Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


Interferon-gamma release assays for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection

INTRODUCTION

The development of interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) is an important advance in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). IGRAs are in vitro blood tests of cell-mediated immune response; they measure T cell release of interferon (IFN)-gamma following stimulation by antigens unique to Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

The goal of testing for LTBI is to identify individuals who are at increased risk for the development of tuberculosis (TB) and therefore who would benefit from treatment of latent TB infection. Only those who would benefit from treatment should be tested, so a decision to test presupposes a decision to treat if the test is positive.

A large number of studies have evaluated IGRAs, and these have been summarized in systematic reviews and guidelines [1-12]. Issues related to the assays and their use will be reviewed here. Other issues related to diagnosis of LTBI are discussed in detail separately. (See "Diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (tuberculosis screening) in HIV-negative adults" and "Diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in HIV-infected patients".)

OVERVIEW OF IGRAs

Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are diagnostic tools for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) [13]. They are surrogate markers of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and indicate a cellular immune response to M. tuberculosis. IGRAs cannot distinguish between latent infection and active tuberculosis (TB) disease and should not be used for diagnosis of active TB, which is a microbiological diagnosis. A positive IGRA result may not necessarily indicate active TB, and a negative IGRA result may not rule out active TB [11,14]. (See "Diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-negative patients".)

Because IGRAs are not affected by Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination status, IGRAs are useful for evaluation of LTBI in BCG-vaccinated individuals, particularly in settings where BCG vaccination is administered after infancy or multiple (booster) BCG vaccinations are given. In contrast, the specificity of tuberculin skin test (TST) varies depending on timing of BCG and whether repeated (booster) vaccinations are given. A World Atlas of BCG Policies and Practices has been compiled to help clinicians and public health practitioners review variations in BCG policies and their impact on TST and to determine the populations for which IGRAs may be more specific than the TST [15]. Further, although based on limited evidence, IGRAs appear to be unaffected by most infections with environmental nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), which can cause false-positive TSTs [16]. In addition, limited data suggest that IGRA results are not affected by intravesical BCG for bladder cancer [17].

                   

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Jun 2014. | This topic last updated: Jul 14, 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Menzies D, Pai M, Comstock G. Meta-analysis: new tests for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: areas of uncertainty and recommendations for research. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146:340.
  2. Pai M, Zwerling A, Menzies D. Systematic review: T-cell-based assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: an update. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149:177.
  3. van Zyl-Smit RN, Zwerling A, Dheda K, Pai M. Within-subject variability of interferon-g assay results for tuberculosis and boosting effect of tuberculin skin testing: a systematic review. PLoS One 2009; 4:e8517.
  4. Chang KC, Leung CC. Systematic review of interferon-gamma release assays in tuberculosis: focus on likelihood ratios. Thorax 2010; 65:271.
  5. Mazurek GH, Jereb J, Vernon A, et al. Updated guidelines for using Interferon Gamma Release Assays to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection - United States, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010; 59:1.
  6. Tuberculosis. In: Red Book, American Academy of Pediatrics, 2009. http://aapredbook.aappublications.org/ (Accessed on September 22, 2010).
  7. Zwerling A, van den Hof S, Scholten J, et al. Interferon-gamma release assays for tuberculosis screening of healthcare workers: a systematic review. Thorax 2012; 67:62.
  8. Cattamanchi A, Smith R, Steingart KR, et al. Interferon-gamma release assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in HIV-infected individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 56:230.
  9. Machingaidze S, Wiysonge CS, Gonzalez-Angulo Y, et al. The utility of an interferon gamma release assay for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection and disease in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2011; 30:694.
  10. Smith R, Cattamanchi A, Steingart KR, et al. Interferon-γ release assays for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: evidence in immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2011; 23:377.
  11. Metcalfe JZ, Everett CK, Steingart KR, et al. Interferon-γ release assays for active pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis in adults in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect Dis 2011; 204 Suppl 4:S1120.
  12. Pai M, Kunimoto D, Jamieson F, Menzies D. Diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection. Canadian TB Standards, 7th Edition. Can Respir J 2013; 20 (Suppl A):23A.
  13. Pai M, Denkinger CM, Kik SV, et al. Gamma interferon release assays for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 2014; 27:3.
  14. Sester M, Sotgiu G, Lange C, et al. Interferon-γ release assays for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2011; 37:100.
  15. Zwerling A, Behr MA, Verma A, et al. The BCG World Atlas: a database of global BCG vaccination policies and practices. PLoS Med 2011; 8:e1001012.
  16. Adams LV, Waddell RD, Von Reyn CF. T-SPOT.TB Test(R) results in adults with Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease. Scand J Infect Dis 2008; 40:196.
  17. Silverman MS, Reynolds D, Kavsak PA, et al. Use of an interferon-gamma based assay to assess bladder cancer patients treated with intravesical BCG and exposed to tuberculosis. Clin Biochem 2007; 40:913.
  18. Andersen P, Munk ME, Pollock JM, Doherty TM. Specific immune-based diagnosis of tuberculosis. Lancet 2000; 356:1099.
  19. Arend SM, van Meijgaarden KE, de Boer K, et al. Tuberculin skin testing and in vitro T cell responses to ESAT-6 and culture filtrate protein 10 after infection with Mycobacterium marinum or M. kansasii. J Infect Dis 2002; 186:1797.
  20. Lewis FM, Marsh BJ, von Reyn CF. Fish tank exposure and cutaneous infections due to Mycobacterium marinum: tuberculin skin testing, treatment, and prevention. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 37:390.
  21. Wallis RS, Pai M, Menzies D, et al. Biomarkers and diagnostics for tuberculosis: progress, needs, and translation into practice. Lancet 2010; 375:1920.
  22. Pai M. Spectrum of latent tuberculosis - existing tests cannot resolve the underlying phenotypes. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010; 8:242; author reply 242.
  23. Rangaka MX, Wilkinson KA, Glynn JR, et al. Predictive value of interferon-γ release assays for incident active tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2012; 12:45.
  24. Bakir M, Millington KA, Soysal A, et al. Prognostic value of a T-cell-based, interferon-gamma biomarker in children with tuberculosis contact. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149:777.
  25. del Corral H, París SC, Marín ND, et al. IFNgamma response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, risk of infection and disease in household contacts of tuberculosis patients in Colombia. PLoS One 2009; 4:e8257.
  26. Hill PC, Jackson-Sillah DJ, Fox A, et al. Incidence of tuberculosis and the predictive value of ELISPOT and Mantoux tests in Gambian case contacts. PLoS One 2008; 3:e1379.
  27. Lienhardt C, Fielding K, Hane AA, et al. Evaluation of the prognostic value of IFN-gamma release assay and tuberculin skin test in household contacts of infectious tuberculosis cases in Senegal. PLoS One 2010; 5:e10508.
  28. Mahomed H, Hawkridge T, Verver S, et al. The tuberculin skin test versus QuantiFERON TB Gold® in predicting tuberculosis disease in an adolescent cohort study in South Africa. PLoS One 2011; 6:e17984.
  29. Pai M, Minion J, Sohn H, et al. Novel and improved technologies for tuberculosis diagnosis: progress and challenges. Clin Chest Med 2009; 30:701.
  30. Denkinger CM, Dheda K, Pai M. Guidelines on interferon-γ release assays for tuberculosis infection: concordance, discordance or confusion? Clin Microbiol Infect 2011; 17:806.
  31. http://www.tstin3d.com (Accessed on September 01, 2010).
  32. Fong KS, Tomford JW, Teixeira L, et al. Challenges of interferon-γ release assay conversions in serial testing of health-care workers in a TB control program. Chest 2012; 142:55.
  33. Slater ML, Welland G, Pai M, et al. Challenges with QuantiFERON-TB Gold assay for large-scale, routine screening of U.S. healthcare workers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 188:1005.
  34. Dorman SE, Belknap R, Graviss EA, et al. Interferon-γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in healthcare workers in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014; 189:77.
  35. Joshi M, Monson TP, Joshi A, Woods GL. IFN-γ release assay conversions and reversions. Challenges with serial testing in U.S. health care workers. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014; 11:296.
  36. Daley CL, Reves RR, Beard MA, et al. A summary of meeting proceedings on addressing variability around the cut point in serial interferon-γ release assay testing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013; 34:625.
  37. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Clinical Guideline 33. Tuberculosis: clinical diagnosis and management of tuberculosis, and measures for its prevention and control. Vol. 2006. London: NICE, 2006. http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=CG033NICEguideline (Accessed on August 16, 2010).
  38. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Clinical guideline 17. Tuberculosis: clinical diagnosis and management of tuberculosis, and measures for its prevention and control. London: NICE, 2011. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/13422/53642/53642.pdf.
  39. European Center for Disease Prevention and Control. Use of interferon-gamma release assays in support of TB diagnosis. Stockholm, 2011. http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/1103_GUI_IGRA.pdf (Accessed on May 16, 2011).
  40. Mandalakas AM, Detjen AK, Hesseling AC, et al. Interferon-gamma release assays and childhood tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2011; 15:1018.
  41. Menzies D. Interpretation of repeated tuberculin tests. Boosting, conversion, and reversion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159:15.
  42. Pai M, O'Brien R. Serial testing for tuberculosis: can we make sense of T cell assay conversions and reversions? PLoS Med 2007; 4:e208.
  43. Joshi M, Monson TP, Woods GL. Use of interferon-gamma release assays in a health care worker screening program: experience from a tertiary care centre in the United States. Can Respir J 2012; 19:84.
  44. Pai M, Elwood K. Interferon-gamma release assays for screening of health care workers in low tuberculosis incidence settings: dynamic patterns and interpretational challenges. Can Respir J 2012; 19:81.
  45. Zwerling A, Pai M, Michael JS, Christopher DJ. Serial testing using interferon-γ release assays in nursing students in India. Eur Respir J 2014; 44:257.
  46. Canadian Tuberculosis Committee (CTC). Updated recommendations on interferon gamma release assays for latent tuberculosis infection. An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS). Can Commun Dis Rep 2008; 34:1.
  47. Zwerling A, van den Hof S, Scholten J, et al. Interferon-gamma release assays for tuberculosis screening of healthcare workers: a systematic review. Thorax 2012; 67:62.
  48. Loddenkemper R, Diel R, Nienhaus A. To repeat or not to repeat-that is the question!: Serial testing of health-care workers for TB infection. Chest 2012; 142:10.
  49. Machingaidze S, Verver S, Mulenga H, et al. Predictive value of recent QuantiFERON conversion for tuberculosis disease in adolescents. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 186:1051.
  50. Doberne D, Gaur RL, Banaei N. Preanalytical delay reduces sensitivity of QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube assay for detection of latent tuberculosis infection. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49:3061.
  51. Gaur RL, Pai M, Banaei N. Impact of blood volume, tube shaking, and incubation time on reproducibility of QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube assay. J Clin Microbiol 2013; 51:3521.
  52. Metcalfe JZ, Cattamanchi A, McCulloch CE, et al. Test variability of the QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube assay in clinical practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187:206.
  53. Whitworth WC, Hamilton LR, Goodwin DJ, et al. Within-subject interlaboratory variability of QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube tests. PLoS One 2012; 7:e43790.
  54. Park JS, Lee JS, Kim MY, et al. Monthly follow-ups of interferon-γ release assays among health-care workers in contact with patients with TB. Chest 2012; 142:1461.
  55. Pai M. Serial testing with TB interferon-γ release assays: toward a nuanced understanding. Chest 2012; 142:1366.
  56. Pai M, Dheda K, Cunningham J, et al. T-cell assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: moving the research agenda forward. Lancet Infect Dis 2007; 7:428.
  57. Pai M, Lewinsohn DM. Interferon-gamma assays for tuberculosis: is anergy the Achilles' heel? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 172:519.
  58. Anibarro L, Trigo M, Villaverde C, et al. Tuberculin skin test and interferon-γ release assay show better correlation after the tuberculin 'window period' in tuberculosis contacts. Scand J Infect Dis 2011; 43:424.
  59. Lee SW, Oh DK, Lee SH, et al. Time interval to conversion of interferon-gamma release assay after exposure to tuberculosis. Eur Respir J 2011; 37:1447.
  60. Adetifa IM, Ota MO, Walther B, et al. Decay kinetics of an interferon gamma release assay with anti-tuberculosis therapy in newly diagnosed tuberculosis cases. PLoS One 2010; 5.
  61. Bocchino M, Chairadonna P, Matarese A, et al. Limited usefulness of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube for monitoring anti-tuberculosis therapy. Respir Med 2010; 104:1551.
  62. Chee CB, KhinMar KW, Gan SH, et al. Tuberculosis treatment effect on T-cell interferon-gamma responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens. Eur Respir J 2010; 36:355.
  63. Denkinger CM, Pai M, Patel M, Menzies D. Gamma interferon release assay for monitoring of treatment response for active tuberculosis: an explosion in the spaghetti factory. J Clin Microbiol 2013; 51:607.
  64. Adetifa IM, Ota MO, Jeffries DJ, et al. Interferon-γ ELISPOT as a biomarker of treatment efficacy in latent tuberculosis infection: a clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187:439.
  65. World Health Organization. The use of tuberculosis interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) in low- and middle-income countries. Policy Statement. Geneva, WHO, 2011 http://www.who.int/tb/features_archive/igra_policy24oct/en/index.html (Accessed on October 19, 2011).