Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2017 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Early pregnancy prediction of preeclampsia

Errol R Norwitz, MD, PhD, MBA
Section Editor
Charles J Lockwood, MD, MHCM
Deputy Editor
Vanessa A Barss, MD, FACOG


Preeclampsia refers to the onset of hypertension with proteinuria and/or end-organ dysfunction after 20 weeks of gestation in a previously normotensive woman (table 1). The clinical manifestations of preeclampsia can appear any time from the late second trimester to the first few weeks postpartum; however, the blueprint for the disease is laid down in early pregnancy and is characterized by abnormal remodeling of the maternal spiral arteries at the placental site.

Preeclampsia cannot reliably be predicted. There are currently no tests available in early pregnancy that can accurately distinguish women who will go on to develop preeclampsia from those who will not [1-3]. For this reason, obstetric care providers focus primarily on early detection of the disease. All pregnant women are monitored for evidence of preeclampsia at each of their prenatal visits.

While the ability to predict which women will develop preeclampsia before they become symptomatic is of limited benefit as neither its development nor progression from the mild to severe can be prevented in most patients, and no cure exists except for delivery, accurate identification of women at risk may improve the likelihood of timely diagnosis. Early diagnosis may improve maternal and perinatal outcome by ensuring appropriate management (eg, antenatal corticosteroids for fetal lung maturation, treatment of severe hypertension, and early delivery). Furthermore, high-risk women may benefit from the initiation of low-dose aspirin therapy starting at the end of the first trimester as this may reduce the frequency of preeclampsia and associated adverse outcomes.

Screening women in early pregnancy to identify those most likely to develop preeclampsia will be reviewed here. Additional issues related to the diagnosis and management of preeclampsia are discussed separately.

(See "Preeclampsia: Clinical features and diagnosis".)

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information on subscription options, click below on the option that best describes you:

Subscribers log in here

Literature review current through: Sep 2017. | This topic last updated: Apr 27, 2017.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2017 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Angeli F, Angeli E, Reboldi G, Verdecchia P. Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy: clinical applicability of risk prediction models. J Hypertens 2011; 29:2320.
  2. Myatt L, Clifton RG, Roberts JM, et al. First-trimester prediction of preeclampsia in nulliparous women at low risk. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119:1234.
  3. Committee Opinion No. 638: First-Trimester Risk Assessment for Early-Onset Preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126:e25. Reaffirmed 2017.
  4. US Preventive Services Task Force, Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, et al. Screening for Preeclampsia: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2017; 317:1661.
  5. Henderson JT, Thompson JH, Burda BU, Cantor A. Preeclampsia Screening: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2017; 317:1668.
  6. Milne F, Redman C, Walker J, et al. The pre-eclampsia community guideline (PRECOG): how to screen for and detect onset of pre-eclampsia in the community. BMJ 2005; 330:576.
  7. http://sogc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/gui307CPG1405Erev.pdf (Accessed on July 27, 2016).
  8. LeFevre ML, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Low-dose aspirin use for the prevention of morbidity and mortality from preeclampsia: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2014; 161:819.
  9. Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, et al. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ 2016; 353:i1753.
  10. Leslie K, Thilaganathan B, Papageorghiou A. Early prediction and prevention of pre-eclampsia. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 25:343.
  11. Mabuchi A, Yamamoto R, Ishii K, et al. Significance of high-normal blood pressure during early second trimester for predicting the onset of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Hypertens Pregnancy 2016; 35:234.
  12. Haugen M, Brantsæter AL, Winkvist A, et al. Associations of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with pregnancy outcome and postpartum weight retention: a prospective observational cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14:201.
  13. Cnossen JS, ter Riet G, Mol BW, et al. Are tests for predicting pre-eclampsia good enough to make screening viable? A review of reviews and critical appraisal. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88:758.
  14. Conde-Agudelo A, Villar J, Lindheimer M. World Health Organization systematic review of screening tests for preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104:1367.
  15. Briceño-Pérez C, Briceño-Sanabria L, Vigil-De Gracia P. Prediction and prevention of preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy 2009; 28:138.
  16. Meads CA, Cnossen JS, Meher S, et al. Methods of prediction and prevention of pre-eclampsia: systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling. Health Technol Assess 2008; 12:iii.
  17. Giguère Y, Charland M, Bujold E, et al. Combining biochemical and ultrasonographic markers in predicting preeclampsia: a systematic review. Clin Chem 2010; 56:361.
  18. Brunelli VB, Prefumo F. Quality of first trimester risk prediction models for pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. BJOG 2015; 122:904.
  19. Levine RJ, Maynard SE, Qian C, et al. Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:672.
  20. Lam C, Lim KH, Karumanchi SA. Circulating angiogenic factors in the pathogenesis and prediction of preeclampsia. Hypertension 2005; 46:1077.
  21. Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Kim YM, et al. Plasma soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 concentration is elevated prior to the clinical diagnosis of pre-eclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 17:3.
  22. Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Tarca AL, et al. A decrease in maternal plasma concentrations of sVEGFR-2 precedes the clinical diagnosis of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202:550.e1.
  23. Maynard SE, Min JY, Merchan J, et al. Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Clin Invest 2003; 111:649.
  24. Wolf M, Shah A, Lam C, et al. Circulating levels of the antiangiogenic marker sFLT-1 are increased in first versus second pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193:16.
  25. Venkatesha S, Toporsian M, Lam C, et al. Soluble endoglin contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Nat Med 2006; 12:642.
  26. Luft FC. Soluble endoglin (sEng) joins the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase (sFlt) receptor as a pre-eclampsia molecule. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21:3052.
  27. AbdAlla S, Lother H, el Massiery A, Quitterer U. Increased AT(1) receptor heterodimers in preeclampsia mediate enhanced angiotensin II responsiveness. Nat Med 2001; 7:1003.
  28. Levine RJ, Lam C, Qian C, et al. Soluble endoglin and other circulating antiangiogenic factors in preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:992.
  29. Moore Simas TA, Crawford SL, Solitro MJ, et al. Angiogenic factors for the prediction of preeclampsia in high-risk women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:244.e1.
  30. Robinson CJ, Johnson DD. Soluble endoglin as a second-trimester marker for preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:174.e1.
  31. Kleinrouweler CE, Wiegerinck MM, Ris-Stalpers C, et al. Accuracy of circulating placental growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and soluble endoglin in the prediction of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2012; 119:778.
  32. Levine RJ, Thadhani R, Qian C, et al. Urinary placental growth factor and risk of preeclampsia. JAMA 2005; 293:77.
  33. Levine RJ, Hauth JC, Curet LB, et al. Trial of calcium to prevent preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:69.
  34. Buhimschi CS, Magloire L, Funai E, et al. Fractional excretion of angiogenic factors in women with severe preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:1103.
  35. Buhimschi CS, Norwitz ER, Funai E, et al. Urinary angiogenic factors cluster hypertensive disorders and identify women with severe preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192:734.
  36. Zeisler H, Llurba E, Chantraine F, et al. Predictive Value of the sFlt-1:PlGF Ratio in Women with Suspected Preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:13.
  37. Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. First-trimester maternal factors and biomarker screening for preeclampsia. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34:618.
  38. Farina A. Biophysical markers for abnormal placentation: first and/or second trimester. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34:628.
  39. Goetzinger KR, Odibo AO. Screening for abnormal placentation and adverse pregnancy outcomes with maternal serum biomarkers in the second trimester. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34:635.
  40. Halscott TL, Ramsey PS, Reddy UM. First trimester screening cannot predict adverse outcomes yet. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34:668.
  41. Martin A, Krishna I, Badell M, Samuel A. Can the quantity of cell-free fetal DNA predict preeclampsia: a systematic review. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34:685.
  42. Cnossen JS, Morris RK, ter Riet G, et al. Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. CMAJ 2008; 178:701.
  43. Kleinrouweler CE, Bossuyt PM, Thilaganathan B, et al. Value of adding second-trimester uterine artery Doppler to patient characteristics in identification of nulliparous women at increased risk for pre-eclampsia: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42:257.
  44. Velauthar L, Plana MN, Kalidindi M, et al. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis involving 55,974 women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43:500.
  45. Chien PF, Arnott N, Gordon A, et al. How useful is uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth retardation and perinatal death? An overview. BJOG 2000; 107:196.
  46. Papageorghiou AT, Yu CK, Nicolaides KH. The role of uterine artery Doppler in predicting adverse pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 18:383.
  47. Yu CK, Smith GC, Papageorghiou AT, et al. An integrated model for the prediction of preeclampsia using maternal factors and uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in unselected low-risk women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193:429.
  48. Myatt L, Clifton RG, Roberts JM, et al. The utility of uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in prediction of preeclampsia in a low-risk population. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120:815.
  49. Gant NF, Daley GL, Chand S, et al. A study of angiotensin II pressor response throughout primigravid pregnancy. J Clin Invest 1973; 52:2682.
  50. Dekker GA, Makovitz JW, Wallenburg HC. Prediction of pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders by angiotensin II sensitivity and supine pressor test. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97:817.
  51. Gant NF, Chand S, Worley RJ, et al. A clinical test useful for predicting the development of acute hypertension in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974; 120:1.
  52. Tomoda S, Kitanaka T, Ogita S, Hidaka A. Prediction of pregnancy-induced hypertension by isometric exercise. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 20:249.
  53. Baker PN, Johnson IR. The use of the hand-grip test for predicting pregnancy-induced hypertension. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994; 56:169.
  54. Cnossen JS, de Ruyter-Hanhijärvi H, van der Post JA, et al. Accuracy of serum uric acid determination in predicting pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85:519.
  55. Thangaratinam S, Ismail KM, Sharp S, et al. Accuracy of serum uric acid in predicting complications of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. BJOG 2006; 113:369.
  56. Urato AC, Bond B, Craigo SD, et al. Admission uric acid levels and length of expectant management in preterm preeclampsia. J Perinatol 2012; 32:757.
  57. Dizon-Townson D, Miller C, Sibai B, et al. The relationship of the factor V Leiden mutation and pregnancy outcomes for mother and fetus. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:517.
  58. Silver RM, Zhao Y, Spong CY, et al. Prothrombin gene G20210A mutation and obstetric complications. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115:14.