Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate®

Normal and abnormal labor progression

Robert M Ehsanipoor, MD
Andrew J Satin, MD, FACOG
Section Editor
Charles J Lockwood, MD, MHCM
Deputy Editor
Vanessa A Barss, MD, FACOG


During normal labor, regular and painful uterine contractions cause progressive dilation and effacement of the cervix, accompanied by descent and eventual expulsion of the fetus. "Abnormal labor," "dystocia," and "failure to progress" are traditional but imprecise terms that have been used to describe a labor pattern deviating from that observed in the majority of women who have a spontaneous vaginal delivery. These labor abnormalities are best described as protraction disorders (ie, slower than normal progress) or arrest disorders (ie, complete cessation of progress).

This topic will describe normal labor progress and discuss the diagnosis and management of protraction and arrest disorders. Management of normal labor and delivery is reviewed separately. (See "Management of normal labor and delivery".)


Although determining whether labor is progressing normally is a key component of intrapartum care, determining the onset of labor, measuring its progress, and evaluating the factors (power, passenger, pelvis) that affect its course are an inexact science.

Stages and phases — Interpretation of labor progress depends on the stage and phase. The three stages and their phases are:

First stage – Time from onset of labor to complete cervical dilation. Clinically, women are simply asked the time when they believe labor began to document the onset of labor; the time complete dilation is first identified on physical examination documents the end of the first stage. The precise times are impossible to determine since the normal uterus contracts intermittently and irregularly throughout gestation, the initial regular contractions at the onset of labor are mild and infrequent, initial cervical changes are subtle, and physical examination to document cervical change is performed intermittently.


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Mar 2017. | This topic last updated: Apr 05, 2017.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Zhang J, Troendle J, Mikolajczyk R, et al. The natural history of the normal first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115:705.
  2. Le Ray C, Fraser W, Rozenberg P, et al. Duration of passive and active phases of the second stage of labour and risk of severe postpartum haemorrhage in low-risk nulliparous women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 158:167.
  3. FRIEDMAN E. The graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1954; 68:1568.
  4. FRIEDMAN EA. Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1955; 6:567.
  5. Friedman EA. Labor: Clinical Evaluation and Management, 2nd ed, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York 1978.
  6. Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:1281.
  7. Suzuki R, Horiuchi S, Ohtsu H. Evaluation of the labor curve in nulliparous Japanese women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203:226.e1.
  8. Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Nicholson JM, Caughey AB. Second stage of labor and epidural use: a larger effect than previously suggested. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:527.
  9. Cohen WR, Friedman EA. Perils of the new labor management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212:420.
  10. Cohen WR, Friedman EA. Misguided guidelines for managing labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212:753.e1.
  11. Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187:824.
  12. Peisner DB, Rosen MG. Transition from latent to active labor. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68:448.
  13. Laughon SK, Branch DW, Beaver J, Zhang J. Changes in labor patterns over 50 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206:419.e1.
  14. Albers LL. The duration of labor in healthy women. J Perinatol 1999; 19:114.
  15. Kilpatrick SJ, Laros RK Jr. Characteristics of normal labor. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74:85.
  16. Neal JL, Lowe NK, Ahijevych KL, et al. "Active labor" duration and dilation rates among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset: a systematic review. J Midwifery Womens Health 2010; 55:308.
  17. Myles TD, Santolaya J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:52.
  18. Nelson DB, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Relationship of the length of the first stage of labor to the length of the second stage. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122:27.
  19. Piper JM, Bolling DR, Newton ER. The second stage of labor: factors influencing duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165:976.
  20. Gurewitsch ED, Johnson E, Allen RH, et al. The descent curve of the grand multiparous woman. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:1036.
  21. Graseck A, Tuuli M, Roehl K, et al. Fetal descent in labor. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:521.
  22. Harper LM, Caughey AB, Odibo AO, et al. Normal progress of induced labor. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119:1113.
  23. Sondgeroth KE, Stout MJ, Graseck AS, et al. Progress of induced labor in trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213:420.e1.
  24. Janakiraman V, Ecker J, Kaimal AJ. Comparing the second stage in induced and spontaneous labor. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:606.
  25. Lavender T, Hart A, Smyth RM. Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; :CD005461.
  26. Yeo L, Romero R. Sonographic evaluation in the second stage of labor to improve the assessment of labor progress and its outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33:253.
  27. Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, et al. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33:313.
  28. Kalache KD, Dückelmann AM, Michaelis SA, et al. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33:326.
  29. Zhu BP, Grigorescu V, Le T, et al. Labor dystocia and its association with interpregnancy interval. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195:121.
  30. Kjaergaard H, Olsen J, Ottesen B, Dykes AK. Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88:402.
  31. Gifford DS, Morton SC, Fiske M, et al. Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95:589.
  32. Gimovsky AC, Guarente J, Berghella V. Prolonged second stage in nulliparous with epidurals: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30:461.
  33. Algovik M, Nilsson E, Cnattingius S, et al. Genetic influence on dystocia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83:832.
  34. Schulman H, Romney SL. Variability of uterine contractions in normal human parturition. Obstet Gynecol 1970; 36:215.
  35. Lindgren L. The influence of uterine motility upon cervical dilatation in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973; 117:530.
  36. Hauth JC, Hankins GD, Gilstrap LC 3rd, et al. Uterine contraction pressures with oxytocin induction/augmentation. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68:305.
  37. CALDEYRO-BARCIA R, POSEIRO JJ. Oxytocin and contractility of the pregnant human uterus. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1959; 75:813.
  38. Seitchik J, Castillo M. Oxytocin augmentation of dysfunctional labor. II. Uterine activity data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145:526.
  39. CALDEYRO-BARCIA R, SICA-BLANCO Y, POSEIRO JJ, et al. A quantitative study of the action of synthetic oxytocin on the pregnant human uterus. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1957; 121:18.
  40. Chua S, Kurup A, Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS. Augmentation of labor: does internal tocography result in better obstetric outcome than external tocography? Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76:164.
  41. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. Active-phase labor arrest: oxytocin augmentation for at least 4 hours. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93:323.
  42. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Savage KG, Hauth JC. Active phase labor arrest: revisiting the 2-hour minimum. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98:550.
  43. Bakker JJ, Verhoeven CJ, Janssen PF, et al. Outcomes after internal versus external tocodynamometry for monitoring labor. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:306.
  44. Kominiarek MA, Zhang J, Vanveldhuisen P, et al. Contemporary labor patterns: the impact of maternal body mass index. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205:244.e1.
  45. Robinson BK, Mapp DC, Bloom SL, et al. Increasing maternal body mass index and characteristics of the second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118:1309.
  46. Maharaj D. Assessing cephalopelvic disproportion: back to the basics. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2010; 65:387.
  47. Pattinson RC, Cuthbert A, Vannevel V. Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at or near term for deciding on mode of delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3:CD000161.
  48. Senécal J, Xiong X, Fraser WD, Pushing Early Or Pushing Late with Epidural study group. Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:763.
  49. Turrentine MA, Andres RL. Modern analysis of pathologic uterine rings. South Med J 1997; 90:40.
  50. Turrentine MA, Andres RL. Recurrent Bandl's ring as an etiology for failed vaginal birth after cesarean section. Am J Perinatol 1994; 11:65.
  51. Lauria MR, Barthold JC, Zimmerman RA, Turrentine MA. Pathologic uterine ring associated with fetal head trauma and subsequent cerebral palsy. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:495.
  52. Tinelli A, Di Renzo GC, Malvasi A. The intrapartum ultrasonographic detection of the Bandl ring as a marker of dystocia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; 131:310.
  53. Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Weiner CP. Ultrasonographic observation of Bandl's contraction ring. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 86:35.
  54. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; :CD000331.
  55. Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, et al. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120:1181.
  56. Wei SQ, Luo ZC, Xu H, Fraser WD. The effect of early oxytocin augmentation in labor: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:641.
  57. Wei S, Wo BL, Qi HP, et al. Early amniotomy and early oxytocin for prevention of, or therapy for, delay in first stage spontaneous labour compared with routine care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; :CD006794.
  58. Nachum Z, Garmi G, Kadan Y, et al. Comparison between amniotomy, oxytocin or both for augmentation of labor in prolonged latent phase: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2010; 8:136.
  59. Selo-Ojeme DO, Pisal P, Lawal O, et al. A randomised controlled trial of amniotomy and immediate oxytocin infusion versus amniotomy and delayed oxytocin infusion for induction of labour at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 279:813.
  60. Bugg GJ, Siddiqui F, Thornton JG. Oxytocin versus no treatment or delayed treatment for slow progress in the first stage of spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; :CD007123.
  61. Satin AJ, Leveno KJ, Sherman ML, McIntire DD. Factors affecting the dose response to oxytocin for labor stimulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166:1260.
  62. Satin AJ, Leveno KJ, Sherman ML, et al. High- versus low-dose oxytocin for labor stimulation. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80:111.
  63. Satin AJ, Leveno KJ, Sherman ML, McIntire D. High-dose oxytocin: 20- versus 40-minute dosage interval. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83:234.
  64. Seitchik J, Amico J, Robinson AG, Castillo M. Oxytocin augmentation of dysfunctional labor. IV. Oxytocin pharmacokinetics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150:225.
  65. Wei SQ, Luo ZC, Qi HP, et al. High-dose vs low-dose oxytocin for labor augmentation: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203:296.
  66. Kenyon S, Tokumasu H, Dowswell T, et al. High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin for augmentation of delayed labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; :CD007201.
  67. Oppenheimer LW, Labrecque M, Wells G, et al. Prostaglandin E vaginal gel to treat dystocia in spontaneous labour: a multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. BJOG 2005; 112:612.
  68. Vogel JP, West HM, Dowswell T. Titrated oral misoprostol for augmenting labour to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; :CD010648.
  69. Bloom SL, McIntire DD, Kelly MA, et al. Lack of effect of walking on labor and delivery. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:76.
  70. Smyth RM, Markham C, Dowswell T. Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; :CD006167.
  71. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin. Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. Number 36, July 2002. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 78:321.
  72. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:693.
  73. Leveno KJ, Nelson DB, McIntire DD. Second-stage labor: how long is too long? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214:484.
  74. Gimovsky AC, Berghella V. Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214:361.e1.
  75. Sung JF, Daniels KI, Brodzinsky L, et al. Cesarean delivery outcomes after a prolonged second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:306.e1.
  76. Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191:933.
  77. Torvaldsen S, Roberts CL, Bell JC, Raynes-Greenow CH. Discontinuation of epidural analgesia late in labour for reducing the adverse delivery outcomes associated with epidural analgesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; :CD004457.
  78. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. Hands/knees posture in late pregnancy or labour for fetal malposition (lateral or posterior). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; :CD001063.
  79. Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ, Shehmar M. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; :CD002006.
  80. Roberts CL, Algert CS, Cameron CA, Torvaldsen S. A meta-analysis of upright positions in the second stage to reduce instrumental deliveries in women with epidural analgesia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84:794.
  81. Hofmeyr GJ, Vogel JP, Cuthbert A, Singata M. Fundal pressure during the second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3:CD006067.
  82. Lemos A, Amorim MM, Dornelas de Andrade A, et al. Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3:CD009124.
  83. Salvesen KA, Mørkved S. Randomised controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy. BMJ 2004; 329:378.
  84. Price BB, Amini SB, Kappeler K. Exercise in pregnancy: effect on fitness and obstetric outcomes-a randomized trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44:2263.
  85. Salvesen KÅ, Stafne SN, Eggebø TM, Mørkved S. Does regular exercise in pregnancy influence duration of labor? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93:73.
  86. Skowronski E, Hartman K. Obstetric management following traumatic tetraplegia: case series and literature review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 48:485.
  87. Stephansson O, Sandström A, Petersson G, et al. Prolonged second stage of labour, maternal infectious disease, urinary retention and other complications in the early postpartum period. BJOG 2016; 123:608.
  88. Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Bryant AS, Caughey AB. Length of the first stage of labor and associated perinatal outcomes in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:1127.
  89. Laughon SK, Berghella V, Reddy UM, et al. Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124:57.
  90. Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Laros RK Jr, Caughey AB. Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196:585.e1.
  91. Allen VM, Baskett TF, O'Connell CM, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes with increasing duration of the second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:1248.
  92. Rouse DJ, Weiner SJ, Bloom SL, et al. Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201:357.e1.
  93. Grobman WA, Bailit J, Lai Y, et al. Association of the Duration of Active Pushing With Obstetric Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127:667.
  94. Miller CM, Cohn S, Akdagli S, et al. Postpartum hemorrhage following vaginal delivery: risk factors and maternal outcomes. J Perinatol 2017; 37:243.
  95. Gerber S, Vial Y, Hohlfeld P. [Maternal and neonatal prognosis after a prolonged second stage of labor]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1999; 28:145.
  96. Yancey MK, Herpolsheimer A, Jordan GD, et al. Maternal and neonatal effects of outlet forceps delivery compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery in term pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78:646.
  97. Sandström A, Altman M, Cnattingius S, et al. Durations of second stage of labor and pushing, and adverse neonatal outcomes: a population-based cohort study. J Perinatol 2017; 37:236.