UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Endoscopic ultrasound in chronic pancreatitis

Authors
Michael B Wallace, MD, MPH
Massimo Raimondo, MD, FACG
Section Editor
Douglas A Howell, MD, FASGE, FACG
Deputy Editor
Anne C Travis, MD, MSc, FACG, AGAF

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was developed initially for improving imaging of the pancreas [1-4]. The close proximity of the pancreas to the gastric and duodenal lumen permits EUS to obtain high-resolution imaging without interference by overlying bowel gas. (See "Endoscopic ultrasound: Normal pancreaticobiliary anatomy".)

The EUS diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis (CP) relies on quantitative and qualitative parenchymal and ductal criteria of which several have been published. It is generally accepted that, in the absence of any criteria, CP is unlikely, whereas in the presence of ≥5 criteria, CP is likely even though endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) and standard tests of pancreatic function may still be normal. The clinical significance of fewer (one to four) features found on EUS is unclear, particularly when other diagnostic tests such as ERCP and function testing are normal.

EUS has allowed for the recognition of several features of CP that had not been appreciated with other imaging modalities. These include hyperechoic margins of the pancreatic duct, subtle lobularity of the parenchyma, small cystic changes in the parenchyma, and side branch duct ectasia (image 1A-B). The ability to detect these subtle changes has raised questions as to how chronic pancreatitis should be defined and whether EUS may be overly sensitive. However, accumulating evidence suggests that these early changes detected by EUS correlate with histologic changes of CP and may predict progression to more overt disease.

NORMAL PANCREATIC EUS

Several normal sonographic findings of the pancreas have been described, which allow for appreciation of the abnormalities that can be seen on EUS. The following findings were noted in a study involving 130,951 patients who underwent a screening examination with transabdominal ultrasonography (TUS) using a 3.5 or 5 mHz probe [5]:

Pancreatic duct diameter, which is measured similarly by TUS and EUS, was dilated (>3 mm) in only 0.49 percent of individuals and was more common in men and in older individuals. There was a strong trend toward increasing duct diameter with age.

             

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2016. | This topic last updated: Tue Oct 20 00:00:00 GMT 2015.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Sivak MV, Kaufman A. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic disease. A preliminary report. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1986; 123:130.
  2. Lees WR. Endoscopic ultrasonography of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic pseudocysts. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1986; 123:123.
  3. Kaufman AR, Sivak MV Jr. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic disease. Gastrointest Endosc 1989; 35:214.
  4. Dancygier H, Classen M. Endosonographic diagnosis of benign pancreatic and biliary lesions. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1986; 123:119.
  5. Ikeda M, Sato T, Morozumi A, et al. Morphologic changes in the pancreas detected by screening ultrasonography in a mass survey, with special reference to main duct dilatation, cyst formation, and calcification. Pancreas 1994; 9:508.
  6. Catalano MF, Lahoti S, Alcocer E, et al. Dynamic imaging of the pancreas using real-time endoscopic ultrasonography with secretin stimulation. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:580.
  7. Catalano MF, Lahoti S, Geenen JE, Hogan WJ. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography, and secretin test in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:11.
  8. Nattermann C, Goldschmidt AJ, Dancygier H. Endosonography in chronic pancreatitis--a comparison between endoscopic retrograde pancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 1993; 25:565.
  9. Wiersema MJ, Hawes RH, Lehman GA, et al. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with chronic abdominal pain of suspected pancreatic origin. Endoscopy 1993; 25:555.
  10. Forsmark CE. The diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52:293.
  11. Walsh TN, Rode J, Theis BA, Russell RC. Minimal change chronic pancreatitis. Gut 1992; 33:1566.
  12. Zimmerman MJ, Mishra G, Lewin DN, et al. Comparison of EUS findings with histopathology in chronic pancreatitis [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45:AB185.
  13. Fléjou JF, Potet F, Molas G, et al. Cystic dystrophy of the gastric and duodenal wall developing in heterotopic pancreas: an unrecognised entity. Gut 1993; 34:343.
  14. Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki K, Takakuwa H. Gastric aberrant pancreas: EUS analysis in comparison with the histology. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49:493.
  15. Menzel J, Foerster EC, Ubrig B, et al. Ex vivo examination of the pancreas by intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS). Endoscopy 1993; 25:571.
  16. Furukawa T, Tsukamoto Y, Naitoh Y, et al. Differential diagnosis of pancreatic diseases with an intraductal ultrasound system. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40:213.
  17. Hollerbach S, Klamann A, Topalidis T, Schmiegel WH. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2001; 33:824.
  18. Morita Y, Takiguchi M, Yasuda J, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonographic findings of the pancreas after pancreatic duct ligation in the dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1998; 39:557.
  19. Buscail L, Escourrou J, Moreau J, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in chronic pancreatitis: a comparative prospective study with conventional ultrasonography, computed tomography, and ERCP. Pancreas 1995; 10:251.
  20. Sahai AV, Zimmerman M, Aabakken L, et al. Prospective assessment of the ability of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose, exclude, or establish the severity of chronic pancreatitis found by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:18.
  21. Hastier P, Buckley MJ, Francois E, et al. A prospective study of pancreatic disease in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis: comparative diagnostic value of ERCP and EUS and long-term significance of isolated parenchymal abnormalities. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49:705.
  22. Stevens T, Conwell DL, Zuccaro G Jr, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography for the prediction of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53:1146.
  23. Usküdar O, Oğuz D, Akdoğan M, et al. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic ultrasonography, and fecal elastase 1 in chronic pancreatitis and clinical correlation. Pancreas 2009; 38:503.
  24. Bhutani MS. Endoscopic ultrasonography: changes of chronic pancreatitis in asymptomatic and symptomatic alcoholic patients. J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18:455.
  25. Kahl S, Glasbrenner B, Leodolter A, et al. EUS in the diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis: a prospective follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55:507.
  26. Wallace MB, Hawes RH, Durkalski V, et al. The reliability of EUS for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: interobserver agreement among experienced endosonographers. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53:294.
  27. Lau JY, Sung JJ, Chan AC, et al. Stigmata of hemorrhage in bleeding peptic ulcers: an interobserver agreement study among international experts. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46:33.
  28. von Kummer R, Holle R, Gizyska U, et al. Interobserver agreement in assessing early CT signs of middle cerebral artery infarction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17:1743.
  29. Lok CE, Morgan CD, Ranganathan N. The accuracy and interobserver agreement in detecting the 'gallop sounds' by cardiac auscultation. Chest 1998; 114:1283.
  30. Stevens T, Zuccaro G Jr, Dumot JA, et al. Prospective comparison of radial and linear endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2009; 41:836.
  31. Gardner TB, Taylor DJ, Gordon SR. Reported findings on endoscopic ultrasound examinations for chronic pancreatitis: toward establishing an endoscopic ultrasound quality benchmark. Pancreas 2014; 43:37.
  32. Rajan E, Clain JE, Levy MJ, et al. Age-related changes in the pancreas identified by EUS: a prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61:401.
  33. Catalano MF, Sahai A, Levy M, et al. EUS-based criteria for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: the Rosemont classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69:1251.
  34. Hirooka Y, Goto H, Ito A, et al. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in pancreatic diseases: a preliminary study. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93:632.
  35. Norton ID, Zheng Y, Wiersema MS, et al. Neural network analysis of EUS images to differentiate between pancreatic malignancy and pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54:625.
  36. Catanzaro A, Richardson S, Veloso H, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with clinically indeterminate suspicion of pancreatic cancer and normal EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58:836.