UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Medline ® Abstract for Reference 17

of 'Endoscopic ultrasound in the staging of exocrine pancreatic cancer'

17
TI
Pancreatic tumors: evaluation with endoscopic US, CT, and MR imaging.
AU
Müller MF, Meyenberger C, Bertschinger P, Schaer R, Marincek B
SO
Radiology. 1994;190(3):745.
 
PURPOSE: To compare the value of endosonography (endoscopic ultrasound [US]), dynamic computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the evaluation of pancreatic tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of pancreatic tumor underwent endoscopic US (n = 49), CT (n = 46), and MR imaging (n = 25). The final diagnosis of a malignant (n = 22), benign (n = 2), or inflammatory (n = 9) tumor, or no (n = 16) tumor was made at surgery (n = 28) and/or a combination of biopsy (n = 9) and 9-24-month follow-up (n = 12).
RESULTS: The sensitivity was 94% for endoscopic US, 69% for CT, and 83% for MR imaging. Specificity was 100% for endoscopic US, 64% for CT, and 100% for MR imaging. Accuracy was 96% for endoscopic US, 67% for CT, and 84% for MR imaging. The sensitivity for the detection of tumors less than 3 cm in diameter was 93% for endoscopic US (n = 15), 53% for CT (n = 15), and 67% for MR imaging (n = 12).
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic US is more accurate than dynamic CT and MR imaging inthe diagnosis of pancreatic tumor, particularly for tumors less than 3 cm in diameter.
AD
Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland.
PMID