Medline ® Abstracts for References 1-4

We characterized 70 consecutive patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis to assess major risks for liver disease. Each patient was reevaluated for past alcohol exposure, scored by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis (IAH) score and assessed for viral hepatitis risks and risks for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The results were compared with 50 consecutive NASH patients, 39 nonalcoholic patients age 50 and over with cirrhosis from hepatitis C, and 33 consecutive patients with cirrhosis caused by primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Among the cryptogenic group, 49 (70%) were female, and the mean age was 63 +/- 11 years. Although ascites and variceal bleeding were common, almost one half lacked major signs of complicated portal hypertension. A history of Type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or obesity was present in 51 (73%). Nineteen (27%) patients had a history of blood transfusions antedating the diagnosis of cirrhosis. No clinical or histological features distinguished this group from the other patients, and 14 (74%) of these had a history of obesity and/or diabetes. Nineteen of the remaining nontransfused patients had indeterminant IAH scores but were histologically and biochemically indistinguishable from the others. Twelve of these (63%) also had a history of obesity and/or diabetes. Both diabetes and obesity were significantly more commonin the cryptogenic cirrhotic patients compared with the cirrhotic patients with PBC or hepatitis C. In contrast, the prevalence of obesity and diabetes was similar to the NASH patients who were, on average, a decade younger. Although there is some diversity that indicates more than one cause, our findings suggest that NASH plays an under-recognized role in many patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis, most of whom are older, type 2 diabetic and obese females.

OBJECTIVES: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is postulated to be the cause of most cases of cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC). While ethnic differences in the prevalence of obesity and DM in the United States are well documented, there is little information regarding prevalence of CC or NASH among different U.S. ethnic groups. This study was performed to assess the demographic characteristics of patients with CC at a U.S. county hospital with a racially and ethnically diverse patient population.

METHODS: Medical records and pathology databases were reviewed to identify patients at Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas County, Texas from 1990 to 2001 with CC or cirrhosis attributed to NASH.

RESULTS: Forty-one patients (12 men, 29 women) were found to meet these criteria. Of these, 68% were obese (BMI>or = 30) and/or had type 2 DM and 74% of liver biopsies revealed one or more features of NASH. Of patients with CC 68% were Hispanic while only 7% were African American, despite the fact that Hispanics comprised<26% and AfricanAmericans>40% of adult medicine patients. Prevalence of CC among Hispanic and African American patients was 3.1-fold higher and 3.9-fold lower, respectively, than among European American patients despite similar prevalence of DM among Hispanics and African Americans.

CONCLUSION: These findings support the hypothesis that NASH associated with obesity and DM is responsible for the majority of cases of CC among Hispanics and European Americans. However, the current findings also indicate that this form of cirrhosis is unexpectedly rare among African Americans.

It has recently been suggested that nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is an under-recognized cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC) on the basis of higher prevalence of obesity and type II diabetes among these patients. To test this hypothesis, we studied 65 consecutive patients with advanced cirrhosis (Child-Pugh Score>/= 7) of undetermined etiology (CC) from our active waiting list for liver transplantation in January 1993, 1996, and 1999. For each patient, we selected 2 age- and sex-matched controls from the corresponding lists. The prevalence of obesity (defined as body mass index [BMI]>/= 30) and diabetes were compared between the groups. Sixteen patients (and their 32 controls) with CC were excluded as further review of records suggested other possible etiologies. Thus, the final analysis included 49 patients and 98 controls. The etiology of cirrhosis in the control group was alcohol in 16.3%, chronic viral hepatitis in 30.6%, autoimmune hepatitis in 8.2%, and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) or primary sclerosing cholangitis in 35.7%. The prevalence of obesity (55% vs. 24%) and type II diabetes (47% vs. 22%) was significantly higher in patients with CC compared with controls. Twenty-three percent of patients with CC had both obesity and diabetes compared with 5% among controls (P =.002). There was no difference in the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia (serum cholesterol>200 mg/dL) between thegroups. In conclusion, patients with advanced CC are more likely to be obese and diabetic compared with age- and sex-matched patients with advanced cirrhosis. This supports the hypothesis that NASH may be an etiological factor in some of the patients with CC.