UpToDate
Official reprint from UpToDate®
www.uptodate.com ©2016 UpToDate®

Delayed surgical management of the disrupted anal sphincter

Author
Liliana Bordeianou, MD, MPH
Section Editor
Martin Weiser, MD
Deputy Editor
Kristen Eckler, MD, FACOG

INTRODUCTION

Fecal incontinence is the involuntary loss of flatus or feces. Data are conflicting as to whether the rate is higher in women than in men [1,2]. Fecal incontinence affects 9 percent of women aged 40 to 59 years old and as many as 21 percent of women aged over 80 years old [3]. Unfortunately, it is often unrecognized by clinicians because patients do not report their symptoms. The emotional, psychological, and social problems created by fecal incontinence can be devastating, debilitating, and costly [4]. (See "Fecal incontinence in adults: Etiology and evaluation", section on 'Epidemiology'.)

The most common cause of fecal incontinence in healthy women is obstetric trauma, which can result in mechanical disruption of the anal sphincter muscles or damage to the nerves that innervate these muscles. The injury may be occult and symptoms may not occur until many years after delivery [5,6]. A rectovaginal fistula is another cause of fecal incontinence; it may occur after breakdown of a repair of third or fourth degree lacerations. (See "Effect of pregnancy and childbirth on anal sphincter function and fecal incontinence" and "Approach to episiotomy", section on 'Complications' and "Rectovaginal and anovaginal fistulas".)

Delayed repair of anal sphincter disruption will be reviewed here. The anatomy and physiology of the anal sphincter, pathogenesis of anal sphincter dysfunction, and evaluation of patients with fecal incontinence are discussed separately. (See "Fecal incontinence in adults: Etiology and evaluation".) Primary surgical repair of anal sphincter injury related to childbirth is also discussed separately. (See "Repair of episiotomy and perineal lacerations associated with childbirth".)

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS

Chronic third and fourth degree lacerations occur from unrecognized obstetric trauma or breakdown of a primary perineal repair after childbirth. Women who suffer from chronic third or fourth degree lacerations typically complain of fecal urgency, and can have incontinence to gas, mucus, liquid, and even solid feces. The severity of symptoms is, at least in part, dependent on the size of the tear, but also on the amount and functionality of the residual muscle [7].

Physical examination — Women with chronic fourth degree lacerations frequently have complete disruption of the perineal body, as well as the external and internal anal sphincter. Disruption of the sphincter complex occurs anteriorly, and in many patients, the tear is easily identifiable on examination. Occasionally, the tear is less obvious: physical examination alone can miss a tear in as many as 25 percent of women who present with fecal incontinence [8]. Therefore, endoanal ultrasound should always be obtained as part of the evaluation of fecal incontinence and prior to any surgical repair. (See 'Preoperative diagnostic studies' below.) In addition, the rectovaginal septum is often attenuated. The anal mucosa usually is in direct proximity to the distal vaginal epithelium; however, in some women, a thin bridge of perineal skin is present between the vaginal and anal epithelium.

                       

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Nov 2016. | This topic last updated: Wed Jul 15 00:00:00 GMT 2015.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2016 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Drossman DA, Li Z, Andruzzi E, et al. U.S. householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Prevalence, sociodemography, and health impact. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38:1569.
  2. Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS, et al. Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology 2009; 137:512.
  3. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 2008; 300:1311.
  4. Sung VW, Rogers ML, Myers DL, et al. National trends and costs of surgical treatment for female fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:652.e1.
  5. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994; 308:887.
  6. Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg 2008; 247:224.
  7. Bordeianou L, Lee KY, Rockwood T, et al. Anal resting pressures at manometry correlate with the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and with presence of sphincter defects on ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51:1010.
  8. Keating JP, Stewart PJ, Eyers AA, et al. Are special investigations of value in the management of patients with fecal incontinence? Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40:896.
  9. Toglia MR, DeLancey JO. Anal incontinence and the obstetrician-gynecologist. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84:731.
  10. Lowry AC, Simmang CL, Boulos P, et al. Consensus statement of definitions for anorectal physiology and rectal cancer: report of the Tripartite Consensus Conference on Definitions for Anorectal Physiology and Rectal Cancer, Washington, D.C., May 1, 1999. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44:915.
  11. Gearhart S, Hull T, Floruta C, et al. Anal manometric parameters: predictors of outcome following anal sphincter repair? J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9:115.
  12. Ricciardi R, Mellgren AF, Madoff RD, et al. The utility of pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies in idiopathic incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49:852.
  13. Gilliland R, Altomare DF, Moreira H Jr, et al. Pudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41:1516.
  14. Barisić G, Krivokapić Z, Marković V, et al. The role of overlapping sphincteroplasty in traumatic fecal incontinence. Acta Chir Iugosl 2000; 47:37.
  15. Bravo Gutierrez A, Madoff RD, Lowry AC, et al. Long-term results of anterior sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:727.
  16. Goetz LH, Lowry AC. Overlapping sphincteroplasty: is it the standard of care? Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2005; 18:22.
  17. Oberwalder M, Dinnewitzer A, Baig MK, et al. Do internal anal sphincter defects decrease the success rate of anal sphincter repair? Tech Coloproctol 2006; 10:94.
  18. Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Jagelman DG. The role of sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence reevaluated: a prospective physiologic and functional review. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34:22.
  19. Aitola P, Hiltunen KM, Matikainen M. Functional results of anterior levatorplasty and external sphincter plication for faecal incontinence. Ann Chir Gynaecol 2000; 89:29.
  20. Moscovitz I, Rotholtz NA, Baig MK, et al. Overlapping sphincteroplasty: does preservation of the scar influence immediate outcome? Colorectal Dis 2002; 4:275.
  21. Fang DT, Nivatvongs S, Vermeulen FD, et al. Overlapping sphincteroplasty for acquired anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27:720.
  22. Sultan AH, Monga AK, Kumar D, Stanton SL. Primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture using the overlap technique. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106:318.
  23. Tjandra JJ, Han WR, Goh J, et al. Direct repair vs. overlapping sphincter repair: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46:937.
  24. Garcia V, Rogers RG, Kim SS, et al. Primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter laceration: a randomized trial of two surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192:1697.
  25. Fitzpatrick M, Behan M, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. A randomized clinical trial comparing primary overlap with approximation repair of third-degree obstetric tears. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183:1220.
  26. Williams A, Adams EJ, Tincello DG, et al. How to repair an anal sphincter injury after vaginal delivery: results of a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2006; 113:201.
  27. Farrell SA, Gilmour D, Turnbull GK, et al. Overlapping compared with end-to-end repair of third- and fourth-degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:16.
  28. Fernando RJ, Sultan AH, Kettle C, et al. Repair techniques for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:1261.
  29. Fernando RJ, Sultan AH, Kettle C, Thakar R. Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; :CD002866.
  30. Delancey JO, Toglia MR, Perucchini D. Internal and external anal sphincter anatomy as it relates to midline obstetric lacerations. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90:924.
  31. Arnaud A, Sarles JC, Sielezneff I, et al. Sphincter repair without overlapping for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34:744.
  32. Schoetz DJ Jr. Operative therapy for anal incontinence. Surg Clin North Am 1985; 65:35.
  33. Hasegawa H, Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Randomized trial of fecal diversion for sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:961.
  34. Brown SR, Wadhawan H, Nelson RL. Surgery for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; :CD001757.
  35. Matzel KE, Lux P, Heuer S, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11:636.
  36. Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg 2010; 251:441.
  37. Wong WD, Congliosi SM, Spencer MP, et al. The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45:1139.
  38. Mahony R, Behan M, O'Herlihy C, O'Connell PR. Randomized, clinical trial of bowel confinement vs. laxative use after primary repair of a third-degree obstetric anal sphincter tear. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:12.
  39. McDonald M, Grabsch E, Marshall C, Forbes A. Single- versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Surg 1998; 68:388.
  40. Jensen LL, Lowry AC. Biofeedback improves functional outcome after sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40:197.