Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Endometrial carcinoma: Pretreatment evaluation, staging, and surgical treatment

Steven C Plaxe, MD
Section Editor
Barbara Goff, MD
Deputy Editor
Sandy J Falk, MD, FACOG


Uterine cancer (picture 1) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States; annually there are approximately 46,470 new cases and 8120 deaths from the disease [1]. Women have a 2.5 percent lifetime risk of developing endometrial carcinoma, which accounts for 6 percent of all cancers in women. Fortunately, most cases are diagnosed at an early stage when surgery alone may be adequate for cure. Five-year survival rates for localized, regional, and metastatic disease are 96, 67, and 17 percent, respectively.

Preoperative evaluation, staging, and posttreatment surveillance for endometrial carcinoma will be reviewed here. Risk factors, clinical features, diagnosis, and histopathology, treatment with chemotherapy or radiation, and uterine sarcoma are discussed separately. (See "Endometrial carcinoma: Epidemiology and risk factors" and "Treatment of low-risk endometrial cancer" and "Treatment of recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer" and "Uterine sarcoma: Classification, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis" and "Treatment and prognosis of uterine leiomyosarcoma".)


Prior to treatment, a complete pelvic and general physical examination should be performed, with particular attention to the size and mobility of the uterus and the presence of extrauterine masses or ascites; potential sites of nodal metastases should also be examined (eg, supraclavicular nodes) [2]. Laboratory evaluation or imaging studies should be selected as appropriate for the planned treatment (eg, major surgery, chemotherapy, radiation), patient comorbidities, and suspicion of metastases. Cervical cancer screening should be performed as appropriate. (See "Preoperative medical evaluation of the adult healthy patient" and "Preoperative evaluation and management of patients with cancer" and "Screening for cervical cancer".)

Preoperative issues related to endometrial carcinoma staging are discussed in this section. Diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma is discussed in detail separately.

Assessment for hereditary cancer syndromes — Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer) is associated with a greatly increased risk of endometrial carcinoma, as well as colon and ovarian cancer and other Lynch-associated malignancies. Synchronous tumors discovered intraoperatively are common in these women. Synchronous tumors are simultaneously diagnosed primary tumors involving two different organs. These tumors do not represent a metastasis from one organ to the other. Women with endometrial carcinoma who have a family history suggestive of Lynch syndrome should be referred for genetic counseling and testing and also have testing of their tumor specimen for the mismatch repair proteins which characterize this syndrome. (See "Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer): Clinical manifestations and diagnosis" and 'Testing of tumor specimen for mismatch repair deficiency' below.)

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:

Subscribers log in here

Literature review current through: Nov 2017. | This topic last updated: Jun 01, 2017.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61:212.
  2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin, clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists, number 65, August 2005: management of endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:413.
  3. Hsieh CH, ChangChien CC, Lin H, et al. Can a preoperative CA 125 level be a criterion for full pelvic lymphadenectomy in surgical staging of endometrial cancer? Gynecol Oncol 2002; 86:28.
  4. Dotters DJ. Preoperative CA 125 in endometrial cancer: is it useful? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182:1328.
  5. Todo Y, Sakuragi N, Nishida R, et al. Combined use of magnetic resonance imaging, CA 125 assay, histologic type, and histologic grade in the prediction of lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188:1265.
  6. Powell JL, Hill KA, Shiro BC, et al. Preoperative serum CA-125 levels in treating endometrial cancer. J Reprod Med 2005; 50:585.
  7. Chung HH, Kim JW, Park NH, et al. Use of preoperative serum CA-125 levels for prediction of lymph node metastasis and prognosis in endometrial cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85:1501.
  8. Kim HS, Park CY, Lee JM, et al. Evaluation of serum CA-125 levels for preoperative counseling in endometrioid endometrial cancer: a multi-center study. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 118:283.
  9. Kinkel K, Kaji Y, Yu KK, et al. Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiology 1999; 212:711.
  10. Beddy P, Moyle P, Kataoka M, et al. Evaluation of depth of myometrial invasion and overall staging in endometrial cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2012; 262:530.
  11. Selman TJ, Mann CH, Zamora J, Khan KS. A systematic review of tests for lymph node status in primary endometrial cancer. BMC Womens Health 2008; 8:8.
  12. Park JY, Kim EN, Kim DY, et al. Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 108:486.
  13. Horowitz NS, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ, et al. Prospective evaluation of FDG-PET for detecting pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in uterine corpus cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 95:546.
  14. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, et al. Accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cancer. Eur Radiol 2009; 19:1529.
  15. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Corpus Uteri. In: AJCC Staging Manual, 7th, Springer, New York 2010. p.403.
  16. Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones H 3rd, et al. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2000; 70:209.
  17. Lewin SN, Herzog TJ, Barrena Medel NI, et al. Comparative performance of the 2009 international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics' staging system for uterine corpus cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:1141.
  18. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 105:103.
  19. Benedet JL. Editorial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2000; 70:207.
  20. Mavromatis ID, Antonopoulos CN, Matsoukis IL, et al. Validity of intraoperative gross examination of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012; 91:779.
  21. Fanning J, Tsukada Y, Piver MS. Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1990; 37:47.
  22. Quinlivan JA, Petersen RW, Nicklin JL. Accuracy of frozen section for the operative management of endometrial cancer. BJOG 2001; 108:798.
  23. Goff BA, Rice LW. Assessment of depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1990; 38:46.
  24. Kucera E, Kainz C, Reinthaller A, et al. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section diagnosis in stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2000; 49:62.
  25. Case AS, Rocconi RP, Straughn JM Jr, et al. A prospective blinded evaluation of the accuracy of frozen section for the surgical management of endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:1375.
  26. Egle D, Grissemann B, Zeimet AG, et al. Validation of intraoperative risk assessment on frozen section for surgical management of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 110:286.
  27. Kwon JS, Francis JA, Qiu F, et al. When is a pathology review indicated in endometrial cancer? Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:1224.
  28. Leitao MM Jr, Kehoe S, Barakat RR, et al. Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling diagnosis of FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111:244.
  29. Kumar S, Medeiros F, Dowdy SC, et al. A prospective assessment of the reliability of frozen section to direct intraoperative decision making in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 127:525.
  30. Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, et al. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer 1987; 60:2035.
  31. Boronow RC, Morrow CP, Creasman WT, et al. Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63:825.
  32. ASTEC study group, Kitchener H, Swart AM, et al. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study. Lancet 2009; 373:125.
  33. Mahdi H, Kumar S, Al-Wahab Z, et al. Prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy in uterine serous cancer. BJOG 2013; 120:384.
  34. Todo Y, Yamamoto R, Minobe S, et al. Risk factors for postoperative lower-extremity lymphedema in endometrial cancer survivors who had treatment including lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 119:60.
  35. https://gogmember.gog.org/manuals/pdf/surgman.pdf.
  36. Dowdy SC, Aletti G, Cliby WA, et al. Extra-peritoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy--a prospective cohort study of 293 patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111:418.
  37. Aalders JG, Thomas G. Endometrial cancer--revisiting the importance of pelvic and para aortic lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 104:222.
  38. Homesley HD, Kadar N, Barrett RJ, Lentz SS. Selective pelvic and periaortic lymphadenectomy does not increase morbidity in surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167:1225.
  39. Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Riva C, et al. Postoperative complications after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the surgical staging of endometrial cancer. J Surg Oncol 2001; 78:232.
  40. Russell AH. Forwards through the rear-view mirror. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 115:1.
  41. Larson DM, Johnson KK. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging of high-risk endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Gynecol Oncol 1993; 51:345.
  42. Yokoyama Y, Maruyama H, Sato S, Saito Y. Indispensability of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancers. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 64:411.
  43. McMeekin DS, Lashbrook D, Gold M, et al. Nodal distribution and its significance in FIGO stage IIIc endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 82:375.
  44. Yaegashi N, Ito K, Niikura H. Lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: is paraaortic lymphadenectomy necessary? Int J Clin Oncol 2007; 12:176.
  45. Abu-Rustum NR, Gomez JD, Alektiar KM, et al. The incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis in surgically staged endometrial cancer patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 115:236.
  46. Todo Y, Kato H, Kaneuchi M, et al. Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet 2010; 375:1165.
  47. Abu-Rustum NR, Chi DS, Leitao M, et al. What is the incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal recurrence in grade 1 endometrial carcinoma? Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111:46.
  48. Kilgore LC, Partridge EE, Alvarez RD, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: survival comparisons of patients with and without pelvic node sampling. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 56:29.
  49. Chan JK, Cheung MK, Huh WK, et al. Therapeutic role of lymph node resection in endometrioid corpus cancer: a study of 12,333 patients. Cancer 2006; 107:1823.
  50. Mariani A, Webb MJ, Keeney GL, et al. Low-risk corpus cancer: is lymphadenectomy or radiotherapy necessary? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182:1506.
  51. Chan JK, Wu H, Cheung MK, et al. The outcomes of 27,063 women with unstaged endometrioid uterine cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 106:282.
  52. Pierga JY, Dieras V, Paraiso D, et al. Treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma with combination of etoposide, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil: a phase II study. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 60:59.
  53. Grigsby PW, Perez CA, Kuten A, et al. Clinical stage I endometrial cancer: prognostic factors for local control and distant metastasis and implications of the new FIGO surgical staging system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992; 22:905.
  54. Benedetti Panici P, Basile S, Maneschi F, et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100:1707.
  55. Abu-Rustum NR, Alektiar K, Iasonos A, et al. The incidence of symptomatic lower-extremity lymphedema following treatment of uterine corpus malignancies: a 12-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 103:714.
  56. Frumovitz M, Singh DK, Meyer L, et al. Predictors of final histology in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 95:463.
  57. Ben-Shachar I, Pavelka J, Cohn DE, et al. Surgical staging for patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:487.
  58. Roland PY, Kelly FJ, Kulwicki CY, et al. The benefits of a gynecologic oncologist: a pattern of care study for endometrial cancer treatment. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 93:125.
  59. Gershenson DM. Why American women are not receiving state-of-the-art gynecologic cancer care. Cancer J 2001; 7:450.
  60. Guidelines for referral to a gynecologic oncologist: rationale and benefits. The Society of Gynecologic Oncologists. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 78:S1.
  61. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp (Accessed on June 01, 2017).
  62. Wright JD, Cham S, Chen L, et al. Utilization of sentinel lymph node biopsy for uterine cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216:594.e1.
  63. Kang S, Yoo HJ, Hwang JH, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: meta-analysis of 26 studies. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 123:522.
  64. Ansari M, Rad MA, Hassanzadeh M, et al. Sentinel node biopsy in endometrial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2013; 34:387.
  65. Rossi EC, Kowalski LD, Scalici J, et al. A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:384.
  66. Frumovitz M, Levenback CF. Is lymphatic mapping in uterine cancer feasible? Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15:1815.
  67. Robison K, Holman LL, Moore RG. Update on sentinel lymph node evaluation in gynecologic malignancies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2011; 23:8.
  68. Palomba S, Falbo A, Mocciaro R, et al. Laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Gynecol Oncol 2009; 112:415.
  69. Tozzi R, Malur S, Koehler C, Schneider A. Analysis of morbidity in patients with endometrial cancer: is there a commitment to offer laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 2005; 97:4.
  70. Sonoda Y, Zerbe M, Smith A, et al. High incidence of positive peritoneal cytology in low-risk endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 80:378.
  71. Niikura H, Okamura C, Utsunomiya H, et al. Sentinel lymph node detection in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 92:669.
  72. Mais V, Peiretti M, Gargiulo T, et al. Intraoperative sentinel lymph node detection by vital dye through laparoscopy or laparotomy in early endometrial cancer. J Surg Oncol 2010; 101:408.
  73. Disaia PJ. Predicting parametrial involvement in endometrial cancer: is this the end for radical hysterectomies in stage II endometrial cancers? Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:1016.
  74. Watanabe Y, Satou T, Nakai H, et al. Evaluation of parametrial spread in endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:1027.
  75. Barlin JN, Puri I, Bristow RE. Cytoreductive surgery for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 118:14.
  76. Mourits MJ, Bijen CB, Arts HJ, et al. Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11:763.
  77. Janda M, Gebski V, Brand A, et al. Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11:772.
  78. Galaal K, Bryant A, Fisher AD, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; :CD006655.
  79. de la Orden SG, Reza MM, Blasco JA, et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008; 15:395.
  80. Janda M, Gebski V, Davies LC, et al. Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Disease-Free Survival Among Women With Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017; 317:1224.
  81. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30:695.
  82. Fanning J, Hossler C. Laparoscopic conversion rate for uterine cancer surgical staging. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:1354.
  83. Mariani A, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, et al. Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 109:11.
  84. Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, et al. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:1422.
  85. Fader AN, Cohen S, Escobar PF, Gunderson C. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 22:331.
  86. Escobar PF, Fader AN, Rasool N, Espalliat LR. Single-port laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling or lymphadenectomy: development of a technique and instrumentation. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010; 20:1268.
  87. Susini T, Massi G, Amunni G, et al. Vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial cancer in the elderly. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 96:362.
  88. Chan JK, Lin YG, Monk BJ, et al. Vaginal hysterectomy as primary treatment of endometrial cancer in medically compromised women. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97:707.
  89. Resnick K, Straughn JM Jr, Backes F, et al. Lynch syndrome screening strategies among newly diagnosed endometrial cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:530.
  90. Backes FJ, Leon ME, Ivanov I, et al. Prospective evaluation of DNA mismatch repair protein expression in primary endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 114:486.
  91. Resnick KE, Hampel H, Fishel R, Cohn DE. Current and emerging trends in Lynch syndrome identification in women with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 114:128.
  92. Goodfellow PJ, Buttin BM, Herzog TJ, et al. Prevalence of defective DNA mismatch repair and MSH6 mutation in an unselected series of endometrial cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100:5908.
  93. Stefansson I, Akslen LA, MacDonald N, et al. Loss of hMSH2 and hMSH6 expression is frequent in sporadic endometrial carcinomas with microsatellite instability: a population-based study. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8:138.
  94. Chadwick RB, Pyatt RE, Niemann TH, et al. Hereditary and somatic DNA mismatch repair gene mutations in sporadic endometrial carcinoma. J Med Genet 2001; 38:461.
  95. Black D, Soslow RA, Levine DA, et al. Clinicopathologic significance of defective DNA mismatch repair in endometrial carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:1745.
  96. Dunlop MG, Farrington SM, Nicholl I, et al. Population carrier frequency of hMSH2 and hMLH1 mutations. Br J Cancer 2000; 83:1643.
  97. Zaino R, Whitney C, Brady MF, et al. Simultaneously detected endometrial and ovarian carcinomas--a prospective clinicopathologic study of 74 cases: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 83:355.
  98. Soliman PT, Slomovitz BM, Broaddus RR, et al. Synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary: a single institution review of 84 cases. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 94:456.
  99. Walsh C, Holschneider C, Hoang Y, et al. Coexisting ovarian malignancy in young women with endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:693.
  100. Ulbright TM, Roth LM. Metastatic and independent cancers of the endometrium and ovary: a clinicopathologic study of 34 cases. Hum Pathol 1985; 16:28.
  101. In memoriam William Henry Daines Trubshaw 1908-1971. S Afr J Surg 1971; 9:172.
  102. Zaino RJ, Kauderer J, Trimble CL, et al. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer 2006; 106:804.
  103. Lee TS, Lee JY, Kim JW, et al. Outcomes of ovarian preservation in a cohort of premenopausal women with early-stage endometrial cancer: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 131:289.
  104. Creasman WT, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, et al. Carcinoma of the corpus uteri. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006; 95 Suppl 1:S105.