Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point of care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

For more information, click below.


Subscribers log in here


Related articles

Evaluation of the peripheral blood smear

Topic Outline

GRAPHICS

INTRODUCTION

Examination of the peripheral blood smear is an inexpensive but powerful diagnostic tool in both children and adults. It provides rapid, reliable access to information about a variety of hematologic disorders. The smear offers a window into the functional status of the bone marrow, the factory producing all blood elements. It is particularly important when assessing cytopenic states (eg, anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia). Review of the smear is an important adjunct to other clinical data; in some cases, the peripheral smear alone is sufficient to establish a diagnosis [1].

Automated machines that deliver increasingly sophisticated data about blood counts and morphology tend to generalize and include a wide array of morphologic abnormalities. However, only an experienced reviewer can weigh the relative significance of observed findings and assess their importance within the context of other clinical data. A trained eye will also appreciate other subtleties of morphology that may be undetected by automated review. (See "Automated hematology instrumentation".)

Review of the peripheral smear is not required in all patients with a hematological disorder. Certain straightforward conditions such as iron deficiency anemia can be easily diagnosed on the basis of clinical information and basic laboratory data (eg, mean corpuscular volume, serum iron, ferritin) alone. However, there are a number of settings in which interpretation of the peripheral smear is especially important. Three examples include:

  • Hemolytic anemia — Review of red cell morphology may identify the cause of erythrocyte destruction (eg, the presence of bite cells points to a Heinz body hemolytic anemia) and the ultimate diagnosis (eg, oxidant damage to the red cell secondary to drugs)
  • Thrombocytopenia — Distinguishing between increased platelet consumption and reduced platelet production can often be made through review of platelet size
  • White cell disorders — The precise disease classification may rely upon evaluation of abnormal circulating cells (eg, the presence of Auer rods in a blast form in patients with acute myeloid leukemia)

Evaluation of the peripheral blood smear will be discussed here. Evaluation of bone marrow aspirate smears is discussed separately. (See "Evaluation of bone marrow aspirate smears".)

                                               

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article you must have access through your hospital or your group practice, log in to your personal subscription, or purchase a personal subscription. For more information, click below.
Literature review current through: Apr 2013. | This topic last updated: Dec 4, 2012.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2013 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Bain BJ. Diagnosis from the blood smear. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:498.
  2. Exner M, Schwarzinger I. Targeting the dust. Br J Haematol 2001; 114:739.
  3. Amati F, Canellini G, Beris P. Polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia with hyperviscosity syndrome. Br J Haematol 2002; 116:2.
  4. Ng V. Chemical-associated artifacts. Blood 2009; 113:4487.
  5. Todd A, Pardoe L, O'Brian R. Unexpected blood abnormalities following chemoembolisation. Br J Haematol 2010; 150:500.
  6. Westerman DA, Evans D, Metz J. Neutrophil hypersegmentation in iron deficiency anaemia: a case-control study. Br J Haematol 1999; 107:512.
  7. Ward PC, McKenna RW, Kroft SH. White blood cell changes in hyperthermia. Br J Haematol 2007; 138:130.
  8. Peterson L, Parkin J, Nelson A. Mucopolysaccharidosis type VII. A morphologic, cytochemical, and ultrastructural study of the blood and bone marrow. Am J Clin Pathol 1982; 78:544.
  9. Presentey B. Alder anomaly accompanied by a mutation of the myeloperoxidase structural gene. Acta Haematol 1986; 75:157.
  10. Ghandi MK, Howard MR, Hamilton PJ. The Alder-Reilly anomaly in association with the myelodysplastic syndrome. Clin Lab Haematol 1996; 18:39.
  11. Stachon A, Sondermann N, Imohl M, Krieg M. Nucleated red blood cells indicate high risk of in-hospital mortality. J Lab Clin Med 2002; 140:407.
  12. Zanella A, Bianchi P, Fermo E, Valentini G. Hereditary pyrimidine 5'-nucleotidase deficiency: from genetics to clinical manifestations. Br J Haematol 2006; 133:113.
  13. Tay HS, Mills A, Bain BJ. Diagnosis from a blood film following dog-bite. Am J Hematol 2012; 87:915.
  14. Lancashire J, Crowther M. Blood smear: fulminant pneumococcal bacteremia. Blood 2012; 120:4458.
  15. Bhargava P, Longhi LP. Images in clinical medicine. Peripheral smear with Malassezia furfur. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:e25.
  16. Branda JA, Ferraro MJ, Kratz A. Sensitivity of peripheral blood smear review for the diagnosis of Candida fungemia. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007; 131:97.
  17. Lyke KE, Diallo DA, Dicko A, et al. Association of intraleukocytic Plasmodium falciparum malaria pigment with disease severity, clinical manifestations, and prognosis in severe malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2003; 69:253.
  18. Abdulsalam AH, Sabeeh N, Hatim A, Bain BJ. Diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus from a bone marrow aspirate. Am J Hematol 2012; 87:620.