Down syndrome: Overview of prenatal screening
- Geralyn M Messerlian, PhD
Geralyn M Messerlian, PhD
- Professor of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University
- Glenn E Palomaki, PhD
Glenn E Palomaki, PhD
- Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University
Early detection of pregnancies at high risk for trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) is the primary target of prenatal aneuploidy screening since this syndrome is the most common autosomal trisomy among live births. Because biochemical-marker screening for Down syndrome involves measuring levels of the same markers that perform well for detecting trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome, the second most common autosomal trisomy among live births), biochemical-marker screening tests provide risk assessment for both chromosomal abnormalities. Some screening tests also provide risk assessment for trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome). Because both the birth prevalence and long-term survival are much higher for Down syndrome than for trisomies 18 and 13, this topic will focus on Down syndrome.
Issues related to prenatal screening for Down syndrome will be reviewed here. The clinical characteristics, medical care, and prognosis for children with these syndromes are discussed separately:
●(See "Down syndrome: Management".)
- Morris JK, Mutton DE, Alberman E. Revised estimates of the maternal age specific live birth prevalence of Down's syndrome. J Med Screen 2002; 9:2.
- Savva GM, Walker K, Morris JK. The maternal age-specific live birth prevalence of trisomies 13 and 18 compared to trisomy 21 (Down syndrome). Prenat Diagn 2010; 30:57.
- Lou S, Mikkelsen L, Hvidman L, et al. Does screening for Down's syndrome cause anxiety in pregnant women? A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015; 94:15.
- Rausch DN, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Canick JA. Participation in maternal serum screening following screen positive results in a previous pregnancy. J Med Screen 2000; 7:4.
- Kuppermann M, Pena S, Bishop JT, et al. Effect of enhanced information, values clarification, and removal of financial barriers on use of prenatal genetic testing: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 312:1210.
- Hunter AG, Cappelli M, Humphreys L, et al. A randomized trial comparing alternative approaches to prenatal diagnosis counseling in advanced maternal age patients. Clin Genet 2005; 67:303.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 88, December 2007. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:1459.
- Cartier L, Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Wilson RD, et al. Counselling considerations for prenatal genetic screening. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012; 34:489.
- ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77: screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:217.
- Palomaki GE, Knight GJ, Ashwood ER, et al. Screening for down syndrome in the United States: results of surveys in 2011 and 2012. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013; 137:921.
- Committee Opinion No. 640: Cell-Free DNA Screening For Fetal Aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126:e31.
- Merkatz IR, Nitowsky HM, Macri JN, Johnson WE. An association between low maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein and fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148:886.
- Cuckle HS, Wald NJ, Lindenbaum RH. Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein measurement: a screening test for Down syndrome. Lancet 1984; 1:926.
- Wald NJ, Hackshaw AK, George LM. Assay precision of serum alpha fetoprotein in antenatal screening for neural tube defects and Down's syndrome. J Med Screen 2000; 7:74.
- Canick JA, Knight GJ, Palomaki GE, et al. Low second trimester maternal serum unconjugated oestriol in pregnancies with Down's syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95:330.
- Wald NJ, Cuckle HS, Densem JW, et al. Maternal serum unconjugated oestriol as an antenatal screening test for Down's syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95:334.
- Bogart MH, Pandian MR, Jones OW. Abnormal maternal serum chorionic gonadotropin levels in pregnancies with fetal chromosome abnormalities. Prenat Diagn 1987; 7:623.
- Aitken DA, Wallace EM, Crossley JA, et al. Dimeric inhibin A as a marker for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:1231.
- Hackshaw AK, Wald NJ. Repeat testing in antenatal screening for Down syndrome using dimeric inhibin-A in combination with other maternal serum markers. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21:58.
- Haddow JE, Palomaki GE, Knight GJ, et al. Second trimester screening for Down's syndrome using maternal serum dimeric inhibin A. J Med Screen 1998; 5:115.
- Odibo AO, Stamilio DM, Nelson DB, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of prenatal screening strategies for Down syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:562.
- Gil MM, Quezada MS, Revello R, et al. Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for fetal aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45:249.
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Non-invasive Prenatal Testing: A Review of the Cost Effectiveness and Guidelines. CADTH Rapid Response Reports 2014. Available at http://www.cadth.ca/en/products/rapid-response/publication/4171.
- Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) , SMFM Consult Series #36: Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening using Cell Free DNA, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.043
- Bianchi DW, Parker RL, Wentworth J, et al. DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:799.
- Norton ME, Jacobsson B, Swamy GK, et al. Cell-free DNA analysis for noninvasive examination of trisomy. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1589.
- Zhang H, Gao Y, Jiang F, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18 and 13: clinical experience from 146,958 pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45:530.
- Norton ME, Jelliffe-Pawlowski LL, Currier RJ. Chromosome abnormalities detected by current prenatal screening and noninvasive prenatal testing. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124:979.
- Fiorentino F, Napoletano S, Caiazzo F, et al. Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line test in pregnancies with a priori low risk for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities. Eur J Hum Genet 2013; 21:725.
- Sheets KB, Crissman BG, Feist CD, et al. Practice guidelines for communicating a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors. J Genet Couns 2011; 20:432.
- Collins VR, Muggli EE, Riley M, et al. Is Down syndrome a disappearing birth defect? J Pediatr 2008; 152:20.
- Won RH, Currier RJ, Lorey F, Towner DR. The timing of demise in fetuses with trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. Prenat Diagn 2005; 25:608.
- Morris JK, Wald NJ, Watt HC. Fetal loss in Down syndrome pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 1999; 19:142.
- Wessels MW, Los FJ, Frohn-Mulder IM, et al. Poor outcome in Down syndrome fetuses with cardiac anomalies or growth retardation. Am J Med Genet A 2003; 116A:147.
- Sparks TN, Griffin E, Page J, et al. Down syndrome: perinatal mortality risks with each additional week of expectant management. Prenat Diagn 2016; 36:368.
- Palomaki GE, Haddow JE, Beauregard LJ. Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome in Maine, 1980 to 1993. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:1409.
- Natoli JL, Ackerman DL, McDermott S, Edwards JG. Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: a systematic review of termination rates (1995-2011). Prenat Diagn 2012; 32:142.
- Morris JK, Alberman E. Trends in Down's syndrome live births and antenatal diagnoses in England and Wales from 1989 to 2008: analysis of data from the National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register. BMJ 2009; 339:b3794.
- Shin M, Besser LM, Kucik JE, et al. Prevalence of Down syndrome among children and adolescents in 10 regions of the United States. Pediatrics 2009; 124:1565.
- Deng C, Yi L, Mu Y, et al. Recent trends in the birth prevalence of Down syndrome in China: impact of prenatal diagnosis and subsequent terminations. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35:311.
- Maxwell S, Bower C, O'Leary P. Impact of prenatal screening and diagnostic testing on trends in Down syndrome births and terminations in Western Australia 1980 to 2013. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35:1324.
- RATIONALE FOR SCREENING
- CANDIDATES FOR PRENATAL SCREENING
- CANDIDATES FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING
- SCREENING TESTS
- Second trimester quadruple test
- First trimester combined test
- Tests integrated across the first and second trimesters
- Cell-free DNA
- MANAGEMENT OF SCREENING RESULTS
- Screen-negative test result
- Screen-positive test result
- - Screen positive biochemical marker-based tests
- - Screen positive cell-free DNA-based test
- DIAGNOSTIC TESTING
- DELIVERING THE DIAGNOSIS TO PATIENTS WITH AFFECTED PREGNANCIES
- MANAGEMENT OF PREGNANCY
- IMPACT OF OFFERING PRENATAL SCREENING
- INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS
- SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS