Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point of care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

For more information, click below.


Subscribers log in here


Related Searches

Obstetrical issues in grand multiparity

INTRODUCTION

A commonly used clinical definition of parity is the number of births (both live born infants and stillbirths) of at least 20 weeks of gestation that a woman has experienced. Nulliparas have experienced no such births, primiparas have experienced one such birth, and multiparas have experienced more than one such birth. (Pregnancy losses under 20 weeks of gestation are considered abortions, which may be spontaneous or induced. A woman's gravidity is the sum of her parity and number of abortions).

A 1934 study suggested that multiparity increased the risk of pregnancy complications, and first introduced the term "grand multipara." The author concluded that grand multiparity was dangerous because, in his study, maternal mortality increased steadily from the 5th to the 10th pregnancy [1]. On the basis of this finding, and results from subsequent studies, the clinically accepted definition of grand multiparity became parity equal to or greater than five. In the United States in 2010, nearly 190,000 women gave birth to a child that was at least their fifth birth [2].

VARIABLES AFFECTING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PARITY AND PREGNANCY OUTCOME

The relationship between obstetric complications and parity has been studied extensively, with inconsistent findings. In additional to the usual limitations of observational data, there are several reasons for the discordancy:

Variability in the definition of parity — There are discrepancies in the way clinicians define parity. A study that evaluated the definition of the term parity among obstetricians and midwives in London noted that 13 percent defined parity by the number of pregnancies irrespective of outcome, 62 percent defined parity as pregnancies of ≥24 weeks of gestation irrespective of outcome, and 25 percent defined parity as pregnancies of ≥24 weeks ending in live birth [3]. Only 21 percent of those surveyed described twin pregnancies as a single parous experience.

In addition, there is a discrepancy between the clinical definition of parity and the definition used by the United States National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), an organization within the Centers for Disease Control. The NCHS defines parity as the number of prior live births, excluding stillbirths and fetal deaths [4], while most clinical investigators in the US have defined parity as the number of births (live births and stillbirths) >20 weeks of gestation. Other gestational age cut-offs to define a parous event (eg, birth after 28 weeks of gestation) are used in other parts of the world.

      

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article you must have access through your hospital or your group practice, log in to your personal subscription, or purchase a personal subscription. For more information, click below.
Literature review current through: Apr 2013. | This topic last updated: Feb 14, 2013.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2013 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Solomons, B. The dangerous multipara. Lancet 1934; 2:8.
  2. Births: Final data for 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2012; 61:1.
  3. Opara EI, Zaidi J. The interpretation and clinical application of the word 'parity': a survey. BJOG 2007; 114:1295.
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics: NCHS Definitions. National Survey of Family Growth. June 18, 2004; December 4, 2004.
  5. Aliyu MH, Jolly PE, Ehiri JE, Salihu HM. High parity and adverse birth outcomes: exploring the maze. Birth 2005; 32:45.
  6. Bai J, Wong FW, Bauman A, Mohsin M. Parity and pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186:274.
  7. Simonsen SM, Lyon JL, Alder SC, Varner MW. Effect of grand multiparity on intrapartum and newborn complications in young women. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:454.
  8. Lyrenäs S. Labor in the grand multipara. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2002; 53:6.
  9. Tanbo TG, Bungum L. The grand multipara--maternal and neonatal complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66:53.
  10. Bugg GJ, Atwal GS, Maresh M. Grandmultiparae in a modern setting. BJOG 2002; 109:249.
  11. Roman H, Robillard PY, Verspyck E, et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in grand multiparity. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:1294.
  12. Toohey JS, Keegan KA Jr, Morgan MA, et al. The "dangerous multipara": fact or fiction? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172:683.
  13. Babinszki A, Kerenyi T, Torok O, et al. Perinatal outcome in grand and great-grand multiparity: effects of parity on obstetric risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181:669.
  14. Brunner J, Melander E, Krook-Brandt M, Thomassen PA. Grand multiparity as an obstetric risk factor; a prospective case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992; 47:201.
  15. Humphrey MD. Is grand multiparity an independent predictor of pregnancy risk? A retrospective observational study. Med J Aust 2003; 179:294.
  16. Samueloff A, Mor-Yosef S, Seidman DS, et al. Grand multiparity--a nationwide survey. Isr J Med Sci 1989; 25:625.
  17. Seidman DS, Armon Y, Roll D, et al. Grand multiparity: an obstetric or neonatal risk factor? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158:1034.
  18. Fuchs K, Peretz BA, Marcovici R, et al. The "grand multipara"--is it a problem? A review of 5785 cases. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1985; 23:321.
  19. Chan BC, Lao TT. Effect of parity and advanced maternal age on obstetric outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 102:237.
  20. Bobrowski RA, Bottoms SF. Underappreciated risks of the elderly multipara. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172:1764.
  21. Nassar AH, Fayyumy R, Saab W, et al. Grandmultiparas in modern obstetrics. Am J Perinatol 2006; 23:345.
  22. Al JF. Grandmultiparity: a potential risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Reprod Med 2012; 57:53.
  23. Simmons D, Shaw J, McKenzie A, et al. Is grand multiparity associated with an increased risk of dysglycaemia? Diabetologia 2006; 49:1522.
  24. El-Toukhy T, Ramadan G, Maidman D, et al. Impact of parity on obstetric and neonatal outcome of external cephalic version. J Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 27:580.
  25. Agrawal S, Agarwal A, Das V. Impact of grandmultiparity on obstetric outcome in low resource setting. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2011; 37:1015.
  26. Shechter Y, Levy A, Wiznitzer A, et al. Obstetric complications in grand and great grand multiparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23:1211.
  27. Shah PS, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of LBW/PT births. Parity and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89:862.
  28. Jacquemyn Y, Senten L, Vellinga S, et al. Does practice make perfect? An age-matched study on grand multiparity in Flanders, Belgium. J Perinat Med 2006; 34:28.
  29. Hilder L, Sairam S, Thilaganathan B. Influence of parity on fetal mortality in prolonged pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 132:167.
  30. Geidam AD, Audu BM, Oummate Z. Pregnancy outcome among grand multiparous women at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital: a case control study. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 31:404.