Smarter Decisions,
Better Care

UpToDate synthesizes the most recent medical information into evidence-based practical recommendations clinicians trust to make the right point-of-care decisions.

  • Rigorous editorial process: Evidence-based treatment recommendations
  • World-Renowned physician authors: over 5,100 physician authors and editors around the globe
  • Innovative technology: integrates into the workflow; access from EMRs

Choose from the list below to learn more about subscriptions for a:


Subscribers log in here


Delayed-interval delivery in multifetal pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Multifetal pregnancies are often complicated by obstetrical conditions that lead to preterm delivery, placing the neonates at risk of prolonged hospitalization, serious morbidity, and mortality. Typically, all of the fetuses of a multiple gestation are delivered within a short interval of one another. However, in selected cases, the preterm birth of one sibling may not require delivery of the other fetus(es), who may remain in utero for an extended period, thereby improving their chance of survival and decreasing morbidity among the survivors. These are referred to as delayed-interval deliveries. Delayed-interval deliveries have been the subject of numerous case reports and reviews [1-10].

A variety of techniques have been proposed to select and manage these unique and challenging pregnancies. No strategy has been subjected to a randomized controlled trial. The clinician's intent to provide the best possible outcome in each circumstance precludes achieving high order scientific evidence on which to base any recommendations to families.

BACKGROUND DATA

Several reviews on the technique of delayed-interval delivery have been published [11-14]; many of the same case reports are included in all of the manuscripts. There is a large ascertainment bias in the publication of these cases; successful outcomes often are reported while many unsuccessful cases go unreported. Three representative studies are illustrated below:

  • An analysis of the 1995 to 1998 United States Matched Multiple Birth File database identified 200 twin pregnancies in which the first twin was live-born between 17 and 29 weeks of gestation and the second twin was delivered two or more days later [15,16]. The median duration of delay was six days (range 2 to 107 days). These delayed interval deliveries were matched to nondelayed twins presenting at the same gestational ages. One-year survival rates in the delayed delivery group were 56 percent compared to 24 percent for the nondelayed twins. The authors concluded that a strategy of delayed interval delivery resulted in improved survival and less neonatal morbidity than would otherwise be anticipated with the standard approach [15].
  • A subsequent large series reported on 17 years of experience with delayed-interval delivery from the same center utilizing a uniform protocol [17]. In this study, 38 twin and 12 triplet pregnancies underwent asynchronous delivery. In contrast to our own practice protocol (described below), the authors did not perform cerclage or routine amniocentesis for the retained sibling, and monochorionic twins and triplets were considered appropriate candidates for delayed interval delivery. Anti-D immune globulin was given to Rh(D)-negative mothers after delivery of the first twin/triplet, as indicated. Delayed interval delivery was useful in some settings: perinatal outcomes of second twins were improved when the first sibling was delivered between 20 and 29 weeks.
  • Another series from one institution also reported significantly increased survival in the retained sibling(s) [18]. Maternal morbidity was high (32 percent), similar to that in our own and other reports. These authors did not use a uniform approach to management and noted that amniocentesis was not always successful in excluding maternal morbidity.

Most authors recommend placement of a cerclage [19-25]. An important reason to consider cerclage is that silent cervical dilatation may have played a role in the early birth of the first sibling. If this is a possibility, then cerclage may forestall the birth of the remaining sibling(s). If a different mechanism of the early birth is apparent (eg, placental abruption, labor unrelated to cervical insufficiency, labor related to fetal demise), cerclage is unlikely to be useful. There are numerous reports of successful delayed-interval deliveries without surgical intervention [17,26-28]. Of note, women with a cerclage placed prior to consideration of delayed-interval delivery have poorer outcomes; these pregnancies are often complicated by intraamniotic infection ultimately necessitating delivery.

          

Subscribers log in here

To continue reading this article, you must log in with your personal, hospital, or group practice subscription. For more information or to purchase a personal subscription, click below on the option that best describes you:
Literature review current through: Jun 2014. | This topic last updated: Aug 2, 2013.
The content on the UpToDate website is not intended nor recommended as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your own physician or other qualified health care professional regarding any medical questions or conditions. The use of this website is governed by the UpToDate Terms of Use ©2014 UpToDate, Inc.
References
Top
  1. Porreco RP, Sabin ED, Heyborne KD, Lindsay LG. Delayed-interval delivery in multifetal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178:20.
  2. Farkouh LJ, Sabin ED, Heyborne KD, et al. Delayed-interval delivery: extended series from a single maternal-fetal medicine practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183:1499.
  3. Sakala EP, Branson BC. Prolonged delivery-abortion interval in twin and triplet pregnancies. A report of two cases. J Reprod Med 1987; 32:79.
  4. Cardwell MS, Caple P, Baker CL. Triplet pregnancy with delivery on three separate days. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71:448.
  5. Long MG, Gibb DM, Kempley S, et al. Retention of the second twin: a viable option? Case reports. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98:1295.
  6. Daikoku NH, Graham D, Gopal JJ, et al. Delayed birth intervals of immature fraternal triplets in preterm labor. A case report. J Reprod Med 1993; 38:734.
  7. Minakami H, Honma Y, Izumi A, et al. Emergency cervical cerclage after the first delivery in a twin pregnancy with dichorionic placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173:345.
  8. Kurzel, RB, Kovacs, BW, Goodwin, TM, et al. Delivery of previable twins: when to attempt delay of delivery of the second twin (abstract). Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172:413.
  9. Knight R, Craig S, Bethune M, et al. Delayed delivery of the second twin after premature previable delivery of the first twin. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 37:470.
  10. Hamersley SL, Coleman SK, Bergauer NK, et al. Delayed-interval delivery in twin pregnancies. J Reprod Med 2002; 47:125.
  11. Wittmann BK, Farquharson D, Wong GP, et al. Delayed delivery of second twin: report of four cases and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79:260.
  12. Poeschmann PP, van Oppen CA, Bruinse HW. Delayed interval delivery in multiple pregnancies: report of three cases and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1992; 47:139.
  13. Platt JS, Rosa C. Delayed interval delivery in multiple gestations. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1999; 54:343.
  14. Cristinelli S, Fresson J, André M, Monnier-Barbarino P. Management of delayed-interval delivery in multiple gestations. Fetal Diagn Ther 2005; 20:285.
  15. Zhang J, Hamilton B, Martin J, Trumble A. Delayed interval delivery and infant survival: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191:470.
  16. Oyelese Y, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. Delayed interval delivery in twin pregnancies in the United States: Impact on perinatal mortality and morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192:439.
  17. Arabin B, van Eyck J. Delayed-interval delivery in twin and triplet pregnancies: 17 years of experience in 1 perinatal center. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:154.e1.
  18. Roman AS, Fishman S, Fox N, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after delayed-interval delivery of multifetal pregnancies. Am J Perinatol 2011; 28:91.
  19. Lavery JP, Austin RJ, Schaefer DS, Aladjem S. Asynchronous multiple birth. A report of five cases. J Reprod Med 1994; 39:55.
  20. Flynn A, Scott F, Birrell W, Evans N. Delayed-interval delivery in a quadruplet pregnancy: the use of transperineal ultrasound and cervical cerclage. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 35:280.
  21. Boehm FH, Lombardi SJ, Rosemond RL. Immediate cerclage following delivery of one nonviable twin. A report of three cases. J Reprod Med 1992; 37:986.
  22. Arias F. Delayed delivery of multifetal pregnancies with premature rupture of membranes in the second trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:1233.
  23. Kalchbrenner MA, Weisenborn EJ, Chyu JK, et al. Delayed delivery of multiple gestations: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179:1145.
  24. Beinder E, Lang N. Delayed interval delivery in a twin pregnancy with monochorionic placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176:254.
  25. Zhang J, Johnson CD, Hoffman M. Cervical cerclage in delayed interval delivery in a multifetal pregnancy: a review of seven case series. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 108:126.
  26. Ziegler WF, Welgoss J. Delayed delivery of a triplet pregnancy without surgical intervention: a case report. Am J Perinatol 1996; 13:191.
  27. Berghella V, Davis GH, Macones GA, Wapner RJ. Prolongation of pregnancy and survival of remaining fetuses after operative evacuation of one triplet at 18 weeks' gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88:665.
  28. Porreco, RP. World Symposium of Perinatal Medicine. Boston, 2004.
  29. Romero R, Quintero R, Nores J, et al. Amniotic fluid white blood cell count: a rapid and simple test to diagnose microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and predict preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165:821.
  30. Smith GN, Brien JF. Use of nitroglycerin for uterine relaxation. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1998; 53:559.
  31. van Doorn HC, van Wezel-Meijler G, van Geijn HP, Dekker GA. Delayed interval delivery in multiple pregnancies. Is optimism justified? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78:710.
  32. Livingston JC, Livingston LW, Ramsey R, Sibai BM. Second-trimester asynchronous multifetal delivery results in poor perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103:77.
  33. Hoffman MK, Sciscione AC. Sepsis and multisystem organ failure in a woman attempting interval delivery in a triplet pregnancy: a case report. J Reprod Med 2004; 49:387.
  34. Beck L, Terinde R, Röhrborn G, et al. Twin pregnancy, abortion of one fetus with Down's syndrome by sectio parva, the other delivered mature and healthy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1981; 12:267.
  35. Porreco RP, Sabin ED, Heyborne KD, Lingle JR. Selective delivery in a twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179:264.