Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point of care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

For more information, click below.


Subscribers log in here


Inguinal and femoral hernia repair: Open techniques

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal hernioplasty is among the most common procedures performed by general surgeons [1]. Indirect inguinal hernias develop at the internal ring, the site where the spermatic cord in males (the round ligament in females) enters the abdominal wall (figure 1 and figure 2). The origin is lateral to the inferior epigastric artery, in contrast to direct hernias which originate medial to the inferior epigastric vessels through Hesselbach's triangle. Hesselbach's triangle is an anatomic landmark, bounded by the rectus abdominis muscle medially, the inguinal ligament (Poupart's) inferiorly and the inferior epigastric vessels laterally. Femoral hernias protrude through the femoral ring, which is bounded anteriorly by to the inguinal ligament (ileopubic tract), posteriorly by Cooper’s ligament, medially by the lacunar ligament, and laterally by the femoral sheath (figure 3).

The main principles of hernia repair are to reinforce the floor of the inguinal canal and tighten the internal inguinal ring [2]. All hernia surgeons agree that repairs must be tension free to minimize recurrences [3]. In the past, relaxing incisions in the rectus sheath were used to reduce tension [4], but recurrences remained unacceptably high because autogenous tissues weaken over time. Mesh has been incorporated in hernia repairs to reduce tension, leading to a fall in recurrence rates. Although initial infection rates near 6 percent dampened enthusiasm for the use of mesh, use of appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis has significantly lowered the rate of infectious complications [5,6].

Many techniques have been proposed for hernia repair. These can be divided into tissue approximation repairs (such as the Bassini or McVay repair) and tension free repairs using mesh. The most commonly used open approaches include the Lichtenstein open tension-free hernioplasty, a plug and patch, or an open preperitoneal approach [7]. All of these options have their advocates and result in recurrence rates of 1 to 2 percent when performed by surgeons skilled in the technique [8-14].

We focus here on the Lichtenstein open tension-free hernioplasty, as it is considered the "gold standard" for open hernia repair [7]. Long-term results favor the Lichtenstein technique because of its low recurrence rate and ease of technical mastery, and because it can be performed in the outpatient setting with local anesthetic [15].

This topic will cover open repair of inguinal hernias. The diagnosis and general approach to the treatment of groin hernias is addressed in detail elsewhere. (See "Overview of abdominal hernias" and "Classification, clinical features and diagnosis of inguinal and femoral hernias in adults" and "Sports-related groin pain or 'sports hernia'" and "Overview of treatment for inguinal and femoral hernias".)

                             

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article you must have access through your hospital or your group practice, log in to your personal subscription, or purchase a personal subscription. For more information, click below.
Literature review current through: Apr 2013. | This topic last updated: Aug 1, 2012.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2013 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States. Surg Clin North Am 1993; 73:413.
  2. Sachs M, Damm M, Encke A. Historical evolution of inguinal hernia repair. World J Surg 1997; 21:218.
  3. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2002; 235:322.
  4. McVAY CB, CHAPP JD. Inguinal and femoral hernioplasty; the evaluation of a basic concept. Ann Surg 1958; 148:499.
  5. Polk HC. Prophylactic antibiotics. West J Med 1975; 123:458.
  6. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 1989; 157:188.
  7. Amid PK. Groin hernia repair: open techniques. World J Surg 2005; 29:1046.
  8. Nienhuijs SW, van Oort I, Keemers-Gels ME, et al. Randomized trial comparing the Prolene Hernia System, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2005; 92:33.
  9. Voyles CR, Hamilton BJ, Johnson WD, Kano N. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic inguinal hernia trials favors open hernia repair with preperitoneal mesh prosthesis. Am J Surg 2002; 184:6.
  10. Kingsnorth AN, Porter CS, Bennett DH, et al. Lichtenstein patch or Perfix plug-and-patch in inguinal hernia: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of short-term outcome. Surgery 2000; 127:276.
  11. Kingsnorth AN, Wright D, Porter CS, Robertson G. Prolene Hernia System compared with Lichtenstein patch: a randomised double blind study of short-term and medium-term outcomes in primary inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 2002; 6:113.
  12. Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ, et al. Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2003; 237:142.
  13. Vironen J, Nieminen J, Eklund A, Paavolainen P. Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein patch or Prolene Hernia System for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2006; 93:33.
  14. Zhao G, Gao P, Ma B, et al. Open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2009; 250:35.
  15. McGillicuddy JE. Prospective randomized comparison of the Shouldice and Lichtenstein hernia repair procedures. Arch Surg 1998; 133:974.
  16. Fry DE. Surgical site infections and the surgical care improvement project (SCIP): evolution of national quality measures. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2008; 9:579.
  17. Bratzler DW, Houck PM, Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers Workgroup, et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38:1706.
  18. Sanchez-Manuel FJ, Lozano-García J, Seco-Gil JL. Antibiotic prophylaxis for hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; :CD003769.
  19. Campanelli G, Champault G, Pascual MH, et al. Randomized, controlled, blinded trial of Tissucol/Tisseel for mesh fixation in patients undergoing Lichtenstein technique for primary inguinal hernia repair: rationale and study design of the TIMELI trial. Hernia 2008; 12:159.
  20. Nowobilski W, Dobosz M, Wojciechowicz T, Mionskowska L. Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty using butyl-2-cyanoacrylate versus sutures. Preliminary experience of a prospective randomized trial. Eur Surg Res 2004; 36:367.
  21. Kapischke M, Schulze H, Caliebe A. Self-fixating mesh for the Lichtenstein procedure--a prestudy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010; 395:317.
  22. Paajanen H, Kössi J, Silvasti S, et al. Randomized clinical trial of tissue glue versus absorbable sutures for mesh fixation in local anaesthetic Lichtenstein hernia repair. Br J Surg 2011; 98:1245.
  23. Dittrick GW, Ridl K, Kuhn JA, McCarty TM. Routine ilioinguinal nerve excision in inguinal hernia repairs. Am J Surg 2004; 188:736.
  24. Mui WL, Ng CS, Fung TM, et al. Prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy in open inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006; 244:27.
  25. Simons MP, Kleijnen J, van Geldere D, et al. Role of the Shouldice technique in inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review of controlled trials and a meta-analysis. Br J Surg 1996; 83:734.
  26. Shouldice, EE. The treatment of hernia. Ontario Med Rev 1953; 20:670.
  27. Glassow F. The Shouldice Hospital technique. Int Surg 1986; 71:148.
  28. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias under local anesthesia. Ann Surg 1996; 223:249.
  29. McIntosh A, Hutchinson A, Roberts A, Withers H. Evidence-based management of groin hernia in primary care--a systematic review. Fam Pract 2000; 17:442.
  30. Hachisuka T. Femoral hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83:1189.
  31. Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, et al. Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; :CD002197.
  32. Gilbert, AI, Graham, MF, Voigt, WJ. A bilayer patch device for inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 1999; 3:161.
  33. Elsebae MM, Nasr M, Said M. Tension-free repair versus Bassini technique for strangulated inguinal hernia: A controlled randomized study. Int J Surg 2008; 6:302.
  34. LaRoque, GP. The intra-abdominal method of removing inguinal and femoral hernia. Arch Surg 1932; 24:189.
  35. Williams C. Repair of Sliding Inguinal Hernia Through the Abdominal (Laroque) Approach. Ann Surg 1947; 126:612.
  36. Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs JO, et al. Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 295:285.
  37. Shulman AG, Amid PK, Lichtenstein IL. Returning to work after herniorrhaphy. BMJ 1994; 309:216.