UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Medline ® Abstract for Reference 12

of 'Hormone receptors in breast cancer: Clinical utility and guideline recommendations to improve test accuracy'

12
TI
Adjuvant ovarian ablation vs CMF chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients: trial update and impact of immunohistochemical assessment of ER status.
AU
Thomson CS, Twelves CJ, Mallon EA, Leake RE, Scottish Cancer Trials Breast Group, Scottish Cancer Therapy Network
SO
Breast. 2002;11(5):419.
 
This trial, initiated in 1980, examined the relative values of adjuvant ovarian ablation and chemotherapy comprising cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in premenopausal women with pathological stage II breast cancer. With median follow-up for patients still alive of 13.9 years, there is no difference in survival between women receiving ovarian ablation and CMF (hazard ratio 1.01; 95% CI: 0.74, 1.37). Tumour oestrogen receptor (ER) status was assessed at the time using biochemical ligand-binding assay and retrospectively by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Agreement between these two methods was only fair, but both confirmed the importance of ER status in determining appropriate adjuvant systemic therapy. A statistically significant interaction between IHC quick score and treatment (P=0.001) showed ovarian ablation was more beneficial for patients with a positive quick score, whereas women with a quick score of 0 had a significantly higher risk of death with ovarian ablation (2.33; 95% CI: 1.30, 4.20). We have shown that IHC identifies women with ER 'poor' tumours for whom endocrine manipulation is not appropriate.
AD
Scottish Cancer Intelligence Unit, Information and Statistics Division, Trinity Park House, South Trinity Road, Edinburgh EH5 3SQ, UK.
PMID