UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate®

Medline ® Abstract for Reference 18

of 'Normal and abnormal labor progression'

18
TI
Relationship of the length of the first stage of labor to the length of the second stage.
AU
Nelson DB, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ
SO
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):27-32.
 
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the lengths of the first and second stages of labor.
METHODS: In this observational study of women delivering at our hospital, the onset of the first stage of labor was defined as admission at 3-cm to 4-cm dilatation in the presence of uterine contractions with or without rupture of membranes. This study was limited to nulliparous women with a singleton, cephalic live birth at 37 0/7 weeks of gestation or more. Women presenting with more advanced cervical dilatation (greater than 4 cm), prior cesarean delivery, diabetes, hypertension, and placental accidents were excluded. Each woman was analyzed based on her specific lengths of first and second stages of labor, that is, paired observations for each woman.
RESULTS: Between January 1, 2001, and June 30, 2012, a total of 172,522 women were delivered and 12,523 (7.3%) met the inclusion criteria. The 95 percentile was 15.6 and 2.9 hours for the first and second stages, respectively. Women with first stages greater than the 95 percentile had a 16.3% rate of a second-stage length greater than the 95 percentile compared with 4.5% (P<.001) inwomen with first stages less than the 95 percentile. This relationship persisted when analyzed for variables influencing labor to include neonate birth weight, epidural analgesia, or maternal size.
CONCLUSION: Overall, the length of the second stage significantly increased concomitantly with increasing length of the first stage (P<.001).
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
AD
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
PMID