Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Echocardiographic assessment of the right heart

Jonathan Afilalo, MD, MSc, FACC, FRCPC(C)
Lawrence Rudski, MD, FRCPC(C), FACC, FASE
Section Editor
Jeroen J Bax, MD, PhD
Deputy Editor
Susan B Yeon, MD, JD, FACC


The right ventricle (RV) has historically received less attention than its counterpart of the left side of the heart, yet there is a substantial body of evidence showing that RV size and function are perhaps equally important in predicting adverse outcomes in cardiovascular disease. RV dysfunction is associated with excess morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic left-sided heart failure, acute myocardial infarction (with or without RV involvement), pulmonary embolism, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and congenital heart disease [1-3]. Advances in noninvasive imaging of the RV, particularly with echocardiography, have yielded insights into the pathophysiology of this complex and once elusive chamber.

In an attempt to standardize the echocardiographic evaluation of the right heart, the American Society of Echocardiography published guidelines on measures and normal reference values to identify right ventricular pathology [4] and the American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) subsequently updated some of these reference values [5]. This topic will review the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart, specifically the right atrium (RA) and RV. The echocardiographic assessment of right-sided heart valves is presented separately. (See "Echocardiographic evaluation of the tricuspid valve" and "Echocardiographic evaluation of the pulmonic valve and pulmonary artery".)


The right atrium (RA) transmits and pumps blood across the tricuspid valve into the right ventricle (RV), which then ejects the stroke volume through the pulmonic valve and into the main pulmonary artery. In the absence of shunt, forward stroke volume of the right heart is obligately equal to that of the left.

The right heart differs from the left in terms of anatomy and physiology. The RV loosely resembles a pyramid and is composed of three portions: the inlet, the body, and the outflow tract. Contraction is generated by a deep layer of longitudinal fibers that result in longitudinal (base to apex) shortening, and a superficial layer of circumferential fibers that result in inward thickening (movie 1) [6]. The RV lacks a third layer of spiral fibers as seen in the left ventricle.

The RV end-diastolic volume is slightly larger than that of the left ventricle, and as a result has a slightly lower ejection fraction. RV ejection is accomplished with a mass that is approximately one-fifth that of the left ventricle. Accordingly, the RV is well suited as a volume pump, but is prone to failure when faced with an acute pressure challenge.


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Sep 2016. | This topic last updated: Jun 30, 2016.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Ghio S, Klersy C, Magrini G, et al. Prognostic relevance of the echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Int J Cardiol 2010; 140:272.
  2. Afilalo J, Flynn AW, Shimony A, et al. Incremental value of the preoperative echocardiogram to predict mortality and major morbidity in coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 2013; 127:356.
  3. Hamon M, Agostini D, Le Page O, et al. Prognostic impact of right ventricular involvement in patients with acute myocardial infarction: meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:2023.
  4. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010; 23:685.
  5. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015; 28:1.
  6. Haddad F, Hunt SA, Rosenthal DN, Murphy DJ. Right ventricular function in cardiovascular disease, part I: Anatomy, physiology, aging, and functional assessment of the right ventricle. Circulation 2008; 117:1436.
  7. Raymond RJ, Hinderliter AL, Willis PW, et al. Echocardiographic predictors of adverse outcomes in primary pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39:1214.
  8. Sallach JA, Tang WH, Borowski AG, et al. Right atrial volume index in chronic systolic heart failure and prognosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2:527.
  9. Everett TH 4th, Olgin JE. Atrial fibrosis and the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2007; 4:S24.
  10. Bouchardy J, Marelli AJ, Martucci G, et al. Mirror image atrial dilatation in adult patients with atrial fibrillation and congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2013; 167:816.
  11. Burgess MI, Mogulkoc N, Bright-Thomas RJ, et al. Comparison of echocardiographic markers of right ventricular function in determining prognosis in chronic pulmonary disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002; 15:633.
  12. Frémont B, Pacouret G, Jacobi D, et al. Prognostic value of echocardiographic right/left ventricular end-diastolic diameter ratio in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: results from a monocenter registry of 1,416 patients. Chest 2008; 133:358.
  13. Therrien J, Provost Y, Merchant N, et al. Optimal timing for pulmonary valve replacement in adults after tetralogy of Fallot repair. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95:779.
  14. Iriart X, Montaudon M, Lafitte S, et al. Right ventricle three-dimensional echography in corrected tetralogy of fallot: accuracy and variability. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009; 10:784.
  15. Lai WW, Gauvreau K, Rivera ES, et al. Accuracy of guideline recommendations for two-dimensional quantification of the right ventricle by echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008; 24:691.
  16. Niemann PS, Pinho L, Balbach T, et al. Anatomically oriented right ventricular volume measurements with dynamic three-dimensional echocardiography validated by 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50:1668.
  17. Leibundgut G, Rohner A, Grize L, et al. Dynamic assessment of right ventricular volumes and function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: a comparison study with magnetic resonance imaging in 100 adult patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010; 23:116.
  18. Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012; 25:3.
  19. Maffessanti F, Muraru D, Esposito R, et al. Age-, body size-, and sex-specific reference values for right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography: a multicenter echocardiographic study in 507 healthy volunteers. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 6:700.
  20. Schnittger I, Gordon EP, Fitzgerald PJ, Popp RL. Standardized intracardiac measurements of two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 2:934.
  21. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978; 58:1072.
  22. Cooper MJ, Teitel DF, Silverman NH, Enderlein M. Comparison of M-mode echocardiographic measurement of right ventricular wall thickness obtained by the subcostal and parasternal approach in children. Am J Cardiol 1984; 54:835.
  23. Lange PE, Seiffert PA, Pries F, et al. Value of image enhancement and injection of contrast medium for right ventricular volume determination by two-dimensional echocardiography in congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55:152.
  24. Wann LS, Stickels KR, Bamrah VS, Gross CM. Digital processing of contrast echocardiograms: a new technique for measuring right ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53:1164.
  25. Ryan T, Petrovic O, Dillon JC, et al. An echocardiographic index for separation of right ventricular volume and pressure overload. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5:918.
  26. Kaul S, Tei C, Hopkins JM, Shah PM. Assessment of right ventricular function using two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J 1984; 107:526.
  27. Miller D, Farah MG, Liner A, et al. The relation between quantitative right ventricular ejection fraction and indices of tricuspid annular motion and myocardial performance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004; 17:443.
  28. Larrazet F, Czitrom D, Laborde F, et al. Decreased right ventricular lateral wall velocities early after cardiac surgery. Echocardiography 2011; 28:438.
  29. Tamborini G, Muratori M, Brusoni D, et al. Is right ventricular systolic function reduced after cardiac surgery? A two- and three-dimensional echocardiographic study. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009; 10:630.
  30. Sato T, Tsujino I, Ohira H, et al. Validation study on the accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of right ventricular systolic function in pulmonary hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012; 25:280.
  31. Alam M, Wardell J, Andersson E, et al. Right ventricular function in patients with first inferior myocardial infarction: assessment by tricuspid annular motion and tricuspid annular velocity. Am Heart J 2000; 139:710.
  32. Ghio S, Recusani F, Klersy C, et al. Prognostic usefulness of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to idiopathic or ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85:837.
  33. Kjaergaard J, Akkan D, Iversen KK, et al. Right ventricular dysfunction as an independent predictor of short- and long-term mortality in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2007; 9:610.
  34. Damy T, Kallvikbacka-Bennett A, Goode K, et al. Prevalence of, associations with, and prognostic value of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) among out-patients referred for the evaluation of heart failure. J Card Fail 2012; 18:216.
  35. Kukulski T, Voigt JU, Wilkenshoff UM, et al. A comparison of regional myocardial velocity information derived by pulsed and color Doppler techniques: an in vitro and in vivo study. Echocardiography 2000; 17:639.
  36. Sade LE, Gülmez O, Ozyer U, et al. Tissue Doppler study of the right ventricle with a multisegmental approach: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22:361.
  37. Wahl A, Praz F, Schwerzmann M, et al. Assessment of right ventricular systolic function: comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance derived ejection fraction and pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging of the tricuspid annulus. Int J Cardiol 2011; 151:58.
  38. De Castro S, Cavarretta E, Milan A, et al. Usefulness of tricuspid annular velocity in identifying global RV dysfunction in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension: a comparison with 3D echo-derived right ventricular ejection fraction. Echocardiography 2008; 25:289.
  39. Liu YT, Li MT, Fang Q, et al. Right-heart function related to the results of acute pulmonary vasodilator testing in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension caused by connective tissue disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012; 25:274.
  40. Oguzhan A, Abaci A, Eryol NK, et al. Colour tissue Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of right ventricular function in patients with right ventricular infarction. Cardiology 2003; 100:41.
  41. Meluzín J, Spinarová L, Bakala J, et al. Pulsed Doppler tissue imaging of the velocity of tricuspid annular systolic motion; a new, rapid, and non-invasive method of evaluating right ventricular systolic function. Eur Heart J 2001; 22:340.
  42. Dokainish H, Sengupta R, Patel R, Lakkis N. Usefulness of right ventricular tissue Doppler imaging to predict outcome in left ventricular heart failure independent of left ventricular diastolic function. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99:961.
  43. Wang J, Prakasa K, Bomma C, et al. Comparison of novel echocardiographic parameters of right ventricular function with ejection fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007; 20:1058.
  44. Lindström L, Wilkenshoff UM, Larsson H, Wranne B. Echocardiographic assessment of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Heart 2001; 86:31.
  45. Anavekar NS, Gerson D, Skali H, et al. Two-dimensional assessment of right ventricular function: an echocardiographic-MRI correlative study. Echocardiography 2007; 24:452.
  46. Zornoff LA, Skali H, Pfeffer MA, et al. Right ventricular dysfunction and risk of heart failure and mortality after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39:1450.
  47. Anavekar NS, Skali H, Bourgoun M, et al. Usefulness of right ventricular fractional area change to predict death, heart failure, and stroke following myocardial infarction (from the VALIANT ECHO Study). Am J Cardiol 2008; 101:607.
  48. Yoerger DM, Marcus F, Sherrill D, et al. Echocardiographic findings in patients meeting task force criteria for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: new insights from the multidisciplinary study of right ventricular dysplasia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45:860.
  49. Marcus FI, McKenna WJ, Sherrill D, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: proposed modification of the task force criteria. Circulation 2010; 121:1533.
  50. Tei C, Dujardin KS, Hodge DO, et al. Doppler echocardiographic index for assessment of global right ventricular function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1996; 9:838.
  51. Kjaergaard J, Snyder EM, Hassager C, et al. Impact of preload and afterload on global and regional right ventricular function and pressure: a quantitative echocardiography study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006; 19:515.
  52. Abd El Rahman MY, Abdul-Khaliq H, Vogel M, et al. Value of the new Doppler-derived myocardial performance index for the evaluation of right and left ventricular function following repair of tetralogy of fallot. Pediatr Cardiol 2002; 23:502.
  53. Chockalingam A, Gnanavelu G, Alagesan R, Subramaniam T. Myocardial performance index in evaluation of acute right ventricular myocardial infarction. Echocardiography 2004; 21:487.
  54. Eidem BW, O'Leary PW, Tei C, Seward JB. Usefulness of the myocardial performance index for assessing right ventricular function in congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86:654.
  55. Møller JE, Søndergaard E, Poulsen SH, et al. Serial Doppler echocardiographic assessment of left and right ventricular performance after a first myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14:249.
  56. Mörner S, Lindqvist P, Waldenström A, Kazzam E. Right ventricular dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy as evidenced by the myocardial performance index. Int J Cardiol 2008; 124:57.
  57. Vizzardi E, D'Aloia A, Bordonali T, et al. Long-term prognostic value of the right ventricular myocardial performance index compared to other indexes of right ventricular function in patients with moderate chronic heart failure. Echocardiography 2012; 29:773.
  58. Hsiao SH, Yang SH, Wang WC, et al. Usefulness of regional myocardial performance index to diagnose pulmonary embolism in patients with echocardiographic signs of pulmonary hypertension. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98:1652.
  59. Eidem BW, Tei C, O'Leary PW, et al. Nongeometric quantitative assessment of right and left ventricular function: myocardial performance index in normal children and patients with Ebstein anomaly. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998; 11:849.
  60. Sebbag I, Rudski LG, Therrien J, et al. Effect of chronic infusion of epoprostenol on echocardiographic right ventricular myocardial performance index and its relation to clinical outcome in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88:1060.
  61. Blanchard DG, Malouf PJ, Gurudevan SV, et al. Utility of right ventricular Tei index in the noninvasive evaluation of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension before and after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2:143.
  62. López-Candales A, Rajagopalan N, Dohi K, et al. Abnormal right ventricular myocardial strain generation in mild pulmonary hypertension. Echocardiography 2007; 24:615.
  63. Kittipovanonth M, Bellavia D, Chandrasekaran K, et al. Doppler myocardial imaging for early detection of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with pulmonary hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21:1035.
  64. Fine NM, Chen L, Bastiansen PM, et al. Outcome prediction by quantitative right ventricular function assessment in 575 subjects evaluated for pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 6:711.
  65. Brennan JM, Blair JE, Goonewardena S, et al. Reappraisal of the use of inferior vena cava for estimating right atrial pressure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007; 20:857.
  66. Beigel R, Cercek B, Luo H, Siegel RJ. Noninvasive evaluation of right atrial pressure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013; 26:1033.
  67. Do DH, Therrien J, Marelli A, et al. Right atrial size relates to right ventricular end-diastolic pressure in an adult population with congenital heart disease. Echocardiography 2011; 28:109.
  68. Sundereswaran L, Nagueh SF, Vardan S, et al. Estimation of left and right ventricular filling pressures after heart transplantation by tissue Doppler imaging. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82:352.
  69. Sade LE, Gulmez O, Eroglu S, et al. Noninvasive estimation of right ventricular filling pressure by ratio of early tricuspid inflow to annular diastolic velocity in patients with and without recent cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007; 20:982.
  70. Mandeville JC, Colebourn CL. Can transthoracic echocardiography be used to predict fluid responsiveness in the critically ill patient? A systematic review. Crit Care Res Pract 2012; 2012:513480.
  71. Yock PG, Popp RL. Noninvasive estimation of right ventricular systolic pressure by Doppler ultrasound in patients with tricuspid regurgitation. Circulation 1984; 70:657.
  72. Amsallem M, Sternbach JM, Adigopula S, et al. Addressing the Controversy of Estimating Pulmonary Arterial Pressure by Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2016; 29:93.
  73. Currie PJ, Seward JB, Chan KL, et al. Continuous wave Doppler determination of right ventricular pressure: a simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study in 127 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 6:750.
  74. Berger M, Haimowitz A, Van Tosh A, et al. Quantitative assessment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with tricuspid regurgitation using continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 6:359.
  75. Fisher MR, Criner GJ, Fishman AP, et al. Estimating pulmonary artery pressures by echocardiography in patients with emphysema. Eur Respir J 2007; 30:914.
  76. Rich JD, Shah SJ, Swamy RS, et al. Inaccuracy of Doppler echocardiographic estimates of pulmonary artery pressures in patients with pulmonary hypertension: implications for clinical practice. Chest 2011; 139:988.
  77. McQuillan BM, Picard MH, Leavitt M, Weyman AE. Clinical correlates and reference intervals for pulmonary artery systolic pressure among echocardiographically normal subjects. Circulation 2001; 104:2797.
  78. Mahan G, Debestani A, Gardin J, et al.. Estimation of pulmonary artery pressure by pulsed Doppler echocardiography [abstract]. Circulation 1983; 68 Suppl III:III.
  79. Pulmonary Hypertension and Pulmonary Vein Stenosis. In: The Echo Manual, Third, Oh JK, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. (Eds), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007. p.147.
  80. Aduen JF, Castello R, Lozano MM, et al. An alternative echocardiographic method to estimate mean pulmonary artery pressure: diagnostic and clinical implications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22:814.
  81. Steckelberg RC, Tseng AS, Nishimura R, et al. Derivation of mean pulmonary artery pressure from noninvasive parameters. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013; 26:464.
  82. Yared K, Noseworthy P, Weyman AE, et al. Pulmonary artery acceleration time provides an accurate estimate of systolic pulmonary arterial pressure during transthoracic echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011; 24:687.
  83. Kurzyna M, Torbicki A, Pruszczyk P, et al. Disturbed right ventricular ejection pattern as a new Doppler echocardiographic sign of acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90:507.
  84. Abbas AE, Fortuin FD, Schiller NB, et al. Echocardiographic determination of mean pulmonary artery pressure. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92:1373.
  85. Rajagopalan N, Simon MA, Suffoletto MS, et al. Noninvasive estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance in pulmonary hypertension. Echocardiography 2009; 26:489.
  86. Abbas AE, Franey LM, Marwick T, et al. Noninvasive assessment of pulmonary vascular resistance by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013; 26:1170.
  87. Kitabatake A, Inoue M, Asao M, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of pulmonary hypertension by a pulsed Doppler technique. Circulation 1983; 68:302.
  88. Arkles JS, Opotowsky AR, Ojeda J, et al. Shape of the right ventricular Doppler envelope predicts hemodynamics and right heart function in pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183:268.
  89. Opotowsky AR, Clair M, Afilalo J, et al. A simple echocardiographic method to estimate pulmonary vascular resistance. Am J Cardiol 2013; 112:873.
Topic Outline