UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Instruments and devices used in laparoscopic surgery

Authors
Jon Gould, MD
Todd A Ponsky, MD, FACS
Jeffrey Blatnik, MD
Section Editors
Jeffrey Marks, MD
Tommaso Falcone, MD, FRCSC, FACOG
Deputy Editor
Wenliang Chen, MD, PhD

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive surgery has undergone significant advances and has changed the way operations are performed. Technological advances have produced progressively smaller laparoscopic instruments and higher quality imaging that allow laparoscopic surgeons to perform precise dissection with minimal bleeding through most dissection planes, even those that are highly vascular.

Adequate hemostasis is essential during laparoscopic procedures to ensure a clear view of the operating field. The need to convert to an open procedure negates the advantages of the laparoscopic approach. Primary prevention of bleeding through the use of various laparoscopic devices to carefully dissect and identify vascular structures prior to dividing them (as needed) is fundamental. However, when bleeding does occur, these devices can also be used to safely and efficiently achieve hemostasis to allow the procedures to continue laparoscopically. (See "Complications of laparoscopic surgery", section on 'Management of hemorrhage'.)

This topic will discuss devices and techniques available for laparoscopic imaging, dissection, and control of bleeding encountered during laparoscopic surgery. Abdominal access techniques are discussed in detail elsewhere. (See "Abdominal access techniques used in laparoscopic surgery".)

LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

Laparoscopic surgery refers to surgical procedures that are performed through one or multiple small incisions, rather than through a larger, usually single, incision through the abdominal wall. Advantages of laparoscopy over laparotomy include smaller scars, quicker recovery, decreased adhesion formation [1], and for some procedures (but not all), less bleeding, fewer complications and shorter procedure duration [2-6]. However, in many cases, the risk of major complications (pulmonary embolus, transfusion, fistula formation, major additional unplanned surgery) may be similar for the open and laparoscopic approaches to a given procedure. The advantages and disadvantages of the laparoscopic approach for specific procedures are discussed in separate topic reviews.

Depending upon the nature of the specific surgical procedure, laparoscopic entry can be performed using a closed (Veress needle, optical access) or open technique (Hasson technique). Once pneumoperitoneum has been established, one or more ports are placed through which the camera and instruments are passed. Techniques for laparoscopic entry are reviewed in detail elsewhere. (See "Abdominal access techniques used in laparoscopic surgery" and "Abdominal access techniques used in laparoscopic surgery", section on 'Single-incision surgery (SIS)'.)

                                   

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2016. | This topic last updated: Thu Feb 18 00:00:00 GMT+00:00 2016.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Pismensky SV, Kalzhanov ZR, Eliseeva MY, et al. Severe inflammatory reaction induced by peritoneal trauma is the key driving mechanism of postoperative adhesion formation. BMC Surg 2011; 11:30.
  2. Hutter MM, Randall S, Khuri SF, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 2006; 243:657.
  3. Jiang L, Yang KH, Guan QL, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer: an update meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 2013; 27:2466.
  4. Azziz, R, Steinkampf, MP, Murphy, A. Postoperative recuperation: relation to the extent of endoscopic surgery. Fertil Steril 1989; 5:131.
  5. Lundorff P, Hahlin M, Källfelt B, et al. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Fertil Steril 1991; 55:911.
  6. Levine, RL. Economic impact of pelviscopic surgery.
  7. Schollmeyer T, Soyinka AS, Schollmeyer M, Meinhold-Heerlein I. Georg Kelling (1866-1945): the root of modern day minimal invasive surgery. A forgotten legend? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007; 276:505.
  8. Spaner SJ, Warnock GL. A brief history of endoscopy, laparoscopy, and laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1997; 7:369.
  9. Stellato TA. History of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1992; 72:997.
  10. Boppart SA, Deutsch TF, Rattner DW. Optical imaging technology in minimally invasive surgery. Current status and future directions. Surg Endosc 1999; 13:718.
  11. Berber E, Siperstein AE. Understanding and optimizing laparoscopic videosystems. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:781.
  12. Park A, Charash WF, Shaw M. The future of imaging in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 2000; 14:517.
  13. Kong SH, Oh BM, Yoon H, et al. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera. Surg Endosc 2010; 24:1132.
  14. van Bergen P, Kunert W, Buess GF. The effect of high-definition imaging on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery: an experimental comparison between three-dimensional imaging and direct vision through a stereoscopic TEM rectoscope. Surg Endosc 2000; 14:71.
  15. Blavier A, Nyssen AS. Influence of 2D and 3D view on performance and time estimation in minimal invasive surgery. Ergonomics 2009; 52:1342.
  16. Brand PJ. Fibre optics in medicine and surgery. Biomed Eng 1973; 8:508.
  17. Autorino R, Cadeddu JA, Desai MM, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2011; 59:26.
  18. Buddingh KT, Nieuwenhuijs VB, van Buuren L, et al. Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future patient safety interventions. Surg Endosc 2011; 25:2449.
  19. Hublet A, Dili A, Lemaire J, et al. Laparoscopic ultrasonography as a good alternative to intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of prospective study. Acta Chir Belg 2009; 109:312.
  20. Luck AJ, Maddern GJ. Intraoperative abdominal ultrasonography. Br J Surg 1999; 86:5.
  21. Olsen AK, Bjerkeset OA. Laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) in gastrointestinal surgery. Eur J Ultrasound 1999; 10:159.
  22. Zhu B, Sevick-Muraca EM. A review of performance of near-infrared fluorescence imaging devices used in clinical studies. Br J Radiol 2015; 88:20140547.
  23. Boni L, David G, Mangano A, et al. Clinical applications of indocyanine green (ICG) enhanced fluorescence in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2015; 29:2046.
  24. Kawaguchi Y, Velayutham V, Fuks D, et al. Usefulness of Indocyanine Green-Fluorescence Imaging for Visualization of the Bile Duct During Laparoscopic Liver Resection. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221:e113.
  25. Boni L, David G, Dionigi G, et al. Indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence to assess bowel perfusion during laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 2016; 30:2736.
  26. Buda A, Bussi B, Di Martino G, et al. Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping With Near-Infrared Fluorescent Imaging Using Indocyanine Green: A New Tool for Laparoscopic Platform in Patients With Endometrial and Cervical Cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016; 23:265.
  27. Fengler J. Near-infrared fluorescence laparoscopy--technical description of PINPOINT® a novel and commercially available system. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17 Suppl 3:3.
  28. Pryor AD, Tushar JR, DiBernardo LR. Single-port cholecystectomy with the TransEnterix SPIDER: simple and safe. Surg Endosc 2010; 24:917.
  29. Shadduck PP, Paquentin EM, Carvalho GL, Redan JA. Mini-Laparoscopy: Instruments and Economics. Surg Technol Int 2015; 27:59.
  30. Milad MP, Milad EA. Laparoscopic morcellator-related complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21:486.
  31. Driessen SR, Arkenbout EA, Thurkow AL, Jansen FW. Electromechanical morcellators in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: an update. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21:377.
  32. Khan MN, Fayyad T, Cecil TD, Moran BJ. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: the risk of postoperative infectious complications. JSLS 2007; 11:363.
  33. Sooriakumaran P, Kommu SS, Cooke J, et al. Evaluation of a commercial vascular clip: risk factors and predictors of failure from in vitro studies. BJU Int 2009; 103:1410.
  34. Casale P, Pomara G, Simone M, et al. Hem-o-lok clips to control both the artery and the vein during laparoscopic nephrectomy: personal experience and review of the literature. J Endourol 2007; 21:915.
  35. Lucchi M, Duranti L, Melfi F, Mussi A. Polymer self-locking clips for vascular control during minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139:1345.
  36. Izaki H, Fukumori T, Takahashi M, et al. Clinical research of renal vein control using Hem-o-lok clips in laparoscopic nephrectomy. Int J Urol 2006; 13:1147.
  37. Ponsky L, Cherullo E, Moinzadeh A, et al. The Hem-o-lok clip is safe for laparoscopic nephrectomy: a multi-institutional review. Urology 2008; 71:593.
  38. Dekel Y, Mor E. Hem-o-lok clip dislodgment causing death of the donor after laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2008; 86:887.
  39. Song J, Cho SJ, Park CS, et al. Two uterine arterial management methods in laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1998; 24:145.
  40. Beck SD, Lifshitz DA, Cheng L, et al. Endoloop-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 2002; 16:175.
  41. Wehrman WE, Tangren CM, Inge TH. Cost analysis of ligature versus stapling techniques of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007; 17:371.
  42. Beldi G, Vorburger SA, Bruegger LE, et al. Analysis of stapling versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Br J Surg 2006; 93:1390.
  43. Nguyen NT, Longoria M, Welbourne S, et al. Glycolide copolymer staple-line reinforcement reduces staple site bleeding during laparoscopic gastric bypass: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 2005; 140:773.
  44. Giannopoulos GA, Tzanakis NE, Rallis GE, et al. Staple line reinforcement in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: does it actually make a difference? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2010; 24:2782.
  45. Ibele A, Garren M, Gould J. Effect of circular staple line buttressing material on gastrojejunostomy failure in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2010; 6:64.
  46. Jensen EH, Portschy PR, Chowaniec J, Teng M. Meta-analysis of bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement and risk of fistula following pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17:267.
  47. Yamamoto M, Hayashi MS, Nguyen NT, et al. Use of Seamguard to prevent pancreatic leak following distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 2009; 144:894.
  48. Gill RS, Switzer N, Driedger M, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with staple line buttress reinforcement in 116 consecutive morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 2012; 22:560.
  49. El-Hakim A, Cai Y, Marcovich R, et al. Effect of Endo-GIA vascular staple size on laparoscopic vessel sealing in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 2004; 18:961.
  50. Massarweh NN, Cosgriff N, Slakey DP. Electrosurgery: history, principles, and current and future uses. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202:520.
  51. Humes DJ, Ahmed I, Lobo DN. The pedicle effect and direct coupling: delayed thermal injuries to the bile duct after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 2010; 145:96.
  52. Carbonell AM, Joels CS, Kercher KW, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2003; 13:377.
  53. Levy B, Emery L. Randomized trial of suture versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:147.
  54. Goldstein SL, Harold KL, Lentzner A, et al. Comparison of thermal spread after ureteral ligation with the Laparo-Sonic ultrasonic shears and the Ligasure system. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2002; 12:61.
  55. Fullum TM, Kim S, Dan D, Turner PL. Laparoscopic "Dome-down" cholecystectomy with the LCS-5 Harmonic scalpel. JSLS 2005; 9:51.
  56. Campagnacci R, de Sanctis A, Baldarelli M, et al. Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 2007; 21:1526.
  57. Yung E, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. Cost comparison of reusable and single-use ultrasonic shears for laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2010; 20:512.
  58. Gyr T, Ghezzi F, Arslanagic S, et al. Minimal invasive laparoscopic hysterectomy with ultrasonic scalpel. Am J Surg 2001; 181:516.
  59. Bessa SS, Al-Fayoumi TA, Katri KM, Awad AT. Clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2008; 18:593.
  60. Abu Hilal M, Underwood T, Taylor MG, et al. Bleeding and hemostasis in laparoscopic liver surgery. Surg Endosc 2010; 24:572.
  61. Jiao LR, Ayav A, Navarra G, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection assisted by the laparoscopic Habib Sealer. Surgery 2008; 144:770.
  62. Curro G, Bartolotta M, Barbera A, et al. Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency-assisted segmental liver resection: a new technique. Ann Surg 2009; 250:229.
  63. Shaw RW. Evaluation of the role of laser treatment for the treatment of pain in endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003; 997:240.
  64. Lee J, Gianduzzo TR. Advances in laser technology in urology. Urol Clin North Am 2009; 36:189.
  65. Ikegami T, Shimada M, Imura S, et al. Argon gas embolism in the application of laparoscopic microwave coagulation therapy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009; 16:394.
  66. Romano F, Gelmini R, Caprotti R, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy: ligasure versus EndoGIA: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007; 17:763.