:1761.
  17. Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, Ascione R. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2002; 359:1194.
  18. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:21.
  19. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, et al. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004; 291:1841.
  20. Nathoe HM, van Dijk D, Jansen EW, et al. A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:394.
  21. Légaré JF, Buth KJ, King S, et al. Coronary bypass surgery performed off pump does not result in lower in-hospital morbidity than coronary artery bypass grafting performed on pump. Circulation 2004; 109:887.
  22. Widimsky P, Straka Z, Stros P, et al. One-year coronary bypass graft patency: a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump surgery angiographic results of the PRAGUE-4 trial. Circulation 2004; 110:3418.
  23. Houlind K, Kjeldsen BJ, Madsen SN, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in elderly patients: results from the Danish on-pump versus off-pump randomization study. Circulation 2012; 125:2431.
  24. Møller CH, Penninga L, Wetterslev J, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for ischaemic heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; :CD007224.
  25. Hattler B, Messenger JC, Shroyer AL, et al. Off-Pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with worse arterial and saphenous vein graft patency and less effective revascularization: Results from the Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial. Circulation 2012; 125:2827.
  26. Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, et al. Off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 30 days. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:1489.
  27. Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, et al. Effects of off-pump and on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 1 year. N Engl J Med 2013; 368:1179.
  28. Diegeler A, Börgermann J, Kappert U, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting in elderly patients. N Engl J Med 2013; 368:1189.
  29. Brewer R, Theurer PF, Cogan CM, et al. Morbidity but not mortality is decreased after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97:831.
  30. Kim JB, Yun SC, Lim JW, et al. Long-term survival following coronary artery bypass grafting: off-pump versus on-pump strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63:2280.
  31. MacGillivray TE, Vlahakes GJ. Patency and the pump--the risks and benefits of off-pump CABG. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:3.
  32. Lapar DJ, Mery CM, Kozower BD, et al. The effect of surgeon volume on mortality for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 143:854.
  33. Sharony R, Bizekis CS, Kanchuger M, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduces mortality and stroke in patients with atheromatous aortas: a case control study. Circulation 2003; 108 Suppl 1:II15.
  34. Karthik S, Musleh G, Grayson AD, et al. Coronary surgery in patients with peripheral vascular disease: effect of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77:1245.
  35. Hirose H, Amano A, Takahashi A. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72:2013.
  36. Boyd WD, Desai ND, Del Rizzo DF, et al. Off-pump surgery decreases postoperative complications and resource utilization in the elderly. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68:1490.
  37. Ascione R, Nason G, Al-Ruzzeh S, et al. Coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with preoperative nondialysis-dependent renal insufficiency. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72:2020.
  38. Bucerius J, Gummert JF, Walther T, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: impact on postoperative renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77:1250.
  39. Brown JM, Poston RS, Gammie JS, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in consecutive patients: decision-making algorithm and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81:555.
  40. Abu-Omar Y, Taggart DP. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Lancet 2002; 360:327.
  41. Omer S, Cornwell LD, Rosengart TK, et al. Completeness of coronary revascularization and survival: Impact of age and off-pump surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148:1307.
  42. Herz I, Moshkovitz Y, Hendler A, et al. Revascularization of left anterior descending artery with drug-eluting stents: comparison with off-pump surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79:88.
  43. Eefting F, Nathoe H, van Dijk D, et al. Randomized comparison between stenting and off-pump bypass surgery in patients referred for angioplasty. Circulation 2003; 108:2870.
  44. Yi G, Youn YN, Hong S, et al. Comparison of long-term outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus drug-eluting stents in triple-vessel coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2012; 109:819.
  45. Galloway AC, Shemin RJ, Glower DD, et al. First report of the Port Access International Registry. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67:51.
  46. Mehran R, Dangas G, Stamou SC, et al. One-year clinical outcome after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. Circulation 2000; 102:2799.
  47. Calafiore AM, Di Giammarco G, Teodori G, et al. Midterm results after minimally invasive coronary surgery (LAST operation). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 115:763.
  48. Holzhey DM, Cornely JP, Rastan AJ, et al. Review of a 13-year single-center experience with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass as the primary surgical treatment of coronary artery disease. Heart Surg Forum 2012; 15:E61.
  49. Boonstra PW, Grandjean JG, Mariani MA. Reoperative coronary bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass through a small thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63:405.
  50. Azoury FM, Gillinov AM, Lytle BW, et al. Off-pump reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting by thoracotomy: patient selection and operative technique. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71:1959.
  51. Stamou SC, Pfister AJ, Dangas G, et al. Beating heart versus conventional single-vessel reoperative coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69:1383.
  52. Holzhey DM, Jacobs S, Walther T, et al. Cumulative sum failure analysis for eight surgeons performing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134:663.
  53. Diegeler A, Thiele H, Falk V, et al. Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:561.
  54. Thiele H, Oettel S, Jacobs S, et al. Comparison of bare-metal stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery: a 5-year follow-up. Circulation 2005; 112:3445.
  55. Drenth DJ, Veeger NJ, Winter JB, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing stenting with off-pump coronary surgery for high-grade stenosis in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: three-year follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:1955.
  56. Blazek S, Rossbach C, Borger MA, et al. Comparison of sirolimus-eluting stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery: 7-year follow-up of a randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8:30.
  57. Blazek S, Holzhey D, Jungert C, et al. Comparison of bare-metal stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery: 10-year follow-up of a randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6:20.
  58. Ng PC, Chua AN, Swanson MS, et al. Anterior thoracotomy wound complications in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69:1338.
  59. Casula R, Khoshbin E, Athanasiou T. The midterm outcome and MACE of robotically enhanced grafting of left anterior descending artery with left internal mammary artery. J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 9:19.
  60. Byrne JG, Leacche M, Vaughan DE, Zhao DX. Hybrid cardiovascular procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 1:459.
  61. Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58:e123.