Evaluation of pulmonary disability

INTRODUCTION

Chronic respiratory disease is a major cause of disability worldwide. Evaluation of pulmonary disability for social security or workers’ compensation assessments is an important aspect of clinical care. Examples include the cigarette smoker with severe emphysema who is no longer able to do his or her job, the auto body worker with isocyanate-induced asthma, the retired coal miner with pneumoconiosis, the business executive with severe sleep apnea, or the plumber or ship builder with lung cancer or asbestosis.

An approach to the evaluation of pulmonary disability that largely reflects the recommendations in the American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 6th Edition, will be reviewed here [1]. The routine clinical evaluation and management of the specific conditions noted above are reviewed separately. (See "Disability assessment and determination in the United States" and "Occupational low back pain: Evaluation".)

DEFINITIONS

WHO model of disablement — The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health, known more commonly as the ICF [2]. The ICF is WHO's framework for measuring health and disability at both the individual and population levels. Unlike its predecessor, which was endorsed for field trail purposes only, the ICF was endorsed for use as the international standard to describe and measure health and disability. This model is composed of health and health-related domains that reflect body, individual, and societal perspectives (figure 1) [3]. The components of functioning and disability include body function and structure and also activities and participation. Consideration of environmental factors takes into account that an individual’s functioning and disability occur in a context that may be influenced by their immediate and general environment.

The American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 6th Edition, has embraced this classification system because it incorporates the complex and dynamic interactions between an individual’s medical condition, the environment, and personal factors [1]. Further, it recognizes that the relationships between impairment, activity limitations, and participation are fluid and multidirectional. For instance, an individual may have measurable impairment without significant impact on activity level, either in work or recreation, or conversely they may report major activity limitation without significant demonstrable objective impairment.

Impairment ratings — Physicians are typically asked to provide an impairment rating based upon quantitative objective measurements. This rating is generally submitted to a Social Security Board, Workers' Compensation carrier, or other administrative body that will determine the final degree of disability. Physicians' impairment ratings are usually given heavy weighting in determining the degree of disability. Other socioeconomic factors are given varying degrees of import in the final evaluation.

                  

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2014. | This topic last updated: Nov 14, 2014.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 6th ed, American Medical Association, Chicago 2008.
  2. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health ICF, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization 2001
  3. Kostanjsek N. Use of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems. BMC Public Health 2011; 11 Suppl 4:S3.
  4. Evaluation of impairment/disability secondary to respiratory disorders. American Thoracic Society. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986; 133:1205.
  5. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005; 26:319.
  6. Miller MR, Crapo R, Hankinson J, et al. General considerations for lung function testing. Eur Respir J 2005; 26:153.
  7. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J 2005; 26:948.
  8. Macintyre N, Crapo RO, Viegi G, et al. Standardisation of the single-breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J 2005; 26:720.
  9. Crapo RO, Casaburi R, Coates AL, et al. Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161:309.
  10. American Thoracic Society, American College of Chest Physicians. ATS/ACCP Statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167:211.
  11. Guidelines for the evaluation of impairment/disability in patients with asthma. American Thoracic Society. Medical Section of the American Lung Association. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 147:1056.
  12. US Department of Veterans Affairs: 38 CFR Book C,Schedule for Rating Disabilities Veterans Benefits Administration References: Web Automated Reference Material System (WARMS) 2006. http://www.benefits.va.gov/warms/bookc.asp#h (Accessed on April 23, 2012).
  13. Standards for determining coal miner's total disability or death due to pneumoconiosis; claims for benefits under Part C of Title IV of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act, as amended--Employment Standards Administration, Labor. Notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comment. Fed Regist 1982; 47:22674.
  14. Regulations implementing the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, as amended. Employment Standards Administration, Labor. Final rule. Fed Regist 2000; 65:79920.
  15. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational exposure to cotton dust. Fed Regist 2001; 66:18191.
  16. Department of Labor, Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Act Longshore , 33 U.S.C. §§ 901 – 950 1985.
  17. Ferris BG. Epidemiology Standardization Project (American Thoracic Society). Am Rev Respir Dis 1978; 118:1.
  18. Kiefer EM, Hankinson JL, Barr RG. Similar relation of age and height to lung function among Whites, African Americans, and Hispanics. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 173:376.
  19. Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159:179.
  20. Tarlo SM, Balmes J, Balkissoon R, et al. Diagnosis and management of work-related asthma: American College Of Chest Physicians Consensus Statement. Chest 2008; 134:1S.
  21. American Thoracic Society. Guidelines for assessing and managing asthma risk at work, school, and recreation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 169:873.
  22. Eisner MD, Yelin EH, Katz PP, et al. Risk factors for work disability in severe adult asthma. Am J Med 2006; 119:884.
  23. Disability evaluation under Social Security. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration, SSA Pub. No. 64-039 Blue Book September 2008
  24. Disability evaluation under Social Security. Consultative Exams A Guide for Health Professionals U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration, SSA Publication Green Book No. 64-025 November 1999.
  25. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Veterans Benefits Adminstration. http://www.benefits.va.gov/compensation/.
  26. Division of Coal Mine Workers' Compensation (DCMWC). Guide to Filing for Black Lung Benefits: Miner's Claim. http://www.dol.gov/owcp/dcmwc/filing_guide_miner.htm.
  27. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational exposure to cotton dust; final mandatory occupational, safety and health standards. Fed Regist 1978; 43:27351.
  28. Lai PS, Christiani DC. Long-term respiratory health effects in textile workers. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2013; 19:152.