Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


Intrauterine adhesions

INTRODUCTION

Intrauterine adhesions develop as a result of intrauterine trauma. The degree of adhesion formation and the impact of the adhesions on the contour of uterine cavity vary greatly. With minimal disease, thin bands of tissue stretch between surfaces of the uterine cavity, whereas severe disease is characterized by complete obliteration of the cavity, with the anterior wall of the uterus densely adherent to the posterior wall.

ETIOLOGY

Approximately 90 percent of cases of severe intrauterine adhesive disease are related to curettage for pregnancy complications, such as missed or incomplete abortion, postpartum hemorrhage, or retained placental remnants [1,2]. Repeated curettage for pregnancy loss increases the risk of developing adhesions from 8 percent after the first curettage to over 30 percent with the third curettage [3]. The basalis layer of the endometrium appears to most susceptible to damage in the first four postpartum or postabortal weeks; however, adhesions can develop in the nongravid uterus as a result of endometrial injury from procedures such as myomectomy or nonpuerperal curettage [4].

The role of postpartum or postabortal infection in adhesion formation is controversial, and data are limited. A study that evaluated 28 women with significant postcesarean delivery endometritis by hysteroscopy reported the frequency of adhesions in these women was similar to that in controls without postcesarean infection [5]. Another study reported a nonsignificant increase in adhesion formation when dilation and curettage was performed in the presence of concurrent infection [6]. Trauma is the major cause of intrauterine adhesions, although infection may play a minor contributing role.

In the developing world, genital tuberculosis is a cause of intrauterine adhesions, which are often severe with complete obliteration of the uterine cavity [7]. These patients typically present with amenorrhea and cyclic pelvic pain. The adhesions are believed to form secondary to chronic inflammation of the endometrium. (See "Postpartum endometritis".)

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS

Intrauterine adhesions can be asymptomatic and of no clinical significance. Symptoms associated with clinically significant intrauterine adhesions include:

         

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Mar 2014. | This topic last updated: Oct 11, 2013.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. March CM. Intrauterine adhesions. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1995; 22:491.
  2. Schenker JG. Etiology of and therapeutic approach to synechia uteri. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1996; 65:109.
  3. Letterie GS. Structural abnormalities and reproductive failure: effective techniques for diagnosis and management, Blackwell Science, Massachusetts 1998.
  4. Al-Inany H. Intrauterine adhesions. An update. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80:986.
  5. Polishuk WZ, Anteby SO, Weinstein D. Puerperal endometritis and intrauterine adhesions. Int Surg 1975; 60:418.
  6. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988; 49:944.
  7. NETTER A, MUSSET R, LAMBERT A, et al. [Tuberculous endo-uterine symphysis; an anatomo-clinical and radiologically characteristic syndrome]. Gynecol Obstet (Paris) 1955; 54:19.
  8. ASHERMAN JG. Traumatic intra-uterine adhesions. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1950; 57:892.
  9. ASHERMAN JG. Amenorrhoea traumatica (atretica). J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1948; 55:23.
  10. AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for management of intrauterine synechiae. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17:1.
  11. Soares SR, Barbosa dos Reis MM, Camargos AF. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity diseases. Fertil Steril 2000; 73:406.
  12. Roma Dalfó A, Ubeda B, Ubeda A, et al. Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in the detection of intrauterine abnormalities: a comparison with hysteroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183:1405.
  13. Shalev J, Meizner I, Bar-Hava I, et al. Predictive value of transvaginal sonography performed before routine diagnostic hysteroscopy for evaluation of infertility. Fertil Steril 2000; 73:412.
  14. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Vignali M. Intrauterine adhesions: detection with transvaginal US. Radiology 1996; 199:757.
  15. Schlaff WD, Hurst BS. Preoperative sonographic measurement of endometrial pattern predicts outcome of surgical repair in patients with severe Asherman's syndrome. Fertil Steril 1995; 63:410.
  16. Fernandez H, Gervaise A, de Tayrac R. Operative hysteroscopy for infertility using normal saline solution and a coaxial bipolar electrode: a pilot study. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:1773.
  17. Levine RU, Neuwirth RS. Simultaneous laparoscopy and hysteroscopy for intrauterine adhesions. Obstet Gynecol 1973; 42:441.
  18. Thomson AJ, Abbott JA, Kingston A, et al. Fluoroscopically guided synechiolysis for patients with Asherman's syndrome: menstrual and fertility outcomes. Fertil Steril 2007; 87:405.
  19. Orhue AA, Aziken ME, Igbefoh JO. A comparison of two adjunctive treatments for intrauterine adhesions following lysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003; 82:49.
  20. Pabuçcu R, Atay V, Orhon E, et al. Hysteroscopic treatment of intrauterine adhesions is safe and effective in the restoration of normal menstruation and fertility. Fertil Steril 1997; 68:1141.
  21. Zikopoulos KA, Kolibianakis EM, Platteau P, et al. Live delivery rates in subfertile women with Asherman's syndrome after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis using the resectoscope or the Versapoint system. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 8:720.
  22. Capella-Allouc S, Morsad F, Rongières-Bertrand C, et al. Hysteroscopic treatment of severe Asherman's syndrome and subsequent fertility. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:1230.
  23. Katz Z, Ben-Arie A, Lurie S, et al. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in Asherman's syndrome. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 1996; 41:462.
  24. Valle RF, Sciarra JJ. Intrauterine adhesions: hysteroscopic diagnosis, classification, treatment, and reproductive outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158:1459.