Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


First degree atrioventricular block

INTRODUCTION

Atrioventricular (AV) block is defined as a delay or interruption in the transmission of an impulse, either transient or permanent, from the atria to the ventricles due to an anatomic or functional impairment in the conduction system. The conduction can be delayed, intermittent, or absent. The commonly used terminology includes first degree AV block (slowed conduction without missed beats), second degree AV block (missed beats, often in a regular pattern, eg, 2:1, 3:2, or higher degrees of block), and third degree or complete AV block.

The PR interval includes atrial depolarization (the P wave) and subsequent conduction through the AV node, His bundle, bundle branches and fascicles, and terminal Purkinje fibers (figure 1). The normal PR interval is between 120 to 200 msec (0.12 to 0.20 sec) and tends to shorten with increases in heart rate due in part to rate-related shortening of action potentials. Children under age 14 tend to have a PR interval of about 140 msec. (See "ECG tutorial: Basic principles of ECG analysis", section on 'PR interval'.)

Atrioventricular impulse transmission is delayed in first degree AV block, resulting in a PR interval longer than 200 msec (>210 msec at slow heart rates). On occasion, the PR interval may be prolonged in the absence of apparent heart disease [1-5]. As an example, first degree AV block, with PR intervals as long as 280 msec has been reported in 1.6 percent of healthy aviators [4]. (See "ECG tutorial: Atrioventricular block", section on 'First degree atrioventricular block'.)

The remainder of this topic will discuss the manifestations of AV block due to conduction delay at different sites in the conducting system, as this distinction is important clinically in terms of prognosis and the indications for implantation of a pacemaker. The etiologies of AV block, as well as second and third degree AV block, are discussed separately. (See "Etiology of atrioventricular block" and "Second degree atrioventricular block: Mobitz type I (Wenckebach block)" and "Second degree atrioventricular block: Mobitz type II" and "Third degree (complete) atrioventricular block".)

SITES OF FIRST DEGREE AV BLOCK WITH A NORMAL QRS DURATION

While first degree AV block with a normal QRS duration (waveform 1) can result from conduction delay in the atrium, the AV node, the bundle of His, or in the specialized infra-Hisian conduction system, the majority of cases with a normal QRS results from atrial or AV nodal delay. However, involvement of more than one of these sites has been reported in 20 to 80 percent of cases [6-8].

              

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2014. | This topic last updated: Oct 31, 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. SCHERF D, DIX JH. The effects of posture on A-V conduction. Am Heart J 1952; 43:494.
  2. JOHNSON RL, AVERILL KH, LAMB LE. Electrocardiographic findings in 67,375 asymptomatic subjects. VII. Atrioventricular block. Am J Cardiol 1960; 6:153.
  3. Viitasalo MT, Kala R, Eisalo A. Ambulatory electrocardiographic recording in endurance athletes. Br Heart J 1982; 47:213.
  4. Graybiel A, McFarland RA, Gates DC, et al. Analysis of the electrocardiogram obtained from 1000 young healthy aviators. Am Heart J 1944; 27:524.
  5. PACKARD JM, GRAETTINGER JS, GRAYBIEL A. Analysis of the electrocardiograms obtained from 1000 young healthy aviators; ten year follow-up. Circulation 1954; 10:384.
  6. Narula OS. Atrioventricular block. In: Cardiac Arrhythmias: Electrophysiology, Diagnosis and Management, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1979. p.85.
  7. Peuch P, Groileau R, Guimond C. Incidence of different types of A-V block and their localization by His bundle recordings. In: The Conduction System of the Heart, Wellens HJJ, Lie KI, Janse MJ (Eds), Stenfert, Leiden, 1976. p.467.
  8. Peuch P. The value in intracardiac recordings. In: Cardiac Arrhythmias, Krikler D, Gododwin JF (Eds), Saunders, Philadelphia 1975. p.81.
  9. Jacobsen JR, Gillette PC, Corbett BN, et al. Intracardiac electrography in endocardial cushion defects. Circulation 1976; 54:599.
  10. Kastor JA, Goldreyer BN, Josephson ME, et al. Electrophysiologic characteristics of Ebstein's anomaly of the tricuspid valve. Circulation 1975; 52:987.
  11. Sherron P, Torres-Arraut E, Tamer D, et al. Site of conduction delay and electrophysiologic significance of first-degree atrioventricular block in children with heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55:1323.
  12. Narula OS, Runge M, Samet P. Second-degree Wenckebach type AV block due to block within the atrium. Br Heart J 1972; 34:1127.
  13. Josephson ME. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: Techniques and Interpretations, 2d ed, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia 1993.
  14. Narula OS, Gann D, Samet P. Prognostic value of H-V intervals. In: His Bundle Electrocardiography and Clinical Electrophysiology, Narula OS (Ed), F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia 1975. p.437.
  15. Narula OS, Samet P. Significance of first degree A-V block. Circulation 1971; 43:772.
  16. Levites R, Haft JI. Significance of first degree heart block (prolonged P--R interval) in bifascicular block. Am J Cardiol 1974; 34:259.
  17. Guimond C, Puech P. Intra-His bundle blocks (102 cases). Eur J Cardiol 1976; 4:481.
  18. Dhingra RC, Palileo E, Strasberg B, et al. Significance of the HV interval in 517 patients with chronic bifascicular block. Circulation 1981; 64:1265.
  19. Bar FW, Den Dulk K, Wellens HJJ. Atrioventricular dissociation. In: Comprehensive Electrocardiology: Theory and Practice in Health and Disease, MacFarlane PW, Lawrie TDV (Eds), Pergamon Press, New York 1989. p.933.
  20. Scheinman MM, Peters RW, Modin G, et al. Prognostic value of infranodal conduction time in patients with chronic bundle branch block. Circulation 1977; 56:240.
  21. Erikssen J, Otterstad JE. Natural course of a prolonged PR interval and the relation between PR and incidence of coronary heart disease. A 7-year follow-up study of 1832 apparently healthy men aged 40-59 years. Clin Cardiol 1984; 7:6.
  22. Cheng S, Keyes MJ, Larson MG, et al. Long-term outcomes in individuals with prolonged PR interval or first-degree atrioventricular block. JAMA 2009; 301:2571.
  23. Magnani JW, Wang N, Nelson KP, et al. Electrocardiographic PR interval and adverse outcomes in older adults: the Health, Aging, and Body Composition study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2013; 6:84.
  24. Crisel RK, Farzaneh-Far R, Na B, Whooley MA. First-degree atrioventricular block is associated with heart failure and death in persons with stable coronary artery disease: data from the Heart and Soul Study. Eur Heart J 2011; 32:1875.
  25. Aro AL, Anttonen O, Kerola T, et al. Prognostic significance of prolonged PR interval in the general population. Eur Heart J 2014; 35:123.
  26. Holmqvist F, Hellkamp AS, Lee KL, et al. Adverse effects of first-degree AV-block in patients with sinus node dysfunction: data from the mode selection trial. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2014; 37:1111.
  27. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2008; 117:e350.