Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2015 UpToDate®

Diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease

Andrew H Soll, MD
Section Editor
Mark Feldman, MD, MACP, AGAF, FACG
Deputy Editor
Shilpa Grover, MD, MPH


There are two major considerations in diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease (PUD): determining whether dyspeptic symptoms are due to PUD and determining the specific etiology of an ulcer discovered by endoscopy or radiography. Symptoms alone cannot reliably distinguish PUD from other causes of dyspepsia.

The diagnosis is generally established by upper endoscopy, although the need to pursue a definitive diagnosis depends upon the clinical setting. As an example, establishing a definitive diagnosis is always required in patients over the age of 55 years and in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding or other alarm symptoms (such as early satiety, dysphagia, weight loss, occult gastrointestinal bleeding, or otherwise unexplained anemia), although these alarm features have limited value in predicting an underlying malignancy [1]. By contrast, empiric testing for H. pylori may be appropriate in young patients without alarm symptoms. (See "Approach to the adult with dyspepsia" and "Peptic ulcer disease: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis".)

This topic review will discuss diagnostic studies in patients who may have a peptic ulcer, and provide an overall approach to the diagnosis. The treatment of PUD is presented separately. (See "Peptic ulcer disease: Management".)


There are no established blood tests that can reliably predict the presence of PUD. However, a complete blood count and blood chemistries (including liver function tests and serum calcium levels) are generally obtained. Normal values on these tests are reassuring while abnormalities may help to guide further testing. Unexpected anemia, for example, warrants a detailed evaluation and may raise concern for an underlying malignancy. (See "Clinical features, diagnosis, and staging of gastric cancer".)


Detection of ulcer disease — Endoscopy is the most accurate diagnostic test for peptic ulcer disease (PUD). Sensitivity of endoscopy depends in part upon the location of the ulcer, the experience of the endoscopist, and the "gold" standard used. Experienced endoscopists detect about 90 percent of gastroduodenal lesions found by a second endoscopist, by radiography, or at surgery [2,3].


Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Oct 2015. | This topic last updated: Dec 3, 2013.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2015 UpToDate, Inc.
  1. Moayyedi P, Talley NJ, Fennerty MB, Vakil N. Can the clinical history distinguish between organic and functional dyspepsia? JAMA 2006; 295:1566.
  2. Cotton PB, Shorvon PJ. Analysis of endoscopy and radiography in the diagnosis, follow-up and treatment of peptic ulcer disease. Clin Gastroenterol 1984; 13:383.
  3. Dooley CP, Larson AW, Stace NH, et al. Double-contrast barium meal and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. A comparative study. Ann Intern Med 1984; 101:538.
  4. Graham DY, Schwartz JT, Cain GD, Gyorkey F. Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology 1982; 82:228.
  5. Eckardt VF, Giessler W, Kanzler G, Bernhard G. Does endoscopic follow-up improve the outcome of patients with benign gastric ulcers and gastric cancer? Cancer 1992; 69:301.
  6. Stephens MR, Lewis WG, White S, et al. Prognostic significance of alarm symptoms in patients with gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2005; 92:840.
  7. Bytzer P. Endoscopic follow-up study of gastric ulcer to detect malignancy: is it worthwhile? Scand J Gastroenterol 1991; 26:1193.
  8. Kochman ML, Elta GH. Gastric ulcers--when is enough enough? Gastroenterology 1993; 105:1583.
  9. Todd JA, Richards CJ, Dixon A, Robinson RJ. Gastric ulcer and malignancy--is there a need for follow-up endoscopy? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 19:989.
  10. Maniatis AG, Eisen GM, Brazer SR. Endoscopic discrimination of gastric ulcers. J Clin Gastroenterol 1997; 24:203.
  11. Bustamante M, Devesa F, Borghol A, et al. Accuracy of the initial endoscopic diagnosis in the discrimination of gastric ulcers: is endoscopic follow-up study always needed? J Clin Gastroenterol 2002; 35:25.
  12. Hopper AN, Stephens MR, Lewis WG, et al. Relative value of repeat gastric ulcer surveillance gastroscopy in diagnosing gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2006; 9:217.
  13. Gurin NN, Logunov KV. [Effectiveness of differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ulcers at endoscopy]. Ter Arkh 1998; 70:37.
  14. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Banerjee S, Cash BD, et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of patients with peptic ulcer disease. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71:663.
  15. Hosokawa O, Watanabe K, Hatorri M, et al. Detection of gastric cancer by repeat endoscopy within a short time after negative examination. Endoscopy 2001; 33:301.
  16. Whiting JL, Sigurdsson A, Rowlands DC, et al. The long term results of endoscopic surveillance of premalignant gastric lesions. Gut 2002; 50:378.
  17. Farinati F, Cardin F, Di Mario F, et al. Early and advanced gastric cancer during follow-up of apparently benign gastric ulcer: significance of the presence of epithelial dysplasia. J Surg Oncol 1987; 36:263.
  18. Bramble MG, Suvakovic Z, Hungin AP. Detection of upper gastrointestinal cancer in patients taking antisecretory therapy prior to gastroscopy. Gut 2000; 46:464.
  19. Levine MS. Role of the double-contrast upper gastrointestinal series in the 1990s. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1995; 24:289.
  20. Glick SN. Duodenal ulcer. Radiol Clin North Am 1994; 32:1259.
  21. Laufer I, Levine MS. Double Contrast Gastrointestinal Radiography, 2nd, Laufer I, Levine MD (Eds), WB Saunders, Philadelphia 1992.
  22. Ohata H, Oka M, Yanaoka K, et al. Gastric cancer screening of a high-risk population in Japan using serum pepsinogen and barium digital radiography. Cancer Sci 2005; 96:713.
  23. Lin HJ, Lo WC, Perng CL, et al. Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. Helicobacter 2004; 9:663.
  24. van Leerdam ME, van der Ende A, ten Kate FJ, et al. Lack of accuracy of the noninvasive Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test in patients with gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98:798.
  25. Gisbert JP, Esteban C, Jimenez I, Moreno-Otero R. 13C-urea breath test during hospitalization for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in peptic ulcer bleeding. Helicobacter 2007; 12:231.
  26. Spiegel BM, Vakil NB, Ofman JJ. Dyspepsia management in primary care: a decision analysis of competing strategies. Gastroenterology 2002; 122:1270.
  27. Delaney BC, Qume M, Moayyedi P, et al. Helicobacter pylori test and treat versus proton pump inhibitor in initial management of dyspepsia in primary care: multicentre randomised controlled trial (MRC-CUBE trial). BMJ 2008; 336:651.
  28. McJunkin B, Sissoko M, Levien J, et al. Dramatic decline in prevalence of Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer disease in an endoscopy-referral population. Am J Med 2011; 124:260.
  29. Vakil N, Moayyedi P, Fennerty MB, Talley NJ. Limited value of alarm features in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2006; 131:390.
  30. Canga C 3rd, Vakil N. Upper GI malignancy, uncomplicated dyspepsia, and the age threshold for early endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97:600.
  31. Talley NJ, Vakil N, Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for the management of dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100:2324.