Medline ® Abstract for Reference 49

BACKGROUND: Whether renal revascularization reduces left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with coronary artery disease is uncertain.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial testing the effect of renal artery stenting versus medical therapy on left ventricular hypertrophy progression in patients affected by ischemic heart disease and renal artery stenosis.

SETTING& PARTICIPANTS: Incident patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing cardiac catheterization with renal artery stenosis>50%-≤80%.

INTERVENTION: Revascularization plus standard medical therapy versus medical therapy alone.

OUTCOMES: Primary end point was change in echocardiographic left ventricular mass index (LVMI).

MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and echocardiographic studies were performed at baseline and after 1 year.

RESULTS: 84 patients were randomly assigned: 43 to revascularization plus standard medical therapy and 41 to medical therapy alone. At baseline, clinical characteristics were similar in the 2 study groups. After 1 year, there was no statistically significant difference between longitudinal change in the medical therapy group versus that in the medical therapy plus revascularization group for LVMI (2.1; 95% CI, -6.1 to 10.3 g/m(2)), blood pressure (systolic, -0.2 [95% CI, -9.1 to 8.8 mm Hg]; diastolic, -3.3 [95% CI, -8.4 to 1.8 mm Hg]), or estimated glomerular filtration rate (1.5; 95% CI, -5.8 to 8.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). The number of major cardiovascular events was similar in the 2 groups (revascularization plus standard medical therapy [fatal, n = 2; nonfatal, n = 11]and medical therapy alone [fatal, n = 2; nonfatal, n = 11]).

LIMITATIONS: Patients with very severe renal artery stenosis were excluded from the study.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study was unable to detect a clinically significant benefit of renal revascularization on LVMI in patients with coronary artery disease and renal artery stenosis of 50%-80%.