Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


Management of patients with a colostomy or ileostomy

INTRODUCTION

Fecal diversions may be required on either a temporary or permanent basis for the management of a variety of pathologic conditions, including congenital anomalies, obstructive or inflammatory disorders, traumatic disruption of the intestinal tract, or gastrointestinal malignancy [1]. The number of permanent diversions is decreasing because of medical and surgical advances.

Fecal diversions are commonly classified according to the segment of the bowel utilized (eg, sigmoid, colon, ileum) and/or surgical construction (eg, loop, end); both anatomic location and construction have an impact on management. Location of the ostomy (eg, whether it is proximal or distal to the ileocecal valve or proximal to the anus) tremendously impacts the type and volume of output (effluent). Ileostomies, cecostomies, and ascending colostomies typically produce >500 mL per day of output containing digestive enzymes, while descending/sigmoid colostomies produce stool that is formed and does not contain digestive enzymes [2,3]. Loop stomas are larger and somewhat more difficult to manage than end stomas. Any diversion involving retention of the distal bowel is normally accompanied by intermittent mucoid discharge from the anus.

The surgical principles of construction of an ostomy and the management of parastomal hernia complications are reviewed separately. (See "Surgical principles of ostomy construction" and "Parastomal hernia".)

COLOSTOMY

A colostomy is performed when it is necessary to bypass or remove the distal colon, rectum, or anus, and it is either inadvisable or not feasible to maintain integrity of the bowel. If the distal rectum and anorectal sphincter mechanism are removed, the colostomy is permanent; if the sphincter mechanism is retained, there is the potential for restoration of continuity.

Temporary colostomy — A temporary colostomy can be performed on an emergency basis to decompress an obstructed or perforated distal colon. A temporary "diverting" colostomy can also be performed electively to permit healing of a fistulous tract or acute inflammatory process distal to the colostomy. In addition, a diverting colostomy is sometimes created for protection of a distal anastomosis when delayed healing is anticipated (such as an anastomosis involving irradiated tissue); however, the procedure now favored for protection of a distal anastomosis is a diverting ileostomy [4-6].

                                          

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Jul 2014. | This topic last updated: Apr 15, 2013.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Doughty D. Principles of ostomy management in the oncology patient. J Support Oncol 2005; 3:59.
  2. Erwin-Toth P, Doughty D. Principles and procedures of stomal management. In: Ostomies and Continent Diversions: Nursing Management, Hampton, B, Bryant, R (Eds), Mosby, St. Louis 1992. p.29.
  3. Colwell J. Principles of stoma management. In: Colwell, J, Goldberg, M, Carmel, J, Fecal and Urinary Diversions: Management Principles (Ed), Mosby, St. Louis 2004. p.240.
  4. Vasilevsky C, Gordon P. Gastrointestinal cancers: Surgical management. In: Fecal and Urinary Diversions: Management Principles, Colwell, J, Goldberg, M, Carmel, J (Eds), Mosby, St. Louis 2004. p.126.
  5. Güenaga KF, Lustosa SA, Saad SS, et al. Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; :CD004647.
  6. Rodríguez-Ramírez SE, Uribe A, Ruiz-García EB, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after preoperative chemoradiation therapy and low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer. Rev Invest Clin 2006; 58:204.
  7. Bowley DM, Boffard KD, Goosen J, et al. Evolving concepts in the management of colonic injury. Injury 2001; 32:435.
  8. Muller-Stich BP, Choudhry A, Vetter G, et al. Preoperative bowel preparation: surgical standard or past? Dig Surg 2006; 23:375.
  9. Demetriades D, Murray JA, Chan L, et al. Penetrating colon injuries requiring resection: diversion or primary anastomosis? An AAST prospective multicenter study. J Trauma 2001; 50:765.
  10. Schilling MK, Maurer CA, Kollmar O, Büchler MW. Primary vs. secondary anastomosis after sigmoid colon resection for perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey Stage III and IV): a prospective outcome and cost analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44:699.
  11. Biondo S, Jaurrieta E, Martí Ragué J, et al. Role of resection and primary anastomosis of the left colon in the presence of peritonitis. Br J Surg 2000; 87:1580.
  12. Murray JA, Demetriades D, Colson M, et al. Colonic resection in trauma: colostomy versus anastomosis. J Trauma 1999; 46:250.
  13. Gonzalez RP, Falimirski ME, Holevar MR. Further evaluation of colostomy in penetrating colon injury. Am Surg 2000; 66:342.
  14. Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, et al. Quality of life with a temporary stoma: ileostomy vs. colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:650.
  15. Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, et al. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 2001; 25:274.
  16. Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, et al. Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2001; 88:360.
  17. Sakai Y, Nelson H, Larson D, et al. Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion: a case-matched study. Arch Surg 2001; 136:338.
  18. Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C, et al. Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:1168.
  19. Schiessel R, Rosen HR. Preservation and restoration of sphincter function in patients with rectal cancer. Can J Gastroenterol 2000; 14:423.
  20. Di Betta E, D'Hoore A, Filez L, Penninckx F. Sphincter saving rectum resection is the standard procedure for low rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003; 18:463.
  21. Willis S, Kasperk R, Braun J, Schumpelick V. Comparison of colonic J-pouch reconstruction and straight coloanal anastomosis after intersphincteric rectal resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2001; 386:193.
  22. Young M. Caring for patients with coloanal reservoirs for rectal cancer. Medsurg Nurs 2000; 9:193.
  23. Kiran R, Fazio V. Inflammatory bowel disease: Surgical management. In: Fecal and Urinary Diversions: Management Principles, Colwell, J, Goldberg, M, Carmel, J (Eds), Mosby, St. Louis 2004. p.80.
  24. Guy TS, Williams NN, Rosato EF. Crohn's disease of the colon. Surg Clin North Am 2001; 81:159.
  25. Seidel SA, Newman M, Sharp KW. Ileoanal pouch versus ileostomy: is there a difference in quality of life? Am Surg 2000; 66:540.
  26. Becker JM. Surgical therapy for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1999; 28:371.
  27. Beech D, Pontius A, Muni N, Long WP. Familial adenomatous polyposis: a case report and review of the literature. J Natl Med Assoc 2001; 93:208.
  28. Mowschenson PM, Critchlow JF, Peppercorn MA. Ileoanal pouch operation: long-term outcome with or without diverting ileostomy. Arch Surg 2000; 135:463.
  29. Sugerman HJ, Sugerman EL, Meador JG, et al. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion. Ann Surg 2000; 232:530.
  30. Gullberg K, Liljeqvist L. Gains and losses with stapling and omission of loop ileostomy in pelvic pouch surgery: a matched control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 1999; 14:255.
  31. Bax TW, McNevin MS. The value of diverting loop ileostomy on the high-risk colon and rectal anastomosis. Am J Surg 2007; 193:585.
  32. Appau KA, Fazio VW, Shen B, et al. Use of infliximab within 3 months of ileocolonic resection is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes in Crohn's patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12:1738.
  33. Colombel JF, Loftus EV Jr, Tremaine WJ, et al. Early postoperative complications are not increased in patients with Crohn's disease treated perioperatively with infliximab or immunosuppressive therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99:878.
  34. Kunitake H, Hodin R, Shellito PC, et al. Perioperative treatment with infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis is not associated with an increased rate of postoperative complications. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12:1730.
  35. Subramanian V, Pollok RC, Kang JY, Kumar D. Systematic review of postoperative complications in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with immunomodulators. Br J Surg 2006; 93:793.
  36. Litle VR, Barbour S, Schrock TR, Welton ML. The continent ileostomy: long-term durability and patient satisfaction. J Gastrointest Surg 1999; 3:625.
  37. Colwell JC, Goldberg M, Carmel J. The state of the standard diversion. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2001; 28:6.
  38. Piwonka MA, Merino JM. A multidimensional modeling of predictors influencing the adjustment to a colostomy. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 1999; 26:298.
  39. White C. Ostomy adjustment. In: Fecal and Urinary Diversions: Management, Colwell, J, Goldberg, M, Carmel, J (Eds), Mosby, St. Louis 2004. p.326.
  40. Bass EM, Del Pino A, Tan A, et al. Does preoperative stoma marking and education by the enterostomal therapist affect outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40:440.
  41. Lyons AS. Ileostomy and colostomy support groups. Mt Sinai J Med 2001; 68:110.
  42. Nugent KP, Daniels P, Stewart B, et al. Quality of life in stoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:1569.
  43. Haugen V, Bliss DZ, Savik K. Perioperative factors that affect long-term adjustment to an incontinent ostomy. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2006; 33:525.
  44. Annells M. The experience of flatus incontinence from a bowel ostomy: a hermeneutic phenomenology. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2006; 33:518.
  45. Manderson L. Boundary breaches: the body, sex and sexuality after stoma surgery. Soc Sci Med 2005; 61:405.
  46. Floruta CV. Dietary choices of people with ostomies. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2001; 28:28.
  47. Black P. Healthy eating. In: Holistic Stoma Care, Bailliere Tindall, 2000. p.177.
  48. McCann E. Routine assessment of the patient with an ostomy. In: Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing Secrets, Milne C, Corbett I, Dubuc D (Eds), Hanley and Belfus, Philadelphia 2003.
  49. Carmel J, Goldberg M. Preoperative and postoperative management. In: Fecal and Urinary Diversions: Management Principles, Colwell, J, Goldberg, M, Carmel, J (Eds), Mosby, St. Louis 2004. p.207.
  50. Leong AF, Yunos AB. Stoma management in a tropical country: colostomy irrigation versus natural evacuation. Ostomy Wound Manage 1999; 45:52.
  51. Schaube J, Scharf P, Herz R. [The quality of life after extirpation of the rectum for carcinoma]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1996; 121:153.
  52. Woodhouse F. Colostomy irrigation: are we offering it enough? Br J Nurs 2005; 14:S14.
  53. Park JJ, Del Pino A, Orsay CP, et al. Stoma complications: the Cook County Hospital experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:1575.
  54. Shellito PC. Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41:1562.
  55. Colwell J. Stomal and peristomal complications. In: Fecal and Urinary Diversions: Management Principles, Colwell, J, Goldberg, M, Carmel, J (Eds), Mosby, St. Loius 2004. p.308.
  56. Erwin-Toth P. Prevention and management of peristomal skin complications. Adv Skin Wound Care 2000; 13:175.
  57. Kiran RP, O'Brien-Ermlich B, Achkar JP, et al. Management of peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48:1397.
  58. LYONS AS, SIMON BE. Z-plasty for colostomy stenosis. Ann Surg 1960; 151:59.
  59. Conte JV, Arcomano TA, Naficy MA, Holt RW. Treatment of bleeding stomal varices. Report of a case and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 1990; 33:308.
  60. Roberts PL, Martin FM, Schoetz DJ Jr, et al. Bleeding stomal varices. The role of local treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 1990; 33:547.
  61. Noubibou M, Douala HC, Druez PM, et al. Chronic stomal variceal bleeding after colonic surgery in patients with portal hypertension: efficacy of beta-blocking agents? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 18:807.
  62. Shapiro R, Chin EH, Steinhagen RM. Reduction of an incarcerated, prolapsed ileostomy with the assistance of sugar as a desiccant. Tech Coloproctol 2010; 14:269.
  63. Shabbir J, Britton DC. Stoma complications: a literature overview. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12:958.