Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


Laparoscopic/robotic-assisted radical cystectomy

INTRODUCTION

The clinical spectrum of bladder cancer ranges from superficial to metastatic disease at presentation. The most important treatment-related issues include the identification of those who can be adequately managed without total cystectomy, those who need radical cystectomy, and those who require a combined modality approach that includes chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy (RT).

Radical cystectomy is the treatment of choice for high-risk superficial disease as well as localized but muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Traditionally, radical cystectomy has been performed using an open approach that allows wide excision of the bladder, extended lymph node dissection, and a full range of urinary diversion procedures.

The goal of minimally invasive radical cystectomy (with or without robotic assistance) is to reproduce the oncologic results of an open procedure, while decreasing the surgical complications and postoperative recovery time. Laparoscopy was first used for removal of the urinary bladder in 1992 [1], and subsequent advances have evolved towards a robotic-assisted intracorporeal approach to include extended lymph node dissection and totally intracorporeal urinary diversion.

The technical aspects of laparoscopic/robotic radical cystectomy and the early results with this approach are reviewed here. The role of open radical cystectomy is discussed separately. (See "Radical cystectomy and bladder-sparing treatments for urothelial (transitional cell) bladder cancer".)

TECHNIQUE

The goal of minimally-invasive radical cystectomy (with or without robotic assistance) is to reproduce the oncologic results of an open procedure, while minimizing surgical complications and postoperative recovery time. The technique continues to evolve.

     

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2014. | This topic last updated: Nov 20, 2012.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Parra RO, Andrus CH, Jones JP, Boullier JA. Laparoscopic cystectomy: initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder. J Urol 1992; 148:1140.
  2. Desai MM, Berger AK, Brandina RR, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic high extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 2012; 61:350.
  3. Haber GP, Campbell SC, Colombo JR Jr, et al. Perioperative outcomes with laparoscopic radical cystectomy: "pure laparoscopic" and "open-assisted laparoscopic" approaches. Urology 2007; 70:910.
  4. Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol 2010; 57:196.
  5. Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, et al. Comparative analysis of outcomes and costs following open radical cystectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: results from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Eur Urol 2012; 61:1239.
  6. Martin AD, Nunez RN, Castle EP. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: a complete cost analysis. Urology 2011; 77:621.
  7. Lee R, Ng CK, Shariat SF, et al. The economics of robotic cystectomy: cost comparison of open versus robotic cystectomy. BJU Int 2011; 108:1886.
  8. Simonato A, Gregori A, Lissiani A, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy: our experience in a consecutive series of 10 patients with a 3 years follow-up. Eur Urol 2005; 47:785.
  9. Guillotreau J, Gamé X, Mouzin M, et al. Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: morbidity of laparoscopic versus open surgery. J Urol 2009; 181:554.
  10. DeGer S, Peters R, Roigas J, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with continent urinary diversion (rectosigmoid pouch) performed completely intracorporeally: an intermediate functional and oncologic analysis. Urology 2004; 64:935.
  11. Tanaka K, Hara I, Takenaka A, et al. Incidence of local and port site recurrence of urologic cancer after laparoscopic surgery. Urology 2008; 71:728.
  12. Haber GP, Gill IS. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy for cancer: oncological outcomes at up to 5 years. BJU Int 2007; 100:137.
  13. Cathelineau X, Arroyo C, Rozet F, et al. Laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy: the montsouris experience after 84 cases. Eur Urol 2005; 47:780.
  14. El-Tabey NA, Shoma AM. Port site metastases after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Urology 2005; 66:1110.
  15. Pruthi RS, Nielsen ME, Nix J, et al. Robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: surgical and pathological outcomes in 100 consecutive cases. J Urol 2010; 183:510.
  16. Smith AB, Raynor M, Amling CL, et al. Multi-institutional analysis of robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative outcomes and complications in 227 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012; 22:17.
  17. Schumacher MC, Jonsson MN, Hosseini A, et al. Surgery-related complications of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion. Urology 2011; 77:871.
  18. Wang GJ, Barocas DA, Raman JD, Scherr DS. Robotic vs open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncological efficacy. BJU Int 2008; 101:89.
  19. Ng CK, Kauffman EC, Lee MM, et al. A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy. Eur Urol 2010; 57:274.
  20. Chade DC, Laudone VP, Bochner BH, Parra RO. Oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: open versus minimally invasive approaches. J Urol 2010; 183:862.
  21. Nepple KG, Strope SA, Grubb RL 3rd, Kibel AS. Early oncologic outcomes of robotic vs. open radical cystectomy for urothelial cancer. Urol Oncol 2013; 31:894.
  22. Martin AD, Nunez RN, Pacelli A, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: intermediate survival results at a mean follow-up of 25 months. BJU Int 2010; 105:1706.
  23. Kauffman EC, Ng CK, Lee MM, et al. Early oncological outcomes for bladder urothelial carcinoma patients treated with robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2011; 107:628.