UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Medline ® Abstract for Reference 45

of 'Induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in younger adults'

45
TI
High-dose cytarabine in induction treatment improves the outcome of adult patients younger than age 46 years with acute myeloid leukemia: results of the EORTC-GIMEMA AML-12 trial.
AU
Willemze R, Suciu S, Meloni G, Labar B, Marie JP, Halkes CJ, Muus P, Mistrik M, Amadori S, Specchia G, Fabbiano F, Nobile F, Sborgia M, Camera A, Selleslag DL, Lefrère F Sr, Magro D, Sica S, Cantore N, Beksac M, Berneman Z, Thomas X, Melillo L, Guimaraes JE, Leoni P, Luppi M, Mitra ME, Bron D, Fillet G, Marijt EW, Venditti A, Hagemeijer A, Mancini M, Jansen J, Cilloni D, Meert L, Fazi P, Vignetti M, Trisolini SM, Mandelli F, de Witte T
SO
J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(3):219.
 
PURPOSE: Cytarabine plays a pivotal role in the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Most centers use 7 to 10 days of cytarabine at a daily dose of 100 to 200 mg/m(2) for remission induction. Consensus has not been reached on the benefit of higher dosages of cytarabine.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell' Adulto (GIMEMA) Leukemia Groups conducted a randomized trial (AML-12; Combination Chemotherapy, Stem Cell Transplant and Interleukin-2 in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia) in 1,942 newly diagnosed patients with AML, age 15 to 60 years, comparing remission induction treatment containing daunorubicin, etoposide, and either standard-dose (SD) cytarabine (100 mg/m(2) per day by continuous infusion for 10 days) or high-dose (HD) cytarabine (3,000 mg/m(2) every 12 hours by 3-hour infusion on days1, 3, 5, and 7). Patients in complete remission (CR) received a single consolidation cycle containing daunorubicin and intermediate-dose cytarabine (500 mg/m(2) every 12 hours for 6 days). Subsequently, a stem-cell transplantation was planned. The primary end point was survival.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 6 years, overall survival was 38.7% for patients randomly assigned to SD cytarabine and 42.5% for those randomly assigned to HD cytarabine (log-rank test P = .06; multivariable analysis P = .009). For patients younger than age 46 years, survival was 43.3% and 51.9%, respectively (P = .009; multivariable analysis P = .003), and for patients age 46 to 60 years, survival was 33.9% and 32.9%, respectively (P = .91). CR rates were 72.0% and 78.7%, respectively (P<.001) and were 75.6% and 82.4% for patients younger than age 46 years (P = .01) and 68.3% and 74.8% for patients age 46 years and older (P = .03). Patients of all ages with very-bad-risk cytogenetic abnormalities and/or FLT3-ITD (internal tandem duplication) mutation, or with secondary AML benefitted from HD cytarabine.
CONCLUSION: HD cytarabine produces higher remission and survival rates than SD cytarabine, especially in patients younger than age 46 years.
AD
Roelof Willemze, Constantijn J.M. Halkes, and Erik W.A. Marijt, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Petra Muus, Joop Jansen, and Theo de Witte, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Stefan Suciu and Liv Meert, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters; Dominique Bron, Hôpital Universitaire, Bordet-Erasme, Brussels; Dominik L.D. Selleslag, Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Jan, Brugge; Zwi Berneman, Universitair Ziekenhuis, Antwerpen; Georges Fillet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire du Sart-Tilman, Liège; Anne Hagemeijer, Center for Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Giovanna Meloni, Marco Mancini, Silvia Maria Trisolini, and Franco Mandelli, "Sapienza" University; Sergio Amadori and Adriano Venditti, Tor Vergata University Hospital; Simona Sica, UniversitàCattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico A. Gemelli; Paola Fazi and Marco Vignetti, Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell' Adulto Foundation, Central Office, Rome; Giorgina Specchia, Universitàdegli Studi di Bari, Bari; Francesco Fabbiano, Ospedali Riuniti "Villa Sofia-Cervello"; Maria Enza Mitra, Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone," Palermo; Francesco Nobile, Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria; Marco Sborgia, Azienda UnitáSanitaria Locale di Pescara, Pescara; Andrea Camera, L'A.O. Universitaria-Universitàdegli Studi di Napoli "Federico II," Napoli; Domenico Magro, A.O. Pugliese Ciaccio, Catanzaro; Nicola Cantore, A.O. San Giuseppe Moscati, Avellino; Lorella Melillo, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo; Pietro Leoni, A.O. Nuovo Ospedale Torrette, Ancona; Mario Luppi, A.O. Universitaria di Modena, Modena; Daniela Cilloni, University of Torino, Torino, Italy; Boris Labar, University Hospital Center-Rebro, Zagreb, Croatia; Jean-Pierre Marie, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris and University Paris 6; Francois Lef
PMID