Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:

Subscribers log in here

Related articles

Induction of labor


Induction of labor refers to techniques for stimulating uterine contractions to accomplish delivery prior to the onset of spontaneous labor. It is one of the most commonly performed obstetrical procedures in the United States. Between 1990 and 2011, the overall frequency of labor induction more than doubled, rising from 9.5 to 23.2 percent [1], and early term (in the 37th and 38th week of gestation) inductions quadrupled, rising from 2 to 8 percent [2]. Some of this increase is related to a rise in the number of medically and obstetrically indicated inductions; however, it appears that marginally indicated and elective inductions account for a large proportion of the increase [3]. Reasons for the increase in these inductions include the availability of better cervical ripening agents, patient and provider desire to arrange a convenient time of delivery, and more relaxed attitudes toward marginal indications for induction [4]. Patient and provider concerns about the risk of fetal demise with expectant management near term or postterm have also contributed to the increased rate of induction.

Principles of induction of labor in women with an unscarred uterus will be discussed here. Issues regarding induction of labor in women who have had a previous cesarean delivery and methods of cervical ripening are reviewed separately. (See "Cervical ripening and induction of labor in women with a prior cesarean delivery" and "Techniques for ripening the unfavorable cervix prior to induction".)


Major societies, such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) [5,6], the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [7], and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) [8], have published guidelines for labor induction.


Obstetrical and medical indications — Delivery before the onset of labor is indicated when the maternal/fetal risks associated with continuing the pregnancy are thought to be greater than the maternal/fetal risks associated with early delivery [5]. The only options are induction of labor or cesarean delivery. When there are no contraindications to labor and vaginal birth (see 'Contraindications to induction' below), induction of labor is generally preferred, given the increased maternal risks associated with cesarean delivery. (See "Cesarean delivery: Postoperative issues", section on 'Complications' and "Cesarean delivery: Postoperative issues", section on 'Long-term risks'.)

However, the magnitude of maternal/fetal risk of early delivery can rarely be determined with precision. The relative risk of delivery versus continuation of pregnancy is influenced by factors such as gestational age, presence/absence of fetal lung maturity, severity of the clinical condition, and cervical status. Although timely induction of women with some pregnancy complications has been recommended to improve maternal-fetal outcome [9,10], there is only limited high quality evidence establishing any benefits for specific medical and obstetrical indications for induction [11].


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Mar 2014. | This topic last updated: Apr 10, 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, et al. Births: Final data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2013; 62.
  2. Murthy K, Grobman WA, Lee TA, Holl JL. Trends in induction of labor at early-term gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204:435.e1.
  3. Moore LE, Rayburn WF. Elective induction of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49:698.
  4. Rayburn WF, Zhang J. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100:164.
  5. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins -- Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:386.
  6. Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, et al. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120:1181.
  7. Induction of labour (CG70)
  8. Leduc D, Biringer A, Lee L, et al. Induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2013; 35:840.
  9. Nicholson JM, Parry S, Caughey AB, et al. The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198:511.e1.
  10. Spong CY, Mercer BM, D'alton M, et al. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118:323.
  11. Mozurkewich E, Chilimigras J, Koepke E, et al. Indications for induction of labour: a best-evidence review. BJOG 2009; 116:626.
  12. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion no. 561: Nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121:911.
  13. Ehrenthal DB, Hoffman MK, Jiang X, Ostrum G. Neonatal outcomes after implementation of guidelines limiting elective delivery before 39 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118:1047.
  14. Clark SL, Miller DD, Belfort MA, et al. Neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with elective term delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:156.e1.
  15. Elective Induction of Labor: Safety and Harms. AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. 2009.
  16. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Patient Safety Checklist no. 5: scheduling induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118:1473.
  17. Nielsen PE, Howard BC, Hill CC, et al. Comparison of elective induction of labor with favorable Bishop scores versus expectant management: a randomized clinical trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 18:59.
  18. Laughon SK, Zhang J, Grewal J, et al. Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206:486.e1.
  19. Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Amy JJ. Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186:240.
  20. Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94:600.
  21. Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191:1511.
  22. Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, et al. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:690.
  23. Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, et al. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:698.
  24. Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180:628.
  25. Prysak M, Castronova FC. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a case-control analysis of safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92:47.
  26. Ehrenthal DB, Jiang X, Strobino DM. Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:35.
  27. Osmundson S, Ou-Yang RJ, Grobman WA. Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117:583.
  28. Cheng YW, Kaimal AJ, Snowden JM, et al. Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207:502.e1.
  29. Darney BG, Snowden JM, Cheng YW, et al. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122:761.
  30. Stock SJ, Ferguson E, Duffy A, et al. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study. BMJ 2012; 344:e2838.
  31. Dietz PM, Rizzo JH, England LJ, et al. Early term delivery and health care utilization in the first year of life. J Pediatr 2012; 161:234.
  32. Zhang X, Kramer MS. Variations in mortality and morbidity by gestational age among infants born at term. J Pediatr 2009; 154:358.
  33. Escobar GJ, Greene JD, Hulac P, et al. Rehospitalisation after birth hospitalisation: patterns among infants of all gestations. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90:125.
  34. Wang ML, Dorer DJ, Fleming MP, Catlin EA. Clinical outcomes of near-term infants. Pediatrics 2004; 114:372.
  35. Wetta L, Tita AT. Early term births: considerations in management. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2012; 39:89.
  36. Kaufman KE, Bailit JL, Grobman W. Elective induction: an analysis of economic and health consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187:858.
  37. Crane JM. Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49:573.
  38. Hatfield AS, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Sonographic cervical assessment to predict the success of labor induction: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:186.
  39. Tanir HM, Sener T, Yildiz Z. Digital and transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment for prediction of successful labor induction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 100:52.
  40. Baacke KA, Edwards RK. Preinduction cervical assessment. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49:564.
  41. Bakker JJ, van der Goes BY, Pel M, et al. Morning versus evening induction of labour for improving outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2:CD007707.
  43. Johnson DP, Davis NR, Brown AJ. Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188:1565.
  44. Laughon SK, Zhang J, Troendle J, et al. Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117:805.
  45. Arulkumaran S, Gibb DM, TambyRaja RL, et al. Failed induction of labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 25:190.
  46. Xenakis EM, Piper JM, Conway DL, Langer O. Induction of labor in the nineties: conquering the unfavorable cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90:235.
  47. Kiss H, Ahner R, Hohlagschwandtner M, et al. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of term labor: a literature review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79:3.
  48. Garite TJ, Casal D, Garcia-Alonso A, et al. Fetal fibronectin: a new tool for the prediction of successful induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175:1516.
  49. Tam WH, Tai SM, Rogers MS. Prediction of cervical response to prostaglandin E2 using fetal fibronectin. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78:861.
  50. Blanch G, Oláh KS, Walkinshaw S. The presence of fetal fibronectin in the cervicovaginal secretions of women at term--its role in the assessment of women before labor induction and in the investigation of the physiologic mechanisms of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174:262.
  51. Ahner R, Egarter C, Kiss H, et al. Fetal fibronectin as a selection criterion for induction of term labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173:1513.
  52. Sciscione A, Hoffman MK, DeLuca S, et al. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of vaginal birth in nulliparas undergoing preinduction cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:980.
  53. Reis FM, Gervasi MT, Florio P, et al. Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:1361.
  54. Ojutiku D, Jones G, Bewley S. Quantitative foetal fibronectin as a predictor of successful induction of labour in post-date pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002; 101:143.
  55. Verhoeven CJ, Opmeer BC, Oei SG, et al. Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length and wedging for predicting outcome of labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42:500.
  56. Pevzner L, Rayburn WF, Rumney P, Wing DA. Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:261.
  57. Clark S, Belfort M, Saade G, et al. Implementation of a conservative checklist-based protocol for oxytocin administration: maternal and newborn outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:480.e1.
  58. Alfirevic Z, Kelly AJ, Dowswell T. Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; :CD003246.
  59. Calderyro-Barcia, R, Sereno, JA. The response of human uterus to oxytocin throughout pregnancy. Oxytocin. Calderyro-Barcia, R, Heller, H (Eds), Pergamon Press, London 1959.
  60. Fuchs AR, Fuchs F, Husslein P, Soloff MS. Oxytocin receptors in the human uterus during pregnancy and parturition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150:734.
  61. Thornton S, Davison JM, Baylis PH. Plasma oxytocin during the first and second stages of spontaneous human labour. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1992; 126:425.
  62. Ryden, G, Sjoholm, I. The metabolism of oxytocin in pregnant and non-pregnant women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 1971; 9:Suppl.
  63. Seitchik J, Amico J, Robinson AG, Castillo M. Oxytocin augmentation of dysfunctional labor. IV. Oxytocin pharmacokinetics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 150:225.
  64. Hayes EJ, Weinstein L. Improving patient safety and uniformity of care by a standardized regimen for the use of oxytocin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198:622.e1.
  65. Freeman RK, Nageotte M. A protocol for use of oxytocin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:445.
  66. Patka JH, Lodolce AE, Johnston AK. High- versus low-dose oxytocin for augmentation or induction of labor. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39:95.
  67. Merrill DC, Zlatnik FJ. Randomized, double-masked comparison of oxytocin dosage in induction and augmentation of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94:455.
  68. Satin AJ, Leveno KJ, Sherman ML, et al. High- versus low-dose oxytocin for labor stimulation. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80:111.
  69. Smith JG, Merrill DC. Oxytocin for induction of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49:594.
  70. Girard B, Vardon D, Creveuil C, et al. Discontinuation of oxytocin in the active phase of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88:172.
  71. Diven LC, Rochon ML, Gogle J, et al. Oxytocin discontinuation during active labor in women who undergo labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207:471.e1.
  72. Daniel-Spiegel E, Weiner Z, Ben-Shlomo I, Shalev E. For how long should oxytocin be continued during induction of labour? BJOG 2004; 111:331.
  73. Ustunyurt E, Ugur M, Ustunyurt BO, et al. Prospective randomized study of oxytocin discontinuation after the active stage of labor is established. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2007; 33:799.
  74. Hauth JC, Hankins GD, Gilstrap LC 3rd, et al. Uterine contraction pressures with oxytocin induction/augmentation. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68:305.
  75. Blakemore KJ, Qin NG, Petrie RH, Paine LL. A prospective comparison of hourly and quarter-hourly oxytocin dose increase intervals for the induction of labor at term. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75:757.
  76. O'Driscoll K, Foley M, MacDonald D. Active management of labor as an alternative to cesarean section for dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63:485.
  77. Thorp JA, Boylan PC, Parisi VM, Heslin EP. Effects of high-dose oxytocin augmentation on umbilical cord blood gas values in primigravid women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159:670.
  78. Cummiskey KC, Dawood MY. Induction of labor with pulsatile oxytocin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163:1868.
  79. Tribe RM, Crawshaw SE, Seed P, et al. Pulsatile versus continuous administration of oxytocin for induction and augmentation of labor: two randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206:230.e1.
  80. Bricker L, Luckas M. Amniotomy alone for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; :CD002862.
  81. Howarth GR, Botha DJ. Amniotomy plus intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; :CD003250.
  82. Selo-Ojeme DO, Pisal P, Lawal O, et al. A randomised controlled trial of amniotomy and immediate oxytocin infusion versus amniotomy and delayed oxytocin infusion for induction of labour at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 279:813.
  83. Macones GA, Cahill A, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO. The efficacy of early amniotomy in nulliparous labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207:403.e1.
  84. Keirse MJ. Natural prostaglandins for induction of labor and preinduction cervical ripening. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49:609.
  85. Egarter C, Schurz B, Wagner G, et al. [Comparison between prostaglandin E2 gel and oxytocin in medically indicated labor induction]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1987; 47:337.
  86. Silva-Cruz A, Godinho F, Pinto JM, et al. Prostaglandin E2 gel compared to oxytocin for medically-indicated labour induction at term: a controlled clinical trial. Pharmatherapeutica 1988; 5:228.
  87. Wing DA, Fassett MJ, Guberman C, et al. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:1689.
  88. Boulvain M, Stan C, Irion O. Membrane sweeping for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; :CD000451.
  89. Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; :CD003392.
  90. Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Corticosteroids for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; :CD003100.
  91. Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Hyaluronidase for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; :CD003097.
  92. Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Sexual intercourse for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; :CD003093.
  93. Tan PC, Yow CM, Omar SZ. Effect of coital activity on onset of labor in women scheduled for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:820.
  94. Kelly AJ, Munson C, Minden L. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; :CD006901.
  95. Dove D, Johnson P. Oral evening primrose oil: its effect on length of pregnancy and selected intrapartum outcomes in low-risk nulliparous women. J Nurse Midwifery 1999; 44:320.
  96. McFarlin BL, Gibson MH, O'Rear J, Harman P. A national survey of herbal preparation use by nurse-midwives for labor stimulation. Review of the literature and recommendations for practice. J Nurse Midwifery 1999; 44:205.
  97. Omar NS, Tan PC, Sabir N, et al. Coitus to expedite the onset of labour: a randomised trial. BJOG 2013; 120:338.
  98. Kelly AJ, Kavanagh J, Thomas J. Castor oil, bath and/or enema for cervical priming and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 7:CD003099.
  99. Smith CA, Crowther CA, Grant SJ. Acupuncture for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; :CD002962.
  100. Chaudhry Z, Fischer J, Schaffir J. Women's use of nonprescribed methods to induce labor: a brief report. Birth 2011; 38:168.
  101. Kozhimannil KB, Johnson PJ, Attanasio LB, et al. Use of nonmedical methods of labor induction and pain management among U.S. women. Birth 2013; 40:227.
  102. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:192.
  103. Bakker PC, Kurver PH, Kuik DJ, Van Geijn HP. Elevated uterine activity increases the risk of fetal acidosis at birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196:313.e1.
  104. Jonsson M, Nordén-Lindeberg S, Ostlund I, Hanson U. Acidemia at birth, related to obstetric characteristics and to oxytocin use, during the last two hours of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87:745.
  105. Simpson KR, James DC. Effects of oxytocin-induced uterine hyperstimulation during labor on fetal oxygen status and fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199:34.e1.
  106. Peebles DM, Spencer JA, Edwards AD, et al. Relation between frequency of uterine contractions and human fetal cerebral oxygen saturation studied during labour by near infrared spectroscopy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101:44.
  107. Heuser CC, Knight S, Esplin MS, et al. Tachysystole in term labor: incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and effect on fetal heart tracings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209:32.e1.
  108. Flannelly, GM, Turner, MJ, Rassmussen, MJ, Strong, JM. Rupture of the uterus in Dublin: An update. J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 13:440.
  109. Catanzarite V, Cousins L, Dowling D, Daneshmand S. Oxytocin-associated rupture of an unscarred uterus in a primigravida. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:723.
  110. Wing DA, Ortiz-Omphroy G, Paul RH. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177:612.
  111. Wing DA, Miller H, Parker L, et al. Misoprostol vaginal insert for successful labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117:533.
  112. Brummer HC. Interaction of E prostaglandins and syntocinon on the pregnant human myometrium. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1971; 78:305.
  113. Gillespie A. Interrelationship between oxytocin (endogenous and exogenous) and prostaglandins. Adv Biosci 1973; 9:761.
  114. Wikland M, Lindblom B, Hammarström S, Wiqvist N. The effect of prostaglandin I on the contractility of the term pregnant human myometrium. Prostaglandins 1983; 26:905.
  115. Baguma-Nibasheka M, Wentworth RA, Green LR, et al. Differences in the in vitro sensitivity of ovine myometrium and mesometrium to oxytocin and prostaglandins E2 and F2alpha. Biol Reprod 1998; 58:73.
  116. Chan WY. Uterine and placental prostaglandins and their modulation of oxytocin sensitivity and contractility in the parturient uterus. Biol Reprod 1983; 29:680.
  117. Tan PC, Daud SA, Omar SZ. Concurrent dinoprostone and oxytocin for labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:1059.
  118. Khan RA, Khan ZE, Ashraf O. Concurrent versus sequential methods for labor induction at term. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007; 96:94.
  119. Christensen FC, Tehranifar M, Gonzalez JL, et al. Randomized trial of concurrent oxytocin with a sustained-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186:61.
  120. Coleman FH, Rayburn WF, Burks LS, et al. Patterns of uterine activity. Using oxytocin after intracervical PGE2. J Reprod Med 1997; 42:44.
  121. Tan PC, Valiapan SD, Tay PY, Omar SZ. Concurrent oxytocin with dinoprostone pessary versus dinoprostone pessary in labour induction of nulliparas with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. BJOG 2007; 114:824.
  122. Simpson KR, James DC. Efficacy of intrauterine resuscitation techniques in improving fetal oxygen status during labor. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:1362.
  123. Sharma SK, Gajraj NM, Sidawi JE. Prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia: a comparison of intravascular administration of hetastarch versus lactated Ringer's solution. Anesth Analg 1997; 84:111.
  124. Pullen KM, Riley ET, Waller SA, et al. Randomized comparison of intravenous terbutaline vs nitroglycerin for acute intrapartum fetal resuscitation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:414.e1.
  125. (Accessed on May 24, 2012).
  126. Care of the patient receiving oxytocin for labor induction or augmentation. University of Michigan Hospital. November 2010. (Accessed on May 24, 2012).
  127. (Accessed on May 24, 2012).
  128. Porreco RP, Clark SL, Belfort MA, et al. The changing specter of uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:269.e1.
  129. Kramer MS, Rouleau J, Baskett TF, et al. Amniotic-fluid embolism and medical induction of labour: a retrospective, population-based cohort study. Lancet 2006; 368:1444.
  130. Lilien AA. Oxytocin-induced water intoxication. A report of a maternal death. Obstet Gynecol 1968; 32:171.
  131. Bilek W, Dorr P. Water intoxication and grand mal seizure due to oxytocin. Can Med Assoc J 1970; 103:379.
  132. Moen V, Brudin L, Rundgren M, Irestedt L. Hyponatremia complicating labour--rare or unrecognised? A prospective observational study. BJOG 2009; 116:552.
  134. Feeney JG. Water intoxication and oxytocin. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982; 285:243.
  135. Davies GA, Tessier JL, Woodman MC, et al. Maternal hemodynamics after oxytocin bolus compared with infusion in the third stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:294.
  136. Gregory SG, Anthopolos R, Osgood CE, et al. Association of autism with induced or augmented childbirth in North Carolina Birth Record (1990-1998) and Education Research (1997-2007) databases. JAMA Pediatr 2013; 167:959.
  137. Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV. Does augmentation or induction of labor with oxytocin increase the risk for autism? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209:502.
  138. Levine LD, Bogner HR, Hirshberg A, et al. Term induction of labor and subsequent preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013.
  139. Sciscione A, Larkin M, O'Shea A, et al. Preinduction cervical ripening with the Foley catheter and the risk of subsequent preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:751.
  140. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. Criteria for failed labor induction: prospective evaluation of a standardized protocol. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96:671.
  141. Simon CE, Grobman WA. When has an induction failed? Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:705.
  142. Hoffman MK, Vahratian A, Sciscione AC, et al. Comparison of labor progression between induced and noninduced multiparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:1029.
  143. Macer JA, Macer CL, Chan LS. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166:1690.
  144. Janakiraman V, Ecker J, Kaimal AJ. Comparing the second stage in induced and spontaneous labor. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:606.
  145. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:693.
  146. Rouse DJ, Weiner SJ, Bloom SL, et al. Failed labor induction: toward an objective diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117:267.
  147. Beckmann M. Predicting a failed induction. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 47:394.
  148. Harper LM, Caughey AB, Odibo AO, et al. Normal progress of induced labor. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119:1113.