UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Irritant contact dermatitis in adults

Authors
Ronald Goldner, MD
Papapit Tuchinda, MD
Section Editor
Joseph Fowler, MD
Deputy Editor
Rosamaria Corona, MD, DSc

INTRODUCTION

Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is a localized inflammatory skin response to a wide range of chemical or physical agents. ICD results from direct cytotoxic effect of irritants; unlike allergic contact dermatitis, it is not immune mediated. ICD is a multifactorial disorder influenced by the physical and chemical properties of the irritating substance, host-related susceptibility factors, and environmental factors.

The clinical manifestations of ICD are similar to those of other acute or chronic eczematous dermatitides, including atopic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis.

This topic will discuss the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management of ICD in adults. Atopic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis are discussed separately. Diaper dermatitis, the prototype of irritant contact dermatitis in infants and young children, is discussed separately.

(See "Treatment of atopic dermatitis (eczema)".)

(See "Basic mechanisms and pathophysiology of allergic contact dermatitis".)

                           

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2016. | This topic last updated: Thu Jun 25 00:00:00 GMT+00:00 2015.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Clark SC, Zirwas MJ. Management of occupational dermatitis. Dermatol Clin 2009; 27:365.
  2. Thyssen JP, Johansen JD, Linneberg A, Menné T. The epidemiology of hand eczema in the general population--prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 2010; 62:75.
  3. Dickel H, Kuss O, Schmidt A, et al. Importance of irritant contact dermatitis in occupational skin disease. Am J Clin Dermatol 2002; 3:283.
  4. Smith HR, Basketter DA, McFadden JP. Irritant dermatitis, irritancy and its role in allergic contact dermatitis. Clin Exp Dermatol 2002; 27:138.
  5. Fluhr JW, Darlenski R, Angelova-Fischer I, et al. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment. 1. Skin irritation. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2008; 21:124.
  6. Wood LC, Elias PM, Calhoun C, et al. Barrier disruption stimulates interleukin-1 alpha expression and release from a pre-formed pool in murine epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 1996; 106:397.
  7. Wilmer JL, Burleson FG, Kayama F, et al. Cytokine induction in human epidermal keratinocytes exposed to contact irritants and its relation to chemical-induced inflammation in mouse skin. J Invest Dermatol 1994; 102:915.
  8. Spiekstra SW, Toebak MJ, Sampat-Sardjoepersad S, et al. Induction of cytokine (interleukin-1alpha and tumor necrosis factor-alpha) and chemokine (CCL20, CCL27, and CXCL8) alarm signals after allergen and irritant exposure. Exp Dermatol 2005; 14:109.
  9. Eberhard Y, Ortiz S, Ruiz Lascano A, et al. Up-regulation of the chemokine CCL21 in the skin of subjects exposed to irritants. BMC Immunol 2004; 5:7.
  10. De Jongh CM, Verberk MM, Withagen CE, et al. Stratum corneum cytokines and skin irritation response to sodium lauryl sulfate. Contact Dermatitis 2006; 54:325.
  11. Visscher MO, Said D, Wickett R. Stratum corneum cytokines, structural proteins, and transepidermal water loss: effect of hand hygiene. Skin Res Technol 2010; 16:229.
  12. Heinemann C, Paschold C, Fluhr J, et al. Induction of a hardening phenomenon by repeated application of SLS: analysis of lipid changes in the stratum corneum. Acta Derm Venereol 2005; 85:290.
  13. Watkins SA, Maibach HI. The hardening phenomenon in irritant contact dermatitis: an interpretative update. Contact Dermatitis 2009; 60:123.
  14. Schwindt DA, Wilhelm KP, Miller DL, Maibach HI. Cumulative irritation in older and younger skin: a comparison. Acta Derm Venereol 1998; 78:279.
  15. Goh CL. Prognosis of contact and occupational dermatitis. Clin Dermatol 1997; 15:655.
  16. Rougier A, Dupuis D, Lotte C, et al. Regional variation in percutaneous absorption in man: measurement by the stripping method. Arch Dermatol Res 1986; 278:465.
  17. Jakasa I, de Jongh CM, Verberk MM, et al. Percutaneous penetration of sodium lauryl sulphate is increased in uninvolved skin of patients with atopic dermatitis compared with control subjects. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155:104.
  18. Jakasa I, Verberk MM, Esposito M, et al. Altered penetration of polyethylene glycols into uninvolved skin of atopic dermatitis patients. J Invest Dermatol 2007; 127:129.
  19. Dickel H, Bruckner TM, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL. Impact of atopic skin diathesis on occupational skin disease incidence in a working population. J Invest Dermatol 2003; 121:37.
  20. Lerbaek A, Kyvik KO, Mortensen J, et al. Heritability of hand eczema is not explained by comorbidity with atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 2007; 127:1632.
  21. de Jongh CM, John SM, Bruynzeel DP, et al. Cytokine gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to chronic irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2008; 58:269.
  22. Allen MH, Wakelin SH, Holloway D, et al. Association of TNFA gene polymorphism at position -308 with susceptibility to irritant contact dermatitis. Immunogenetics 2000; 51:201.
  23. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Skin occlusion and irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: an overview. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 44:201.
  24. Ohlenschlaeger J, Friberg J, Ramsing D, Agner T. Temperature dependency of skin susceptibility to water and detergents. Acta Derm Venereol 1996; 76:274.
  25. Berardesca E, Vignoli GP, Distante F, et al. Effects of water temperature on surfactant-induced skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 32:83.
  26. Fluhr JW, Praessler J, Akengin A, et al. Air flow at different temperatures increases sodium lauryl sulphate-induced barrier disruption and irritation in vivo. Br J Dermatol 2005; 152:1228.
  27. John SM, Uter W. Meteorological influence on NaOH irritation varies with body site. Arch Dermatol Res 2005; 296:320.
  28. Uter W, Gefeller O, Schwanitz HJ. An epidemiological study of the influence of season (cold and dry air) on the occurrence of irritant skin changes of the hands. Br J Dermatol 1998; 138:266.
  29. Fluhr JW, Akengin A, Bornkessel A, et al. Additive impairment of the barrier function by mechanical irritation, occlusion and sodium lauryl sulphate in vivo. Br J Dermatol 2005; 153:125.
  30. Willis CM, Stephens CJ, Wilkinson JD. Epidermal damage induced by irritants in man: a light and electron microscopic study. J Invest Dermatol 1989; 93:695.
  31. Aramaki J, Löffler C, Kawana S, et al. Irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulphate: interrelation between concentration and exposure time. Br J Dermatol 2001; 145:704.
  32. Wigger-Alberti W, Krebs A, Elsner P. Experimental irritant contact dermatitis due to cumulative epicutaneous exposure to sodium lauryl sulphate and toluene: single and concurrent application. Br J Dermatol 2000; 143:551.
  33. Warner RR, Boissy YL, Lilly NA, et al. Water disrupts stratum corneum lipid lamellae: damage is similar to surfactants. J Invest Dermatol 1999; 113:960.
  34. Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ. The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1999; 72:496.
  35. Pigatto PD, Legori A, Bigardi AS. Occupational dermatitis from physical causes. Clin Dermatol 1992; 10:231.
  36. Bordel-Gómez MT, Miranda-Romero A. Fibreglass dermatitis: a report of 2 cases. Contact Dermatitis 2008; 59:120.
  37. Modi GM, Doherty CB, Katta R, Orengo IF. Irritant contact dermatitis from plants. Dermatitis 2009; 20:63.
  38. Morris-Jones R, Robertson SJ, Ross JS, et al. Dermatitis caused by physical irritants. Br J Dermatol 2002; 147:270.
  39. Rietschel RL. Clues to an accurate diagnosis of contact dermatitis. Dermatol Ther 2004; 17:224.
  40. Kütting B, Uter W, Baumeister T, et al. Non-invasive bioengineering methods in an intervention study in 1020 male metal workers: results and implications for occupational dermatology. Contact Dermatitis 2010; 62:272.
  41. Steiner M, Aikman-Green S, Prescott GJ, Dick FD. Side-by-side comparison of an open-chamber (TM 300) and a closed-chamber (Vapometer™) transepidermal water loss meter. Skin Res Technol 2011; 17:366.
  42. Elkeeb R, Hui X, Chan H, et al. Correlation of transepidermal water loss with skin barrier properties in vitro: comparison of three evaporimeters. Skin Res Technol 2010; 16:9.
  43. Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Agner T, Serup J. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1990; 22:164.
  44. Bircher A, de Boer EM, Agner T, et al. Guidelines for measurement of cutaneous blood flow by laser Doppler flowmetry. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 30:65.
  45. Clarys P, Alewaeters K, Lambrecht R, Barel AO. Skin color measurements: comparison between three instruments: the Chromameter(R), the DermaSpectrometer(R) and the Mexameter(R). Skin Res Technol 2000; 6:230.
  46. Andersen PH, Maibach HI. Skin irritation in man: a comparative bioengineering study using improved reflectance spectroscopy. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 33:315.
  47. Clarys P, Clijsen R, Taeymans J, Barel AO. Hydration measurements of the stratum corneum: comparison between the capacitance method (digital version of the Corneometer CM 825®) and the impedance method (Skicon-200EX®). Skin Res Technol 2012; 18:316.
  48. Schwensen JF, Menné T, Johansen JD. The combined diagnosis of allergic and irritant contact dermatitis in a retrospective cohort of 1000 consecutive patients with occupational contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 71:356.
  49. Aydin O, Engin B, Oğuz O, et al. Non-pustular palmoplantar psoriasis: is histologic differentiation from eczematous dermatitis possible? J Cutan Pathol 2008; 35:169.
  50. Clemmensen A, Andersen F, Petersen TK, et al. Applicability of an exaggerated forearm wash test for efficacy testing of two corticosteroids, tacrolimus and glycerol, in topical formulations against skin irritation induced by two different irritants. Skin Res Technol 2011; 17:56.
  51. Levin C, Zhai H, Bashir S, et al. Efficacy of corticosteroids in acute experimental irritant contact dermatitis? Skin Res Technol 2001; 7:214.
  52. Le TK, De Mon P, Schalkwijk J, van der Valk PG. Effect of a topical corticosteroid, a retinoid and a vitamin D3 derivative on sodium dodecyl sulphate induced skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 37:19.
  53. Yokota M, Maibach HI. Moisturizer effect on irritant dermatitis: an overview. Contact Dermatitis 2006; 55:65.
  54. Held E, Lund H, Agner T. Effect of different moisturizers on SLS-irritated human skin. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 44:229.
  55. Menné T, Johansen JD, Sommerlund M, et al. Hand eczema guidelines based on the Danish guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis 2011; 65:3.
  56. Packham C. Gloves as chemical protection--can they really work? Ann Occup Hyg 2006; 50:545.
  57. Bauer A, Schmitt J, Bennett C, et al. Interventions for preventing occupational irritant hand dermatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; :CD004414.
  58. Williams C, Wilkinson SM, McShane P, et al. A double-blind, randomized study to assess the effectiveness of different moisturizers in preventing dermatitis induced by hand washing to simulate healthcare use. Br J Dermatol 2010; 162:1088.
  59. Lee JY, Effendy I, Maibach HI. Acute irritant contact dermatitis: recovery time in man. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 36:285.
  60. Choi JM, Lee JY, Cho BK. Chronic irritant contact dermatitis: recovery time in man. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 42:264.
  61. Cvetkovski RS, Zachariae R, Jensen H, et al. Prognosis of occupational hand eczema: a follow-up study. Arch Dermatol 2006; 142:305.
  62. Mälkönen T, Alanko K, Jolanki R, et al. Long-term follow-up study of occupational hand eczema. Br J Dermatol 2010; 163:999.