Medline ® Abstract for Reference 47
of 'Induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in younger adults'
Randomized comparison of double induction and timed-sequential induction to a "3 + 7" induction in adults with AML: long-term analysis of the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) 9000 study.
Castaigne S, Chevret S, Archimbaud E, Fenaux P, Bordessoule D, Tilly H, de Revel T, Simon M, Dupriez B, Renoux M, Janvier M, Micléa JM, Thomas X, Bastard C, Preudhomme C, Bauters F, Degos L, Dombret H
Blood. 2004;104(8):2467. Epub 2004 May 13.
Between 1990 and 1996, we conducted a randomized trial in adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in order to compare relapse-free interval (RFI) after double induction (arm B), timed-sequential induction (arm C), or control "3 + 7" induction (arm A). Patients achieving complete remission (CR) after induction +/- salvage received the same consolidation chemotherapy, which included a dosage stratification according to patient's age (younger or older than 50 years). This long-term analysis was performed in 592 patients (arm A/B/C, 197/198/197 patients). Overall CR rate was 76% without differences between the 3 arms, even if a salvage course was less frequently needed in arm B. Treatment-related mortality, either during the induction or the postremission phase, was not significantly higher in arms B and C than in arm A. Among the 449 CR patients, 250 relapsed (arm A/B/C, 90/87/73 patients) without significant differences in RFI in arms B and C versus arm A (P = .39 and .15, by the Gray test). However, when analyzing the 345 patients younger than 50, RFI was significantly improved in younger patientsreceiving timed-sequential induction (P = .038 by the Gray test), while not in those receiving double induction. Event-free survival and overall survival were similar in the 3 randomization arms.
Department of Onco-Hematology, Centre hospitalier de Versailles, 78150 Le Chesnay, France. email@example.com