UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Medline ® Abstract for Reference 54

of 'Endoscopic methods for the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary neoplasms'

54
TI
Role of EUS for preoperative evaluation of cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center experience.
AU
Mohamadnejad M, DeWitt JM, Sherman S, LeBlanc JK, Pitt HA, House MG, Jones KJ, Fogel EL, McHenry L, Watkins JL, Cote GA, Lehman GA, Al-Haddad MA
SO
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(1):71. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
 
BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remain difficult.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of EUS in the diagnosis and preoperative evaluation of CCA.
DESIGN: Observational study of prospectively collected data.
SETTING: Single tertiary referral hospital in Indianapolis, Indiana.
PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with CCA from January 2003 through October 2009.
INTERVENTIONS: EUS and EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Sensitivity of EUS for the detection of a tumor and prediction of unresectability compared with CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); sensitivity of EUS-FNA to provide tissue diagnosis, by using surgical pathology as a reference standard.
RESULTS: A total of 228 patients with biliary strictures undergoing EUS were identified. Of these, 81 (mean age 70 years, 45 men) had CCA. Fifty-one patients (63%) had distal and 30 (37%) had proximal CCA. For those with available imaging, tumor detection was superior with EUS compared with triphasic CT (76 of 81 [94%]vs 23 of 75 [30%], respectively; P<.001). MRI identified the tumor in 11 of 26 patients (42%; P = .07 vs EUS). EUS identified CCA in all 51 (100%) distal and 25 (83%) of 30 proximal tumors (P<.01). EUS-FNA (median, 5 passes; range, 1-12 passes) was performed in 74 patients (91%). The overall sensitivity of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of CCA was 73% (95% confidence interval, 62%-82%) and was significantly higher in distal compared with proximal CCA (81% vs 59%, respectively; P = .04). Fifteen tumors were definitely unresectable. EUS correctly identified unresectability in 8 of 15 and correctly identified the 38 of 39 patients with resectable tumors (53% sensitivity and 97% specificity for unresectability). CT and/or MRI failed to detect unresectability in 6 of these 8 patients.
LIMITATION: Single-center study.
CONCLUSION: EUS and EUS-FNA are sensitive for the diagnosis of CCA and very specific in predicting unresectability. The sensitivity of EUS-FNA is significantly higher in distal thanin proximal CCA.
AD
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.
PMID