Disclosures: Andrew M Kaunitz, MD Grant/Research/Clinical Trial Support: Agile [Contraception (Investigational contraceptive patch)]; Bayer [Uterine fibroids (IUDs, implants, oral contraceptives, menopausal therapies)]; Therapeutics MD [Menopausal symptoms (Investigational menopausal therapies)]; Merck [Contraception (Contraceptive vaginal ring, contraceptive implant)]; Teva [Contraception (Copper IUD, oral contraceptives)]. Consultant/Advisory Boards: Actavis [Contraception (Vaginal estrogen, IUD, oral contraceptives)]; Bayer [Contraception (IUDs, implants, oral contraceptives, menopausal therapies)]; Merk [Contraception (Contraceptive vaginal ring, contraceptive implant)]; Teva [Contraception (Copper IUD, oral contraceptives)]. Mimi Zieman, MD Consultant/Advisory Boards: Bayer Healthcare [Contraception (LNG IUS, Essure)]. Kristen Eckler, MD, FACOG Nothing to disclose.
Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.
INTRODUCTION — Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is an injectable, progestin-only contraceptive that provides highly effective, private, relatively long-acting (three months), reversible contraception. Use of DMPA eliminates both the need for user action daily or near the time of sexual intercourse and the need for partner cooperation.
DMPA is a good contraceptive option for the following groups of women:
●Women who do not want to take a contraceptive pill daily
●Women who have a contraindication to, or wish to avoid, an estrogen-containing contraceptive
●Women who would like to eliminate regular menses
●Women who can take advantage of DMPA's non-contraceptive benefits (eg, reduction in endometrial cancer risk)
●Adolescents who may not consistently remember to use types of contraception that require frequent administration
●Institutionalized adolescents and women who have difficulty using other forms of contraception
●Adolescents and women with physical or intellectual differences that make other methods difficult to use or remember
Other types of progestin-only contraceptives include:
●Progestin pills (minipills) (see "Progestin-only pills (POPs) for contraception")
●Progestin implants (eg, Nexplanon, Jadelle) (see "Etonogestrel contraceptive implant")
●Intrauterine contraception (eg, Mirena, Liletta, Skyla) (see "Intrauterine contraception: Devices, candidates, and selection")
FORMULATIONS AND PHARMACOLOGY — Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is available in two formulations: 150 mg/1 mL for intramuscular (IM) injection and 104 mg/0.65 mL for subcutaneous (SC) injection. It can be given every 3 months (13 weeks) because low solubility of the microcrystals at the injection site allows pharmacologically active drug levels to persist and remain effective for several months .
Following a single intramuscular dose of DMPA, the drug level increases for approximately three weeks, reaching a peak blood concentration of up to 7 ng/mL for a few days [2,3]. The level then declines until it becomes undetectable between 120 and 200 days following injection , but there is considerable inter-individual variability in serum levels. Ovulation resumes at DMPA levels <0.1 ng/mL .
The formulation for subcutaneous injection provides slower and more sustained absorption of the progestin than conventional intramuscular DMPA. This enables a 30 percent lower dose of progestin (104 versus 150 mg) and reduces peak blood levels by half , but with the same duration of effect as conventional DMPA. Administration via the SC route is less painful than IM injection and potentially may allow patient self-administration [5-8]. Otherwise, the benefits and risks are similar for IM and SC administration.
Serum progesterone levels are low (<0.4 ng/mL) for several months following an injection of DMPA since ovulation is suppressed . Estrogen levels vary, but most women have lower levels than normally cycling women [1,9]. Women who have used DMPA for several years have serum estradiol levels between 10 and 92 pg/mL (mean about 40 pg/mL) . Although the endometrium becomes atrophic, vasomotor symptoms are uncommon and the vaginal epithelium remains moist and well rugated.
MECHANISMS OF ACTION — Progestins can prevent pregnancy via several mechanisms. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) primarily acts by inhibition of gonadotropin secretion, thereby inhibiting follicular maturation and ovulation . The inhibition of ovarian function results in a hypoestrogenic state, which inhibits endometrial proliferation and renders the endometrium less receptive to implantation. Progestins also cause changes in cervical mucus (thicker and less permeable to sperm) and tubal motility (reduced ciliary action) that are unfavorable to sperm migration, thus inhibiting fertilization.
EFFICACY — Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is a highly effective contraceptive. The unintended pregnancy rate for the first year of perfect use of DMPA has been estimated at 0.2 percent . This estimate is a weighted average derived from seven trials of the 150 mg intramuscular dose and two trials of the 104 mg subcutaneous dose. Of note, no pregnancies occurred in women using the 104 mg subcutaneous injection [12,13].
For women with typical use during the first year of DMPA use, an unintended pregnancy rate of 6 percent has been reported . This typical-use failure rate likely reflects women who returned late for the next injection. In a study of women using DMPA who returned consistently and on time for injections, the three-year cumulative failure rate for DMPA was 0.7 percent, which is comparable to the failure rate for women using intrauterine devices (IUDs) and the contraceptive implant . (See 'Repeat injections' below.)
Medical eligibility criteria — The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Medical Eligibility Criteria are listed in the table (table 1). In addition to standard contraindications to hormone use, contraindications specific to DMPA (150 mg intramuscular [IM] injection or 104 mg subcutaneous injection) include:
●Current use of aminoglutethimide (usually for the treatment of Cushing's syndrome) because aminoglutethimide may increase metabolism of progestins
●Pregnancy planned within the next year because a delay in return in fertility occurs with DMPA (see 'Return to fertility after discontinuation' below)
●Long-term use of corticosteroid therapy in women with a history of, or risk factors for, nontraumatic fractures (see 'Reduction in bone mineral density' below)
Women with contraindications to estrogen therapy — Although clinicians should familiarize themselves with the contraindications listed on package labeling for all medications they prescribe, progestin-only hormonal methods appear to be appropriate contraceptive choices for many women with relative contraindications to estrogen-containing contraceptives (table 1). Many of the contraindications listed in the package insert were established for combined estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives and then extrapolated to progestin-only methods because clinical trials have not evaluated the safety of the latter in women with contraindications to estrogen. (See "Risks and side effects associated with estrogen-progestin contraceptives".)
Intramuscular DMPA — Both the 1 mL vial and the 1 mL prefilled syringe of DMPA should be shaken vigorously just before use to ensure that the dose being administered represents a uniform suspension; 150 mg of DMPA is administered by deep IM injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle.
Subcutaneous DMPA — The pre-filled syringe (0.65 mL) of DMPA should be shaken vigorously just before use to create a uniform suspension; 104 mg of DMPA is administered by SC injection into the anterior thigh or abdomen.
A study of the pharmacokinetic profile of SC DMPA over one cycle after injection in the upper arm reported injection at this site provided sufficient medroxyprogesterone levels for contraceptive protection . The study included 24 women with body mass index (BMI) from 18 to 40 kg/m2. Although off-label, administering SC DMPA in the upper arm is a reasonable option for women who prefer this injection site to the anterior thigh or abdomen.
Self-administration of DMPA — Although self-administration is off-label, this approach can enhance access. Several reports have documented preliminary experience with DMPA IM and DMPA SC self-administration [5,6,21].
Timing of injections — The first DMPA injection can be given at any time as long as pregnancy has been excluded. Back-up contraception, such as barrier contraception, the previously used hormonal method, or abstinence, is indicated for seven days if :
●DMPA is initiated more than seven days from the onset of the last menstrual period
●The woman is post-abortion and DMPA was not initiated at the time of the abortion
●The woman is postpartum, has not had a menstrual period, and (1) is fully breastfeeding and >6 months postpartum or (2) not fully breastfeeding and ≥21 days postpartum
Initial injection — Although pregnancy should be excluded before initiating contraception (table 2), there is no evidence that inadvertent administration of DMPA during pregnancy increases the risk of congenital anomalies [22,23]. In the United States Planned Parenthood National Database for 1994 to 1998, 402 DMPA users became pregnant and many of these women received more than one dose of DMPA while pregnant . No fetal anomalies were reported; however, birth outcome data were incomplete.
●First day of menses – The ideal time to initiate DMPA is within seven days of the onset of menses. This approach increases the certainty that the patient is not pregnant at the time of injection and prevents ovulation during the first month of use, so that back-up contraception is unnecessary . Most women have pharmacologically active drug levels and relatively impermeable cervical mucus within 24 hours after injection.
●Quick start – Several studies have initiated DMPA on the day the patient is first seen for contraception, rather than waiting until her next menses begins [25-28], as long as pregnancy can be excluded with reasonable certainty by history or pregnancy testing. This "same day" "quick start" or "Depo-now" approach facilitates DMPA initiation for many users, and thus may prevent some pregnancies .
If DMPA is initiated more than seven days after the first day of the woman's menstrual period and she has had unprotected intercourse during the cycle, clinicians and patients must recognize that there is a small chance of preimplantation or early pregnancy despite a negative pregnancy test prior to the injection. We suggest these women receive emergency contraception if intercourse occurred within the previous 120 hours, and we advise them to use back-up contraception for seven days after DMPA injection  since ovulation may occur within 24 hours of the initial injection, and we counsel them to have a repeat pregnancy test in two to three weeks.
●Switching from another method – Begin DMPA while the woman is still using hormonal contraception (pill, patch, ring), and discontinue the other method seven days after the injection (table 3). Otherwise, a condom or abstinence should be used as a back-up if the first injection is not given within seven days of menses onset.
If switching from intrauterine contraception, the injection should be given seven days before removal of the intrauterine device (IUD). Otherwise, switching from an IUD requires consideration of fertilization and implantation from residual sperm in the reproductive tract. Options to prevent these pregnancies include advising the woman to :
•Abstain from sex or use barrier contraception for seven days before removing the IUD and receiving the first DMPA injection.
•Use emergency contraception at the time of IUD removal.
Repeat injections — DMPA users should be encouraged to return every 3 months (13 weeks) for repeat injections.
●Women who return late for a repeat injection – Women using injectable birth control who present late for follow-up injections should not be denied repeat injection solely because they are not on time. After a 150 mg injection, ovulation does not occur for at least 14 weeks. Therefore, a two-week "grace period" (repeat injection without pregnancy testing) is appropriate for women receiving injections every 3 months (13 weeks). In women more than two weeks late for their injection (>15 weeks from the last injection), we suggest a pregnancy test before administering DMPA and back-up contraception (or abstinence) for seven days . In the United States, CDC guidelines support this approach ; however, the package labeling is more conservative and recommends excluding pregnancy prior to reinjection in women more than one week late for their injection or >14 weeks from their last injection.
As a result of a study showing that contraceptive efficacy is maintained with a grace period as long as four weeks , the World Health Organization (WHO) adopted a longer grace period in its updated guideline . In this study of 2290 women in developing countries who underwent 13,608 DMPA cycles, the pregnancy risk per 100 women-years was statistically similar for users who were "on time" for their injection (0.6, 95% CI 0.33-0.92; 12,508 cycles), users who were two weeks late for their injection (0.0; 95% CI 0.0-1.88; 739 cycles), and users who were four weeks late for their injection (0.4; 95% CI 0.01-2.29; 893 cycles) . A limitation of these data is that more than one third of the women in the study were lactating, placing them at low baseline risk for conception.
Because pregnancy testing may not be readily available in low resource countries, expanding the grace period to four weeks is reasonable in such settings. In high resource countries, we continue to encourage women to return on time and allow a two-week grace period, and require documentation of a negative pregnancy test in women who present more than two weeks (>15 weeks from their last injection).
●Women who return early for a repeat injection – If it is more convenient for a patient to move up the date of her DMPA injection, a repeat injection may be given early .
DISCONTINUATION — Discontinuation rates at one year range from 40 to 75 percent .
Return to fertility after discontinuation — Although depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) does not permanently impact endocrine function, return of fertility may be delayed. Within 10 months of the last injection, 50 percent of women who discontinue DMPA to become pregnant will conceive; in a small proportion of women, however, fertility is not reestablished until 18 months after the last injection . The persistence of ovulation suppression following DMPA discontinuation is not related to the duration of use, but is related to weight . Women with lower body weights conceive sooner after discontinuing DMPA than women with higher body weights.
Before initiating DMPA contraception, clinicians should counsel candidates about the possible prolonged duration of contraceptive action. Women who may want to become pregnant within the next one or two years should choose an alternative contraceptive.
Switching from DMPA to another method — For women who wish to change from DMPA to another form of contraception, the new method should be started no later than 15 (ideally no later than 14) weeks after the previous injection. This ensures that the woman is not pregnant at the time she initiates a new contraceptive method.
With long-term use of DMPA, most users become amenorrheic. Initiation of contraception should not be delayed until resumption of menses. Amenorrhea after discontinuing DMPA injections does not mean the woman is protected against pregnancy if she has unprotected intercourse.
COUNSELING — The advantages and disadvantages of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) use are summarized in the table (table 4). Proactive, candid counseling on both the side effects of DMPA, especially bleeding irregularities, and the need for timed injections is important because women who are well-informed when they choose this method of contraception are much more likely to become satisfied users with high continuation rates [27,35-39]. In a randomized trial, women who received information on risks, benefits, and overall characteristics of DMPA at each visit and counseling that emphasized that potential side effects were not harmful were much less likely to discontinue the method within 12 months than the usual care group (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.16-0.44) and much less likely to discontinue the method because of menstrual disturbances (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.11-0.37) .
SIDE EFFECTS — Side effects usually decrease or stop within the first few months after starting injections. A change in uterine bleeding pattern is the best documented and most common side effect in depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users. Side effects associated with DMPA use were illustrated in a clinical trial in which over 3900 DMPA users were followed for up to seven years . The following side effects were reported by more than 5 percent of subjects: menstrual irregularities (unscheduled bleeding or amenorrhea), weight changes, headache, abdominal pain or discomfort, nervousness, dizziness, and asthenia.
Menstrual changes — Menstrual changes occur in all women using DMPA and are the most frequent reason for discontinuation. In many cases, women become anxious over menstrual changes because of concerns that the changes are due to pregnancy or gynecologic disease. Proactive patient education before initiation of DMPA, as well as supportive follow-up, can markedly reduce these concerns. Women who will not tolerate the menstrual changes that inevitably accompany use of DMPA are counseled to choose an alternative contraceptive.
Unscheduled bleeding — During the first months of use, episodes of unpredictable bleeding and spotting lasting seven days or longer are common. The frequency and duration of such unscheduled bleeding decrease with increasing duration of use.
If persistent spotting or unscheduled bleeding in the first few months of use is unacceptable to a DMPA user who otherwise wishes to continue using this method, one option is to administer oral or transdermal estrogen supplements. The efficacy of supplemental estrogen for prevention or treatment of active unscheduled bleeding in DMPA users is unclear. Trials have reported discordant findings. (See "Management of unscheduled bleeding in women using contraception", section on 'Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA)'.)
If bothersome spotting and/or unscheduled bleeding persist after several injections of DMPA, we evaluate for other causes of abnormal uterine bleeding. The purpose of such evaluation is to exclude cervicitis (including that caused by chlamydial or gonococcal infection), cervical neoplasia, and uterine/endometrial pathology (including fibroids, adenomyosis, endometrial polyps, and endometritis). (See "Approach to abnormal uterine bleeding in nonpregnant reproductive-age women".)
Once these conditions have been excluded, further evaluation for repeat bleeding episodes is not necessary unless the woman develops new signs or symptoms (eg, heavy bleeding, pain, vaginal discharge, new abnormal findings on pelvic examination). Women are educated that unscheduled bleeding can persist for the duration of contraceptive use. If a treatable cause of the unscheduled bleeding is not found and the patient remains dissatisfied with the menstrual changes caused by DMPA, then she may be better served by another contraceptive method. (See "Management of unscheduled bleeding in women using contraception", section on 'General approach'.)
Amenorrhea — Amenorrhea becomes increasingly prevalent with increasing duration of DMPA use. Approximately 50 percent of women will achieve amenorrhea after one year of use [12,40] and over 70 percent will report amenorrhea with longer duration of use . We counsel women that absence of bleeding represents an expected and reversible phenomenon associated with DMPA use and that amenorrhea (along with a reduction or elimination of menstrual cramps) can be viewed as one of the advantages of using this method [42-44].
Weight changes — Concerns about weight gain may limit some women's choice of DMPA and other progestin-only methods. Observational studies have reported variable effects of DMPA on weight gain. These studies are difficult to interpret because individuals tend to gain weight over time irrespective of contraceptive use. Discontinuation of and changes in contraceptive methods over time, as well as variability in study design, characteristics of the participants, and endpoints also prevent using observational data to make definite conclusions about the effect of contraception on weight.
A 2013 systematic review (meta-analysis could not be performed) of studies on the effects of progestin-only contraceptives on weight concluded mean gain was <2 kg for most studies up to 12 months and usually similar to the comparison group using another contraceptive . Major findings were:
●DMPA versus estrogen-progestin contraception (three studies): no significant difference between groups in weight gain
●DMPA versus no contraception (one study): DMPA was associated with a greater increase in body fat (mean difference 11 percent; 95% CI 3-19) and a greater decrease in percent lean body mass (mean difference -4 percent; 95% CI -7 to -1)
●DMPA versus non-hormonal intrauterine device (IUD) (two studies): in one study, mean weight gain was greater for DMPA users than users of a nonhormonal IUD at one, two, and three years (mean difference 2.28 kg, 2.71 kg, 3.17 kg, respectively), while another study found no difference between groups at 10 years.
Multiple factors appear to play a role in weight gain over time, and should be considered when counseling women about this side effect. For example, one group observed that black women gain more weight over time with use of various types of contraception (implant, DMPA, copper IUD, levonorgestrel IUD) than non-black women . In addition, a 2013 systematic review of three studies observed that DMPA users who gained >5 percent of baseline body weight within six months of starting DMPA appeared to be at increased risk of weight gain over the following two to three years; however, attrition and loss to follow-up was a major limitation of these studies .
Randomized trials, although not definitive, have not reported significant weight gain in DMPA users. One randomized trial compared the effects of intramuscular DMPA and saline injections on food intake, resting energy expenditure, and body weight . DMPA did not increase appetite or weight in normal weight women observed during the two menstrual cycles before, and first menstrual cycle following, the initial injection. Two randomized trials comparing a subcutaneous formulation of DMPA and leuprolide in women with symptomatic endometriosis found no difference in the impact of these drugs on weight over 6 to 12 months of use [49,50]. However, the results of these trials are not generalizable since the first trial involved only 20 volunteers who received only 1 injection of DMPA  and, in the other two trials, controls were given leuprolide rather than another contraceptive drug or no contraceptive drug.
Headache — Although natural progesterone and oral progestins have been reported to reduce the frequency of migraine, DMPA appears to trigger headache as a side effect in susceptible patients [51,52]. However, a history of headache is not a contraindication to DMPA use (table 1).
Mood changes — Observational studies have not reported any consistent effects of DMPA on mood [53-56]. We feel that progestins may cause or exacerbate depressive symptoms in certain subpopulations of women, including those with a history of premenstrual syndrome or mood disorders [57-59]. Therefore, we suggest that clinicians follow such women closely when any progestin-based therapy is initiated, but we do not feel a history of depression represents a contraindication to use of DMPA (table 1).
Other — Dizziness, bloating, and decreased libido are other reported side effects.
Two to 20 percent of patients using the subcutaneous formulation have reported a dent, dimple, or lump at the injection site (termed granuloma/atrophy), or other minor site reactions (redness, pruritus, bruising, or blistering) [5,6,12]. The natural history of granuloma/atrophy is unclear; resolution is possible as with other forms of lipoatrophy.
While hormonal medications can result in hair loss in women, hair loss does not appear to be a common adverse event with use of DMPA. In clinical trials of nearly 1800 women receiving DMPA 104 mg for one year, women did not report the occurrence of hair loss . In a cohort study comparing 219 users of DMPA 150 mg with 171 users of non-hormonal contraception, the DMPA users were more likely to report hair loss than non-hormonal contraception users, but the finding was not significant .
Reduction in bone mineral density — A primary concern regarding the safety of long-term use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is its effect on bone density. One of the contraceptive actions of DMPA results from suppression of gonadotropin secretion , which in turn suppresses ovarian estradiol production . In hypoestrogenic states, bone resorption exceeds bone formation , resulting in a decline in bone mineral density (BMD). The rate of bone loss is not linear; the greatest loss is during the first one to two years of use, after which BMD appears to plateau (figure 1) [63-68]. Compared to nonusers, BMD at the hip and spine of DMPA users decreases by 0.5 to 3.5 percent after one year of use, 5.7 to 7.5 percent after two years of use, and 5.2 to 5.4 percent after five years of use [65-67,69,70]. The subcutaneous (SC) and intramuscular (IM) formulations have similar effects . (See "Drugs that affect bone metabolism".)
Observations of reduced BMD in current DMPA users have led to concerns that DMPA-induced bone loss might increase the long-term risk of fractures years after discontinuation of the drug, particularly in three groups of women :
●Young women, who have not yet attained their peak bone mass
●Perimenopausal women, who may be starting to lose bone mass and who may have reached menopause by the time of DMPA discontinuation, with no opportunity to regain the lost bone mass
●Adolescents/women who are immobilized/wheelchair-bound.
However, studies involving premenopausal women and adolescents treated with DMPA for up to five years showed that the decline in BMD associated with the drug was substantially reversed after discontinuation [49,50,64-67,69,72-82]. Reversal at the spine occurred sooner, and appeared to be more complete, than reversal at the hip. Although there is an association between current DMPA use and decreased BMD, there are few data on the effect of BMD changes in younger women on their short- or long-term fracture risk. The best available data suggest that DMPA use does not reduce peak bone mass and does not increase the risk of osteoporotic fracture in later life in women at average risk of osteoporosis .
We are not aware of published data addressing the skeletal safety of DMPA when used in immobilized/wheelchair-bound adolescents or women. We feel that theoretical skeletal concerns associated with DMPA use should not prevent its use in immobilized/wheelchair-bound women, given its advantages in this patient population: convenience (amenorrhea makes hygiene easier) and avoidance of the increased risk of venous thrombosis associated with both immobility and estrogen-based contraceptives.
Although observational studies have reported an increased risk of fracture in current DMPA users compared with non-users [84-88], DMPA users differ behaviorally in a variety of ways from non-users and these differences may impact their risk of traumatic fractures, thus it is difficult to draw clinical inferences from these findings. A retrospective cohort study provided reassuring data: DMPA users had higher incident fracture risk than never users before beginning DMPA (incidence rate ratio 1.28) and after beginning DMPA (incidence rate ratio 1.23), but the fracture risk in DMPA users did not increase significantly after starting DMPA (incidence rate ratio before and after starting DMPA: 1.01 (95% CI 0.92-1.11) [88,89]. Long-term prospective data are not available.
Despite the lack of a proven increase in fracture rate, in 2004, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a black box warning on DMPA package labeling: "Women who use DMPA may lose significant bone mineral density. Bone loss is greater with increasing duration of use and may not be completely reversible. It is unknown if use of DMPA during adolescence or early adulthood, a critical period of bone accretion, will reduce peak bone mass and increase the risk for osteoporotic fracture in later life. DMPA should be used as a long-term birth control method (eg, longer than two years) only if other birth control methods are inadequate." The addition of this warning to DMPA's package labeling appears to have led some clinicians in the United States to restrict the duration of DMPA use in their patients and to inappropriately order BMD testing in women using DMPA .
Counseling patients — We, and others, including the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG), the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine (SAHM), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) [91-96], believe that the advantages of DMPA use as a contraceptive generally outweigh the theoretical concerns regarding skeletal harm. Accordingly, skeletal health concerns should not restrict initiation or continuation of DMPA in adolescent girls, women 18 to 45 years of age, or older reproductive age women (age more than 45 years). The available evidence also does not justify limiting the duration of DMPA therapy, which may be continued for decades.
Given that the effect of DMPA on BMD is similar to that with pregnancy (decrease in BMD of 2 to 8 percent) or lactation (decrease in BMD of 3 to 5 percent ) [97,98], use of DMPA is not an indication for BMD testing (eg, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA]) either before, during, or in follow-up of its administration [94,96].
Some clinicians prescribe supplemental hormone replacement doses of oral or transdermal estrogen in long-term DMPA users who have additional risk factors for low BMD. (See "Epidemiology and etiology of premenopausal osteoporosis".) This approach is based on data from randomized trials in which menopausal doses of estrogen supplements given to adolescent  and adult DMPA users  prevented declines in BMD. These studies provided evidence that the loss in BMD was estrogen-related and that the effects of estrogen on bone metabolism were not impaired by DMPA. We feel there is insufficient evidence to make specific clinical recommendations regarding estrogen supplementation for DMPA users, in part, because it appears that estrogen from an exogenous (supplemental estrogen) or endogenous (ovarian) source results in similar recovery of BMD following DMPA discontinuation.
There are no data on use of other antiresorptive agents (eg, bisphosphonates, calcitonin, selective estrogen receptor modulators) to prevent bone loss in DMPA users. We recommend not using them for this indication .
To promote bone health, providers should advise DMPA users to have adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, engage in regular exercise, and avoid cigarette smoking and excessive alcohol consumption, which is good advice for all women, regardless of their contraceptive choice. Providers should also use clinical judgment when deciding whether to use DMPA versus an alternative contraceptive in women with risk factors for osteoporosis.
Beneficial effects on comorbid conditions — DMPA has been used to manage a variety of gynecologic and nongynecologic disorders:
●Reduction in heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), dysmenorrhea, or iron-deficiency anemia – The tendency of DMPA to cause amenorrhea makes it a particularly appropriate contraceptive choice for women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), dysmenorrhea, or iron-deficiency anemia [102-105]. There are no data from randomized trials regarding the impact of DMPA on HMB in women with intramural fibroids; however, the author's clinical experience over three decades and other observational data indicate that some women with HMB/anemia associated with intramural fibroids become amenorrheic during use of DMPA .
●Dysmenorrhea related to endometriosis – Progestins inhibit endometriotic tissue growth by directly causing initial decidualization and eventual atrophy and by inhibiting pituitary gonadotropin secretion and ovarian estrogen production. In randomized trials, DMPA was more effective than estrogen-progestin contraceptives and danazol , and as effective as leuprolide for treatment of pain associated with endometriosis [49,50].
●Use in anticoagulated women – In addition to reducing menstrual blood loss, DMPA may prevent development of hemorrhagic corpus luteum cysts in women who are anticoagulated . Although direct evidence is sparse, SC and IM injections do not appear to increase the risk of local hematoma formation .
●Endometrium protection – DMPA transforms proliferative into secretory endometrium, thus it protects against development of endometrial hyperplasia.
●Reduction in PID – DMPA users have a decreased risk of developing pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) . This may be related to changes in cervical mucus, decreased menstrual blood flow, and/or a reduction in retrograde menstruation.
●Reduction in ectopic pregnancy – Women using hormonal contraception, including DMPA, are at very low risk of conceiving ectopic, as well as intrauterine, pregnancies.
●Making hygiene easier – DMPA is a useful means of suppressing menstrual bleeding and managing menstrual hygiene in individuals with special needs (eg, cognitive impairment, military personnel, those who are wheelchair-bound, and athletes) .
●Reduction in sickle cell crisis – Use of DMPA has been associated with fewer painful crises in women with sickle cell disease  and appears to be a safe and effective contraceptive method in this population .
●Possible reduction seizures – The efficacy of DMPA's contraceptive protection does not appear attenuated by the use of enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants , and DMPA may have intrinsic anticonvulsant properties [113,114]. For these reasons, DMPA might be a good contraceptive choice for many women with seizure disorders (table 1).
●Reduction in bothersome perimenopausal symptoms – DMPA reduces heavy anovulatory perimenopausal bleeding and is an effective treatment of menopausal vasomotor symptoms in women who need to avoid estrogen therapy . (See 'Perimenopausal women' below.)
●Lack of drug interactions – A benefit of DMPA use is the lack of drug interactions compared to other types of hormonal contraception (table 1). As discussed above, use of aminoglutethimide (usually for the treatment of Cushing's syndrome) is contraindicated because aminoglutethimide may increase metabolism of progestins.
Possible allergic reactions — Although allergy to any hormonal contraceptive is rare, anaphylaxis to DMPA has been reported .
Impact on cancer risk — Overall, studies have not identified a substantial increase in risk of malignancy with the use of DPMA. In fact, DMPA has been associated with reduced risk of endometrial cancer.
WHO examined the risk of endometrial, ovarian, liver, and cervical carcinoma in DMPA users [117-119]. In case-control studies, the prevalence of endometrial cancer decreased by 80 percent among DMPA users, and DMPA was associated with a greater protective effect against endometrial cancer than oral contraceptives. Theoretically, it is possible that prolonged ovulation suppression associated with DMPA might provide protection against ovarian cancer, as seen with oral contraceptives [42,102,120,121]. In the largest case-control study of this issue, use of DMPA was associated with protection against epithelial ovarian cancer and the magnitude of protection was similar to that seen with oral contraceptives . DMPA has not been associated with an increased risk of cervical or liver cancer.
Studies evaluating the relationship between DMPA use and breast cancer risk have been generally reassuring [123-126], with the exception of two studies that suggested a 2 to 3 fold increased risk of breast cancer [127,128]. In the first of these studies , the authors considered their findings inconclusive given the small number of DMPA users in the study and the lack of a dose-response relationship. In the second study , the increase in risk was limited to current users with ≥12 months of use. The findings of this latter study, conducted in the Seattle, Washington area and based on 1028 cases of breast cancer, directly conflict with those of the Women’s Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences (CARE) Study , conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and based on 4575 cases. In contrast with the Washington State study, the Women’s CARE study found that use of DMPA was not associated with an elevated risk of breast cancer in current/recent users or in women who had initiated DMPA five years prior. Neither study verified hormone use by review of medical records/prescriptions.
Data on the use of DMPA in breast cancer survivors, particularly those who are progestin-receptor negative, are lacking. Non-hormonal contraceptive methods are generally preferred for these women. (See "Approach to the patient following treatment for breast cancer", section on 'Contraception after breast cancer'.)
Cardiovascular risk — There is some evidence that long-term DMPA use induces moderately unfavorable changes in lipid metabolism and reduces peripheral arterial hyperemia-induced flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) [129-133], but does not increase production of coagulation factors and has no adverse effect on blood pressure [134-136]. The clinical implications, if any, of the combination of these changes in healthy young women are unproven. Low-quality evidence from epidemiological studies does not exclude the possibility of an increased risk of venous thrombosis [137,138].
ACOG  and the CDC (table 1) consider DMPA an acceptable contraceptive option (category 2) for women with an uncomplicated history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in whom use of estrogen-progestin contraceptives is contraindicated. In these women, the advantages of using the method generally outweigh the theoretical or proven risks. This recommendation differs from package labeling for DMPA, which indicates that a prior history of VTE is a contraindication to DMPA use. (See "Overview of the use of estrogen-progestin contraceptives".)
For women with multiple risk factors for arterial cardiovascular disease (eg, smoking, older age, diabetes, and hypertension that is poorly controlled or associated with vascular disease) and women with a history of stroke or ischemic heart disease, WHO and the CDC classify DMPA as Category 3, indicating that the risks of use may exceed the benefits. This classification reflects theoretical concerns related to the reduction in plasma high-density lipoprotein levels associated with DMPA use and weak evidence of an increased risk of VTE in users. Although lipid changes associated with use of hormonal contraceptives have not been linked to adverse clinical cardiovascular outcomes , in a case-control study, women with a first episode of VTE/pulmonary embolism were twice as likely to be DMPA users than were controls in the general population (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-4.0; 47 of 948 [5 percent] VTE cases and 23 of 902 [2.5 percent] controls were DMPA users) . In this study, use of progestin-only pills, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device, or the progestin-only contraceptive implant was not a significant risk factor for VTE.
In the absence of accurate data on the absolute risk of VTE in DMPA users, we agree with the CDC’s conclusion that history of VTE/pulmonary embolus is “a condition for which the advantages of using the method [DMPA] generally outweigh the theoretical or proven risks” (table 1).
Lack of protection from sexually transmitted infections — Use of DMPA does not protect users from acquiring sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Whether it increases the risk of acquiring these infections is less clear.
Effect on HIV acquisition and transmission — Studies have raised concern that DMPA is associated with an increased risk of HIV acquisition, although data are mixed [141-143]. Two meta-analyses of observational studies report a small but significant increased risk of HIV acquisition for women using DMPA [142,143]. Potential limitations include observational study design mixed populations of high- and low-risk women, and possible change in sexual behavior, including decreased condom use by women using DMPA. As DMPA is an effective contraceptive option, it should remain available for women until randomized trial data are available.
In the absence of definitive data, we agree with the WHO and CDC assessments that women at high risk of and living with HIV can continue to use all existing hormonal contraceptive methods without restriction (table 5 and table 1) [144,145]. Regardless of contraceptive choice, condoms (male or female) and other HIV preventive measures should always be used to protect against transmission or acquisition of sexually transmitted infections.
Effect on chlamydia and gonorrhea acquisition — Some studies have observed an increased risk of chlamydia and gonorrhea infection in DMPA users compared to oral contraceptive users, contraceptive nonusers, or the general population [63,146-149] However, these differences usually disappear after adjustment for relevant behavioral factors and rates of new versus existing infection.
The hypothesis that long-acting progestins promote transmission of STIs was based on two studies in Rhesus monkeys in whom progestins caused vaginal mucosal thinning, hyperplasia of cervical columnar cells, and cervical ectopy; however, these changes were not found in women given progestins . Moreover, progestins thicken cervical mucus, and thickened cervical mucus may reduce the risk of ascending infection and development of PID.
Change in glucose/insulin — A study that measured fasting glucose and insulin levels over 3 years in 240 white, African-American, and Hispanic women receiving DMPA found some women experienced mild increases in fasting insulin and glucose levels (3 mg/dL and 4 units, respectively, over baseline values); however, these changes probably are not clinically important . DMPA use has been associated with an increased risk of diabetes in women with increased baseline diabetes risk and in women who gain weight during use .
Adolescents — Rates of oral contraceptive failure and discontinuation can be very high among adolescents. In contrast, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) provides highly effective and acceptable contraception in this population [43,153-158].
A study of postpartum teens found that DMPA users were more likely to continue their contraception than oral contraceptive users (55 versus 27 percent), and had lower rates of repeat pregnancy (3 versus 24 percent) during a minimum of 12 months follow-up . Some experts in adolescent gynecology suggest that long-acting progestin methods, coupled with condoms for protection against sexually transmitted infections (STIs), should be considered contraceptives of first choice for sexually active teens [154,160].
The effect of DMPA on bone mineral density (BMD) in adolescents was discussed above. (See 'Reduction in bone mineral density' above.)
Perimenopausal women — Women can safely continue use of DMPA until they become menopausal. Because long-term DMPA users are amenorrheic, perimenopausal DMPA users will not experience the irregular bleeding that characteristically accompanies the perimenopausal transition. Likewise, such women may not experience vasomotor symptoms, which are suppressed by DMPA use. (See "Menopausal hot flashes" and "Menopausal hot flashes", section on 'Options if nonhormonal therapies ineffective or not tolerated'.)
The median age of menopause (when contraception is no longer needed) is 51 to 52 years, meaning that 50 percent of women of this age are still ovulatory. By age 55 years, in contrast, at least 80 percent of women are menopausal [161,162]. Therefore, it is reasonable to continue DMPA without gonadotropin testing until the patient is in her mid-50s. At that time, contraception can be discontinued.
Although serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations increase across the menopausal transition, a single elevated FSH level is not useful in determining menopausal status in any woman because FSH levels vary from cycle to cycle and may fluctuate between the normal premenopausal and postmenopausal ranges . FSH testing is even less useful in DMPA users because DMPA suppresses FSH production, thus menopausal DMPA users may have FSH levels in the premenopausal range related to DMPA. These relationships were illustrated in a study of 82 amenorrheic long-term DMPA users age 40 to 55 years who had FSH testing every 90 days immediately before their DMPA injection: 41 percent of women with a high initial FSH level subsequently had a low FSH level . If FSH is measured in a DMPA user ≥age 50 years, the level is most informative of menopausal status if measured immediately before the next DMPA injection is due  and is in the menopausal range on two consecutive occasions .
The effect of DMPA on BMD was discussed above (see 'Reduction in bone mineral density' above).
Postabortion and postpartum women — Use of DMPA after abortion or delivery, and in breastfeeding women, is discussed separately. (See "Postpartum and postabortion contraception".)
COST — In addition to enhancing quality of life by allowing couples to choose whether and when they wish to bear children, effective contraception saves healthcare costs. An analysis of nine contraceptive methods found that, over a five-year period, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and intrauterine contraception were the most cost-effective reversible contraceptives .
The intramuscular DMPA formulation is available as a generic formulation, which is less costly than the subcutaneous DMPA formulation (Medi-Span $58 versus $143).
INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, “The Basics” and “Beyond the Basics.” The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on “patient info” and the keyword(s) of interest.)
●Basics topics (see "Patient information: Choosing birth control (The Basics)")
●Beyond the Basics topics (see "Patient information: Hormonal methods of birth control (Beyond the Basics)" and "Patient information: Birth control; which method is right for me? (Beyond the Basics)")
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
●Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injection is an excellent method of contraception for women who desire a relatively long-term, reversible contraceptive method. It is highly effective for three months, private, and avoids the need for compliance daily or near the time of sexual intercourse. (See 'Introduction' above and 'Efficacy' above.)
●DMPA can be initiated without a pelvic or breast examination and without any routine laboratory tests. Medical eligibility criteria are listed in the table (table 1). (See 'Administration' above and 'Medical eligibility criteria' above.)
●The ideal time to initiate DMPA is within seven days of the onset of menses or before discontinuing another method of contraception, but it can be started at almost any time. The dose is repeated every three months, with a two-week grace period. We suggest performing a pregnancy test before administering DMPA in women more than two weeks late for their injection. (See 'Timing of injections' above and 'Repeat injections' above.)
●Proactive counseling about side effects, particularly the high frequency of amenorrhea and unscheduled bleeding, is important to enhance continuation of the method. (See 'Counseling' above and 'Side effects' above.)
●Menstrual changes occur in all women using DMPA and are the most frequent cause for discontinuation. During the first months of use, episodes of irregular bleeding and spotting lasting seven days or longer are common. The frequency and duration of such bleeding decrease with increasing duration of use. After one year of use, 50 percent of women experience amenorrhea, and with ongoing use, the rate of amenorrhea increases to 75 percent. (See 'Menstrual changes' above.)
●There is an association between current DMPA use and decreased bone mineral density (BMD); losses in BMD are temporary and reverse after discontinuation of DMPA. There is no evidence of an increase in risk of fractures. We believe that, in all age groups, the advantages of DMPA use as a contraceptive generally outweigh the theoretical concerns regarding skeletal harm. We suggest not avoiding DMPA as a contraceptive option in adolescent girls and older reproductive age women (Grade 2C). (See 'Reduction in bone mineral density' above.)
●In contrast to package labeling, we suggest not avoiding DMPA as a contraceptive option in women with an uncomplicated past history of venous thrombosis (Grade 2C). However, for women with multiple risk factors for arterial cardiovascular disease (eg, smoking, older age, diabetes, hypertension that is poorly controlled or associated with vascular disease), women with a history of stroke or ischemic heart disease, and women with current venous thrombosis, the risks of DMPA use may exceed the benefits. (See 'Cardiovascular risk' above.)
●Return of fertility may be delayed after discontinuing DMPA, but within 10 months of the last injection, 50 percent of women who are trying to conceive will become pregnant; in a small proportion of women, however, fertility is not reestablished until 18 months after the last injection. (See 'Return to fertility after discontinuation' above.)
●Women can safely continue use of DMPA without gonadotropin testing until in the mid-50s. At that time, contraception can be discontinued. Perimenopausal DMPA users will not experience the bothersome irregular bleeding that characteristically accompanies the perimenopausal transition and may not experience vasomotor symptoms. (See 'Perimenopausal women' above.)
- Mishell DR Jr. Pharmacokinetics of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception. J Reprod Med 1996; 41:381.
- Ortiz A, Hirol M, Stanczyk FZ, et al. Serum medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) concentrations and ovarian function following intramuscular injection of depo-MPA. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1977; 44:32.
- DEPO-PROVERA- medroxyprogesterone acetate injection http://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=522 (Accessed on July 11, 2014).
- Shelton JD, Halpern V. Subcutaneous DMPA: a better lower dose approach. Contraception 2014; 89:341.
- Prabhakaran S, Sweet A. Self-administration of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception: feasibility and acceptability. Contraception 2012; 85:453.
- Cameron ST, Glasier A, Johnstone A. Pilot study of home self-administration of subcutaneous depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. Contraception 2012; 85:458.
- Beasley A, White KO, Cremers S, Westhoff C. Randomized clinical trial of self versus clinical administration of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Contraception 2014; 89:352.
- Keith B, Wood S, Tifft S, Hutchings J. Home-based administration of Sayana® Press: review and assessment of needs in low-resource settings. Contraception 2014; 89:344.
- Speroff L, Darney PD. Injectable contraception. In: A Clinical Guide for Contraception, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2010.
- Kaunitz AM. Long-acting injectable contraception with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:1543.
- Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2011; 83:397.
- Jain J, Jakimiuk AJ, Bode FR, et al. Contraceptive efficacy and safety of DMPA-SC. Contraception 2004; 70:269.
- Kaunitz AM, Darney PD, Ross D, et al. Subcutaneous DMPA vs. intramuscular DMPA: a 2-year randomized study of contraceptive efficacy and bone mineral density. Contraception 2009; 80:7.
- Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:1998.
- Leiman G. Depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate as a contraceptive agent: its effect on weight and blood pressure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 114:97.
- Segall-Gutierrez P, Taylor D, Liu X, et al. Follicular development and ovulation in extremely obese women receiving depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate subcutaneously. Contraception 2010; 81:487.
- Sapire KE. Letter to the Editor: Depo-Provera and carbamazepine. Br J Fam Plann 1990; 15:130.
- US Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr62e0614.pdf. (Accessed on June 14, 2013).
- Depo-Provera CI (medroxyprogesterone acetate). US FDA approved product information. National Library of Medicine. www.dailymed.nlm.nih.gov (Accessed on February 11, 2015).
- Halpern V, Combes SL, Dorflinger LJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injected in the upper arm. Contraception 2014; 89:31.
- Williams RL, Hensel DJ, Fortenberry JD. Self-administration of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate by adolescent women. Contraception 2013; 88:401.
- Borgatta L, Murthy A, Chuang C, et al. Pregnancies diagnosed during Depo-Provera use. Contraception 2002; 66:169.
- Brent RL. Nongenital malformations following exposure to progestational drugs: the last chapter of an erroneous allegation. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2005; 73:906.
- Kapp N, Gaffield ME. Initiation of progestogen-only injectables on different days of the menstrual cycle and its effect on contraceptive effectiveness and compliance: a systematic review. Contraception 2013; 87:576.
- Sneed R, Westhoff C, Morroni C, Tiezzi L. A prospective study of immediate initiation of depo medroxyprogesterone acetate contraceptive injection. Contraception 2005; 71:99.
- Balkus J, Miller L. Same-day administration of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate injection: a retrospective chart review. Contraception 2005; 71:395.
- Nelson AL, Katz T. Initiation and continuation rates seen in 2-year experience with Same Day injections of DMPA. Contraception 2007; 75:84.
- Rickert VI, Tiezzi L, Lipshutz J, et al. Depo Now: preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents and young adults. J Adolesc Health 2007; 40:22.
- Lopez LM, Newmann SJ, Grimes DA, et al. Immediate start of hormonal contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12:CD006260.
- World Health Organization. Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use. 2nd edition, 2004. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2004/9241562846.pdf (Accessed on June 03, 2011).
- Steiner MJ, Kwok C, Stanback J, et al. Injectable contraception: what should the longest interval be for reinjections? Contraception 2008; 77:410.
- World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers (2008 update). Baltimore and Geneva, 2008.
- Goldberg AB, Grimes DA. Injectable contraceptives. In: Contraceptive Technology, 19th, Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Nelson AL, et al. (Eds), Ardent Media, New York 2007. p.157.
- Schwallie PC, Assenzo JR. The effect of depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate on pituitary and ovarian function, and the return of fertility following its discontinuation: a review. Contraception 1974; 10:181.
- Lei ZW, Wu SC, Garceau RJ, et al. Effect of pretreatment counseling on discontinuation rates in Chinese women given depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. Contraception 1996; 53:357.
- Hubacher D, Goco N, Gonzalez B, Taylor D. Factors affecting continuation rates of DMPA. Contraception 1999; 60:345.
- Canto De Cetina TE, Canto P, Ordoñez Luna M. Effect of counseling to improve compliance in Mexican women receiving depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate. Contraception 2001; 63:143.
- Westfall JM, Main DS, Barnard L. Continuation rates among injectable contraceptive users. Fam Plann Perspect 1996; 28:275.
- Polaneczky M, Guarnaccia M, Alon J, Wiley J. Early experience with the contraceptive use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in an inner-city clinic population. Fam Plann Perspect 1996; 28:174.
- Hubacher D, Lopez L, Steiner MJ, Dorflinger L. Menstrual pattern changes from levonorgestrel subdermal implants and DMPA: systematic review and evidence-based comparisons. Contraception 2009; 80:113.
- Arias RD, Jain JK, Brucker C, et al. Changes in bleeding patterns with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate subcutaneous injection 104 mg. Contraception 2006; 74:234.
- Kaunitz AM. Menstruation: choosing whether...and when. Contraception 2000; 62:277.
- Smith RD, Cromer BA, Hayes MA, et al. Medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera) use in adolescents: Uterine bleeding and blood pressure patterns, patient satisfaction, and continuation rates. Adolesc Pediatr Gynecol 1993; 8:24.
- Nelson AL. Counseling issues and management of side effects for women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception. J Reprod Med 1996; 41:391.
- Lopez LM, Edelman A, Chen M, et al. Progestin-only contraceptives: effects on weight. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 7:CD008815.
- Vickery Z, Madden T, Zhao Q, et al. Weight change at 12 months in users of three progestin-only contraceptive methods. Contraception 2013; 88:503.
- Steenland MW, Zapata LB, Brahmi D, et al. Appropriate follow up to detect potential adverse events after initiation of select contraceptive methods: a systematic review. Contraception 2013; 87:611.
- Pelkman CL, Chow M, Heinbach RA, Rolls BJ. Short-term effects of a progestational contraceptive drug on food intake, resting energy expenditure, and body weight in young women. Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 73:19.
- Crosignani PG, Luciano A, Ray A, Bergqvist A. Subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Hum Reprod 2006; 21:248.
- Schlaff WD, Carson SA, Luciano A, et al. Subcutaneous injection of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate compared with leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Fertil Steril 2006; 85:314.
- Kaunitz AM. Injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception: an update for U.S. clinicians. Int J Fertil Womens Med 1998; 43:73.
- Martin VT, Behbehani M. Ovarian hormones and migraine headache: understanding mechanisms and pathogenesis--part 2. Headache 2006; 46:365.
- Civic D, Scholes D, Ichikawa L, et al. Depressive symptoms in users and non-users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Contraception 2000; 61:385.
- Westhoff C. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception. Metabolic parameters and mood changes. J Reprod Med 1996; 41:401.
- Westhoff C, Truman C, Kalmuss D, et al. Depressive symptoms and Depo-Provera. Contraception 1998; 57:237.
- Gupta N, O'Brien R, Jacobsen LJ, et al. Mood changes in adolescents using depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception: a prospective study. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2001; 14:71.
- Moore LL, Valuck R, McDougall C, Fink W. A comparative study of one-year weight gain among users of medroxyprogesterone acetate, levonorgestrel implants, and oral contraceptives. Contraception 1995; 52:215.
- Björn I, Bixo M, Nöjd KS, et al. Negative mood changes during hormone replacement therapy: a comparison between two progestogens. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183:1419.
- North American Menopause Society. Role of progestogen in hormone therapy for postmenopausal women: position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2003; 10:113.
- Berenson AB, Odom SD, Breitkopf CR, Rahman M. Physiologic and psychologic symptoms associated with use of injectable contraception and 20 microg oral contraceptive pills. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199:351.e1.
- Clark MK, Sowers M, Levy BT, Tenhundfeld P. Magnitude and variability of sequential estradiol and progesterone concentrations in women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. Fertil Steril 2001; 75:871.
- Gbolade BA. Depo-Provera and bone density. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2002; 28:7.
- Baeten JM, Nyange PM, Richardson BA, et al. Hormonal contraception and risk of sexually transmitted disease acquisition: results from a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185:380.
- Scholes D, LaCroix AZ, Ichikawa LE, et al. Injectable hormone contraception and bone density: results from a prospective study. Epidemiology 2002; 13:581.
- Clark MK, Sowers MR, Nichols S, Levy B. Bone mineral density changes over two years in first-time users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Fertil Steril 2004; 82:1580.
- Clark MK, Sowers M, Levy B, Nichols S. Bone mineral density loss and recovery during 48 months in first-time users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Fertil Steril 2006; 86:1466.
- Ulrich CM, Georgiou CC, Snow-Harter CM, Gillis DE. Bone mineral density in mother-daughter pairs: relations to lifetime exercise, lifetime milk consumption, and calcium supplements. Am J Clin Nutr 1996; 63:72.
- Cromer BA, Bonny AE, Stager M, et al. Bone mineral density in adolescent females using injectable or oral contraceptives: a 24-month prospective study. Fertil Steril 2008; 90:2060.
- Kaunitz AM, Miller PD, Rice VM, et al. Bone mineral density in women aged 25-35 years receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: recovery following discontinuation. Contraception 2006; 74:90.
- Berenson AB, Radecki CM, Grady JJ, et al. A prospective, controlled study of the effects of hormonal contraception on bone mineral density. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98:576.
- Westhoff C. Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate injection (Depo-Provera): a highly effective contraceptive option with proven long-term safety. Contraception 2003; 68:75.
- Cundy T, Cornish J, Roberts H, et al. Spinal bone density in women using depot medroxyprogesterone contraception. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92:569.
- Cundy T, Evans M, Roberts H, et al. Bone density in women receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. BMJ 1991; 303:13.
- Petitti DB, Piaggio G, Mehta S, et al. Steroid hormone contraception and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study in an international population. The WHO Study of Hormonal Contraception and Bone Health. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95:736.
- Scholes D, LaCroix AZ, Ichikawa LE, et al. Change in bone mineral density among adolescent women using and discontinuing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005; 159:139.
- Orr-Walker BJ, Evans MC, Ames RW, et al. The effect of past use of the injectable contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone mineral density in normal post-menopausal women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1998; 49:615.
- Rosenberg L, Zhang Y, Constant D, et al. Bone status after cessation of use of injectable progestin contraceptives. Contraception 2007; 76:425.
- Berenson AB, Breitkopf CR, Grady JJ, et al. Effects of hormonal contraception on bone mineral density after 24 months of use. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:899.
- Cromer BA, Stager M, Bonny A, et al. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, oral contraceptives and bone mineral density in a cohort of adolescent girls. J Adolesc Health 2004; 35:434.
- Sanches L, Marchi NM, Castro S, et al. Forearm bone mineral density in postmenopausal former users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Contraception 2008; 78:365.
- Harel Z, Johnson CC, Gold MA, et al. Recovery of bone mineral density in adolescents following the use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraceptive injections. Contraception 2010; 81:281.
- Viola AS, Castro S, Marchi NM, et al. Long-term assessment of forearm bone mineral density in postmenopausal former users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Contraception 2011; 84:122.
- Kaunitz AM, Arias R, McClung M. Bone density recovery after depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injectable contraception use. Contraception 2008; 77:67.
- Lappe JM, Stegman MR, Recker RR. The impact of lifestyle factors on stress fractures in female Army recruits. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12:35.
- Watson KC, Lentz MJ, Cain KC. Associations between fracture incidence and use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and anti-epileptic drugs in women with developmental disabilities. Womens Health Issues 2006; 16:346.
- Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L. The effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and intrauterine device use on fracture risk in Danish women. Contraception 2008; 78:459.
- Meier C, Brauchli YB, Jick SS, et al. Use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and fracture risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:4909.
- Lanza LL, McQuay LJ, Rothman KJ, et al. Use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception and incidence of bone fracture. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121:593.
- Lanza LL, McQuay LJ, Rothman KJ, et al. Comment on journal review of 'Use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception and incidence of bone fracture'. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2013; 39:306.
- Paschall S, Kaunitz AM. Depo-Provera and skeletal health: a survey of Florida obstetrics and gynecologist physicians. Contraception 2008; 78:370.
- ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. ACOG practice bulletin. No. 73: Use of hormonal contraception in women with coexisting medical conditions. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:1453.
- World Health Organization. WHO Statement on Hormonal Contraception and Bone Health 2005; 1-2.
- Black A, Ad Hoc DMPA Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Canadian contraception consensus--update on Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (dmpa). J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006; 28:305.
- Cromer BA, Scholes D, Berenson A, et al. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and bone mineral density in adolescents--the Black Box Warning: a Position Paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adolesc Health 2006; 39:296.
- Guilbert ER, Brown JP, Kaunitz AM, et al. The use of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate in contraception and its potential impact on skeletal health. Contraception 2009; 79:167.
- Committee Opinion No. 602: Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and bone effects. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:1398.
- Karlsson C, Obrant KJ, Karlsson M. Pregnancy and lactation confer reversible bone loss in humans. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12:828.
- Sowers M, Corton G, Shapiro B, et al. Changes in bone density with lactation. JAMA 1993; 269:3130.
- Cromer BA, Lazebnik R, Rome E, et al. Double-blinded randomized controlled trial of estrogen supplementation in adolescent girls who receive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192:42.
- Cundy T, Ames R, Horne A, et al. A randomized controlled trial of estrogen replacement therapy in long-term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88:78.
- Aries RD, Kaunitz AM, McClung MR. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and bone density. Dialogues in Contraception 2007; 11:1.
- Cullins VE. Noncontraceptive benefits and therapeutic uses of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. J Reprod Med 1996; 41:428.
- Muse K. Hormonal manipulation in the treatment of premenstrual syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1992; 35:658.
- Johnson SR. Premenstrual syndrome, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, and beyond: a clinical primer for practitioners. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104:845.
- Küçük T, Ertan K. Continuous oral or intramuscular medroxyprogesterone acetate versus the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of perimenopausal menorrhagia: a randomized, prospective, controlled clinical trial in female smokers. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2008; 35:57.
- Venkatachalam S, Bagratee JS, Moodley J. Medical management of uterine fibroids with medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo Provera): a pilot study. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 24:798.
- Vercellini P, De Giorgi O, Oldani S, et al. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus an oral contraceptive combined with very-low-dose danazol for long-term treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175:396.
- Sönmezer M, Atabekoğlu C, Cengiz B, et al. Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate in anticoagulated patients with previous hemorrhagic corpus luteum. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2005; 10:9.
- Culwell KR, Curtis KM. Use of contraceptive methods by women with current venous thrombosis on anticoagulant therapy: a systematic review. Contraception 2009; 80:337.
- Elkins TE, Gafford LS, Wilks CS, et al. A model clinic approach to the reproductive health concerns of the mentally handicapped. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68:185.
- De Ceulaer K, Gruber C, Hayes R, Serjeant GR. Medroxyprogesterone acetate and homozygous sickle-cell disease. Lancet 1982; 2:229.
- Manchikanti A, Grimes DA, Lopez LM, Schulz KF. Steroid hormones for contraception in women with sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; :CD006261.
- Mattson RH, Cramer JA, Caldwell BV, Siconolfi BC. Treatment of seizures with medroxyprogesterone acetate: preliminary report. Neurology 1984; 34:1255.
- Frederiksen MC. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception in women with medical problems. J Reprod Med 1996; 41:414.
- North American Menopause Society. Treatment of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms: position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2004; 11:11.
- Lestishock L, Pariseau C, Rooholamini S, Ammerman S. Anaphylaxis from depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in an adolescent girl. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118:443.
- Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and risk of endometrial cancer. The WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives. Int J Cancer 1991; 49:186.
- Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. The WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives. Int J Cancer 1991; 49:191.
- Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and risk of invasive squamous cell cervical cancer. The WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives. Contraception 1992; 45:299.
- Eaton SB, Pike MC, Short RV, et al. Women's reproductive cancers in evolutionary context. Q Rev Biol 1994; 69:353.
- Liang AP, Levenson AG, Layde PM, et al. Risk of breast, uterine corpus, and ovarian cancer in women receiving medroxyprogesterone injections. JAMA 1983; 249:2909.
- Wilailak S, Vipupinyo C, Suraseranivong V, et al. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and epithelial ovarian cancer: a multicentre case-control study. BJOG 2012; 119:672.
- Breast cancer and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate: a multinational study. WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives. Lancet 1991; 338:833.
- Shapiro S, Rosenberg L, Hoffman M, et al. Risk of breast cancer in relation to the use of injectable progestogen contraceptives and combined estrogen/progestogen contraceptives. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 151:396.
- Strom BL, Berlin JA, Weber AL, et al. Absence of an effect of injectable and implantable progestin-only contraceptives on subsequent risk of breast cancer. Contraception 2004; 69:353.
- Paul C, Skegg DC, Spears GF. Depot medroxyprogesterone (Depo-Provera) and risk of breast cancer. BMJ 1989; 299:759.
- Lee NC, Rosero-Bixby L, Oberle MW, et al. A case-control study of breast cancer and hormonal contraception in Costa Rica. J Natl Cancer Inst 1987; 79:1247.
- Li CI, Beaber EF, Tang MT, et al. Effect of depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate on breast cancer risk among women 20 to 44 years of age. Cancer Res 2012; 72:2028.
- Kongsayreepong R, Chutivongse S, George P, et al. A multicentre comparative study of serum lipids and apolipoproteins in long-term users of DMPA and a control group of IUD users. World Health Organization. Task Force on Long-Acting Systemic Agents for Fertility Regulation Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Contraception 1993; 47:177.
- Enk L, Landgren BM, Lindberg UB, et al. A prospective, one-year study on the effects of two long acting injectable contraceptives (depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethisterone oenanthate) on serum and lipoprotein lipids. Horm Metab Res 1992; 24:85.
- Berenson AB, Rahman M, Wilkinson G. Effect of injectable and oral contraceptives on serum lipids. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:786.
- Lizarelli PM, Martins WP, Vieira CS, et al. Both a combined oral contraceptive and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate impair endothelial function in young women. Contraception 2009; 79:35.
- Yadav BK, Gupta RK, Gyawali P, et al. Effects of long-term use of depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate on lipid metabolism in Nepalese women. Korean J Lab Med 2011; 31:95.
- Goldstein J, Cushman M, Badger GJ, Johnson JV. Effect of depomedroxyprogesterone acetate on coagulation parameter: a pilot study. Fertil Steril 2007; 87:1267.
- Taneepanichskul S, Reinprayoon D, Jaisamrarn U. Effects of DMPA on weight and blood pressure in long-term acceptors. Contraception 1999; 59:301.
- Whigham KA, Howie PW, Mack A, Prentice CR. The effect of an injectable progestogen contraceptive on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1979; 86:806.
- Cardiovascular disease and use of oral and injectable progestogen-only contraceptives and combined injectable contraceptives. Results of an international, multicenter, case-control study. World Health Organization Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormone Contraception. Contraception 1998; 57:315.
- van Hylckama Vlieg A, Helmerhorst FM, Rosendaal FR. The risk of deep venous thrombosis associated with injectable depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate contraceptives or a levonorgestrel intrauterine device. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010; 30:2297.
- Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Surrogate end points in clinical research: hazardous to your health. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:1114.
- Bergendal A, Persson I, Odeberg J, et al. Association of venous thromboembolism with hormonal contraception and thrombophilic genotypes. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124:600.
- Polis CB, Phillips SJ, Curtis KM, et al. Hormonal contraceptive methods and risk of HIV acquisition in women: a systematic review of epidemiological evidence. Contraception 2014; 90:360.
- Morrison CS, Chen PL, Kwok C, et al. Hormonal contraception and the risk of HIV acquisition: an individual participant data meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2015; 12:e1001778.
- Ralph LJ, McCoy SI, Shiu K, Padian NS. Hormonal contraceptive use and women's risk of HIV acquisition: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15:181.
- World Health Organization (WHO). Hormonal contraceptive methods for women at high risk of HIV and living with HIV. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/128537/1/WHO_RHR_14.24_eng.pdf (Accessed on July 29, 2015).
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Update to CDC's US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010: Revised recommendations for the use of hormonal contraception among women at high risk for HIV infection or infected with HIV. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6124a4.htm (Accessed on July 29, 2015).
- Clark RA, Kissinger P, Williams T. Contraceptive and sexually transmitted diseases protection among adult and adolescent women infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Int J STD AIDS 1996; 7:439.
- Lavreys L, Chohan V, Overbaugh J, et al. Hormonal contraception and risk of cervical infections among HIV-1-seropositive Kenyan women. AIDS 2004; 18:2179.
- Overton ET, Shacham E, Singhatiraj E, Nurutdinova D. Incidence of sexually transmitted infections among HIV-infected women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception. Contraception 2008; 78:125.
- Morrison CS, Bright P, Wong EL, et al. Hormonal contraceptive use, cervical ectopy, and the acquisition of cervical infections. Sex Transm Dis 2004; 31:561.
- Mauck CK, Callahan MM, Baker J, et al. The effect of one injection of Depo-Provera on the human vaginal epithelium and cervical ectopy. Contraception 1999; 60:15.
- Berenson AB, van den Berg P, Williams KJ, Rahman M. Effect of injectable and oral contraceptives on glucose and insulin levels. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117:41.
- Xiang AH, Kawakubo M, Kjos SL, Buchanan TA. Long-acting injectable progestin contraception and risk of type 2 diabetes in Latino women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2006; 29:613.
- Cromer BA, Smith RD, Blair JM, et al. A prospective study of adolescents who choose among levonorgestrel implant (Norplant), medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera), or the combined oral contraceptive pill as contraception. Pediatrics 1994; 94:687.
- Davis AJ. Use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception in adolescents. J Reprod Med 1996; 41:407.
- O'Dell CM, Forke CM, Polaneczky MM, et al. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or oral contraception in postpartum adolescents. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91:609.
- Chotnopparatpattara P, Taneepanichskul S. Use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in Thai adolescents. Contraception 2000; 62:137.
- Kaunitz AM. Long-acting hormonal contraceptives--indispensable in preventing teen pregnancy. J Adolesc Health 2007; 40:1.
- Tolaymat LL, Kaunitz AM. Long-acting contraceptives in adolescents. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19:453.
- Templeman CL, Cook V, Goldsmith LJ, et al. Postpartum contraceptive use among adolescent mothers. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95:770.
- Stevens-Simon C, Kelly L, Kulick R. A village would be nice but...it takes a long-acting contraceptive to prevent repeat adolescent pregnancies. Am J Prev Med 2001; 21:60.
- McKinlay SM, Bifano NL, McKinlay JB. Smoking and age at menopause in women. Ann Intern Med 1985; 103:350.
- Stanford JL, Hartge P, Brinton LA, et al. Factors influencing the age at natural menopause. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40:995.
- Bastian LA, Smith CM, Nanda K. Is this woman perimenopausal? JAMA 2003; 289:895.
- Juliato CT, Fernandes A, Marchi NM, et al. Usefulness of FSH measurements for determining menopause in long-term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate over 40 years of age. Contraception 2007; 76:282.
- Pérez-Palacios G, Fernández-Aparicio MA, Medina M, et al. On the mechanism of action of progestins. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1981; 97:320.
- Chiou CF, Trussell J, Reyes E, et al. Economic analysis of contraceptives for women. Contraception 2003; 68:3.