Nipple inversion

INTRODUCTION

The nipple is the central projection in the areola. When the nipple is pulled in and points inward instead of out, it is termed nipple inversion or retraction. Nipple inversion can affect one breast or both, and can be congenital or acquired. Acquired nipple inversion can be due to benign or malignant causes. Benign nipple inversion is usually a gradual process, occurring over a few years. When nipple inversion occurs rapidly, the underlying cause can be inflammation, postsurgical changes, or an underlying malignancy [1].

The evaluation and management of nipple inversion will be reviewed here. Nipple discharge, common breast problems, and the diagnostic evaluation of a suspected breast cancer are discussed elsewhere. (See "Nipple discharge" and "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of a palpable breast mass" and "Diagnostic evaluation of women with suspected breast cancer".)

NIPPLE DEVELOPMENT

The breast and nipple begin to form during the second month of gestation from lines of thickened ectoderm running from the axilla to the groin (figure 1) [2]. The nipple is initially an epidermal pit and eventually everts as the fetus nears gestation. An inverted nipple may represent a failure of this eversion during development [2]. Breast development and Tanner staging are depicted in the figure and are discussed in detail elsewhere (picture 1). (See "Breast development and morphology".)

The color of the nipple and areola is initially imparted by blood vessels coursing near the skin. Melanin is deposited in the basal cells as part of the aging process, thereby darkening the nipple-areolar complex [2].

NIPPLE ANATOMY

The normal nipple projects from the central area of the areola (figure 2 and figure 3). The darkly pigmented areola, located in the center of the breast, contains dense collagen fibers and a thin layer of contractile muscle. While there is significant variation in color, shape, size, and projection of the nipple-areola complex, a study of morphologic characteristics in 300 women reported a mean nipple height of 0.9 cm [3]. Differences in nipple projection can be affected by age, race, weight, and hormonal changes.

                              

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Mar 2014. | This topic last updated: Feb 11, 2013.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Da Costa D, Taddese A, Cure ML, et al. Common and unusual diseases of the nipple-areolar complex. Radiographics 2007; 27 Suppl 1:S65.
  2. Skandalakis JE, Skandalakis PN, Weidman TA, Skandalakis LJ. Breast. In: Skandalakis' Surgical Anatomy, Skandalakis JE, Weidman TA, Foster RS Jr, et al (Eds), McGraw Hill, New York 2004.
  3. Sanuki J, Fukuma E, Uchida Y. Morphologic study of nipple-areola complex in 600 breasts. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009; 33:295.
  4. Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Michaelson JS, et al. Breast duct anatomy in the human nipple: three-dimensional patterns and clinical implications. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 106:171.
  5. Love SM, Barsky SH. Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts revisited. Cancer 2004; 101:1947.
  6. Nakajima H, Imanishi N, Aiso S. Arterial anatomy of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96:843.
  7. van Deventer PV. The blood supply to the nipple-areola complex of the human mammary gland. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004; 28:393.
  8. Dixon JM. Management of disorders of the ductal system and infections. In: Diseases of the Breast, Harris LM (Ed), Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia 2007. p.46.
  9. Nicholson BT, Harvey JA, Cohen MA. Nipple-areolar complex: normal anatomy and benign and malignant processes. Radiographics 2009; 29:509.
  10. Han S, Hong YG. The inverted nipple: its grading and surgical correction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104:389.
  11. Schwager RG, Smith JW, Gray GF, Goulian D Jr. Inversion of the human female nipple, with a simple method of treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974; 54:564.
  12. Crestinu JM. The correction of inverted nipples without scars: 17 Years' experience, 452 operations. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2000; 24:52.
  13. Park HS, Yoon CH, Kim HJ. The prevalence of congenital inverted nipple. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1999; 23:144.
  14. Falk RE, Casas KA. Chromosome 2q37 deletion: clinical and molecular aspects. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2007; 145C:357.
  15. Linden H, Williams R, King J, et al. Ulnar mammary sundrome and TX3: Expanding the phenotype. Am J Med Genet 2009; 149A:2809.
  16. Rowley M, Grothey E, Couch FJ. The role of Tbx2 and Tbx3 in mammary development and tumorigenesis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2004; 9:109.
  17. Aronica E, van Kempen AA, van der Heide M, et al. Congenital disorder of glycosylation type Ia: a clinicopathological report of a newborn infant with cerebellar pathology. Acta Neuropathol 2005; 109:433.
  18. Meguid M, Kort K, Numann P, Oler A. Subareolar breast abscess: the penultimate stage of the mammary duct-associated inflammatory disease sequence. In: The Breast, 4th edition, Bland K, Copeland III E (Eds), Elsevier, Philadelphia 2009. Vol 1, p.107.
  19. Mansel R, Webster D, Sweetland H. The duct ectasia/periductal mastitis complex. In: Hughes Mansel & Webster's Benign Disorders and Diseases of the Breast, 3rd edition, Mnansel R, Webster D, Sweetland H (Eds), Saunders, China 2009. p.163.
  20. HAAGENSEN CD. Mammary-duct ectasia; a disease that may simulate carcinoma. Cancer 1951; 4:749.
  21. Rees BI, Gravelle IH, Hughes LE. Nipple retraction in duct ectasia. Br J Surg 1977; 64:577.
  22. Dixon JM. Periductal mastitis/duct ectasia. World J Surg 1989; 13:715.
  23. TEDESCHI LG, OUZOUNIAN G, BYRNE JJ. The role of ductal obstruction and hormonal stimulation in mammary duct ectasia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1962; 114:741.
  24. Dixon JM. Breast infection. In: ABC of Breast Diseases, Dixon JM (Ed), Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 2006. p.19.
  25. Dixon JM, Ravisekar O, Chetty U, Anderson TJ. Periductal mastitis and duct ectasia: different conditions with different aetiologies. Br J Surg 1996; 83:820.
  26. Schäfer P, Fürrer C, Mermillod B. An association of cigarette smoking with recurrent subareolar breast abscess. Int J Epidemiol 1988; 17:810.
  27. Baharoon S. Tuberculosis of the breast. Ann Thorac Med 2008; 3:110.
  28. Makanjuola D, Murshid K, Al Sulaimani S, Al Saleh M. Mammographic features of breast tuberculosis: the skin bulge and sinus tract sign. Clin Radiol 1996; 51:354.
  29. Neville EM, Freeman AH, Adiseshiah M. Clinical significance of recent inversion of the nipple: a reappraisal. J R Soc Med 1982; 75:111.
  30. Haffty BG, Wilson LD, Smith R, et al. Subareolar breast cancer: long-term results with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 33:53.
  31. Fowble B, Solin LJ, Schultz DJ, Weiss MC. Breast recurrence and survival related to primary tumor location in patients undergoing conservative surgery and radiation for early-stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992; 23:933.
  32. Dale PS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-areolar preservation during breast-conserving therapy for subareolar breast carcinomas. Arch Surg 1996; 131:430.
  33. Hinderer UT, del Rio JL. Treatment of the postoperative inverted nipple with or without asymmetry of the areola. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1983; 7:139.
  34. Kalbhen CL, Kezdi-Rogus PC, Dowling MP, Flisak ME. Mammography in the evaluation of nipple inversion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:117.
  35. Giess CS, Keating DM, Osborne MP, et al. Retroareolar breast carcinoma: clinical, imaging, and histopathologic features. Radiology 1998; 207:669.
  36. An HY, Kim KS, Yu IK, et al. Image presentation. The nipple-areolar complex: a pictorial review of common and uncommon conditions. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29:949.
  37. Friedman EP, Hall-Craggs MA, Mumtaz H, Schneidau A. Breast MR and the appearance of the normal and abnormal nipple. Clin Radiol 1997; 52:854.
  38. Stevens WG, Fellows DR, Vath SD, Stoker DA. An integrated approach to the repair of inverted nipples. Aesthet Surg J 2004; 24:211.
  39. Chen SH, Gedebou T, Chen PH. The endoscope as an adjunct to correction of nipple inversion deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119:1178.
  40. Wu HL, Huang X, Zheng SS. A new procedure for correction of severe inverted nipple with two triangular areolar dermofibrous flaps. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32:641.
  41. Szczerba SM, Paulius KL, Nadimi S, Maguina P. Wire subcision as a treatment for nipple inversion. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123:206e.
  42. Kolker AR, Torina PJ. Minimally invasive correction of inverted nipples: a safe and simple technique for reliable, sustainable projection. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62:549.