Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


External cephalic version

INTRODUCTION

External cephalic version (ECV) refers to a procedure in which the fetus is rotated from the breech to the cephalic presentation by manipulation through the mother's abdomen (figure 1). ECV is typically performed in nonlaboring women at or near term to improve their chances of having a vaginal cephalic birth.

Several national organizations recommend ECV. For example, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) states that a skilled service for ECV should be available and offered to women with breech presentation at term [1]. Likewise, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) states that all women near term with breech presentation should be offered an attempt at version [2]. ECV is also recommended by clinical guidelines of the Royal Dutch Organization for Midwives (KNOV) and the Dutch Society for Obstetrics and Gynaecology (NVOG) [3].

Women who are well-informed, encouraged to undergo the procedure, believe in its safety, and desire a vaginal delivery are more likely to opt for ECV [4]. Women may choose not to undergo ECV because of fear of the procedure, the preference for scheduled cesarean delivery, incomplete information, and concerns related to birth complications among friends and family. This topic will discuss the procedure for ECV. The causes, diagnosis, management, and outcome of breech presentation are reviewed separately. (See "Overview of breech presentation".)

EFFECTIVENESS

The effectiveness of ECV is based on its ability to increase the proportion of fetuses in cephalic presentation at the onset of labor and decrease the frequency of cesarean delivery. The effectiveness of ECV was illustrated by a systematic review of seven randomized trials of ECV at term [5]. Compared with women with breech fetuses who had no attempt at ECV, women who attempted ECV had a significant reduction in both noncephalic births (relative risk [RR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.66) and cesarean delivery (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.90) [5]. Although ECV decreased the frequency of cesarean delivery compared with no ECV, studies have shown that the cesarean delivery rate after successful ECV remains higher than in the general obstetrical population:

A 2014 meta-analysis reported that women with successful ECV had a cesarean delivery rate of 21 percent, which was significantly higher than the 11 percent rate in women with cephalic-presenting fetuses and no ECV (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.73-2.76) [6]. The excess risk of cesarean delivery was due to both dystocia and nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns.

                       

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Sep 2014. | This topic last updated: May 28, 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. RCOG Green Top Guidelines: The Management of Breech Presentation. Guideline No 20. 1999. London, RCOG.
  2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. External cephalic version. ACOG practice bulletin Number 13, February 2000.
  3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:693.
  4. Rosman AN, Vlemmix F, Fleuren MA, et al. Patients' and professionals' barriers and facilitators to external cephalic version for breech presentation at term, a qualitative analysis in the Netherlands. Midwifery 2014; 30:324.
  5. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10:CD000083.
  6. de Hundt M, Velzel J, de Groot CJ, et al. Mode of delivery after successful external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:1327.
  7. Vézina Y, Bujold E, Varin J, et al. Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term: a comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:763.
  8. El-Toukhy T, Ramadan G, Maidman D, et al. Impact of parity on obstetric and neonatal outcome of external cephalic version. J Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 27:580.
  9. Lau TK, Lo KW, Wan D, Rogers MS. Predictors of successful external cephalic version at term: a prospective study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104:798.
  10. Pluta, M, Schmidt, S, Giffei, JM, Saling, E. Die Ausere wendung de Feten aus beckenendlage Schadellage in Terminnale unter Tokolyse. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatale 1981; 1985:207.
  11. Brocks V, Philipsen T, Secher NJ. A randomized trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91:653.
  12. Tan GW, Jen SW, Tan SL, Salmon YM. A prospective randomised controlled trial of external cephalic version comparing two methods of uterine tocolysis with a non-tocolysis group. Singapore Med J 1989; 30:155.
  13. Dyson DC, Ferguson JE 2nd, Hensleigh P. Antepartum external cephalic version under tocolysis. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67:63.
  14. Rabinovici J, Barkai G, Shalev J, et al. Impact of a protocol for external cephalic version under tocolysis at term. Isr J Med Sci 1986; 22:34.
  15. Ben-Meir A, Erez Y, Sela HY, et al. Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008; 21:660.
  16. Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, et al. Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199:630.e1.
  17. Kirkinen P, Ylöstalo P. Ultrasonic examination before external version of breech presentation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1982; 13:90.
  18. Hofmeyr GJ, Sadan O, Myer IG, et al. External cephalic version and spontaneous version rates: ethnic and other determinants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93:13.
  19. Fortunato SJ, Mercer LJ, Guzick DS. External cephalic version with tocolysis: factors associated with success. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72:59.
  20. Boucher M, Bujold E, Marquette GP, Vezina Y. The relationship between amniotic fluid index and successful external cephalic version: a 14-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:751.
  21. Wise MR, Sadler L, Ansell D. Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 48:467.
  22. Donald WL, Barton JJ. Ultrasonography and external cephalic version at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162:1542.
  23. Westgren M, Edvall H, Nordström L, et al. Spontaneous cephalic version of breech presentation in the last trimester. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92:19.
  24. Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, et al. Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33:76.
  25. Hofmeyr GJ. Effect of external cephalic version in late pregnancy on breech presentation and caesarean section rate: a controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90:392.
  26. Mahomed K, Seeras R, Coulson R. External cephalic version at term. A randomized controlled trial using tocolysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98:8.
  27. Burgos J, Melchor JC, Cobos P, et al. Does fetal weight estimated by ultrasound really affect the success rate of external cephalic version? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88:1101.
  28. Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, et al. External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112:1143.
  29. Nassar N, Roberts CL, Barratt A, et al. Systematic review of adverse outcomes of external cephalic version and persisting breech presentation at term. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2006; 20:163.
  30. Collaris RJ, Oei SG. External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83:511.
  31. Rijnders M, Herschderfer K, Prins M, et al. A retrospective study of the success, safety and effectiveness of external cephalic version without tocolysis in a specialised midwifery centre in the Netherlands. Midwifery 2008; 24:38.
  32. Collins S, Ellaway P, Harrington D, et al. The complications of external cephalic version: results from 805 consecutive attempts. BJOG 2007; 114:636.
  33. Tatum RK, Orr JW, Soong S, Huddleston JF. Vaginal breech delivery of selected infants weighing more than 2000 grams. A retrospective analysis of seven years' experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152:145.
  34. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. Cephalic version by postural management for breech presentation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10:CD000051.
  35. Chenia F, Crowther CA. Does advice to assume the knee-chest position reduce the incidence of breech presentation at delivery? A randomized clinical trial. Birth 1987; 14:75.
  36. Elkins VH. Procedure for turning breech. In: Effectiveness and satisfaction in antenatal care, Enkin M, Chalmers I (Eds), Spastic International Medical Publishers, London 1982. p.216.
  37. Bung P, Huch R, Huch A. [Is Indian version a successful method for decreasing the incidence of breech presentation?]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1987; 47:202.
  38. Coyle ME, Smith CA, Peat B. Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 5:CD003928.
  39. Tan JM, Macario A, Carvalho B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010; 10:3.
  40. Rosman AN, Guijt A, Vlemmix F, et al. Contraindications for external cephalic version in breech position at term: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92:137.
  41. Holmes WR, Hofmeyr GJ. Management of breech presentation in areas with high prevalence of HIV infection. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 87:272.
  42. Flamm BL, Fried MW, Lonky NM, Giles WS. External cephalic version after previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165:370.
  43. de Meeus JB, Ellia F, Magnin G. External cephalic version after previous cesarean section: a series of 38 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998; 81:65.
  44. Sela HY, Fiegenberg T, Ben-Meir A, et al. Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 142:111.
  45. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:450.
  46. Clock C, Kurtzman J, White J, Chung JH. Cesarean risk after successful external cephalic version: a matched, retrospective analysis. J Perinatol 2009; 29:96.
  47. Burgos J, Cobos P, Rodríguez L, et al. Is external cephalic version at term contraindicated in previous caesarean section? A prospective comparative cohort study. BJOG 2014; 121:230.
  48. Nassar N, Roberts CL, Raynes-Greenow CH, et al. Evaluation of a decision aid for women with breech presentation at term: a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN14570598]. BJOG 2007; 114:325.
  49. www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/4/26 (Accessed on October 29, 2008).
  50. Saling E, Müller-Holve W. External cephalic version under tocolysis. J Perinat Med 1975; 3:115.
  51. Ben-Meir A, Elram T, Tsafrir A, et al. The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196:157.e1.
  52. Hutton EK, Hannah ME, Ross SJ, et al. The Early External Cephalic Version (ECV) 2 Trial: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial of timing of ECV for breech pregnancies. BJOG 2011; 118:564.
  53. Hutton EK, Kaufman K, Hodnett E, et al. External cephalic version beginning at 34 weeks' gestation versus 37 weeks' gestation: a randomized multicenter trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:245.
  54. Mensink WF, Huisjes HJ. [Is external version useful in breech presentation?]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1980; 124:1828.
  55. Van Veelen AJ, Van Cappellen AW, Flu PK, et al. Effect of external cephalic version in late pregnancy on presentation at delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96:916.
  56. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of breech presentation. London (UK): Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG); 2006 Dec.
  57. Burr R, Helyer P, Robson SC. A training model for external cephalic version. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001; 99:199.
  58. Keriakos R, Abdelmalek B, Campbell L. Sheffield modified technique for external cephalic version. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 29:384.
  59. Kuppens SM, Francois AM, Hasaart TH, et al. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2010; 154:A63.
  60. Cluver C, Hofmeyr GJ, Gyte GM, Sinclair M. Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 1:CD000184.
  61. Impey L, Pandit M. Tocolysis for repeat external cephalic version in breech presentation at term: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. BJOG 2005; 112:627.
  62. Stergiotou I, Talbot F, Yoong W. The use of atosiban and ritodrine in external cephalic version. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86:927.
  63. Belfort MA. Intravenous nitroglycerin as a tocolytic agent for intrapartum external cephalic version. S Afr Med J 1993; 83:656.
  64. Andarsio, F, Feng, TI. External cephalic version: nitroglycerin versus terbutaline. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182:161.
  65. Yanny H, Johanson R, Balwin KJ, et al. Double-blind randomised controlled trial of glyceryl trinitrate spray for external cephalic version. BJOG 2000; 107:562.
  66. Bujold E, Marquette GP, Ferreira E, et al. Sublingual nitroglycerin versus intravenous ritodrine as tocolytic for external cephalic version: a double-blinded randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188:1454.
  67. Bujold E, Boucher M, Rinfret D, et al. Sublingual nitroglycerin versus placebo as a tocolytic for external cephalic version: a randomized controlled trial in parous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:1070.
  68. Morgan PJ, Kung R, Tarshis J. Nitroglycerin as a uterine relaxant: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2002; 24:403.
  69. Hilton J, Allan B, Swaby C, et al. Intravenous nitroglycerin for external cephalic version: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:560.
  70. Wilcox CB, Nassar N, Roberts CL. Effectiveness of nifedipine tocolysis to facilitate external cephalic version: a systematic review. BJOG 2011; 118:423.
  71. Goetzinger KR, Harper LM, Tuuli MG, et al. Effect of regional anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118:1137.
  72. Carvalho B, Tan JM, Macario A, et al. Brief report: a cost analysis of neuraxial anesthesia to facilitate external cephalic version for breech fetal presentation. Anesth Analg 2013; 117:155.
  73. Johnson RL, Elliott JP. Fetal acoustic stimulation, an adjunct to external cephalic version: a blinded, randomized crossover study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173:1369.
  74. Bénifla JL, Goffinet F, Bascou V, et al. [Transabdominal amnio-infusion facilitates external version maneuver after initial failure. Six successful attempts]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1995; 24:319.
  75. Adama van Scheltema PN, Feitsma AH, Middeldorp JM, et al. Amnioinfusion to facilitate external cephalic version after initial failure. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:591.
  76. Burgos J, Cobos P, Osuna C, et al. Nitrous oxide for analgesia in external cephalic version at term: prospective comparative study. J Perinat Med 2013; 41:719.
  77. Muñoz H, Guerra S, Perez-Vaquero P, et al. Remifentanil versus placebo for analgesia during external cephalic version: a randomised clinical trial. Int J Obstet Anesth 2014; 23:52.
  78. Guittier MJ, Guillemin F, Farinelli EB, et al. Hypnosis for the control of pain associated with external cephalic version: a comparative study. J Altern Complement Med 2013; 19:820.
  79. Reinhard J, Heinrich TM, Reitter A, et al. Clinical hypnosis before external cephalic version. Am J Clin Hypn 2012; 55:184.
  80. Hofmeyr GJ. Breech presentation and abnormal lie in late pregnancy. In: Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, Chalmers I, Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC (Eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford 1989. p.653.
  81. Vallikkannu N, Nadzratulaiman WN, Omar SZ, et al. Talcum powder or aqueous gel to aid external cephalic version: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14:49.
  82. Hofmeyr GJ, Sonnendecker EW. Cardiotocographic changes after external cephalic version. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90:914.
  83. Boucher M, Marquette GP, Varin J, et al. Fetomaternal hemorrhage during external cephalic version. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112:79.
  84. Khoo CL, Bollapragada S, Mackenzie F. Massive fetomaternal hemorrhage following failed external cephalic version: case report. J Perinat Med 2006; 34:250.
  85. Shankar M, Gough GW, Chakravarti S, Vellacott ID. Massive feto-maternal haemorrhage with good perinatal outcome following failed external cephalic version. Fetal Diagn Ther 2004; 19:68.
  86. Ben-Meir A, Elram T, Tsafrir A, et al. The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196:157.e1.