Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Medline ® Abstract for Reference 40

of 'First-line chemotherapy for advanced (stage III or IV) epithelial ovarian, fallopian tubal, and peritoneal cancer'

Use and Effectiveness of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer.
Wright AA, Cronin A, Milne DE, Bookman MA, Burger RA, Cohn DE, Cristea MC, Griggs JJ, Keating NL, Levenback CF, Mantia-Smaldone G, Matulonis UA, Meyer LA, Niland JC, Weeks JC, O'Malley DM
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep;33(26):2841-7. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
PURPOSE: A 2006 randomized trial demonstrated a 16-month survival benefit with intraperitoneal and intravenous (IP/IV) chemotherapy administered to patients who had ovarian cancer, compared with IV chemotherapy alone, but more treatment-related toxicities. The objective of this study was to examine the use and effectiveness of IP/IV chemotherapy in clinical practice.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 823 women with stage III, optimally cytoreduced ovarian cancer diagnosed at six National Comprehensive Cancer Network institutions. We examined IP/IV chemotherapy use in all patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2012 (N = 823), and overall survival and treatment-related toxicities with Cox regression and logistic regression, respectively, in a propensity score-matched sample (n = 402) of patients diagnosed from 2006 to 2012, excluding trial participants, to minimize selection bias.
RESULTS: Use of IP/IV chemotherapy increased from 0% to 33% between 2003 and 2006, increased to 50% from 2007 to 2008, and plateaued thereafter. Between 2006 and 2012, adoption of IP/IV chemotherapy varied by institution from 4% to 67% (P<.001) and 43% of patients received modified IP/IV regimens at treatment initiation. In the propensity score-matched sample, IP/IV chemotherapy was associated with significantly improved overall survival (3-year overall survival, 81% v 71%; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.99), compared with IV chemotherapy, but also more frequent alterations in chemotherapy delivery route (adjusted rates discontinuation or change, 20.4% v 10.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.47 to 5.47).
CONCLUSION: Although the use of IP/IV chemotherapy increased significantly at National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers between 2003 and 2012, fewer than 50% of eligible patients received it. Increasing IP/IV chemotherapy use in clinical practice may be an important and underused strategy to improve ovarian cancer outcomes.
Alexi A. Wright, Angel Cronin, Dana E. Milne, Nancy L. Keating, Ursula A. Matulonis, and Jane C. Weeks, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Michael A. Bookman, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Robert A. Burger, University of Pennsylvania; Gina Mantia-Smaldone, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; David E. Cohn and David M. O'Malley, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Mihaela Cristea and Joyce C. Niland, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Jennifer J. Griggs, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Charles F. Levenback and Larissa A. Meyer, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. alexi_wright@dfci.harvard.edu.