Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


Midshaft humeral fractures in adults

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the humerus can occur proximally, at the shaft, or distally. The majority of both proximal and midshaft humerus fractures are nondisplaced and can be treated conservatively (nonsurgically).

Nonstress fractures of the midshaft (diaphysis) of the humerus will be reviewed here. Stress fractures of the humeral shaft and proximal humeral fractures are discussed separately. (See "Stress fractures of the humeral shaft" and "Proximal humeral fractures in adults".)

PERTINENT ANATOMY

The humerus is the largest bone in the upper extremity. The proximal humerus articulates with the glenoid of the scapula to form the shoulder joint. The muscles and tendons of the rotator cuff, the acromion, and ligamentous attachments such as those between the coracoid process of the scapula and the acromion, serve to both stabilize the glenohumeral articulation and provide for a wide range of motion of the shoulder joint. The distal humerus articulates with the radius and ulna at the elbow.

The greater tuberosity, located lateral to the humeral head and on the superior aspect of the humerus, provides the attachment for three of the rotator cuff muscles: supraspinatus, infraspinatus and teres minor. The lesser tuberosity of the humerus is located on the anterior surface of the humerus and provides the attachment for the subscapularis muscle. For the purposes of fracture classification, the lesser tuberosity marks the boundary between the proximal humerus and the midshaft.

The humeral shaft supplies the attachment for a number of powerful muscles. The pectoralis major muscle inserts on the proximal shaft while the deltoid muscle attaches to the midshaft. The biceps brachii and triceps muscle groups attach further distally.

                       

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Oct 2014. | This topic last updated: May 1, 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidermark J, et al. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. An epidemiological study of 401 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88:1469.
  2. Visser CP, Coene LN, Brand R, Tavy DL. Nerve lesions in proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10:421.
  3. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury 2006; 37:691.
  4. Ogawa K, Yoshida A. Throwing fracture of the humeral shaft. An analysis of 90 patients. Am J Sports Med 1998; 26:242.
  5. Gosler MW, Testroote M, Morrenhof JW, Janzing HM. Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating humeral shaft fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 1:CD008832.
  6. Denard A Jr, Richards JE, Obremskey WT, et al. Outcome of nonoperative vs operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective study of 213 patients. Orthopedics 2010; 33.
  7. Matsunaga FT, Tamaoki MJ, Matsumoto MH, et al. Treatment of the humeral shaft fractures--minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2013; 14:246.
  8. Mahabier KC, Van Lieshout EM, Bolhuis HW, et al. HUMeral shaft fractures: measuring recovery after operative versus non-operative treatment (HUMMER): a multicenter comparative observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15:39.
  9. Kristiansen B, Angermann P, Larsen TK. Functional results following fractures of the proximal humerus. A controlled clinical study comparing two periods of immobilization. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1989; 108:339.
  10. Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA, et al. Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82:478.
  11. Klenerman L. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1966; 48:105.
  12. Koch PP, Gross DF, Gerber C. The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002; 11:143.
  13. Pehlivan O. Functional treatment of the distal third humeral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002; 122:390.
  14. Fracture Management for Primary Care, Eiff P, Hatch R, Calmbach W. (Eds), Saunders, Philadelphia 2003.
  15. Wallny T, Westermann K, Sagebiel C, et al. Functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures: indications and results. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11:283.
  16. Zagorski, J, Shenkman, J. The management of humerus fractures with prefabricated braces. J Bone Joint Surg 1983; 7:516.
  17. Shao YC, Harwood P, Grotz MR, et al. Radial nerve palsy associated with fractures of the shaft of the humerus: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87:1647.
  18. Bishop J, Ring D. Management of radial nerve palsy associated with humeral shaft fracture: a decision analysis model. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34:991.