UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Medline ® Abstract for Reference 38

of 'Microcephaly in infants and children: Etiology and evaluation'

38
TI
Neurodevelopmental and neuroimaging correlates in nonsyndromal microcephalic children.
AU
Custer DA, Vezina LG, Vaught DR, Brasseux C, Samango-Sprouse CA, Cohen MS, Rosenbaum KN
SO
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2000;21(1):12.
 
This descriptive study examined the relationship between head size, developmental functioning, and neuroimaging findings in children with absolute microcephaly. Subjects, aged 1 to 48 months, were assigned to one of two groups based on occipitofrontal head circumference (OFC). Group A included subjects with an OFC of 2 to 2.99 standard deviations below the mean, and Group B included subjects with an OFC of 3 or more standard deviations below the mean. Brain scan findings for 62% of the subjects were abnormal. Findings included cerebral atrophy, cortical dysplasia, myelination delay, and white matter hypoplasia. Mean scores for developmental measures in Groups A and B were less than 70. Mean developmental scores in the normal imaging group were 70 or greater, whereas developmental scores in the abnormal imaging group were 52 or less. Forty-three percent of the subjects in Group A and 80% of those in Group B had abnormal findings from imaging studies (p = .0394). Subjects with one or more brain abnormalities determined on the basis of magnetic resonance images or computed tomographic scans had significantly lower scores in all developmental areas (p<.05). The authors concluded that abnormal brain images seem to be a better reflection of developmental performance than the degree of microcephaly. J Dev Behav Pediatr 21:12-18, 2000. Index terms: microcephaly, neuroimaging, neurodevelopment.
AD
Department of Medical Genetics, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
PMID