UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Euthanasia and physician-assisted death

Author
Ezekiel J Emanuel, MD, PhD
Section Editors
Kenneth E Schmader, MD
Robert M Arnold, MD
Deputy Editor
Diane MF Savarese, MD

INTRODUCTION

Euthanasia and physician-assisted death (PAD) burst into the United States public arena in 1988 with the publication of "It's over, Debbie" [1]. This article stirred an emotional debate, with many people criticizing what they saw as nonvoluntary euthanasia involving a lethal injection delivered by a physician who did not know the patient and who had only ambiguous evidence of her wishes ("Let's get this over with") [2,3]. The case later turned out to be a fabrication. A later (true) case report describing a patient with a terminal illness who made an intensely personal decision for physician assisted death, involving a self-administered drug prescribed only after extensive discussion with her own physician, was received with less criticism and more balanced discussion; it was eventually considered by a grand jury, which recommended against indicting her physician [4]. These two cases, in a sense, set the stage for the current disputes in the United States over physician-assisted dying. Less volatile discussion, as well as practice, had already begun elsewhere, especially in the Netherlands. In recent years, much of the developed world – those countries with long-life expectancies, highly developed healthcare systems, and mortality characterized primarily by diseases with long downhill courses (cancer, heart and other organ system failure, and dementia) – have seen the emergence of end-of-life debates and increasing pressures for legalization of assisted dying.

Many physicians, particularly those in the fields of oncology and palliative care, will be faced with a request for assistance in dying over their professional lifetimes. No matter where clinicians stand ethically and morally on the permissibility of this practice and regardless of whether these practices are legally permitted or prohibited in a given jurisdiction, clinicians have to carefully consider and decide how they will respond to these requests [1-4].

In the past decade, studies have shown significant gains in understanding about attitudes of physicians and the public towards euthanasia and PAD in the United States and elsewhere, as well as the practices themselves. This review will discuss the following aspects of euthanasia and PAD:

Definitions

Ethical arguments for and against

                     

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2016. | This topic last updated: Tue Jul 05 00:00:00 GMT+00:00 2016.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. A piece of my mind. It's over, Debbie. JAMA 1988; 259:272.
  2. Kass, L. Neither for love nor money: why doctors must not kill. Public Interest 1989; No.
  3. Singer PA, Siegler M. Euthanasia--a critique. N Engl J Med 1990; 322:1881.
  4. Quill TE. Death and dignity. A case of individualized decision making. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:691.
  5. Emanuel EJ. Euthanasia. Historical, ethical, and empiric perspectives. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154:1890.
  6. Physician-assisted suicide: toward a comprehensive understanding. Report of the Task Force on Physician-assisted Suicide of the Society for Health and Human Values. Acad Med 1995; 70:583.
  7. Brody H. Causing, intending, and assisting death. J Clin Ethics 1993; 4:112.
  8. Cassel CK, Meier DE. Morals and moralism in the debate over euthanasia and assisted suicide. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:750.
  9. Fins JJ, Bacchetta MD. Framing the physician-assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia debate: the role of deontology, consequentialism, and clinical pragmatism. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43:563.
  10. Orentlicher D, Pope TM, Rich BA. The changing legal climate for physician aid in dying. JAMA 2014; 311:1961.
  11. Amundsen DW. The physician's obligation to prolong life: a medical duty without classical roots. Hastings Cent Rep 1978; 8:23.
  12. Emanuel EJ. The history of euthanasia debates in the United States and Britain. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121:793.
  13. Verkerk M, van Wijlick E, Legemaate J, de Graeff A. A national guideline for palliative sedation in the Netherlands. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007; 34:666.
  14. Lo B, Rubenfeld G. Palliative sedation in dying patients: "we turn to it when everything else hasn't worked". JAMA 2005; 294:1810.
  15. Meier DE, Emmons CA, Wallenstein S, et al. A national survey of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the United States. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:1193.
  16. Wolfe J, Grier HE, Klar N, et al. Symptoms and suffering at the end of life in children with cancer. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:326.
  17. Washington v. Glucksberg 117 S. Ct. 2258 (1997).
  18. Vacco v. Quill 117 S. Ct. 2293 (1997).
  19. Kamisar Y. On the meaning and impact of the physician-assisted suicide cases. Minn Law Rev 1998; 82:895.
  20. Burt RA. Disorder in the court: physician-assisted suicide and the Constitution. Minn Law Rev 1998; 82:965.
  21. Tucker KL. Aid in Dying: An End of Life-Option Governed by Best Practices. J Health Biomed Law 2012; 324:691. Available at http://www.suffolk.edu/documents/Law%20Journal%20of%20H%20and%20B/Tucker-2-19.pdf (Accessed on July 13, 2015).
  22. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/supreme-court-rules-on-doctor-assisted-suicide/article22828437/.
  23. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/quebec-first-province-to-adopt-right-to-die-legislation/article19009781/ (Accessed on February 23, 2015).
  24. Hurst SA, Mauron A. Assisted suicide and euthanasia in Switzerland: allowing a role for non-physicians. BMJ 2003; 326:271.
  25. Rurup ML, Smets T, Cohen J, et al. The first five years of euthanasia legislation in Belgium and the Netherlands: description and comparison of cases. Palliat Med 2012; 26:43.
  26. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26181615 (Accessed on June 09, 2015).
  27. Watson R. Luxembourg is to allow euthanasia from 1 April. BMJ 2009; 338:b1248.
  28. Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, Storrs, Connecticut collates many polls on this matter.
  29. Blendon RJ, Szalay US, Knox RA. Should physicians aid their patients in dying? The public perspective. JAMA 1992; 267:2658.
  30. Emanuel EJ, Fairclough DL, Daniels ER, Clarridge BR. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: attitudes and experiences of oncology patients, oncologists, and the public. Lancet 1996; 347:1805.
  31. Gallup. Public divided over moral acceptability of doctor-assisted suicide. May 31, 2007. Available online at http://www.gallup.com/poll/27727/public-divided-over-moral-acceptability-doctorassisted-suicide.aspx (Accessed on January 03, 2011).
  32. Emanuel EJ, Fairclough DL, Emanuel LL. Attitudes and desires related to euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide among terminally ill patients and their caregivers. JAMA 2000; 284:2460.
  33. Silveira MJ, DiPiero A, Gerrity MS, Feudtner C. Patients' knowledge of options at the end of life: ignorance in the face of death. JAMA 2000; 284:2483.
  34. The Case Against Assisted Suicide: For the Right to End of Life Care, Foley KM, Hendin H (Eds), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 2002.
  35. Physician-Assisted Dying: The Case for Palliative Care and Patient Choice, Quill T, Battin M (Eds), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 2002.
  36. Yang YT, Curlin FA. Why Physicians Should Oppose Assisted Suicide. JAMA 2016; 315:247.
  37. Heilig S. The SFMS euthanasia survey: results and analysis. SF Med 1989; 61:24,34.
  38. Overmyer M. National survey: physicians' views on the right to die. Physicians Manage 1991; 31:40.
  39. Washington State Medical Association. Initiative 199 WSMA Membership Survey. (Seattle Wash.: Washington State Medical Association March 1991).
  40. Crosby C. Internists grapple with how they should respond to requests for aid in dying. Internist 1992; 33:10.
  41. Caralis PV, Hammond JS. Attitudes of medical students, housestaff, and faculty physicians toward euthanasia and termination of life-sustaining treatment. Crit Care Med 1992; 20:683.
  42. Slome L, Moulton J, Huffine C, et al. Physicians' attitudes toward assisted suicide in AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1992; 5:712.
  43. Fried TR, Stein MD, O'Sullivan PS, et al. Limits of patient autonomy. Physician attitudes and practices regarding life-sustaining treatments and euthanasia. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153:722.
  44. Anderson JG, Caddell DP. Attitudes of medical professionals toward euthanasia. Soc Sci Med 1993; 37:105.
  45. Shapiro RS, Derse AR, Gottlieb M, et al. Willingness to perform euthanasia. A survey of physician attitudes. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154:575.
  46. Cohen JS, Fihn SD, Boyko EJ, et al. Attitudes toward assisted suicide and euthanasia among physicians in Washington State. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:89.
  47. Doukas DJ, Waterhouse D, Gorenflo DW, Seid J. Attitudes and behaviors on physician-assisted death: a study of Michigan oncologists. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13:1055.
  48. Bachman JG, Alcser KH, Doukas DJ, et al. Attitudes of Michigan physicians and the public toward legalizing physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:303.
  49. Lee MA, Nelson HD, Tilden VP, et al. Legalizing assisted suicide--views of physicians in Oregon. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:310.
  50. Back AL, Wallace JI, Starks HE, Pearlman RA. Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in Washington State. Patient requests and physician responses. JAMA 1996; 275:919.
  51. Slome LR, Mitchell TF, Charlebois E, et al. Physician-assisted suicide and patients with human immunodeficiency virus disease. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:417.
  52. Portenoy RK, Coyle N, Kash KM, et al. Determinants of the willingness to endorse assisted suicide. A survey of physicians, nurses, and social workers. Psychosomatics 1997; 38:277.
  53. Wolfe J, Fairclough DL, Clarridge BR, et al. Stability of attitudes regarding physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia among oncology patients, physicians, and the general public. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:1274.
  54. Willems DL, Daniels ER, van der Wal G, et al. Attitudes and practices concerning the end of life: a comparison between physicians from the United States and from The Netherlands. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:63.
  55. Emanuel EJ, Fairclough D, Clarridge BC, et al. Attitudes and practices of U.S. oncologists regarding euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133:527.
  56. Curlin FA, Nwodim C, Vance JL, et al. To die, to sleep: US physicians' religious and other objections to physician-assisted suicide, terminal sedation, and withdrawal of life support. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2008; 25:112.
  57. Seale C. Legalisation of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide: survey of doctors' attitudes. Palliat Med 2009; 23:205.
  58. Eggertson L. Most palliative physicians want no role in assisted death. CMAJ 2015; 187:E177.
  59. Harlow T. No more physician in physician-assisted suicide. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2015; 5:122.
  60. Prokopetz JJ, Lehmann LS. Redefining physicians' role in assisted dying. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:97.
  61. Deliens L, van der Wal G. The euthanasia law in Belgium and the Netherlands. Lancet 2003; 362:1239.
  62. Breitbart W, Rosenfeld BD, Passik SD. Interest in physician-assisted suicide among ambulatory HIV-infected patients. Am J Psychiatry 1996; 153:238.
  63. Suarez-Almazor ME, Newman C, Hanson J, Bruera E. Attitudes of terminally ill cancer patients about euthanasia and assisted suicide: predominance of psychosocial determinants and beliefs over symptom distress and subsequent survival. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:2134.
  64. Office of Disease Prevention and Epidemiology. Department of Human Services, State of Oregon. Twelfth Annual report on Oregon's Death with Dignity Act, March 10, 2005. http://oregon.gov/DHS/ph/pas/docs/year12.pdf (Accessed on February 27, 2012).
  65. Ganzini L, Johnston WS, McFarland BH, et al. Attitudes of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and their care givers toward assisted suicide. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:967.
  66. Chin AE, Hedberg K, Higginson GK, Fleming DW. Legalized physician-assisted suicide in Oregon--the first year's experience. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:577.
  67. Hedberg K, Hopkins D, Kohn M. Five years of legal physician-assisted suicide in Oregon. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:961.
  68. van der Maas PJ, van der Wal G, Haverkate I, et al. Euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and other medical practices involving the end of life in the Netherlands, 1990-1995. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1699.
  69. Kissane DW, Street A, Nitschke P. Seven deaths in Darwin: case studies under the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act, Northern Territory, Australia. Lancet 1998; 352:1097.
  70. Washington State Department of Health. 2009 Death with Dignity Act Report. February 2010. Report available online at http://www.doh.wa.gov/dwda/forms/dwda_2009.pdf (Accessed on January 03, 2011).
  71. Regionale toetsingcommissies euthanasie. Annual report 2009. Aailable online at http://www.euthanasiecommissie.nl/en/review-committees/annualreport/default.asp (Accessed on January 03, 2011).
  72. Emanuel EJ, Daniels ER, Fairclough DL, Clarridge BR. The practice of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the United States: adherence to proposed safeguards and effects on physicians. JAMA 1998; 280:507.
  73. Wilson KG, Scott JF, Graham ID, et al. Attitudes of terminally ill patients toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:2454.
  74. Ganzini L, Goy ER, Dobscha SK. Oregonians' reasons for requesting physician aid in dying. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169:489.
  75. Loggers ET, Starks H, Shannon-Dudley M, et al. Implementing a Death with Dignity program at a comprehensive cancer center. N Engl J Med 2013; 368:1417.
  76. Meier DE, Emmons CA, Litke A, et al. Characteristics of patients requesting and receiving physician-assisted death. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163:1537.
  77. van der Lee ML, van der Bom JG, Swarte NB, et al. Euthanasia and depression: a prospective cohort study among terminally ill cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:6607.
  78. Ganzini L, Goy ER, Dobscha SK. Prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients requesting physicians' aid in dying: cross sectional survey. BMJ 2008; 337:a1682.
  79. van der Heide A, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Rurup ML, et al. End-of-life practices in the Netherlands under the Euthanasia Act. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1957.
  80. Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, van der Heide A, Koper D, et al. Euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions in the Netherlands in 1990, 1995, and 2001. Lancet 2003; 362:395.
  81. Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Penning C, et al. Trends in end-of-life practices before and after the enactment of the euthanasia law in the Netherlands from 1990 to 2010: a repeated cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2012; 380:908.
  82. Bilsen J, Cohen J, Chambaere K, et al. Medical end-of-life practices under the euthanasia law in Belgium. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:1119.
  83. Deliens L, Mortier F, Bilsen J, et al. End-of-life decisions in medical practice in Flanders, Belgium: a nationwide survey. Lancet 2000; 356:1806.
  84. Chambaere K, Vander Stichele R, Mortier F, et al. Recent trends in euthanasia and other end-of-life practices in Belgium. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1179.
  85. van der Heide A, Deliens L, Faisst K, et al. End-of-life decision-making in six European countries: descriptive study. Lancet 2003; 362:345.
  86. Ganzini L, Nelson HD, Schmidt TA, et al. Physicians' experiences with the Oregon Death with Dignity Act. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:557.
  87. Groenewoud JH, van der Heide A, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, et al. Clinical problems with the performance of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in The Netherlands. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:551.
  88. Office of Disease Prevention and Epidemiology. Department of Human Services, State of Oregon. Seventh Annual report on Oregon's Death with Dignity Act, March 10, 2005. egov.oregon.gov/dhs/ph/pas/docs/year7.pdf (Accessed on February 27, 2012).
  89. Nuland SB. Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in practice. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:583.
  90. Vrakking AM, van der Heide A, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, et al. Medical end-of-life decisions made for neonates and infants in the Netherlands, 1995-2001. Lancet 2005; 365:1329.
  91. Verhagen AA, Sol JJ, Brouwer OF, Sauer PJ. [Deliberate termination of life in newborns in The Netherlands; review of all 22 reported cases between 1997 and 2004]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005; 149:183.
  92. Provoost V, Cools F, Mortier F, et al. Medical end-of-life decisions in neonates and infants in Flanders. Lancet 2005; 365:1315.
  93. Verhagen E, Sauer PJ. The Groningen protocol--euthanasia in severely ill newborns. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:959.
  94. Verhagen AA, Sauer PJ. End-of-life decisions in newborns: an approach from The Netherlands. Pediatrics 2005; 116:736.